"It's not against the law to be angry"

[Superflow]

bhstewie said:

It's literally on video.

Do you realise how you're coming across?

What’s not on video is her starting the incident and raging him first then her reaction while filming him from the car.

He is wrong to react the way he did but I think there is more to this to simply dismiss his version out of hand is dangerous when only he would see her reaction filming him .

It’s not that difficult to grasp.

[Sporky]

Superflow said:

What’s not on video is her starting the incident and raging him first then her reaction while filming him from the car.

He is wrong to react the way he did but I think there is more to this to simply dismiss his version out of hand is dangerous when only he would see her reaction filming him .

It’s not that difficult to grasp.

Is there anything to back up his claims that she started it?

[bitchstewie]

Superflow said:

What’s not on video is her starting the incident and raging him first then her reaction while filming him from the car.

He is wrong to react the way he did but I think there is more to this to simply dismiss his version out of hand is dangerous when only he would see her reaction filming him .

It’s not that difficult to grasp.

It's been through the courts and the judge evidently didn't think there was more to it.

The only person grasping here is you.

At straws to excuse some really stty behaviour.

[S600BSB]

Was he a candidate for Reform at the locals?

[Superflow]

Sporky said:

Superflow said:

What’s not on video is her starting the incident and raging him first then her reaction while filming him from the car.

He is wrong to react the way he did but I think there is more to this to simply dismiss his version out of hand is dangerous when only he would see her reaction filming him .

It’s not that difficult to grasp.

Is there anything to back up his claims that she started it?

She admitted it in the link.

He says she went nuts with multiple beeps and flashes.

She says she didn’t.

Judge believed her.

The end.

[cheesejunkie]

Superflow said:

She admitted it in the link.

He says she went nuts with multiple beeps and flashes.

She says she didn’t.

Judge believed her.

The end.

If I beeped at you would you feel justified in getting out of your car and threatening me?

[Sporky]

Superflow said:

Sporky said:

Is there anything to back up his claims that she started it?

She admitted it in the link.

He says she went nuts with multiple beeps and flashes.

She says she didn’t.

No she didn't. She admitted beeping. She did not - and you acknowledge this - admit multiple beeps, flashing, rude gestures, or laughing at him.

Where is your evidence that those happened?

[Badda]

The driver is clearly a man like superflow who sees being horned and flashed at as an attack on their person.
I expect both of them have hit women before for minor indiscretions, such as taking the piss out of them or not having dinner ready on time.
Matter of time for SF now.

[Superflow]

Sporky said:

Superflow said:

Sporky said:

Is there anything to back up his claims that she started it?

She admitted it in the link.

He says she went nuts with multiple beeps and flashes.

She says she didn’t.

No she didn't. She admitted beeping. She did not - and you acknowledge this - admit multiple beeps, flashing, rude gestures, or laughing at him.

Where is your evidence that those happened?

Yes she beeped at him first which is starting it right?

Read my post again.

[Silvanus]

Superflow said:

Sporky said:

Superflow said:

Sporky said:

Is there anything to back up his claims that she started it?

She admitted it in the link.

He says she went nuts with multiple beeps and flashes.

She says she didn’t.

No she didn't. She admitted beeping. She did not - and you acknowledge this - admit multiple beeps, flashing, rude gestures, or laughing at him.

Where is your evidence that those happened?

Yes she beeped at him first which is starting it right?

Read my post again.

So she beeped at him for absolute nothing?

[Gareth79]

Superflow said:

Have this happen daily to me I never react you have to let it go.

If you have people sounding their horn at you *daily* then I suggest you give up driving and take the bus, driving clearly isn't for you.

[cheesejunkie]

Superflow said:

Yes she beeped at him first which is starting it right?

Read my post again.

Starting what?

[Sporky]

Silvanus said:

So she beeped at him for absolute nothing?

Ta-da. I was trying to lead SF gently to that point.

[Silvanus]

Sporky said:

Silvanus said:

So she beeped at him for absolute nothing?

Ta-da. I was trying to lead SF gently to that point.

I'm not sure they were going to get there on their own, it's a bit like with my 10 year old daughter when I lead her to working out the right answer. Although they tend to be more complicated scenarios than this example

[Superflow]

MrBogSmith said:

Superflow said:

She admitted it in the link.

He says she went nuts with multiple beeps and flashes.

She says she didn’t.

Judge believed her.

The end.

Oh no, not possible multiple beeps and flashes!

Some basic critical thinking needed here - the judge didn't necessarily believe her when it comes to horrifying possibilities of car horns and lights. The judge may well have not been able to decide on that aspect, and more importantly...

It's not really relevant. A Magistrates' court is there to deal with criminal behaviour. Even if she did everything he said, it's not a crime is it?

Abbott is a moron for pleading NG. I bet he could have received a caution (assuming no previous) had he admitted it at the police station.

There you go a sensible post at last!

The NG plea didn’t help him here but agree with your first paragraph.

[Superflow]

Silvanus said:

So she beeped at him for absolute nothing?

Yes no need to do it.

We’ve covered this already if I beep at every driver that cuts me up I’d be as angry as this chap haha.

[ChocolateFrog]

Glassman said:

PS: Poor woman to be subjected to that

That's the least threatening angry man I've seen in a while

I was expecting a fat bald man with facial tatoos.

[Silvanus]

Superflow said:

Silvanus said:

So she beeped at him for absolute nothing?

Yes no need to do it.

We’ve covered this already if I beep at every driver that cuts me up I’d be as angry as this chap haha.

I'll help you a bit as clearly you are struggling. The answer in no, she didn't beep for absolutely nothing. She may have done all the things you've suggested and more, but that isn't starting it. The moronic driving started it, she escalated it and his criminal behaviour finished it.

[MrBogSmith]

Superflow said:

MrBogSmith said:

Superflow said:

She admitted it in the link.

He says she went nuts with multiple beeps and flashes.

She says she didn’t.

Judge believed her.

The end.

Oh no, not possible multiple beeps and flashes!

Some basic critical thinking needed here - the judge didn't necessarily believe her when it comes to horrifying possibilities of car horns and lights. The judge may well have not been able to decide on that aspect, and more importantly...

It's not really relevant. A Magistrates' court is there to deal with criminal behaviour. Even if she did everything he said, it's not a crime is it?

Abbott is a moron for pleading NG. I bet he could have received a caution (assuming no previous) had he admitted it at the police station.

There you go a sensible post at last!

The NG plea didn’t help him here but agree with your first paragraph.

I've managed to make a hash of double posting then deleting them both...

Anyway, it always surprises me how minor road incidents can escalate into things like this.

[Superflow]

Silvanus said:

Superflow said:

Silvanus said:

So she beeped at him for absolute nothing?

Yes no need to do it.

We’ve covered this already if I beep at every driver that cuts me up I’d be as angry as this chap haha.

I'll help you a bit as clearly you are struggling. The answer in no, she didn't beep for absolutely nothing. She may have done all the things you've suggested and more, but that isn't starting it. The moronic driving started it, she escalated it and his criminal behaviour finished it.

Moronic driving?

They were exiting Tesco at low speed.It’s nothing.

That’s some leap.