Laurence Fox home raided this am (Blade runner comments?)
Discussion
Countdown said:
Blokes a total waste of oxygen. Loads of people pointing out that it's an offence, lots of his supporters saying it was a photo taken publicly and already available on Twitter, but presumably not inspecting the actual law (quite apart from it being a morally awful thing to do).
He said that people should look up the definition of "revenge porn", but it seems to fall under the legislation:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/secti...
She was likely what might be described as an "intimate state", and they almost certainly don't consent to to being shared by anyone, let alone him. The photo was a paparazzi shot but likely wasn't intentionally "upskirting", but the intent at the time of the photo was taken doesn't matter in the legislation:
He said that people should look up the definition of "revenge porn", but it seems to fall under the legislation:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/secti...
She was likely what might be described as an "intimate state", and they almost certainly don't consent to to being shared by anyone, let alone him. The photo was a paparazzi shot but likely wasn't intentionally "upskirting", but the intent at the time of the photo was taken doesn't matter in the legislation:
Countdown said:
When you’re in a hole - keep digging!There’s something seriously wrong with that guy, self destruct.
Countdown said:
He's a nasty piece of work. Contemptible behaviour.Gareth79 said:
Loads of people pointing out that it's an offence, lots of his supporters saying it was a photo taken publicly and already available on Twitter, but presumably not inspecting the actual law (quite apart from it being a morally awful thing to do).
He said that people should look up the definition of "revenge porn", but it seems to fall under the legislation:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/secti...
She was likely what might be described as an "intimate state", and they almost certainly don't consent to to being shared by anyone, let alone him. The photo was a paparazzi shot but likely wasn't intentionally "upskirting", but the intent at the time of the photo was taken doesn't matter in the legislation:
I seem to recall there was quite a trend amongst the paps a few years ago to try and catch pictures of celebs knickers, or lack thereof. They were always there when they got out of cars trying to catch THE shot. They are a contemptible bunch of scumbags. The fact that this picture was even IN a photo library is abhorrent. He said that people should look up the definition of "revenge porn", but it seems to fall under the legislation:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/secti...
She was likely what might be described as an "intimate state", and they almost certainly don't consent to to being shared by anyone, let alone him. The photo was a paparazzi shot but likely wasn't intentionally "upskirting", but the intent at the time of the photo was taken doesn't matter in the legislation:
Gareth79 said:
Loads of people pointing out that it's an offence, lots of his supporters saying it was a photo taken publicly and already available on Twitter, but presumably not inspecting the actual law (quite apart from it being a morally awful thing to do).
He said that people should look up the definition of "revenge porn", but it seems to fall under the legislation:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/secti...
She was likely what might be described as an "intimate state", and they almost certainly don't consent to to being shared by anyone, let alone him. The photo was a paparazzi shot but likely wasn't intentionally "upskirting", but the intent at the time of the photo was taken doesn't matter in the legislation:
Art of Law suggest may not be an offence.He said that people should look up the definition of "revenge porn", but it seems to fall under the legislation:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/secti...
She was likely what might be described as an "intimate state", and they almost certainly don't consent to to being shared by anyone, let alone him. The photo was a paparazzi shot but likely wasn't intentionally "upskirting", but the intent at the time of the photo was taken doesn't matter in the legislation:
https://youtu.be/T6k483ppMno?si=ibA1lC4GoTqJYWbZ
Challo said:
CoolHands said:
Is his family really really loaded or something, cos didn’t that £180k from earlier in the week make him stop and think?
He is part of a famous acting family. Not sure if that means he has any money though Mrr T said:
Yes, I saw that too. Interesting.Mrr T said:
Gareth79 said:
Loads of people pointing out that it's an offence, lots of his supporters saying it was a photo taken publicly and already available on Twitter, but presumably not inspecting the actual law (quite apart from it being a morally awful thing to do).
He said that people should look up the definition of "revenge porn", but it seems to fall under the legislation:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/secti...
She was likely what might be described as an "intimate state", and they almost certainly don't consent to to being shared by anyone, let alone him. The photo was a paparazzi shot but likely wasn't intentionally "upskirting", but the intent at the time of the photo was taken doesn't matter in the legislation:
Art of Law suggest may not be an offence.He said that people should look up the definition of "revenge porn", but it seems to fall under the legislation:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/secti...
She was likely what might be described as an "intimate state", and they almost certainly don't consent to to being shared by anyone, let alone him. The photo was a paparazzi shot but likely wasn't intentionally "upskirting", but the intent at the time of the photo was taken doesn't matter in the legislation:
https://youtu.be/T6k483ppMno?si=ibA1lC4GoTqJYWbZ
b
hstewie said:
At least he's firmly nailing his colours to a mast. hstewie said:I'm loving the general meltdown across all the right leaning social media usual suspects (and plenty here in PH). These recent results have been signposted for months so shouldn't have to come as a surprise to anyone who wasn't living in a complete bubble.
I can't wait for the total meltdown when the GE elections are finally held.
I can't wait for the total meltdown when the GE elections are finally held.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff