Rishi Sunak - Prime Minister
Discussion
Funny how out of all the things he could have gone for about Abbott the thing he went for was her colour don't you think?
Same as out of all the things Lee Anderson could legitimately criticise Khan for he went straight for the "Islamist" angle.
Could just be coincidence I guess.
If you chaps really want to defend that sort of thing you go for it.
Same as out of all the things Lee Anderson could legitimately criticise Khan for he went straight for the "Islamist" angle.
Could just be coincidence I guess.
If you chaps really want to defend that sort of thing you go for it.
smn159 said:
Frank Hester certainly does sound like a weapons grade 
Indeed, the additional quote stuff surely just adds to how abhorrent he is rather than diluting the Abbott bits? I'm keen to ensure he's seen for what he is, a general scumbag that's also racist rather than just a racist.bhstewie said:
hstewie said: Funny how out of all the things he could have gone for about Abbott the thing he went for was her colour don't you think?
Same as out of all the things Lee Anderson could legitimately criticise Khan for he went straight for the "Islamist" angle.
Could just be coincidence I guess.
If you chaps really want to defend that sort of thing you go for it.
Bingo for stewie.Same as out of all the things Lee Anderson could legitimately criticise Khan for he went straight for the "Islamist" angle.
Could just be coincidence I guess.
If you chaps really want to defend that sort of thing you go for it.
Lefty, race card, seeking offence….
thetapeworm said:
smn159 said:
Frank Hester certainly does sound like a weapons grade
Indeed, the additional quote stuff surely just adds to how abhorrent he is rather than diluting the Abbott bits? I'm keen to ensure he's seen for what he is, a general scumbag that's also racist rather than just a racist.carlo996 said:
bhstewie said:
hstewie said: Funny how out of all the things he could have gone for about Abbott the thing he went for was her colour don't you think?
Same as out of all the things Lee Anderson could legitimately criticise Khan for he went straight for the "Islamist" angle.
Could just be coincidence I guess.
If you chaps really want to defend that sort of thing you go for it.
Bingo for stewie.Same as out of all the things Lee Anderson could legitimately criticise Khan for he went straight for the "Islamist" angle.
Could just be coincidence I guess.
If you chaps really want to defend that sort of thing you go for it.
Lefty, race card, seeking offence….
bhstewie said:
hstewie said: Funny how out of all the things he could have gone for about Abbott the thing he went for was her colour don't you think?
Same as out of all the things Lee Anderson could legitimately criticise Khan for he went straight for the "Islamist" angle.
Could just be coincidence I guess.
If you chaps really want to defend that sort of thing you go for it.
It wasn't though. That's the whole point of the full transcript.Same as out of all the things Lee Anderson could legitimately criticise Khan for he went straight for the "Islamist" angle.
Could just be coincidence I guess.
If you chaps really want to defend that sort of thing you go for it.
His point was that they're both so unbelievably s
t they make him want to be irrational even though he's not.Seems you're still willfully ignoring the context?
The passive aggressive last sentence is just weak. Predicable but weak. Be better.
bhstewie said:
hstewie said: Water off a ducks back.
Like I said if you want to defend that sort of thing you go for it not sure how that's supposed to be passive aggressive.
Why are you so obsessed with trying to paint a picture of anyone who doesn’t immediately agree with whatever your current outrage as “defending” something. It’s such a polarised mindset. Like I said if you want to defend that sort of thing you go for it not sure how that's supposed to be passive aggressive.
You aren’t as good at reading others thoughts as you think. (Quite the opposite in my experience).
bhstewie said:
hstewie said: Water off a ducks back.
Like I said if you want to defend that sort of thing you go for it not sure how that's supposed to be passive aggressive.
Ditto.Like I said if you want to defend that sort of thing you go for it not sure how that's supposed to be passive aggressive.
And I also don't beleive you don't understand what's passive aggressive about what you wrote.
I respect your intellect more than that.
Dagnir said:
Ah, excellent, my thanks for the added context.
Not sure if I had seen the full transcript written as such but it certainly supports my position and undermines the media narrative....shockingly!
Stewie - I assume you hadn't read the whole thing either...any comment?
Does the full context chnage your views at all, or can't you get past the fact that a tory mentioned race?
It doesn't help my view at all, he sounds sexist now too! ClassyNot sure if I had seen the full transcript written as such but it certainly supports my position and undermines the media narrative....shockingly!
Stewie - I assume you hadn't read the whole thing either...any comment?
Does the full context chnage your views at all, or can't you get past the fact that a tory mentioned race?
NerveAgent said:
bhstewie said:
hstewie said: Water off a ducks back.
Like I said if you want to defend that sort of thing you go for it not sure how that's supposed to be passive aggressive.
Why are you so obsessed with trying to paint a picture of anyone who doesn’t immediately agree with whatever your current outrage as “defending” something. It’s such a polarised mindset. Like I said if you want to defend that sort of thing you go for it not sure how that's supposed to be passive aggressive.
You aren’t as good at reading others thoughts as you think. (Quite the opposite in my experience).
Why are you so obsessed with anyone who criticises the Tories, especially when that criticism is deserved.
captain_cynic said:
NerveAgent said:
bhstewie said:
hstewie said: Water off a ducks back.
Like I said if you want to defend that sort of thing you go for it not sure how that's supposed to be passive aggressive.
Why are you so obsessed with trying to paint a picture of anyone who doesn’t immediately agree with whatever your current outrage as “defending” something. It’s such a polarised mindset. Like I said if you want to defend that sort of thing you go for it not sure how that's supposed to be passive aggressive.
You aren’t as good at reading others thoughts as you think. (Quite the opposite in my experience).
Why are you so obsessed with anyone who criticises the Tories, especially when that criticism is deserved.
hiestewie)S600BSB said:
thetapeworm said:
smn159 said:
Frank Hester certainly does sound like a weapons grade
Indeed, the additional quote stuff surely just adds to how abhorrent he is rather than diluting the Abbott bits? I'm keen to ensure he's seen for what he is, a general scumbag that's also racist rather than just a racist.hole. I don’t think this is a difficult conclusion to reach. In that transcript I think the racism bit is the nicest thing he said cos the rest of it was far worse! It doesn’t need to be “ism” related or anti/against any one particular thing, you can just take an overall position across the whole diatribe and go “yep, ahole”. Or is this too simplistic for some ppl?
DeejRC said:
The bloke is an ahole. I don’t think this is a difficult conclusion to reach. In that transcript I think the racism bit is the nicest thing he said cos the rest of it was far worse! It doesn’t need to be “ism” related or anti/against any one particular thing, you can just take an overall position across the whole diatribe and go “yep, ahole”.
Or is this too simplistic for some ppl?
I'm glad others see this as I sure as heck didn't share the extended version to offer him any kind of excuse or paint him as an acceptable human. hole. I don’t think this is a difficult conclusion to reach. In that transcript I think the racism bit is the nicest thing he said cos the rest of it was far worse! It doesn’t need to be “ism” related or anti/against any one particular thing, you can just take an overall position across the whole diatribe and go “yep, ahole”. Or is this too simplistic for some ppl?
As someone in the industry that's lived near the office he and the company have always had an awful reputation for stuff like this, he wasn't exactly hiding until he was needed as useful ammo against Sunak.
thetapeworm said:
DeejRC said:
The bloke is an ahole. I don’t think this is a difficult conclusion to reach. In that transcript I think the racism bit is the nicest thing he said cos the rest of it was far worse! It doesn’t need to be “ism” related or anti/against any one particular thing, you can just take an overall position across the whole diatribe and go “yep, ahole”.
Or is this too simplistic for some ppl?
I'm glad others see this as I sure as heck didn't share the extended version to offer him any kind of excuse or paint him as an acceptable human. hole. I don’t think this is a difficult conclusion to reach. In that transcript I think the racism bit is the nicest thing he said cos the rest of it was far worse! It doesn’t need to be “ism” related or anti/against any one particular thing, you can just take an overall position across the whole diatribe and go “yep, ahole”. Or is this too simplistic for some ppl?
As someone in the industry that's lived near the office he and the company have always had an awful reputation for stuff like this, he wasn't exactly hiding until he was needed as useful ammo against Sunak.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff