Teacher guilty of sex with two boys
Discussion
BikeBikeBIke said:
Lucky b
ds.
You wouldn't have been able to build a pedestal high enough if one us had managed to bed a teacher while at school. ds.I assume she's in for a very long stretch given they'll have to look at it the same way they would if it was a male teacher bedding female students.
TheJimi said:
Rufus Stone said:
Fermit said:
OK, enlighten me. I haven't witnessed the whole case, all of the evidence, only the bits the mainstream media wish to report. I repeat, she's a wrong-un, ZERO excuse for her behaviour, she broke the law, and she needs to take whatever punishment is going to come her way. If he's returning to her again and again for sex (presumably) under no duress or force, how is he not a willing participant? If there was duress, blackmail, whatever, then of course, that entirely changes the scenario.
To repeat. There is no excuse for her part in things. Sex with a 15 year old when you're well in to adulthood AND your their teacher is morally wrong, and illegal, and she deserves whatever is coming to her.
Look at it this way, does a spouse that is beaten enjoy it because they apparently keep going back for more?To repeat. There is no excuse for her part in things. Sex with a 15 year old when you're well in to adulthood AND your their teacher is morally wrong, and illegal, and she deserves whatever is coming to her.
Edited by Fermit on Saturday 18th May 09:39
Rusty Old-Banger said:
pork911 said:
Dagnir said:
pork911 said:
Dagnir said:
pork911 said:
on the list.
The narcissism to think this means anything is wonderfully hilarious.Why don't explain what you meant, then everyone can see my astonishing stupidity?
Edited by Dagnir on Saturday 18th May 07:56
If people don't understand a fairly random 3 word sentence, then that's on you, not them.
Getragdogleg said:
God Damn it, I 100% agree she was in the wrong because of her position as a teacher.
I have stated that many times.
And for the record, I too have stated that she's a wrong-un more than once, and she deserves what ever punishment is coming her way. All myself and Getragdogleg have surmised is that the pupil may or may not have enjoyed it whilst it lasted. None of us know, I've not spoken with the pupil to get his thoughts, so please Stewie, stop using the two of us to virtue signal.I have stated that many times.
ChocolateFrog said:
BikeBikeBIke said:
Lucky bds.
You wouldn't have been able to build a pedestal high enough if one us had managed to bed a teacher while at school. ds.I assume she's in for a very long stretch given they'll have to look at it the same way they would if it was a male teacher bedding female students.
BigMon said:
She had sex with kids. That pretty much covers it.
For all those introducing shade and nuance please refer to point A above.
It's never right and never should be right regardless of whether the child gives consent or not. They are not in a position to give informed consent due to, erm, being a child.
Almost covers it. As a teacher, she is in 'loco parentis' which is essentially the responsibility of treating another person's child as your own. For all those introducing shade and nuance please refer to point A above.
It's never right and never should be right regardless of whether the child gives consent or not. They are not in a position to give informed consent due to, erm, being a child.
Defined by the Children's Act 1989 as; 'The duty of care a professional adult has towards children under their supervision, as well as promoting the safety and welfare of the children in their care.'
This is a fundamental breach of the trust parents place in educators, and she ought to have known that. What punishment is right, I don't know, but she should have no further role with children.
Whether the boys were complicit enjoyed it or not is clearly irrelevant.
Fermit said:
Getragdogleg said:
God Damn it, I 100% agree she was in the wrong because of her position as a teacher.
I have stated that many times.
And for the record, I too have stated that she's a wrong-un more than once, and she deserves what ever punishment is coming her way. All myself and Getragdogleg have surmised is that the pupil may or may not have enjoyed it whilst it lasted. None of us know, I've not spoken with the pupil to get his thoughts, so please Stewie, stop using the two of us to virtue signal.I have stated that many times.
Rape is by nature Violent and forceful. What the victim was wearing should never come into it.
I struggle to call this case a rape, it's an abuse of position, it's morally wrong and she's in trouble.
Some people get beaten up and don't go to the police, others report a touch as assault.
I'm not worried about the lads in this case but if it was the other way round I would be. I don't know if that's a me problem or a society problem and a perception of the difference of the sexes but hey.
I struggle to call this case a rape, it's an abuse of position, it's morally wrong and she's in trouble.
Some people get beaten up and don't go to the police, others report a touch as assault.
I'm not worried about the lads in this case but if it was the other way round I would be. I don't know if that's a me problem or a society problem and a perception of the difference of the sexes but hey.
Electro1980 said:
It’s irrelevant and victim blaming. They were groomed and assaulted by a person in a position of power and authority. The awful thing is you are trying to diminish the seriousness by bringing this up. Just the same as talking about what a rape victim was wearing. The fact that victim keeps being put in quotes says everything.
Right, I'm bowing out of the thread on this note. I am certainly not victim blaming, that's utter tosh. The word 'victim' was put in quotes, as none of us know if he were coerced by her, if he pursued he, or if he was a equal willing participant enjoying the action. Yes, she has committed a crime, as I've said numerous times, she's a wrong un.Fermit said:
Right, I'm bowing out of the thread on this note. I am certainly not victim blaming, that's utter tosh. The word 'victim' was put in quotes, as none of us know if he were coerced by her, if he pursued he, or if he was a equal willing participant enjoying the action. Yes, she has committed a crime, as I've said numerous times, she's a wrong un.
This is the defense the 20yr old rapist tried to use after raping my sister. She was 12.Give your f
king head a wobbleIncidentally, the Daily Fail has an ‘article’ about females abusing children and describes this case as ‘tragic and disreputable’, along with a whole load of bks seemingly suggesting there are ‘reasons’. There is a tiny bit (as in collosal) amount of hypocrisy going on here, both from the DM and the usual suspects on PH.
ks seemingly suggesting there are ‘reasons’. There is a tiny bit (as in collosal) amount of hypocrisy going on here, both from the DM and the usual suspects on PH. Fermit said:
Electro1980 said:
It’s irrelevant and victim blaming. They were groomed and assaulted by a person in a position of power and authority. The awful thing is you are trying to diminish the seriousness by bringing this up. Just the same as talking about what a rape victim was wearing. The fact that victim keeps being put in quotes says everything.
Right, I'm bowing out of the thread on this note. I am certainly not victim blaming, that's utter tosh. The word 'victim' was put in quotes, as none of us know if he were coerced by her, if he pursued he, or if he was a equal willing participant enjoying the action. Yes, she has committed a crime, as I've said numerous times, she's a wrong un.Probably for the best all round that you do bow out now rather than continuing to dig yourself a bigger hole.
Getragdogleg said:
Rape is by nature Violent and forceful. What the victim was wearing should never come into it.
I struggle to call this case a rape, it's an abuse of position, it's morally wrong and she's in trouble.
Some people get beaten up and don't go to the police, others report a touch as assault.
I'm not worried about the lads in this case but if it was the other way round I would be. I don't know if that's a me problem or a society problem and a perception of the difference of the sexes but hey.
Why would you be worried about girls in an equivalent situation but you aren't worried about these boys?I struggle to call this case a rape, it's an abuse of position, it's morally wrong and she's in trouble.
Some people get beaten up and don't go to the police, others report a touch as assault.
I'm not worried about the lads in this case but if it was the other way round I would be. I don't know if that's a me problem or a society problem and a perception of the difference of the sexes but hey.
Greendubber said:
Fermit said:
Electro1980 said:
It’s irrelevant and victim blaming. They were groomed and assaulted by a person in a position of power and authority. The awful thing is you are trying to diminish the seriousness by bringing this up. Just the same as talking about what a rape victim was wearing. The fact that victim keeps being put in quotes says everything.
Right, I'm bowing out of the thread on this note. I am certainly not victim blaming, that's utter tosh. The word 'victim' was put in quotes, as none of us know if he were coerced by her, if he pursued he, or if he was a equal willing participant enjoying the action. Yes, she has committed a crime, as I've said numerous times, she's a wrong un.Probably for the best all round that you do bow out now rather than continuing to dig yourself a bigger hole.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff