RE: 2024 BMW M4 CS | PH Review

RE: 2024 BMW M4 CS | PH Review

Monday 20th May

2024 BMW M4 CS | PH Review

The M3 CS was very good indeed - can the M4 improve on it?


BMW M is in a strange spot right now. As the cars have become heavier, more luxurious, more tech-laden and more-often-than-not-automatic, so they’ve also been imbued with an unprecedented level of track ability. Everything about the latest generation, from their lavish interiors to chunky kerbweights, suggested cars ill-suited to circuit driving - despite the illustrious badge. The tricolour devotees were up in arms. But the M cars proved themselves absolute animals: the first four-wheel-drive M5 became the sensational CS, the XXL M2 rides and handles better than its older, lighter predecessor, and the M3 CS is a sub-7:30 car at the Nurburgring. There’s some special sauce going in somewhere. 

Hopes are high, then, for the M4 CS, given what the four-door equivalent and regular xDrive variant have already achieved. Although don’t forget the CSL, which arguably didn’t capture the imagination quite like an M car with those three letters on the back should have. It was very good, but perhaps expectations got the better of the CSL. Interesting to note that the £117,100 for a CS isn’t much less than the £125,955 once asked for the supposedly senior model. Might this be the special edition that delivers on the promise? 

The CS looks the part, at least. While an M4 still seems about 15 per cent bigger than it needs to be, the wheels, ride height change and CSL hand-me-downs do mean it won’t be mistaken for a standard car. Especially in the Frozen Isle of Man Green, which is stunning. The haters will always hate this generation - and granted, the M3 is probably the more appealing design with rear doors instead of so much rear haunch - but this CS must be the best-looking G82 yet. Damning it with faint praise, perhaps - but in comparison, the CSL feels overdone, and a standard Comp not quite butch enough. 

Time is tight behind the newly flat-bottomed, still too fat, newly Alcantra-clad wheel. While much is familiar from the M3 CS - more boost for 550hp, 20kg less for 1,760kg DIN, a detailed suspension rework - the key difference for this track drive is the fitment of Michelin’s Pilot Sport Cup 2R, as used for the wild 7:21.989 ‘ring lap (the M3 equivalent was 7:28.760). On a regular wheel, so the same size as standard - 275/35 ZR 19 front, 285/30 ZR 20 rears - albeit about as close as it’s possible to get to a road-legal slick. They are the optional tyre available for a CS (standard is mere Cup 2), yet the fact that we’re encouraged to weave on familiarisation laps for heat demonstrates these aren’t your average track tyres. Like flying a hot air balloon (probably), anything less than perfect conditions and you won’t want to go anywhere with Cup 2Rs. And a replacement set will be in the region of £2k. So we're talking about a pretty extreme spec. A few M4s are likely to get them, however, and it’s the only car offered, so here’s what it’s like.

The CS suits those Cup 2Rs like a sprinter suits their spikes. Obviously there’s very little validity in the real world, and the cost is prohibitive, but the outright ability is absolutely extraordinary. Crucially, too, the M4 doesn’t just come across as a grip monster, like a standard car has been stuck on slicks and you’re there to hold on until the grip gives out. There is sufficient finesse for the driver to get stuck into, albeit many miles per hour faster. This is an M4 with the experience elevated across the board, not just overloaded with abundant grip. 

On an unfamiliar Salzburgring, the initial impression is of a GT4 race car. That’s much, much faster down straights. The CS is a model of composure, stability and confidence under enormous braking, the pedal resolute and the car remarkably unflustered; it feels damped like a touring car, absorbing every hit and landing with incredible poise. The turn-in speed and accuracy are freakish for something so heavy. And while the tyres are clearly contributing to that capacity, they’re not everything.

Experience of M4s on lesser rubber and with not quite such extreme specs means the throttle is feathered out of turns initially, only for greedier and greedier applications to be rewarded with phenomenal traction. So much more of the official 550hp and 479lb ft (they’ve never felt more conservative than here) reaches the road every single time - it’s genuinely remarkable. The xDrive system retains its uncanny knack of seeming like a benefit, aiding the colossal traction yet never compromising steering or the car's rear-biased attitude. There’s sufficient communication through the seat to gauge when the limit is going to be breached, too; the steering perhaps lacks a bit of sensation given the vivid, urgent nature of the chassis itself.

Whatever has had a fright in front from your cornering speed (and not just the grille in their mirror) will get no respite down the next straight. The M4 CS is wildly accelerative, gobbling up its intermediate ratios like they were the first three; even in sixth as it passes the 155mph a standard car would be limited to (188mph is the official top speed) the M4 seems emphatically in mid-stride. Doesn’t matter if, in the confusion, you’ve left the last bend a gear higher than ideal, either - the torque lassoes the next bend without delay. But with plenty of drama; the throb of an angrily turbo’d 3.0-litre through a titanium exhaust is part old-school JDM tuner special, part GT race car, part sonorous BMW straight six.

It all makes for an unforgettable track experience. Two laps in an M1 setting (Sport chassis, Sport engine, Comfort steering, Comfort brake, standard 4WD) and two in M2 (Sport Plus, Sport Plus, Sport, Sport, 4WD Sport) obviously isn’t enough to completely know a car, but it is enough to be hugely impressed. The ceramic brakes have enormous staying power, the front axle feels steadfast, and precious little seems to outfox the suspension. Six circulations in total with warm-up and cool-down isn’t many, though the cars continued going out with other wannabe racing drivers and lapped up the punishment (sorry), so there really does seem to be the substance behind the stellar first impressions. Granted, there are also hints here and there, as tyres get hot and inputs clumsier, of a familiar, fairly friendly BMW M balance in there as grip finally yields. But there was no hint of this spiky, slick-shod monster becoming undriveable when off the boil. 

The CS isn’t perfect, mind. An automatic that broadly suits life on the road is exposed here, super quick going up the ratios yet still lacking some bite going back down. Even with the shift speed dialled up to the max, the downshifts don’t snap like they should. It undermines a bit of the confidence in that immense, tarmac-chewing stopping power. Again, the intensity of the rest of the package highlights precisely when the transmission can't step up. Furthermore, while a superb job has been done to lash down a car of this size and weight, the driver remains acutely aware of it - this M4 doesn’t shrink around you, or ever contrive some feeling of a smaller, more intimate sports car. It’s just a phenomenally well-sorted, very large car. 

Indeed, the fact that it’s so sorted despite its gearbox and weight issues, makes it hard not to wonder what might have been. A dual-clutch ain’t coming back, and neither are 1,500kg M4s - but BMW has worked wonders on what it does have. And the upside to its heft and profligacy (if we can call it that) is that there's every chance this CS will follow the M3 and be a lovely road car on top. On those regular Michelins and with the standard xDrive, it’d likely be the perfect companion for a road trip to the ‘ring and as many tourist laps as you could afford, as enjoyable on one as on the other. Rabidly fast, undeniably absorbing and yet still quite luxurious, the whole endeavour comes across as an all-things-to-all-people compromise. Which makes it all the more impressive that the driving experience is shot through with quality and purpose.

That’s all still to be confirmed with a proper drive soon, of course, though clearly the CS has made a very auspicious start. If we're inclined to grade the current crop of M cars by their circuit-crushing abilities - and BMW seems intent that we do - then it might very well be the pick of an outrageously capable bunch. Let’s just hope that’s not just the Cup 2Rs talking…


SPECIFICATION | BMW M4 CS (G82)

Engine: 2,993cc, twin-turbo straight-six
Transmission: 8-speed auto, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 550@6,250rpm
Torque (lb ft): 479@2,750-5,950rpm
0-62mph: 3.4sec
Top speed: 188mph
Weight: 1,760kg DIN, 1,835kg EU
MPG: 27.7 (WLTP)
CO2: 232g/km (WLTP)
Price: £117,100

Author
Discussion

wistec1

Original Poster:

319 posts

43 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
It's an interesting insight by Matt into this current M CS offering. It's a bit like reading a blind dating ad and thinking this is the one you are taking home as a keeper but when you see the photo it's pig ugly with a face that looks like it could eat an apple through a letter box.

Looks are a subjective matter mind but there have been enough universal comments to know that BMW have dropped a bk at the design table and it's evident in the gene pool with other models as well.

What's needed is an LCI face lift but it would appear several years into these malignant mutations BMW have still yet to listen and get back to making beautiful looking cars again.




stuckmojo

2,996 posts

190 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
Look at it, come on.

Save a bit and buy a 911 GTS

Motormouth88

259 posts

62 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
Imagine dropping over 100k on this and walking out the next morning to see it sitting on your driveway in all its hideous glory

Augustus Windsock

3,387 posts

157 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
(Imagines BMW Internal Memo)
“Dear Design Department, please see PH article on the Manhart 850, report back when you understand what a BMW should look like…”

McRors

290 posts

58 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
I must be very naive as I thought that the price would be £20-30k less. Too rich for my blood with a face like that.

FamousPheasant

535 posts

118 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
This is one of those cars that the reviewer could say it handles like an Elise, with the refinement of an s-class and cost 50k and I still wouldn't be interested because it's just so damn ugly.

Alfa Giulia for me please.

GreatScott2016

1,245 posts

90 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
It's what I said previously in that ... "It’s a bit too shouty for me TBH. I remember when the M2 CS topped ECOTY a few years back. It looked sensational and yet the cosmetic changes over the standard car were so subtle making it difficult to differentiate for the uninitiated eye. Less is more I guess …"

Earl of Petrol

511 posts

124 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
BMW Were masters of the dash and instrument layout.
What happened.
Rather have a Giulia QF too.

hungry_hog

2,301 posts

190 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
Aside from the hooter, that weird slab display looks terrible, not integrated at all

Not sure what is going on at BMW for both internal and external design, or is this all designed to appeal to the Chinese market, bit like those awful Balenciaga trainers?

Frankychops

603 posts

11 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
Motormouth88 said:
Imagine dropping over 100k on this and walking out the next morning to see it sitting on your driveway in all its hideous glory
and the instant 35% loss.

GianiCakes

210 posts

75 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
I dunno, I think that used M8 article softened me up a bit as I’m not as offended by the exterior as I once was. I’ve also started to really like the M2, which is mainly Harry’s fault.
I agree with the comments about the interior screen though. A BMW from 30 years ago was a masterclass in cockpit design. The reviews indicate that there’s no doubting how these drive though so that’s reason to celebrate.

epom

11,654 posts

163 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
Again, I can’t believe I’m saying this the M4 is growing on me. Right coffee time.


cerb4.5lee

31,013 posts

182 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
I completely understand why the majority think that it is ugly, but for me personally I don't mind the way it looks, and I like its purposefulness and its aggressiveness.

I'd really like a standard G82 M4 xDrive in the future for sure. It will obviously be a lot different to my F82 M4, with it being much bigger/heavier, plus the ZF8 auto is quite ordinary in comparison to a DCT in many ways as well I reckon(you can get the ZF8 auto in loads of other cars for example).

sturge7878

80 posts

2 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
£117k I mean what this actual fk! You’d have to be lobotomised surely.

GT9

6,879 posts

174 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
hungry_hog said:
Aside from the hooter, that weird slab display looks terrible, not integrated at all

Not sure what is going on at BMW for both internal and external design, or is this all designed to appeal to the Chinese market, bit like those awful Balenciaga trainers?
200k global M division sales last year says to me BMW know exactly what they are doing.
Having said that, the car photographed does have too many bright colours going on for my liking.
Black or tanzanite paint would sort that.


cerb4.5lee

31,013 posts

182 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
GT9 said:
hungry_hog said:
Aside from the hooter, that weird slab display looks terrible, not integrated at all

Not sure what is going on at BMW for both internal and external design, or is this all designed to appeal to the Chinese market, bit like those awful Balenciaga trainers?
200k global M division sales last year says to me BMW know exactly what they are doing.
Having said that, the car photographed does have too many bright colours going on for my liking.
Black or tanzanite paint would sort that.
I know that it is a backhanded compliment really, but I would go for either tanzanite or black as well.

OldPal

34 posts

142 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
Actually really like the m3/4 now when you see them out on the road they look really aggressive although the nose is still too big.

Sounds like an amazing drive but the price is steep and in 991 gt3 territory amongst others

philmots

4,634 posts

262 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
This will likely be ultimate road car and people are moaning about how it looks.

Be grateful stuff like this is still being made, nobody else is doing it as good.

mrclav

1,330 posts

225 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
GT9 said:
200k global M division sales last year says to me BMW know exactly what they are doing.
Having said that, the car photographed does have too many bright colours going on for my liking.
Black or tanzanite paint would sort that.
Indeed, it's clear BMW know what their customers want more than anyone on here - this is the bit that people on the forum don't seem to (or want to) understand.

Their myopic view is at total odds with the reality of BMWs success in selling cars to customers around the world, fuelled by their nostalgia that wants progress to not happen as, in their opinion, they are the arbiters of aesthetic taste based on the old dated designs of cars they liked growing up (conveniently ignoring things like safety legislation that make mass-producing new cars that look like designs of the past literally impossible), then finally their arrogance presumes that they are somehow more intelligent/classy than the people with the actual means and desire to buy products like this.

The way humans consume new products, including cars, has massively changed in the last couple decades and will continue to change as legislation is going to makes cars like this extinct. Rather than moaning, maybe people should enjoy cars like this while they still can.


E90_M3Ross

35,164 posts

214 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
stuckmojo said:
Look at it, come on.

Save a bit and buy a 911 GTS
Whilst I agree a 911 will be a better steer, I'm sure, are they really comparable? The 911 doesn't have decent back seats and the boot space is tiny compared to the M4. If you do happen to need back seats, or take your family on holiday for a week or so, then a 911 won't even enter the equation, no? I may have missed something blindingly obvious but that's my take. Sure, if you don't need the practicality, I get your point, but if you do, the 911 cannot even be considered....?