Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 1)

Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 1)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

tank slapper

7,949 posts

285 months

Friday 31st October 2008
quotequote all
Blib said:
Well, what about the photo I posted immediately above your comment Eric? I have also found this:
That is a still from the documentary which was faked. Here are a couple of actual photos after it landed:




Blib

44,386 posts

199 months

Friday 31st October 2008
quotequote all
tank slapper said:
That is a still from the documentary which was faked. Here are a couple of actual photos after it landed:
Ah, O.K. Thanks. thumbup

Eric Mc

122,276 posts

267 months

Friday 31st October 2008
quotequote all
It just goes to show the dangers of inserting "reconstructed" footage into documentaries.

Sloppy

609 posts

215 months

Friday 31st October 2008
quotequote all

Don't know how they landed this one






stuthemong

2,298 posts

219 months

Friday 31st October 2008
quotequote all
I can help here, sloppy.

dodgy reconstruction, but interesting nonetheless - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXK7Ix75ZSE&fea...

smile
Stu

bobthemonkey

3,852 posts

218 months

Friday 31st October 2008
quotequote all
Sloppy said:
Don't know how they landed this one





This was the Iraqi incident wasn't it? Attempted shoot-down by a shoulder launched SAM.

They survivied with some look and excellent training following United 232.

Burnedout

478 posts

192 months

Saturday 1st November 2008
quotequote all

MrVelox

2,974 posts

189 months

Saturday 1st November 2008
quotequote all
bobthemonkey said:
Sloppy said:
Don't know how they landed this one





This was the Iraqi incident wasn't it? Attempted shoot-down by a shoulder launched SAM.

They survivied with some look and excellent training following United 232.
Interesting note about 232.. they were never able to duplicate landing the plane in the simulator apparently, and it was said that they tried like hell to do so.

fathomfive

9,972 posts

192 months

Saturday 1st November 2008
quotequote all
MrVelox said:
bobthemonkey said:
Sloppy said:
Don't know how they landed this one





This was the Iraqi incident wasn't it? Attempted shoot-down by a shoulder launched SAM.

They survivied with some look and excellent training following United 232.
Interesting note about 232.. they were never able to duplicate landing the plane in the simulator apparently, and it was said that they tried like hell to do so.
Just the difference between real-life and a computer I think.

Can you imagine getting out and looking at the wing? yikes

Amazing.

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

200 months

Saturday 1st November 2008
quotequote all
fathomfive said:
MrVelox said:
bobthemonkey said:
Sloppy said:
Don't know how they landed this one





This was the Iraqi incident wasn't it? Attempted shoot-down by a shoulder launched SAM.

They survivied with some look and excellent training following United 232.
Interesting note about 232.. they were never able to duplicate landing the plane in the simulator apparently, and it was said that they tried like hell to do so.
Just the difference between real-life and a computer I think.

Can you imagine getting out and looking at the wing? yikes

Amazing.
I bet the landing speed was bloody fast to maintain lift with so little wing left.

Sloppy

609 posts

215 months

Saturday 1st November 2008
quotequote all

Yeah it must have been a wild ride for the pilot, full points for landing it, think some of the tyres were shot for landing too.

Full story here: http://www.cargolaw.com/2004nightmare_on.target.ht...

Tony*T3

20,911 posts

249 months

Saturday 1st November 2008
quotequote all
Burnedout said:
Video is of a remote control model plane, cleverly spliced/editted to make it look real. Defo Fake.

Burnedout

478 posts

192 months

Sunday 2nd November 2008
quotequote all



Eric Mc

122,276 posts

267 months

Sunday 2nd November 2008
quotequote all
That colour scheme on the Aussie Hawk is disgusting. Is it the final scheme or is it just primer?

Burnedout

478 posts

192 months

Sunday 2nd November 2008
quotequote all
Pretty putrid - I believe it was final at the time. Here's a nicer colour scheme.




anonymous-user

56 months

Sunday 2nd November 2008
quotequote all
btb said:
Eric Mc said:
They weren't (I've seen both flying).

Ironically, when the RAF ran out of available fighters in the mid 1980s due to delays to the introduction of the Tornado F2/3, as an emergency measure, 74 Squadron (the Tiger Squadron) was reactivated with ex US Navy F4J Phantoms. These were rebranded F4J(UK) Phantoms and were Pratt and Whitney powered.

That's correct. I was working on Phantoms at Raf Wattisham, when we received the 74 Sqn J's. Much younger airframes compared to our birds. From memory, the whole sqn of J's (think there were 12) cost £100,000,000, which i reckon was good value at the time.

The RR engines had a recyclable oil cooling system, therefore they hardly had any smoke trail. The J's engines burnt the coolant oil within the engine (bit like a 2 stroke i guess) and hence the thicker smoke trails.

Did find a mumified scorpion within the spine during a fuel tank change once!No doubt due to the storage conditions in the desert.

  • spelling
Edited by anonymous-user on Wednesday 29th October 18:37
The J79 was General Electric, not P&W. The J79s were TurboJets as opposed to the Rolls Royce Spey 201/202 which were Turbofans. From what I read years ago, low down performance on the Speys was better, but at altitude the J79 was better.

Here is a picture I took in 1990 of a box of 4 (of a formation of 16) F4's during the Battle of Britain Flypast.

The trailing F4 is an F4J as you can see the smaller jet nozzles and lack of RWR & Aerial on the fin.



Edited by anonymous-user on Sunday 2nd November 11:58

Eric Mc

122,276 posts

267 months

Sunday 2nd November 2008
quotequote all
Yep - forget the Phantom had GE engines.

The Sea Fury always looks best in that 50s Royal Navy/Royal Austarlian Navy colour scheme.

Bushmaster

27,428 posts

281 months

Sunday 2nd November 2008
quotequote all

AlexS

1,552 posts

234 months

Sunday 2nd November 2008
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
The intake wasn't optimised for the Spey. On paper it should have had better performance all round.

Bushmaster

27,428 posts

281 months

Sunday 2nd November 2008
quotequote all


A Tornado? In Israel? How bizarre.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED