Mr Bates vs The Post Office

Author
Discussion

Maxdecel

1,251 posts

34 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
eliot said:
Even catching up in 2x speed - the pause was ages!
Think he was distracted by the sound of a JCB doing it's work.

vaud

50,702 posts

156 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
Private notes, "no email traffic" instructions, etc

FFS.

LimmerickLad

998 posts

16 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
vaud said:
Private notes, "no email traffic" instructions, etc

FFS.
discussed "offline" IIRC!!!

Wills2

23,000 posts

176 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
Bonefish Blues said:
This was simply a legal gravy train wasn't it. Snouts in trough, ask no questions, follow instructions.
Yep a £100 million feeding frenzy, if only the walls of the partners boardrooms could talk as they back slapped themselves for their billings and bonuses.



Short Grain

2,819 posts

221 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
And we're back! An afternoon of Selective Memory to come. grumpy

LimmerickLad

998 posts

16 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
Amazing how specific they can when it suits yet don't recall so easily anything that might not be so good for them to remember.

Maxdecel

1,251 posts

34 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
Concern of "adverse publicity" hehe
That went well then.

Short Grain

2,819 posts

221 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
Maxdecel said:
Concern of "adverse publicity" hehe
That went well then.
Any publicity is 'Good Publicity' was the old adage wasn't it? POL have st all over that one.

ETA
For some reason, I get glimpses of John Cleese every now and again with this guy! Think it's around the eyes. Causing quite a conflict for me as Cleese is one of my comedy heroes and this tt just isn't 'kin funny! Anybody else see it? I can't unsee it now frown



Edited by Short Grain on Thursday 2nd May 14:31

LimmerickLad

998 posts

16 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
I cannot recall.....lying barsteward is fooling nobody!

SydneyBridge

8,674 posts

159 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
I hope someone from the SRA is watching

PlywoodPascal

4,271 posts

22 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
Getting rather tasty

You were a witness to perverting the course of justice, and of perjury, why didn’t you call the police?

Short Grain

2,819 posts

221 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
PlywoodPascal said:
Getting rather tasty

You were a witness to perverting the course of justice, and of perjury, why didn’t you call the police?
I almost wish I liked popcorn!! This is great! GJ should be stting himself about now hehe

balise

1,871 posts

211 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
This lawyer on lawyer action is tasty.

PlywoodPascal

4,271 posts

22 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
Short Grain said:
PlywoodPascal said:
Getting rather tasty

You were a witness to perverting the course of justice, and of perjury, why didn’t you call the police?
I almost wish I liked popcorn!! This is great! GJ should be stting himself about now hehe
The bit that was inconsistent in his testimony is that he said that he wk de red why his firm had taken the business at all because they had no experience or expertise in prosecution, and he wondered why they hadn’t been given training.

About 5 minutes later when asked about whether he considered any of the ethical requirements of prosecution or the codes of practice to follow, he said it hasn’t crossed his mind that he should think about such things.

Short Grain

2,819 posts

221 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
The stenographer needs 15 mins break. Reckon Mr. Smith would like a bit longer to patch up the holes from being absolutely skewered in that session.

Wonder if the Head of Security at POL will be called to answer questions re his idea of shredding of documents? That would be 'tasty' as well.

Bonefish Blues

26,932 posts

224 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
SydneyBridge said:
I hope someone from the SRA is watching
At least our chum this morning has already recognised that he'll never practice again and quit his jobs. There will surely be many others.

PlywoodPascal

4,271 posts

22 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
It is extremely interesting how the strong professional code and ethical basis that is - at least in principle - at the core of the legal profession is really allowing the legally qualified people involved to be held much more strongly to account than the executives in POL have been.

Eric Mc

122,109 posts

266 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
That is supposed to be what marks out qualified "professionals" (lawyers, accountants, doctors etc) from "normal" senior admin types.

"Professional Ethics" should actually mean something.

balise

1,871 posts

211 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
It would be good if someone could produce a 30mins highlights package - DOTD or something

732NM

4,678 posts

16 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
PlywoodPascal said:
It is extremely interesting how the strong professional code and ethical basis that is - at least in principle - at the core of the legal profession is really allowing the legally qualified people involved to be held much more strongly to account than the executives in POL have been.
It's pretty clear many of these lawyers don't give a fk about the code of conduct they are bound by.