New US underwater drone

Author
Discussion

Iamnotkloot

Original Poster:

1,439 posts

148 months

Simpo Two

85,682 posts

266 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
Does it need wings? Maybe it flies too...

It looks a bit like a squashed space shuttle.

sherman

13,405 posts

216 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Does it need wings? Maybe it flies too...

It looks a bit like a squashed space shuttle.
They are not wings but dive planes. Subs have them. It helps with going up and down. These are just better faired into the body than the standard subs.
When you dont need space for people you can squash everything up a bit.

You can see what the traditionally look like here.

21TonyK

11,571 posts

210 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
I guess a bit like planes, once you remove the humans manouvering at silly angles and speeds means control surfaces reflect its abilities.

Simpo Two

85,682 posts

266 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
sherman said:
They are not wings but dive planes. Subs have them. It helps with going up and down.
Thanks for the lesson on what a submarine looks like. But those are wings... you don't need that much surface area to manoeuvre underwater, nor lift either.

Flying Phil

1,598 posts

146 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
Could it have a flight/glide capability to get it into distant areas quickly?

sherman

13,405 posts

216 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
Flying Phil said:
Could it have a flight/glide capability to get it into distant areas quickly?
Actually that sounds plausible.
Drop it several hundred miles away and a few thousand feet up from the back of a cargo plane and let it sail in undetected.

popeyewhite

20,030 posts

121 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
sherman said:
Flying Phil said:
Could it have a flight/glide capability to get it into distant areas quickly?
Actually that sounds plausible.
Drop it several hundred miles away and a few thousand feet up from the back of a cargo plane and let it sail in undetectedit will get smashed to bits when it hits the sea.
Looks amazing though.

sherman

13,405 posts

216 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
sherman said:
Flying Phil said:
Could it have a flight/glide capability to get it into distant areas quickly?
Actually that sounds plausible.
Drop it several hundred miles away and a few thousand feet up from the back of a cargo plane and let it sail in undetectedit will get smashed to bits when it hits the sea.
Looks amazing though.
So you dont think the wings would let it glide in at a low enough speed.

popeyewhite

20,030 posts

121 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
sherman said:
popeyewhite said:
sherman said:
Flying Phil said:
Could it have a flight/glide capability to get it into distant areas quickly?
Actually that sounds plausible.
Drop it several hundred miles away and a few thousand feet up from the back of a cargo plane and let it sail in undetectedit will get smashed to bits when it hits the sea.
Looks amazing though.
So you dont think the wings would let it glide in at a low enough speed.
It's an underwater drone, and doesn't seem to have any of the parts concerned with directional ability a glider possesses ie ailerons. My guess is the 'wings' hold ballast or are a storage area. Is the tech even available for an underwater boat to 'glide' through the air?

hidetheelephants

24,680 posts

194 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
It does not fly. Or at least DARPA aren't saying if it does.

sherman

13,405 posts

216 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
It does not fly. Or at least DARPA aren't saying if it does.
They didnt say it existed until yesterday either.

Edited by sherman on Friday 3rd May 00:47

hidetheelephants

24,680 posts

194 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
rofl It's so secret they announced the start of the design competition 4 years ago and have issued press releases since.

sherman

13,405 posts

216 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
rofl It's so secret they announced the start of the design competition 4 years ago and have issued press releases since.
Sorry I dont read every naval magazine under the sun to keep track of design competions of secret navy submarines.
I had never seen or heard of this submersible until yesterday when this thread started.

hidetheelephants

24,680 posts

194 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
Sorry, that was a bit uncalled for. DARPA Manta Ray programme.

sherman

13,405 posts

216 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
Sorry, that was a bit uncalled for. DARPA Manta Ray programme.
beer

Equus

16,980 posts

102 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
It's an underwater drone, and doesn't seem to have any of the parts concerned with directional ability a glider possesses ie ailerons. My guess is the 'wings' hold ballast or are a storage area. Is the tech even available for an underwater boat to 'glide' through the air?
I would assume that it 'flies' underwater, using the wings for hydrodynamic lift (or downforce, it it has a slight positive bouyancy). I'm guessing it does have elevons, and is controlled in much the same way as a flying wing.

I designed and built something similar as a toy when I was a kid - it enables you to have a submersible that doesn't need ballast tanks and all the complicated gubbins required to flood or blow them to dive or surface - which would be a benefit for extended missions (you don't have to carry a big supply of compressed air, or the means to pump out the ballast tanks). You ballast the vehicle as a whole so that (in my case) it has slightly positive bouyancy and so floats when at a standstill, but 'flies' underwater just like an aeroplane when you drive it forward. The problem I had was control, 'cos RC doesn't work well under water and I had neither a Raspberry Pi with which to make it autonomous, nor DARPA's budget, when I was a lad.

From the stuff on the Northrop Grumman website, I'd speculate that this one has slight negative bouyancy when carrying the weight that can tether it to the bottom when it's 'resting', but that it drops that weight when they want it to float to the surface for recovery.

Edited to add quote from article linked in OP (doh! always read the link first...):

"Once deployed, the vehicle uses efficient, buoyancy-driven gliding to move through the water"


Edited by Equus on Friday 3rd May 08:28

Simpo Two

85,682 posts

266 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
Equus said:
floats when at a standstill, but 'flies' underwater just like an aeroplane when you drive it forward.
That would be embarrassing if you need to stop within sight of Ivan and it pops onto the surface...

I like the idea of a drone that could fly/glide in the air first to increase range.

popeyewhite

20,030 posts

121 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Equus said:
floats when at a standstill, but 'flies' underwater just like an aeroplane when you drive it forward.
That would be embarrassing if you need to stop within sight of Ivan and it pops onto the surface...

I like the idea of a drone that could fly/glide in the air first to increase range.
I think we're some way of a commercially or technically viable airflight capable submersible. Moving smoothly underwater and gliding through air are two different very complex abilities.

AnotherClarkey

3,602 posts

190 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
It is a well established and very elegant concept using variable buoyancy to allow it to glide forward while ascending and descending in the water column. Sometimes Wiki can be very helpful...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underwater_glider