RE: Morgan Plus 4 gets (mildly) facelifted for 2024

RE: Morgan Plus 4 gets (mildly) facelifted for 2024

Wednesday 10th April

Morgan Plus Four gets (mildly) facelifted for 2024

Reworked suspension and a Nitron-developed handling pack make a sweet deal that bit sweeter


Only last year did Morgan announce a suite of upgrades for the Plus Four and Six. The 2023 model year saw (controversially) the introduction of stability control, beefier brakes and a jazzed-up cabin. Nothing game-changing, but worthwhile improvements that made two highly likeable sports cars even more appealing. Less than 18 months on and Morgan’s announced a second wave of updates, this time for the Plus Four alone - for now, at least.

Unlike the last refresh, which left the styling untouched, Morgan’s had a stab at giving the Plus Four a mid-life nip and tuck. Granted, you’d be hard-pressed to spot the differences from afar, but look closer and you’ll find new bespoke lights with an eight-inch headlight unit that’s better proportioned for the larger CX platform introduced in 2020. Not only are the new lights more powerful (and look even smarter), but both front and rear light pods now incorporate the indicators, cleaning up the bodywork in the process.

On that note, there’s are new front splitter and rear diffuser that are both finished in matte grey to ‘reduce its visibility’, says Morgan. These serve as a nod to the older Plus 4 (before it spelled out the number), many of which didn’t have them in the first place. The wings have been reworked with more defined edges and a flatter surface, while the ‘floating’ number plate up front looks a little less bulky without its dedicated holder. There are new wing mirrors made from aluminium as well, and the badging has been updated with a new italicised typeface. Try not to get too excited. 

It’s a light facelift, sure, but that’s only because Morgan has been focusing its attention on the bits you can’t see. Namely, improvements to the suspension with tweaked spring rates and ‘re-valved’ dampers (recalibrating the flow of oil within the shock). Moreover, there’s a Dynamic Handling Pack developed in collaboration with suspension gurus Nitron, that brings a rear anti-roll bar, plus new springs with single-way adjustable dampers and ride height control. The Four was already the more agile of the two Plus models, so that should mean the new handling pack amplifies the fun further. 

The interior’s been spruced up a bit, too. After launching a snazzy new lightweight Sennheiser sound system last year, the company has beefed it up with ‘higher-specification’ speakers in the doors which can be dialled up even louder than before. There are also additional speakers behind the seats, and the functionality has been improved with - we suggest you sit down for this - pause and skip features. Audio updates aside, the LCD dash has been improved with more visually appealing graphics, while the interior lighting has been optimised with new fade-in and fade-out functionality. And people say Morgans are basic.

Elsewhere, it’s business as usual, meaning 258hp from a BMW-sourced 2.0-litre turbocharged four-pot paired with either a six-speed manual or eight-speed automatic. Morgan’s already opened the order books, with prices starting from £62,500 before tax, which, as expected, is a slight increase on the outgoing model. Of course, that doesn’t take into account the as-yet unknown cost of the tempting handling pack and the ‘almost endless’ customisation options for those with grandiose plans. Wonder if anyone’s put that claim to the test…


Author
Discussion

Iamnotkloot

Original Poster:

1,440 posts

148 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
I still think it needs a less incongruous steering wheel.

Motormouth88

254 posts

61 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
I do love a Morgan but not sure about that manhole cover bolted to the back

SimonTheSailor

12,630 posts

229 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
What happened to the Aero ? Thought they tried to go all modern ?

ajap1979

8,014 posts

188 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Iamnotkloot said:
I still think it needs a less incongruous steering wheel.
Yes!! It looks completely out of place.

dinkel

26,986 posts

259 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
ajap1979 said:
Iamnotkloot said:
I still think it needs a less incongruous steering wheel.
Yes!! It looks completely out of place.
Yeah, and please loose the spoke wheels...

I fiddled with the configurator:

Better wheels but no options on the steering wheel...

theicemario

654 posts

76 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Stunning cloud9

Keano81

23 posts

104 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Tom Cruise looks like he is having a good time

Macboy

747 posts

206 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
They've done well with the overall modernisation of the model since it was redesigned and it's actually pretty good to drive. But it's now a £100,000 car and the quality issues they have had (cars off the road for months with brake issues, water ingress, generally poor fit and finish) aren't comensurate with that price point. Many/most of the trad. customer simply can't upgrade to newer cars based on cost or feel the newer cars lack the weirdly intangible Morgan qualities that they want. So, MORGAN are going after a new audience many of whom look at the car's price and foibles and can't reconcile the two. They've got stock in dealers, 0% finance, PCP deals, free options and sales aren't on the up.

The magical days of zero depreciation and 10-year waiting lists (if they ever existed) are distant memories - they depreciate like any other car and the use-case for them is really pretty limited - they absolutely aren't a touring car unless you're a multi-day t-shirt wearer with a very understanding partner and while they are fun for day-drives there are plenty of £100k alternatives - both modern and restored classic - so unless you REALLY want a Morgan it's hard to see what else they can do to support sales. The "Mild facelift" is probably hiding a raft of much need quality and engineering changes.

I've had a 4/4 Sport before (which was £29,500 new in 2011 - so £45k with inflation today) and I liked the new car when I drove it ia couple of years ago but I'd find it impossible to justify the current price.

cava

163 posts

160 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
I presume they are forced to fit an airbag steering wheel for 'safety', but seems pointless when there's no rollover protection, side impact protection, etc. People know what they're getting into when they buy such a car. I guess it'd be easy to fit aftermarket and code it out though.

WPA

8,947 posts

115 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Timeless and lovely

Familymad

697 posts

218 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Love the look. Always wondered how they got away with no roll over bar like a Caterham. The height of those seats means your head will do the rollover protecting ….
A plus 8 is still my longe term desire and the 4.8 is a cracker. Most say the plus 6 is almost better if not better.

Muddle238

3,916 posts

114 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Looks much better now that they've cleaned the rear lights up, always looked a bit messy with the previous style in my view.

However, I still think separate sidelights on the top of the front wings looks best. Probably not good for pedestrian safety, but then try not to get run over.

biggbn

23,632 posts

221 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Dream car there.

C5_Steve

3,295 posts

104 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Never really been into these but that looks lovely! Steering wheel aside obviously which is ghastly.

B10

1,247 posts

268 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
For me it needs chrome bumpers, rear spare wheel and a chrome grille

Pistom

4,993 posts

160 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
I appreciate that these CX platform cars are now actually good cars compared to the old ladder frames but to me, they seem to have become a pastiche of their former self.

They've somehow lost their soul.

It's over 30 years since I had my 1600 OHV but that was cheap, uncomfortable, slow but fun.

The current day cars seem expensive, well engineered but somehow dull.

Not sure where the sweet spot lies - if it exists.

GianiCakes

198 posts

74 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
I still think in side view the line is spoiled by the high looking seats which then leads to awkward proportions with the hood up. And I’m also surprised there isn’t a better looking steering wheel option.
They should offer a more reasonably priced CX package as I always thought that looked pretty good.

B10

1,247 posts

268 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Pistom said:
I appreciate that these CX platform cars are now actually good cars compared to the old ladder frames but to me, they seem to have become a pastiche of their former self.

They've somehow lost their soul.

It's over 30 years since I had my 1600 OHV but that was cheap, uncomfortable, slow but fun.

The current day cars seem expensive, well engineered but somehow dull.

Not sure where the sweet spot lies - if it exists.
I agree. I had a 1996 4/4 with a 1.8 Zetec engine. Good fun with character apart from the engine. I think technology is removing character, as character was more often about endearing flaws. I think the sweet spot was the Plus 8.

Robertb

1,515 posts

239 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
ajap1979 said:
Iamnotkloot said:
I still think it needs a less incongruous steering wheel.
Yes!! It looks completely out of place.
Looks like an airbag wheel (I'm sure I've seen it on Lotuses) which might be required for type approval. Are there any other aftermarket options these days?

Its evidently a tricky area as I was reading an article the other day about Techart and was surprised at the lengths they went to to retain the OE wheel structure but retrimmed.

GTRene

16,717 posts

225 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
I guess they also changed the doorcards? look vs a 2022 car.
top card nicer and door puller and so on.