Student Activism in the USA

Author
Discussion

Derek Smith

45,781 posts

249 months

Wednesday 1st May
quotequote all
One of the main differences between the 70s and now is the behaviour of students. There is, seemingly, a lack of reaction to government policies. Back in the day, there would have been lots of students protesting about sending refugees to a country that, when there was a way of applying for political asylum, people could claim asylum from. Students should question.

I feel that what's happening in Palestine is appalling. We have largely passive demonstrations against it in various cities, particularly London, and the government response has been to ignore this swell of opinion. I feel like demonstrating. It's an affront to decency. The casual dismissal of deaths of innocents is enough to make anyone angry. But it took the deaths on non-Palestinians to generate a mild rebuke. A sit-in by students in the country that funds the attacks on innocents, and continues to do so, is a mild response. Good on 'em. Americans should be ashamed of what their country is doing to the middle-east. I'm just glad someone has noticed.

JagLover

42,509 posts

236 months

Wednesday 1st May
quotequote all
Blue62 said:
I’m not sure that this is really a case of identity politics, the opposition to what’s going on in Gaza is fairly broad based, so I don’t understand your ‘natural end point’ comment, but I’m all ears.
Identity politics is simply the latest extremist ideology that separates humanity into a hierarchy based upon innate characteristics and advocates for differing treatment based upon the place in that hierarchy.

It comes as no surprise then to see those who embrace it firstly justifying, or denying, atrocities against Jewish civilians committed by those who have a higher place on the hierarchy. Then secondly turning a protest against the actions of the Israeli state into a campaign of harassment against their fellow citizens who are Jewish.

Blue62

8,924 posts

153 months

Wednesday 1st May
quotequote all
JagLover said:
Identity politics is simply the latest extremist ideology that separates humanity into a hierarchy based upon innate characteristics and advocates for differing treatment based upon the place in that hierarchy.

It comes as no surprise then to see those who embrace it firstly justifying, or denying, atrocities against Jewish civilians committed by those who have a higher place on the hierarchy. Then secondly turning a protest against the actions of the Israeli state into a campaign of harassment against their fellow citizens who are Jewish.
That’s one definition among many, from here it looks as though you’re attempting to put anyone who objects to, or protests against, what the Israeli state is doing in Gaza as identity politics, it’s too broad based to fit that description. I know people of all persuasions who think it’s gone too far, they are generally as far as you can get from anything that could meaningfully be described as identity.

I think you laid yourself bare with the other false statement that you’ve usefully sidestepped, the one where you claimed the current generation bandy the word Nazi around, as though it’s something new.

Electro1980

8,347 posts

140 months

Wednesday 1st May
quotequote all
JagLover said:
It comes as no surprise then to see those who embrace it firstly justifying, or denying, atrocities against Jewish civilians committed by those who have a higher place on the hierarchy. Then secondly turning a protest against the actions of the Israeli state into a campaign of harassment against their fellow citizens who are Jewish.
I’d love to think this is parody, but it’s not. You are literally stating what you are doing defending the actions of Israel in Palestine today, but with the names reversed. Provide evidence of people justifying or denying atrocities against Jewish civilians? For every one fringe loon you find I can provide ten of people defending war crimes by the IDF.

Electro1980

8,347 posts

140 months

Wednesday 1st May
quotequote all
Ridgemont said:
This is not 1968.

Jewish students have over the last few days been told to ‘go back to Poland’ and been told they are ‘Al-Qasam’s next target’.

Utterly despicable and outrageous. Bigotry dressed up as ‘right to protest’ and ‘Free speech’ is still racist bigotry.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/21/nyregion/columb...
Proving my point. Right wing “I don’t agree with it but defend the right of people to say it” quickly devolves in to Pearl clutching whine when it’s something you don’t agree with. Exactly the same as we saw with BLM.

A bunch of far right thugs smash up stuff, hurl abuse at the police and intimidate people “FREE SPEECH! It’s a small minority! You can’t blame everyone for that!!!!”

A small number of protesters from a huge group say some offensive things “SMASH THEM! SEND IN THE RIOT POLICE!!!! WATER CANNON THE LOT OF THEM!!!!”.

The fact that you ignore the subheading to support your claims says it all
“ After reports of harassment by demonstrators, some Jewish students said they felt unsafe. Others said they felt safe, while condemning antisemitism.

Sounds like you are calling for the right to not be offended…

Ridgemont

6,609 posts

132 months

Wednesday 1st May
quotequote all
Electro1980 said:
Ridgemont said:
This is not 1968.

Jewish students have over the last few days been told to ‘go back to Poland’ and been told they are ‘Al-Qasam’s next target’.

Utterly despicable and outrageous. Bigotry dressed up as ‘right to protest’ and ‘Free speech’ is still racist bigotry.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/21/nyregion/columb...
Proving my point. Right wing “I don’t agree with it but defend the right of people to say it” quickly devolves in to Pearl clutching whine when it’s something you don’t agree with. Exactly the same as we saw with BLM.

A bunch of far right thugs smash up stuff, hurl abuse at the police and intimidate people “FREE SPEECH! It’s a small minority! You can’t blame everyone for that!!!!”

A small number of protesters from a huge group say some offensive things “SMASH THEM! SEND IN THE RIOT POLICE!!!! WATER CANNON THE LOT OF THEM!!!!”.

The fact that you ignore the subheading to support your claims says it all
“ After reports of harassment by demonstrators, some Jewish students said they felt unsafe. Others said they felt safe, while condemning antisemitism.

Sounds like you are calling for the right to not be offended…
I’m saying that if you say ‘go back to Poland’ you are despicable. If you want to do that in a general protest then by all means but expect to be arrested for hate speech: I’ve condemned multiple times the lack of action by say the met in tackling hate speech as part of the Palestinian protests in London. I don’t want the Palestinian protests shut down even though I think most of the participants are useful idiots. I want people who wave hate banners with swastikas and star of David’s arrested pronto.
The same applies with Columbia.
But no, we have hypocrites on the left like yourself wibbling about ‘freedom of speech’ when they want a one handed one eyed application of it.

KAgantua

3,912 posts

132 months

Wednesday 1st May
quotequote all
272BHP said:
I find some of this quite shocking to be honest.

https://unherd.com/newsroom/have-elite-universitie...

"Activism can bolster high-achieving students’ social and academic standing, including through lucrative fellowships. An organisation funded by Left-wing billionaire George Soros, for example, has been paying student activists $3,000 per three-month term to pressure politicians and government entities to cut financial ties with Israel."
I do think this recent surge in 'left leaning' protests and activism has someone like this at the source, either Soros, China or Russia.
'Useful idiots' indeed...

Skeptisk

7,557 posts

110 months

Wednesday 1st May
quotequote all
Ridgemont said:
Electro1980 said:
If you exclude all protest where someone feels intimidated then peaceful protest is impossible. But then you Godwin it immediately.

By all accounts, and reasonable definition, the protests have been peaceful. It’s an attack on free speech, by those who claim to so strongly support free speech. By people who are happy to defend people carrying guns in protest, suddenly they don’t believe in the right to protest.

This is all about identity politics. The identity politics of right wing politicians trying to invoke a “far left” boogy man to keep control of a population starting to turn away from populist politics.
This is not 1968.

Jewish students have over the last few days been told to ‘go back to Poland’ and been told they are ‘Al-Qasam’s next target’.

Utterly despicable and outrageous. Bigotry dressed up as ‘right to protest’ and ‘Free speech’ is still racist bigotry.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/21/nyregion/columb...
To be clear. Are these comments being made by all the protesters? Have the comments been defended and sanctioned by the protesters? Or are you using the comments of a few idiots to dismiss the protesters as a whole?


Vanden Saab

14,179 posts

75 months

Wednesday 1st May
quotequote all
Skeptisk said:
Ridgemont said:
Electro1980 said:
If you exclude all protest where someone feels intimidated then peaceful protest is impossible. But then you Godwin it immediately.

By all accounts, and reasonable definition, the protests have been peaceful. It’s an attack on free speech, by those who claim to so strongly support free speech. By people who are happy to defend people carrying guns in protest, suddenly they don’t believe in the right to protest.

This is all about identity politics. The identity politics of right wing politicians trying to invoke a “far left” boogy man to keep control of a population starting to turn away from populist politics.
This is not 1968.

Jewish students have over the last few days been told to ‘go back to Poland’ and been told they are ‘Al-Qasam’s next target’.

Utterly despicable and outrageous. Bigotry dressed up as ‘right to protest’ and ‘Free speech’ is still racist bigotry.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/21/nyregion/columb...
To be clear. Are these comments being made by all the protesters? Have the comments been defended and sanctioned by the protesters? Or are you using the comments of a few idiots to dismiss the protesters as a whole?
As long as one person is not antisemitic that makes it OK. Got it. Same as the hate marches in London.
Strange argument but I guess it made sense when you typed it.

bitchstewie

51,576 posts

211 months

Wednesday 1st May
quotequote all

Vanden Saab

14,179 posts

75 months

Wednesday 1st May
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
Yet some people think these students understand what they are protesting about and are cheering them on.
Ivy league students, are they not supposed to be the best students in America Jeeez...

CharlieCrocodile

1,203 posts

154 months

Wednesday 1st May
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
This is what happens when you give people safe spaces to hide away when they cannot handle their emotions and tell the same people it's ok to shout down anyone who dares to have an opinion different to their own.

Also, from the river to the sea, bring us KFC.

Edited by CharlieCrocodile on Wednesday 1st May 20:46

Fast and Spurious

1,350 posts

89 months

Wednesday 1st May
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
One of the main differences between the 70s and now is the behaviour of students. There is, seemingly, a lack of reaction to government policies. Back in the day, there would have been lots of students protesting about sending refugees to a country that, when there was a way of applying for political asylum, people could claim asylum from. Students should question.

I feel that what's happening in Palestine is appalling. We have largely passive demonstrations against it in various cities, particularly London, and the government response has been to ignore this swell of opinion. I feel like demonstrating. It's an affront to decency. The casual dismissal of deaths of innocents is enough to make anyone angry. But it took the deaths on non-Palestinians to generate a mild rebuke. A sit-in by students in the country that funds the attacks on innocents, and continues to do so, is a mild response. Good on 'em. Americans should be ashamed of what their country is doing to the middle-east. I'm just glad someone has noticed.
Innocents? Ah, bless!

Derek Smith

45,781 posts

249 months

Wednesday 1st May
quotequote all
Fast and Spurious said:
Derek Smith said:
One of the main differences between the 70s and now is the behaviour of students. There is, seemingly, a lack of reaction to government policies. Back in the day, there would have been lots of students protesting about sending refugees to a country that, when there was a way of applying for political asylum, people could claim asylum from. Students should question.

I feel that what's happening in Palestine is appalling. We have largely passive demonstrations against it in various cities, particularly London, and the government response has been to ignore this swell of opinion. I feel like demonstrating. It's an affront to decency. The casual dismissal of deaths of innocents is enough to make anyone angry. But it took the deaths on non-Palestinians to generate a mild rebuke. A sit-in by students in the country that funds the attacks on innocents, and continues to do so, is a mild response. Good on 'em. Americans should be ashamed of what their country is doing to the middle-east. I'm just glad someone has noticed.
Innocents? Ah, bless!
Do you assume that Hamas was 34,000 strong? 'Cause that's roughly how many Palestinians have been killed. There have been 224 aid workers and lots of journalists. I'm not sure what your definition of innocent is, but I assume it includes the 13,000+ children. Ah, bless is a rather pathetic response to all these deaths.

(Figures are about a month old I believe. They have gone up of course.)

Mojooo

12,771 posts

181 months

Wednesday 1st May
quotequote all
You were the future once.

hidetheelephants

24,680 posts

194 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
KAgantua said:
272BHP said:
I find some of this quite shocking to be honest.

https://unherd.com/newsroom/have-elite-universitie...

"Activism can bolster high-achieving students’ social and academic standing, including through lucrative fellowships. An organisation funded by Left-wing billionaire George Soros, for example, has been paying student activists $3,000 per three-month term to pressure politicians and government entities to cut financial ties with Israel."
I do think this recent surge in 'left leaning' protests and activism has someone like this at the source, either Soros, China or Russia.
'Useful idiots' indeed...
Yes, George Soros is going to pay people to campaign against Israel and he's like totally the same as the russian or chinese state. rolleyes

bitchstewie

51,576 posts

211 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
Sorry we've got people on here pushing the usual conspiracy filth about Soros?

Really?

And they call other people "useful idiots".

Mr Penguin

1,318 posts

40 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all

williamp

19,277 posts

274 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
...the people are asking for humanitarian aid, but instead they are resettled elsewhere?? So many parrallels...

andy_s

19,413 posts

260 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
Delicious irony of building a border wall and rejecting non-like people, appropriating Muslim culture by prayer acts, and calling for death when yesterday they had to have a lie down if they were mis-gendered. [I suppose the prayer could be interpreted as 'taking both knees'...]

Hysteria is contagious, PhDs from Ivy Leagues are dumb as rocks [led by plagiarists and nincompoops], extremely impressionable people that understand very little of the world and its mechanisms, narrow minded to the perspectives of others and very open to every 'new' activist fad that elevates their status within their in-group.

Forgive them Father, for they know not what they do.

'Twas ever thus.