Being tax efficient on a spanish property

Being tax efficient on a spanish property

Author
Discussion

jammy_basturd

Original Poster:

29,778 posts

214 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
Ok, thanks for all your help Eric. beer

JCW

905 posts

209 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
Jammy, whilst I can't offer advice as to whether transferring ownership into a UK business is advisable or not, remember that the Hacienda will still retain an element of the sales value for Spanish CGT purposes, unless you purchase another property there. The double taxation agreement works well, and its possible to pay income tax in the UK based on rental income (holiday let) with generous allowances (upkeep, advertising costs, major structural work etc) that is not possible to claim in Spain, which to my mind, is as similarly advantaged as the method you're considering.

Perhaps, its best left alone?

cardigankid

8,849 posts

214 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
I know sweet F.A. about accounting and not a lot more about Spanish property, but I'd like to butt into this interesting thread anyway.

I was told at one time that owning a Spanish property could be a nightmare, because the Hispanics were considering Wealth Taxes and similar, cunningly aimed at hitting the foreign owner of holiday homes, while leaving the locals in peace. Even if you avoid that, I was further told, over some chilled dry sherry and a large plate of Jabugo ham, that even if they didn't get you that way, the lawyers wouls keep a significant portion of the purchase price as some kind of surety, and then forget that they owed you the money, and that there were all sorts of cute little wheezes to relieve you of further funds and generally extract a proportion of the sale price, either in local taxes, lawyers fees and so forth. How that affects your situation where you are selling it to a company you control and no actual money may be changing hands, I'm not sure. I suspect that the old Latin maxim of 'Let's fk the Gringo over real good', probably still applies, and what you really need is a trustworthy Spanish lawyer. Unless you have got his daughter hostage in your cellar, I imagine that you are going have some difficulty there too.

So, assuming that you manage to carry out this transaction in Spain ( and the best of British with that) the problem is that you might have a CGT charge on the increase in value of your property since you bought it. I am very surprised to learn that any Spanish property has increased in value. I would have imagined that it was going down like the Hindenburg.

If then you put this private asset into your company you either do so in exchange for shares or as a loan from you to the company (to buy the property). You can then be repaid the loan at whatever rate you consider appropriate, with no tax implications. Is that approximately right Eric? Any income the company generates from the property must then be taxable profit, and if you use the flat, that is a taxable benefit unless you pay a fair rent, which is taxable profit again. Any costs are however presumably deductable before tax.

However, suppose your intention is not to rent out the property except to yourself, does that mean the company is an investment company, and does it still mean that everything it pays out on charges, local rates, maintenance etc is deductable from profits before tax (assuming that it is making any.) What is the status of a company which just holds an asset, and visibly does nothing with it other than let the directors use it for holidays? If the property becomes a negative asset, and the Spanish are still coming after you for taxes of various kinds, does it put you in a position where you can just fold the company and walk?

I was last in Spain around the time of the Peninsular War, so maybe my recollections are a little out of date. Cojones Senor!

thumbup

Edited by cardigankid on Thursday 2nd April 13:49

Incredible Sulk

5,165 posts

197 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
cardigankid said:
So, assuming that you manage to carry out this transaction in Spain ( and the best of British with that) the problem is that you might have a CGT charge on the increase in value of your property since you bought it. I am very surprised to learn that any Spanish property has increased in value. I would have imagined that it was going down like the Hindenburg.
In an earlier post I referred to the previous fairly widespread practice of not having the real value of a property 'escriturado', and the fact that Hacienda are really clamping down on the practice.

What that means is that when you come to sell a property in the current market, you might end up making a real loss, but still having a capital gain for tax purposes (which as a previous poster mentioned you can roll over if you buy another property), but I bet there are lots of people being caught out by that now.

Eric Mc

122,259 posts

267 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
Cardingan Kid has raised some very valid points - which I didn't mention. In particular, using the company for your own (or your family's use) would create a liability to a taxable Benefit in Kind - unless you as individuals paid the commercial going rate to the company for the use of the property.

bertie

8,550 posts

286 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Cardingan Kid has raised some very valid points - which I didn't mention. In particular, using the company for your own (or your family's use) would create a liability to a taxable Benefit in Kind - unless you as individuals paid the commercial going rate to the company for the use of the property.
Hang on, a few post ago I said....

bertie said:
I'd be careful, there was a case brought by HMRC recently where a guy owned a property in Portugal off shore as it was "more tax efficient" but HMRC said that as this company was controlled from the UK, it falls under UK tax law, and as such they were after him for benefit in kind for staying in his own villa!

I am just in the process myself and having been through the pro's and cons I am owning it personally.

OJ

13,985 posts

230 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
bertie said:
I'd be careful, there was a case brought by HMRC recently where a guy owned a property in Portugal off shore as it was "more tax efficient" but HMRC said that as this company was controlled from the UK, it falls under UK tax law, and as such they were after him for benefit in kind for staying in his own villa!
I thought the Portugeezers shut down the 'offshore ownership' gig years ago

bertie

8,550 posts

286 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
OJ said:
bertie said:
I'd be careful, there was a case brought by HMRC recently where a guy owned a property in Portugal off shore as it was "more tax efficient" but HMRC said that as this company was controlled from the UK, it falls under UK tax law, and as such they were after him for benefit in kind for staying in his own villa!
I thought the Portugeezers shut down the 'offshore ownership' gig years ago
No, it was challenged strongly as nearly 50% of Portugese property outside Portugese ownership is held offshore and they rescinded the proposal.

However HMRC have had a number of bites at it and for this reason I ended up going the private route.

Eric Mc

122,259 posts

267 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
bertie said:
Eric Mc said:
Cardingan Kid has raised some very valid points - which I didn't mention. In particular, using the company for your own (or your family's use) would create a liability to a taxable Benefit in Kind - unless you as individuals paid the commercial going rate to the company for the use of the property.
Hang on, a few post ago I said....

bertie said:
I'd be careful, there was a case brought by HMRC recently where a guy owned a property in Portugal off shore as it was "more tax efficient" but HMRC said that as this company was controlled from the UK, it falls under UK tax law, and as such they were after him for benefit in kind for staying in his own villa!

I am just in the process myself and having been through the pro's and cons I am owning it personally.
Are you not reiterating exactly my point?

bertie

8,550 posts

286 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
bertie said:
Eric Mc said:
Cardingan Kid has raised some very valid points - which I didn't mention. In particular, using the company for your own (or your family's use) would create a liability to a taxable Benefit in Kind - unless you as individuals paid the commercial going rate to the company for the use of the property.
Hang on, a few post ago I said....

bertie said:
I'd be careful, there was a case brought by HMRC recently where a guy owned a property in Portugal off shore as it was "more tax efficient" but HMRC said that as this company was controlled from the UK, it falls under UK tax law, and as such they were after him for benefit in kind for staying in his own villa!

I am just in the process myself and having been through the pro's and cons I am owning it personally.
Are you not reiterating exactly my point?
No, you were re-iterating mine biggrin

Anyway, it's a good point.

Bushmaster

27,428 posts

281 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
Ha ha, 'tax efficient' and 'companies house' in the same sentence?

Set up a Panama foundation wrapped in a BVI trust to own the property. All the tax benefits in the world.

Eric Mc

122,259 posts

267 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
bertie said:
Eric Mc said:
bertie said:
Eric Mc said:
Cardingan Kid has raised some very valid points - which I didn't mention. In particular, using the company for your own (or your family's use) would create a liability to a taxable Benefit in Kind - unless you as individuals paid the commercial going rate to the company for the use of the property.
Hang on, a few post ago I said....

bertie said:
I'd be careful, there was a case brought by HMRC recently where a guy owned a property in Portugal off shore as it was "more tax efficient" but HMRC said that as this company was controlled from the UK, it falls under UK tax law, and as such they were after him for benefit in kind for staying in his own villa!

I am just in the process myself and having been through the pro's and cons I am owning it personally.
Are you not reiterating exactly my point?
No, you were re-iterating mine biggrin

Anyway, it's a good point.
Not really, as your point seemed to be more about "offshore companies". The OP admitted that his company was going to be UK based and registered so there would be no debate about the exposure to BIK charges.

bertie

8,550 posts

286 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
bertie said:
Eric Mc said:
bertie said:
Eric Mc said:
Cardingan Kid has raised some very valid points - which I didn't mention. In particular, using the company for your own (or your family's use) would create a liability to a taxable Benefit in Kind - unless you as individuals paid the commercial going rate to the company for the use of the property.
Hang on, a few post ago I said....

bertie said:
I'd be careful, there was a case brought by HMRC recently where a guy owned a property in Portugal off shore as it was "more tax efficient" but HMRC said that as this company was controlled from the UK, it falls under UK tax law, and as such they were after him for benefit in kind for staying in his own villa!

I am just in the process myself and having been through the pro's and cons I am owning it personally.
Are you not reiterating exactly my point?
No, you were re-iterating mine biggrin

Anyway, it's a good point.
Not really, as your point seemed to be more about "offshore companies". The OP admitted that his company was going to be UK based and registered so there would be no debate about the exposure to BIK charges.
Oh ok, you win, you're right, I'm wrong, I give up.

It's still a valid point.