"It's not against the law to be angry"

"It's not against the law to be angry"

Author
Discussion

S600BSB

4,827 posts

107 months

Tuesday 7th May
quotequote all
paulguitar said:
okgo said:
CraigyMc said:
People new to PH should be shown this thread just so they understand how weird some of the posters on here are.
The funny thing is, almost without fail, they are completely identikit, hate women, hate foreigners, apologists for men’s awful behaviour - it’s like a ‘dhead starter pack’ they all have.

There’s quite a few I look out for now, the above added to the list.
It's been an eye-opener, this thread. It demonstrates that there are some people out there who are genuinely unhinged. There have been a few comments that could genuinely pass for parody.
You are not wrong. Utter loons.

Superflow

1,421 posts

133 months

Tuesday 7th May
quotequote all
Blue62 said:
Superflow said:
rofl Everything ok at home?

I think given some of the name calling and massive over reaction to an opposite viewpoint several posters maybe need to look up irony in their dictionaries.

Chill out guys it’s just the internet you don’t want to end up like our friend in the images which is how I pictured you when reading your posts laugh
I think you’ve nailed it. People who don’t hate women have an ‘opposite viewpoint’ and they look like the angry bloke. I’m impressed that you know what a dictionary is, irony isn’t the biggest word but it’s a subtle one and I’m not convinced you’ve cracked it yet, but there’s time as I imagine you’ve a few years to go before your GCSE’s.
rofl I’m seeing his face again stop it!

shtu

3,481 posts

147 months

Tuesday 7th May
quotequote all
Superflow said:
okgo said:
Superflow the same guy that’s saying shipping immigrants out will win his vote. And I think the one who ran over someone’s cat, then reversed back over it to make sure before driving off?

Sounds like a total see you next Tuesday to me.
rofl Everything ok at home?

I think given some of the name calling and massive over reaction to an opposite viewpoint several posters maybe need to look up irony in their dictionaries.

Chill out guys it’s just the internet you don’t want to end up like our friend in the images which is how I pictured you when reading your posts laugh
Ahh, you're going for the "Look at what an edgelord I am, had you all going there." approach.

Well done. Your blinding intellect has us all in awe.

Or thinking you're a tt.

Definitely one of those.

MC Bodge

21,738 posts

176 months

Tuesday 7th May
quotequote all
Superflow said:
rofl Everything ok at home?

I think given some of the name calling and massive over reaction to an opposite viewpoint several posters maybe need to look up irony in their dictionaries.

Chill out guys it’s just the internet you don’t want to end up like our friend in the images which is how I pictured you when reading your posts laugh
You are not coming across very well.

Blue62

8,924 posts

153 months

Tuesday 7th May
quotequote all
Superflow said:
rofl I’m seeing his face again stop it!
That will be a mirror professor.

eharding

13,761 posts

285 months

Tuesday 7th May
quotequote all
MC Bodge said:
Superflow said:
rofl Everything ok at home?

I think given some of the name calling and massive over reaction to an opposite viewpoint several posters maybe need to look up irony in their dictionaries.

Chill out guys it’s just the internet you don’t want to end up like our friend in the images which is how I pictured you when reading your posts laugh
You are not coming across very well.
I tend to find there's a direct correlation between the number of self-referential laughter emoticons and the poster bellend quotient.

Thus far our oh-so-ribald contributor is progressing nicely along that curve, evolving from a single cringe-worthy rofl, to a solid rofl/laugh combo confirming absolute belter standard, and I'm expecting an imminent development to a painful mashup of further high-grade misogynistic/victim-blaming content combined with a full-on rofl/hehe/biglaugh pyramid spaffed across the bottom of the post.

Nothing shouts "I'm a cockwomble" louder than laughing at your own posts in an attempt to justify a completely boorish and deeply unpleasant viewpoint.



Biggy Stardust

6,971 posts

45 months

Tuesday 7th May
quotequote all
eharding said:
Nothing shouts "I'm a cockwomble" louder than laughing at your own posts in an attempt to justify a completely boorish and deeply unpleasant viewpoint.

Somewhatfoolish

4,404 posts

187 months

Tuesday 7th May
quotequote all
On what planet is this worth *prison*?

Prick needs to just be publically shamed as an absolute bell end. Honestly maybe put in the stocks. I honestly think it'd be awesome if sentences for this sort of disgraceful behaviour were stocks at a locally relevant event and you could chuck mouldy fruit and veg at them. It would be a nice marker of society's opprobrium for behaving ungentlemanlly.

But *prison* is ridiculous for a wee rant against a not particularly fragile lady from sound of it

eharding

13,761 posts

285 months

Tuesday 7th May
quotequote all
Biggy Stardust said:
eharding said:
Nothing shouts "I'm a cockwomble" louder than laughing at your own posts in an attempt to justify a completely boorish and deeply unpleasant viewpoint.
Any fool knows that what you've got there is a womblecock - womble at the front, cock at the back. That being said, hopefully the Bing AI Image generator will baulk at the the ethics of an attempt to shove the front of a boy chicken onto the back end of Madam Cholet, and censor the resulting abomination.


Edited by eharding on Tuesday 7th May 23:36

Blue62

8,924 posts

153 months

Tuesday 7th May
quotequote all
eharding said:
I tend to find there's a direct correlation between the number of self-referential laughter emoticons and the poster bellend quotient.

Thus far our oh-so-ribald contributor is progressing nicely along that curve, evolving from a single cringe-worthy rofl, to a solid rofl/laugh combo confirming absolute belter standard, and I'm expecting an imminent development to a painful mashup of further high-grade misogynistic/victim-blaming content combined with a full-on rofl/hehe/biglaugh pyramid spaffed across the bottom of the post.

Nothing shouts "I'm a cockwomble" louder than laughing at your own posts in an attempt to justify a completely boorish and deeply unpleasant viewpoint.
The ‘emoji quota’ removes any doubt, it’s absolute.

heebeegeetee

28,875 posts

249 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Somewhatfoolish said:
On what planet is this worth *prison*?

Prick needs to just be publically shamed as an absolute bell end. Honestly maybe put in the stocks. I honestly think it'd be awesome if sentences for this sort of disgraceful behaviour were stocks at a locally relevant event and you could chuck mouldy fruit and veg at them. It would be a nice marker of society's opprobrium for behaving ungentlemanlly.

But *prison* is ridiculous for a wee rant against a not particularly fragile lady from sound of it
It's clearly not a wee rant.

Somewhatfoolish

4,404 posts

187 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
heebeegeetee said:
Somewhatfoolish said:
On what planet is this worth *prison*?

Prick needs to just be publically shamed as an absolute bell end. Honestly maybe put in the stocks. I honestly think it'd be awesome if sentences for this sort of disgraceful behaviour were stocks at a locally relevant event and you could chuck mouldy fruit and veg at them. It would be a nice marker of society's opprobrium for behaving ungentlemanlly.

But *prison* is ridiculous for a wee rant against a not particularly fragile lady from sound of it
It's clearly not a wee rant.
TBH I've only looked at the pictures, not bothered watching the video. How long does it go on for?

CraigyMc

16,475 posts

237 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
heebeegeetee said:
Somewhatfoolish said:
On what planet is this worth *prison*?

Prick needs to just be publically shamed as an absolute bell end. Honestly maybe put in the stocks. I honestly think it'd be awesome if sentences for this sort of disgraceful behaviour were stocks at a locally relevant event and you could chuck mouldy fruit and veg at them. It would be a nice marker of society's opprobrium for behaving ungentlemanlly.

But *prison* is ridiculous for a wee rant against a not particularly fragile lady from sound of it
It's clearly not a wee rant.
Banging fists on the car isn't a wee rant.

He's not been sentenced yet by the way.

blueg33

36,109 posts

225 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
okgo said:
Superflow the same guy that’s saying shipping immigrants out will win his vote. And I think the one who ran over someone’s cat, then reversed back over it to make sure before driving off?

Sounds like a total see you next Tuesday to me.
Did he do that? What a vile pathetic little st.

Slowboathome

3,516 posts

45 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
eharding said:
I tend to find there's a direct correlation between the number of self-referential laughter emoticons and the poster bellend quotient.
biggrin

272BHP

5,153 posts

237 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Somewhatfoolish said:
On what planet is this worth *prison*?

Prick needs to just be publically shamed as an absolute bell end. Honestly maybe put in the stocks. I honestly think it'd be awesome if sentences for this sort of disgraceful behaviour were stocks at a locally relevant event and you could chuck mouldy fruit and veg at them. It would be a nice marker of society's opprobrium for behaving ungentlemanlly.

But *prison* is ridiculous for a wee rant against a not particularly fragile lady from sound of it
Any suggestion of prison is of course ridiculous.

I would argue he has probably been punished enough. After all, this has been public shaming on an almost unimaginable scale. To see your own meltdown and that perfectly captured hateful visage splashed across the media must be excruciatingly painful. I don't have much hope for his mental state going forward that's for sure.

okgo

38,211 posts

199 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Oh well.

Act up and there should be consequences.

paulguitar

23,692 posts

114 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Somewhatfoolish said:
TBH I've only looked at the pictures, not bothered watching the video. How long does it go on for?
Maybe at least have a look before weighing in?

President Merkin

3,173 posts

20 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
272BHP said:
Any suggestion of prison is of course ridiculous.

I would argue he has probably been punished enough. After all, this has been public shaming on an almost unimaginable scale. To see your own meltdown and that perfectly captured hateful visage splashed across the media must be excruciatingly painful. I don't have much hope for his mental state going forward that's for sure.
Luckily for you the court of public opinion isn't a thing or you'd be doing life without parole.

vaud

50,712 posts

156 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
272BHP said:
Any suggestion of prison is of course ridiculous.

I would argue he has probably been punished enough. After all, this has been public shaming on an almost unimaginable scale. To see your own meltdown and that perfectly captured hateful visage splashed across the media must be excruciatingly painful. I don't have much hope for his mental state going forward that's for sure.
Community service or suspended would be my vote from the corner of a bar.