Ridiculous tyre wear rate - Kumho KU39

Ridiculous tyre wear rate - Kumho KU39

Author
Discussion

FoxdieUK

Original Poster:

441 posts

142 months

Thursday 12th February 2015
quotequote all
Just before xmas I bought 2 x Kumho Ecsta Le Sport KU39 rear tyres (standard rear alloys) for my 8, they were only £104 per corner, but less than 2 months and roughly around 2500 miles later (mostly motorway) they're now at the legal limit and need replacing.

Now the geometry on my car isn't great (wanting to get it booked into the fish for a full alignment as soon as work permits) but the wear is even across both the rear tyres.

I've driven the car as they're meant to be driven but no burnouts / skid pans / drifting, quite shocked they've worn so quickly.

I understand the phrase "you get what you pay for" is quite relevant here, but this level of wear is ridiculous! The ZZ3s lasted 3x as long and that's with burnouts and other tomfoolery :/

Anyone else had similar experiences?

blue666uk

690 posts

126 months

Thursday 12th February 2015
quotequote all
Should last longer than that, mine is a CV8 admittedly, but have Vred Ultrac Sessanta on there which are mid range and they have lasted 9000 miles an are still holding up well. No burn outs for me, but I don't exactly tip toe around either....

bradwil

813 posts

159 months

Thursday 12th February 2015
quotequote all
Sorry Foxdie but there must be something seriously wrong...I have the exact same tyre...I've done easily 5 proper burnouts with mine check PVS 2013...I have at least 6000 miles of hard driving...and I'm not even near the legal limit...Well maybe near...but not on it...

djwilk

1,693 posts

171 months

Thursday 12th February 2015
quotequote all
Got KU39s as well and so far got at least 4k miles out of them with no visible sign of any wear. 50% town driving with the other 50% on motorways with around a thousand miles at speeds of 120mph+.

When I saw your post on FB, first thing I thought was that you had just found the root cause of your multiple diff failures wink

davegreg

1,099 posts

191 months

Thursday 12th February 2015
quotequote all
I have these tyres all round on my R8 - done over 10K, is my everyday car and still plenty of tread left. Granted, I don't drive it like I stole it - but I do like to floor it from time to time when the mood takes me. Will probably get another set of the same when the time comes. smile

VinceM

1,900 posts

140 months

Thursday 12th February 2015
quotequote all
I had a set on mine and I've literally just changed them, they lasted 11k and had about 2mm left (so not quite on the wear markers).

I don't drive it hard most of the time, it is my daily driver, but don't hang about either.

It may be a case of these tyres not being suitable for the R8 for some bizarre reason, however I'd happily have them on the Monaro again - although they are a bh to get on and off the rim.

007 VXR

64,187 posts

189 months

Thursday 12th February 2015
quotequote all
MPSS ....


That is all biggrin


getmecoat

only have 3 sets of rears on mine since new

PZero 245s 8K miles
PZero 285s 18K mile
MPSS 285s 12K miles so far and at about 60% smile

SteveMJ

919 posts

198 months

Thursday 12th February 2015
quotequote all
About 17k miles on mine so far, double my usual diatance

Steve

Granby

2,473 posts

217 months

Thursday 12th February 2015
quotequote all
007 VXR said:
MPSS ....


That is all biggrin


getmecoat

only have 3 sets of rears on mine since new

PZero 245s 8K miles
PZero 285s 18K mile
MPSS 285s 12K miles so far and at about 60% smile
How comes it took you so long tongue out

badboyburt

2,043 posts

179 months

Thursday 12th February 2015
quotequote all
Something isn't right, Ive had mine on for over 6k and still plenty rubber left.

Oh and it gets driven hard.

phillg

313 posts

211 months

Thursday 12th February 2015
quotequote all
Mine have been absolutely fine.

stigmundfreud

22,454 posts

212 months

Thursday 12th February 2015
quotequote all
that is probably not the tyre they are good, even on a heavy car. Did you get the right load rating? What number is on the side?

if you need the alignment doing, get it done rather than wait to get it to the fish. Anywhere with a decent laser set up, eg hunters, would be advisable.

But easy first check, check the load rating. I've been running falken 453's with great success for years, now got them on the m5 (I know I know) but its a similar weight. The rears have lasted 2 years so far, only just down to the 4mm area and that's been around 15,000 miles, including trans European jaunts.

throwyourbike

704 posts

153 months

Thursday 12th February 2015
quotequote all
Mine are still fine after 10k miles....

FoxdieUK

Original Poster:

441 posts

142 months

Thursday 12th February 2015
quotequote all
These are the ones I got, XL rating, 100Y.

MPSS or PS2s?

stigmundfreud

22,454 posts

212 months

Thursday 12th February 2015
quotequote all
check the DOT date too, but seriously 2500 miles somethings wrong and I would doubt the tyre.

ARAF

20,759 posts

225 months

Thursday 12th February 2015
quotequote all
FoxdieUK said:
These are the ones I got, XL rating, 100Y.

MPSS or PS2s?
Frankly, if Kumhos are wearing faster than anyone else's, then Michelins will too.

mattcov

721 posts

228 months

Thursday 12th February 2015
quotequote all
Worn in the centre or the edges? They are fitted "the right way round" ? i.e. "outside" is actually that.

SturdyHSV

10,130 posts

169 months

Thursday 12th February 2015
quotequote all
As people have said, I'd assume something else was wrong.

If you do go Michelin, go PSS not PS2, the PS2s are inferior in almost every way by most accounts, they're often more expensive too!

chrisgixer

153 posts

162 months

Friday 13th February 2015
quotequote all
If not a set up issue, I'd suggest the tyres are being over powered. So good work laugh


Of the mid range tyres, they are near the bottom of the performance pile imo. Not good in that area, even Mrs Gixer can light them up in shock without trying too hard in her is300. Now replaced with sport maxx RT .


Those that haven't wrecked 39's in short order probably aren't trying as hard, i guess.

monkfish1

11,176 posts

226 months

Friday 13th February 2015
quotequote all
As above, likely to be something wrong with the geometrey to wear that quick.