super yachts 60million+

Author
Discussion

Regbuser

3,789 posts

37 months

Thursday 13th July 2023
quotequote all
Rising Sun, moored off marina del cantone


RevsPerMinute

1,877 posts

223 months

Thursday 13th July 2023
quotequote all
scooby1994 said:

this was in Cavtat,Croatia,dont know the name as it seemed to be painted over

Edited by scooby1994 on Wednesday 5th July 19:56
333ft Feadship SYMPHONY.

Owned by a French guy who sells handbags and watches.

baxb

424 posts

194 months

Thursday 13th July 2023
quotequote all
scooby1994 said:

this was in Cavtat as well,Lady Britt,
there was also an older looking green yacht, quite large but with what looked like rocket launchers pointing outwards on either side,I know they weren't but that is what they looked like
Saw this moored up at Rodney Bay in St Lucia in April, it dwarfed everything else in the marina!

Chucklehead

2,748 posts

210 months

Monday 17th July 2023
quotequote all
67Dino said:


$300m 110m Kaos, currently in Barcelona. Owned by Nancy Walton Laurie, Walmart heiress, although guessing she didn’t buy it there.
Someone took a dislike to her yacht... and a jet, and a bank..

https://www.majorcadailybulletin.com/news/local/20...


Caddyshack

11,044 posts

208 months

Monday 17th July 2023
quotequote all
Chucklehead said:
67Dino said:


$300m 110m Kaos, currently in Barcelona. Owned by Nancy Walton Laurie, Walmart heiress, although guessing she didn’t buy it there.
Someone took a dislike to her yacht... and a jet, and a bank..

https://www.majorcadailybulletin.com/news/local/20...
I hope those blokes get done for that.

Bas Jaski

457 posts

195 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
One of these days a those eco terrorists will get what's coming to them good and proper.

Bonefish Blues

27,301 posts

225 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
TBF it's a bit of water-based paint (already being washed off as they pose) for a photo opportunity. Terrorists they aren't.

Terry Winks

1,248 posts

15 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
Indeed, and I suppose a 110m boat is an easy target, as there is no real justifcation to need one.

SpeckledJim

31,608 posts

255 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
Terry Winks said:
Indeed, and I suppose a 110m boat is an easy target, as there is no real justifcation to need one.
They shouldn't have done it, and should be fined/jailed/whatever, but it's a much more reasonably targeted protest than preventing thousands of normal people from getting to work.

(Once again in case it gets missed - they should be fined/jailed/whatever smile)


AstonZagato

12,778 posts

212 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
SpeckledJim said:
Terry Winks said:
Indeed, and I suppose a 110m boat is an easy target, as there is no real justifcation to need one.
They shouldn't have done it, and should be fined/jailed/whatever, but it's a much more reasonably targeted protest than preventing thousands of normal people from getting to work.

(Once again in case it gets missed - they should be fined/jailed/whatever smile)
I agree on the making sure they are punished but they do have a point when it comes to superyachts and private jets. Conspicuous and largely needless consumption. Unlike people trying to get to work. I rather enjoyed when JSO tried to stop trains in the East End and the commuters almost lynched them.

Antony Moxey

8,201 posts

221 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
AstonZagato said:
I agree on the making sure they are punished but they do have a point when it comes to superyachts and private jets. Conspicuous and largely needless consumption.
Multi-billionaires have as much right to spend their money as anyone else, it's just degrees of price tags - you buy a new car, multi-billionaire buys a yacht, or should everyone just spend the same as the poorest person to ensure it's all fair? Perhaps they should just sit on their cash, drive a 15 year old Corsa and spend their holiday in Blackpool for two weeks every summer (as long as they use public transport, natch).

AndyC_123

1,127 posts

156 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
AstonZagato said:
I agree on the making sure they are punished but they do have a point when it comes to superyachts and private jets. Conspicuous and largely needless consumption.
How would you justify your Aston to them?

Where do we draw the moral line between eating bread & water and living in a cave, and floating on yachts and flying in planes?

SpeckledJim

31,608 posts

255 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
AndyC_123 said:
AstonZagato said:
I agree on the making sure they are punished but they do have a point when it comes to superyachts and private jets. Conspicuous and largely needless consumption.
How would you justify your Aston to them?

Where do we draw the moral line between eating bread & water and living in a cave, and floating on yachts and flying in planes?
We'll all put it in a different place, but if there's no line anywhere then there's no such thing as unreasonably wasteful consumption?


AstonZagato

12,778 posts

212 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
AndyC_123 said:
AstonZagato said:
I agree on the making sure they are punished but they do have a point when it comes to superyachts and private jets. Conspicuous and largely needless consumption.
How would you justify your Aston to them?

Where do we draw the moral line between eating bread & water and living in a cave, and floating on yachts and flying in planes?
A car is a car. If I didn't have an Aston, then I would have another car and travelling those same miles. It might be a little more economical but it really won't make much of a difference. If I weren't driving the Aston (which gets little use) then it consumes nothing.

A superyacht consumes great gobs of energy 24/7/365. An alternative would be a villa - much less energy. The alternative to a private plane would be to fly scheduled - a fraction of the carbon.

AndyC_123

1,127 posts

156 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
SpeckledJim said:
AndyC_123 said:
AstonZagato said:
I agree on the making sure they are punished but they do have a point when it comes to superyachts and private jets. Conspicuous and largely needless consumption.
How would you justify your Aston to them?

Where do we draw the moral line between eating bread & water and living in a cave, and floating on yachts and flying in planes?
We'll all put it in a different place, but if there's no line anywhere then there's no such thing as unreasonably wasteful consumption?
To some there probably isn't.

The vehicles we drive are very much "wasteful consumption" to plenty of people (which I'm sure we would argue against) so who are we to judge others on their lifestyles is the point I'm making. Simply comes down to personal opinion so there will never be an answer smile

AndyC_123

1,127 posts

156 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
AstonZagato said:
AndyC_123 said:
AstonZagato said:
I agree on the making sure they are punished but they do have a point when it comes to superyachts and private jets. Conspicuous and largely needless consumption.
How would you justify your Aston to them?

Where do we draw the moral line between eating bread & water and living in a cave, and floating on yachts and flying in planes?
A car is a car. If I didn't have an Aston, then I would have another car and travelling those same miles. It might be a little more economical but it really won't make much of a difference. If I weren't driving the Aston (which gets little use) then it consumes nothing.
You should walk everywhere to save the planet. Not much of a difference to you is a big difference to someone else...


AstonZagato said:
A superyacht consumes great gobs of energy 24/7/365. An alternative would be a villa - much less energy. The alternative to a private plane would be to fly scheduled - a fraction of the carbon.
An alternative would be no villa and an alternative would be not to fly at all?

And before you know it we're back in our cave eating bread and drinking water wink

Bonefish Blues

27,301 posts

225 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
AndyC_123 said:
An alternative would be no villa and an alternative would be not to fly at all?

And before you know it we're back in our cave eating bread and drinking water wink
Processed food?

AstonZagato

12,778 posts

212 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
AndyC_123 said:
AstonZagato said:
AndyC_123 said:
AstonZagato said:
I agree on the making sure they are punished but they do have a point when it comes to superyachts and private jets. Conspicuous and largely needless consumption.
How would you justify your Aston to them?

Where do we draw the moral line between eating bread & water and living in a cave, and floating on yachts and flying in planes?
A car is a car. If I didn't have an Aston, then I would have another car and travelling those same miles. It might be a little more economical but it really won't make much of a difference. If I weren't driving the Aston (which gets little use) then it consumes nothing.
You should walk everywhere to save the planet. Not much of a difference to you is a big difference to someone else...


AstonZagato said:
A superyacht consumes great gobs of energy 24/7/365. An alternative would be a villa - much less energy. The alternative to a private plane would be to fly scheduled - a fraction of the carbon.
An alternative would be no villa and an alternative would be not to fly at all?

And before you know it we're back in our cave eating bread and drinking water wink
Oh I'm quite convinced that JSO would find me and my lifestyle abhorrent (and pretty much everyone on this site). I also realise that you aren't being serious. However, the scale of my consumption (and my ability to cut it by a significant amount) is radically different from someone who is getting a private jet to the Med, a helicopter to his superyacht and then burning 10,000 litres of oil a day sitting at anchor (vs me flying scheduled, taxi to the hotel and lying on the beach). My carbon footprint is larger than the average person by a factor - but probably a single digit factor. Someone with a superyacht? A factor of tens of thousands, I'd guess.

There is now a slight trend for (non-Russian, non-Gulf) billionaires to order sailing "eco" superyachts (e.g Jeff Bezos, Black Pearl, etc). I suspect that they have decided that, whilst one can still be as extravagant and hedonistic as it is possible to be, conspicuous consumption of hydrocarbons is going to get the masses gathering the pitchforks and flaming torches.

Edited by AstonZagato on Tuesday 18th July 16:37

ColdoRS

1,813 posts

129 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
AstonZagato said:
AndyC_123 said:
AstonZagato said:
AndyC_123 said:
AstonZagato said:
I agree on the making sure they are punished but they do have a point when it comes to superyachts and private jets. Conspicuous and largely needless consumption.
How would you justify your Aston to them?

Where do we draw the moral line between eating bread & water and living in a cave, and floating on yachts and flying in planes?
A car is a car. If I didn't have an Aston, then I would have another car and travelling those same miles. It might be a little more economical but it really won't make much of a difference. If I weren't driving the Aston (which gets little use) then it consumes nothing.
You should walk everywhere to save the planet. Not much of a difference to you is a big difference to someone else...


AstonZagato said:
A superyacht consumes great gobs of energy 24/7/365. An alternative would be a villa - much less energy. The alternative to a private plane would be to fly scheduled - a fraction of the carbon.
An alternative would be no villa and an alternative would be not to fly at all?

And before you know it we're back in our cave eating bread and drinking water wink
Oh I'm quite convinced that JSO would find me and my lifestyle abhorrent (and pretty much everyone on this site). I also realise that you aren't being serious. However, the scale of my consumption (and my ability to cut it by a significant amount) is radically different from someone who is getting a private jet to the Med, a helicopter to his superyacht and then burning 10,000 litres of oil a day sitting at anchor (vs me flying scheduled, taxi to the hotel and lying on the beach). My carbon footprint is larger than the average person by a factor - but probably a single digit factor. Someone with a superyacht? A factor of tens of thousands, I'd guess.

There is now a slight trend for (non-Russian, non-Gulf) billionaires to order sailing "eco" superyachts (e.g Jeff Bezos, Black Pearl, etc). I suspect that they have decided that, whilst one can still be as extravagant and hedonistic as it is possible to be, conspicuous consumption of hydrocarbons is going to get the masses gathering the pitchforks and flaming torches.

Edited by AstonZagato on Tuesday 18th July 16:37
Waffle on brother.

Very preachy words to spout whilst owning an Aston second (third? fourth?) car. Glass houses.

AstonZagato

12,778 posts

212 months

Tuesday 18th July 2023
quotequote all
ColdoRS said:
Very preachy words to spout whilst owning an Aston second (third? fourth?) car. Glass houses.
Sixth actually.
Pot/kettle, etc.
wink

Edited by AstonZagato on Tuesday 18th July 21:11