R.I.P. Simons

Author
Discussion

ooid

Original Poster:

4,135 posts

101 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all

DaveA8

604 posts

82 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
There’s always someone who will tell you that his results were not so good recently but a net worth (largely in cash or cash equivalents) of $31B sort of destroy that theory
He must have been an absolute mathematical genius and very generous to his charities so hopefully he’s gone to quant fund heaven

The Gauge

2,067 posts

14 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
DaveA8 said:
a net worth (largely in cash or cash equivalents) of $31B
Yet still 'only' the 51st richest person in the world. Staggering isn't it.

bad company

18,729 posts

267 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
The Gauge said:
DaveA8 said:
a net worth (largely in cash or cash equivalents) of $31B
Yet still 'only' the 51st richest person in the world. Staggering isn't it.
Mid table on PH Ometer I’d say. Don’t we all have a pot of a few $billion?

FreeLitres

6,054 posts

178 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
Are people sub $60 bn even allowed to join PH?

DaveA8

604 posts

82 months

Sunday 12th May
quotequote all
FreeLitres said:
Are people sub $60 bn even allowed to join PH?
Exemption down to $50B if you are a powerfully built lady magnet

bitchstewie

51,678 posts

211 months

Sunday 12th May
quotequote all
Just to put it in perspective.


Simpo Two

85,754 posts

266 months

Sunday 12th May
quotequote all
First time I've seen a performance fee. 44%!

GliderRider

2,141 posts

82 months

Sunday 12th May
quotequote all
Did he have a DeLorean with a flux capacitor?

Mr Pointy

11,320 posts

160 months

Sunday 12th May
quotequote all
That makes SJP seem almost reasonable...

Except of course the performance was almost worth the fees.

ooid

Original Poster:

4,135 posts

101 months

Sunday 12th May
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
Just to put it in perspective.
To be as 'anal' as Simons, their net return is actually 37.84% (Geometric Mean) nerd

NowWatchThisDrive

704 posts

105 months

Sunday 12th May
quotequote all
ooid said:
bhstewie said:
Just to put it in perspective.
To be as 'anal' as Simons, their net return is actually 37.84% (Geometric Mean) nerd
Although with Medallion being capped due to capacity constraints, the profits are returned annually rather than compounding, so geometric mean isn't really a valid measure of performance. In that sense it's more like an exceptionally good operating business than a fund.

Still an absolute legend who lived an enormously accomplished life though (for anyone interested, "The Man Who Solved the Market" is well worth a read). Decent innings for a lifelong chainsmoker as well.