"It's not against the law to be angry"
Discussion
GT9 said:
Superflow said:
I’m not blaming anyone.
She started the incident because her ego couldn’t let it go for what a few seconds.
Have this happen daily to me I never react you have to let it go.
She drew first blood.
Only last month we had a poster defending a man jailed for verbally abusing their female neighbour and throwing stones at them.She started the incident because her ego couldn’t let it go for what a few seconds.
Have this happen daily to me I never react you have to let it go.
She drew first blood.
That poster went on to say that the judge was out of their depth.
That poster was you.
Are you moulding into some sort of 'defender of twunts'?
Unfortunately the legal system doesn’t have that insight or privilege which means computer says no justice prevails in some cases.
Timothy Bucktu said:
MitchT said:
This is why I don't blow my horn at people who cut me up. You never know what kind of psychopath they might be. I just give them room and forget about it.
Absolutely!There's some seriously unhinged people out there. It's definitely got worse in the last few years.
https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/9542401.man...
When my dad taught me how to drive he told me to assume everyone else on the road is an idiot. He didn’t tell me to assume they’re a psycho with a weapon in the boot.
GT9 said:
Superflow said:
I’m not blaming anyone.
She started the incident because her ego couldn’t let it go for what a few seconds.
Have this happen daily to me I never react you have to let it go.
She drew first blood.
Only last month we had a poster defending a man jailed for verbally abusing their female neighbour and throwing stones at them.She started the incident because her ego couldn’t let it go for what a few seconds.
Have this happen daily to me I never react you have to let it go.
She drew first blood.
That poster went on to say that the judge was out of their depth.
That poster was you.
Are you moulding into some sort of 'defender of twunts'?
He could have his own comic strip in Viz.
hstewie said:
eharding said:
For it is he, Superflow, Defender of Twunts, Bastion of Bellends, Protector of Pricks, Champion of Chuzzlewits, Guardian of Gits, Hero of Haemorrhoids and Sentinel of Sad Sacks. You can guess what he's the Custodian, Curator and Conservator of.
He could have his own comic strip in Viz.
Jeez there’s some angry people about!He could have his own comic strip in Viz.
You don’t drive a Toyota and shop at Tescos do you?
Superflow said:
Read the link.
She raged him first when he pulled out in front of her and repeatedly flashed and honked horn at him.
He has reacted and far from terrified she filmed him while laughing at him from the safety of her locked vehicle.
What’s happened here is she’s seen red because he got in front and ended up setting him up as he’s reacted badly.
He’s an idiot for reacting but she’s a sociopath for lying in court to get revenge all because he got in front of her.
Unbelievable….She raged him first when he pulled out in front of her and repeatedly flashed and honked horn at him.
He has reacted and far from terrified she filmed him while laughing at him from the safety of her locked vehicle.
What’s happened here is she’s seen red because he got in front and ended up setting him up as he’s reacted badly.
He’s an idiot for reacting but she’s a sociopath for lying in court to get revenge all because he got in front of her.
Superflow said:
No merely reading between the lines as the truth is often found there.
Unfortunately the legal system doesn’t have that insight or privilege which means computer says no justice prevails in some cases.
Courts have been presiding over the law LONG before computers became prevalent. "Computer says no justice" FFS!Unfortunately the legal system doesn’t have that insight or privilege which means computer says no justice prevails in some cases.
What 'insight' or 'privelege' are you claiming, that makes you think you know better than the judge who saw the evidence and presumably questioned the witnesses or read their statements?
Edited by Super Sonic on Monday 6th May 15:53
cheesejunkie said:
Super Sonic said:
No, he's entirely responsible for his own actions.
Can’t do thumbs on this forum so have to post to agree.Joking.
Flow doesn’t need evidence, he needs validation of an opinion that’s not coming for obvious reasons.
Super Sonic said:
Courts have been presiding over the law LONG before computers became prevalent. "Computer says no justice" FFS!
What 'insight' or 'privelege' are you claiming, that makes you think you know better than the judge who saw the evidence and presumably questioned the witnesses or read their statements?
You don’t think it possible that people exaggerate and tell lies to win so to speak?What 'insight' or 'privelege' are you claiming, that makes you think you know better than the judge who saw the evidence and presumably questioned the witnesses or read their statements?
Edited by Super Sonic on Monday 6th May 15:53
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff