Blanket 20mph limit across Wales from 2023

Blanket 20mph limit across Wales from 2023

Author
Discussion

oakdale

1,804 posts

203 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
It looks like a policy shift is upcoming.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-68838...

ingenieur

4,097 posts

182 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
oakdale said:
It looks like a policy shift is upcoming.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-68838...
Smells like election prep to me. You can make vague noises about something and drop it like a hot potato after polling day. I've been watching these stories coming out over the last few months and so far I've seen no actual commitment to fixing this problem so they're taking people for fools - again... and they'll probably get away with it.

bigothunter

11,297 posts

61 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
oakdale said:
It looks like a policy shift is upcoming.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-68838...
Itchy won't be happy hehe

bigothunter

11,297 posts

61 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
ingenieur said:
Smells like election prep to me. You can make vague noises about something and drop it like a hot potato after polling day. I've been watching these stories coming out over the last few months and so far I've seen no actual commitment to fixing this problem so they're taking people for fools - again... and they'll probably get away with it.
Then bang the drum and make an issue of it. Just like Nigel Farage does so effectively. We don't live in a dictatorship yet.


Pica-Pica

13,816 posts

85 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
oakdale said:
It looks like a policy shift is upcoming.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-68838...
It’s not a policy shift, it’s an application/guidance shift (some councils have used the guidance sensibly from the off).

bigothunter

11,297 posts

61 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
Pica-Pica said:
oakdale said:
It looks like a policy shift is upcoming.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-68838...
It’s not a policy shift, it’s an application/guidance shift (some councils have used the guidance sensibly from the off).
Targeting 20 limits at specific high risk zones (<5%) rather than 37% of the road network is not a policy shift?

Well if you say so bow

BBC News said:
Wales' 20mph zones should be targeted at schools, hospitals and nurseries, the new transport secretary has said.

The 20mph default speed limit applies to 37% of the road network in Wales - although councils can apply for exemptions on stretches.

Pica-Pica

13,816 posts

85 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
bigothunter said:
Pica-Pica said:
oakdale said:
It looks like a policy shift is upcoming.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-68838...
It’s not a policy shift, it’s an application/guidance shift (some councils have used the guidance sensibly from the off).
Targeting 20 limits at specific high risk zones (<5%) rather than 37% of the road network is not a policy shift?

Well if you say so bow

BBC News said:
Wales' 20mph zones should be targeted at schools, hospitals and nurseries, the new transport secretary has said.

The 20mph default speed limit applies to 37% of the road network in Wales - although councils can apply for exemptions on stretches.
The BBC news article quotes a minister as saying ‘The 20mph law is staying. Instead the guidance for councils will be reviewed’

As I have said, some councils have applied it sensibly.


bennno

11,659 posts

270 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
Evanivitch said:
Really, their words?

Because the national law is that restricted roads are 20 mph. That's the default regardless of signage. So the placing of new 20 mph signs isn't necessary. Now, if the old 30 mph signs are still in place they would be a reasonable excuse for that stretch of road, but not side streets.
So you now agree it was a blanket change?

oakdale

1,804 posts

203 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
We'll end up with the 'blanket' 20mph project being reversed in all but name.
This way, the WG will get to blame someone else for the backlash (the local authorities), as is the WG way.

Pica-Pica

13,816 posts

85 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
bennno said:
Evanivitch said:
Really, their words?

Because the national law is that restricted roads are 20 mph. That's the default regardless of signage. So the placing of new 20 mph signs isn't necessary. Now, if the old 30 mph signs are still in place they would be a reasonable excuse for that stretch of road, but not side streets.
So you now agree it was a blanket change?
It is a default. The road shown below is a fast road, but has street lights. So the default would be 20mph without signage. It has signage, namely, the NSL sign. Nothing changed, before the default would have been 30mph, but as then, and as now, the speed limit is 60mph for cars (the NSL).

bennno

11,659 posts

270 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
Pica-Pica said:
It is a default. The road shown below is a fast road, but has street lights. So the default would be 20mph without signage. It has signage, namely, the NSL sign. Nothing changed, before the default would have been 30mph, but as then, and as now, the speed limit is 60mph for cars (the NSL).
Thats a weak argument, splitting hairs, effectively it was a blanket change of anything that was 30 was supposed to become 20.

Unless where they forgot / run out of money for signs / are now waiting for a review / applied to reverse the change prior to it being implemented etc.

Pica-Pica

13,816 posts

85 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
bennno said:
Pica-Pica said:
It is a default. The road shown below is a fast road, but has street lights. So the default would be 20mph without signage. It has signage, namely, the NSL sign. Nothing changed, before the default would have been 30mph, but as then, and as now, the speed limit is 60mph for cars (the NSL).
Thats a weak argument, splitting hairs, effectively it was a blanket change of anything that was 30 was supposed to become 20.

Unless where they forgot / run out of money for signs / are now waiting for a review / applied to reverse the change prior to it being implemented etc.
It is not an argument, it is a statement of fact (law, actually) A default speed limit means where there are street lights, the speed moved from 30 to 20 unless signed otherwise. Areas where street lights are in a fast area (to illuminate junctions, for instance, and there are plenty of those) need the decided speed limit to be shown, in my example an NSL. It could well also be 30, 40, 50, that needs to be displayed where street lights are present. That is the law.

Stella Tortoise

2,642 posts

144 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
bigothunter said:
Then bang the drum and make an issue of it. Just like Nigel Farage does so effectively. We don't live in a dictatorship yet.
Golden.

bigothunter

11,297 posts

61 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
Stella Tortoise said:
Golden.
As The Tremeloes once sang, (your) Silence is Golden biggrin

ingenieur

4,097 posts

182 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
Pica-Pica said:
bennno said:
Pica-Pica said:
It is a default. The road shown below is a fast road, but has street lights. So the default would be 20mph without signage. It has signage, namely, the NSL sign. Nothing changed, before the default would have been 30mph, but as then, and as now, the speed limit is 60mph for cars (the NSL).
Thats a weak argument, splitting hairs, effectively it was a blanket change of anything that was 30 was supposed to become 20.

Unless where they forgot / run out of money for signs / are now waiting for a review / applied to reverse the change prior to it being implemented etc.
It is not an argument, it is a statement of fact (law, actually) A default speed limit means where there are street lights, the speed moved from 30 to 20 unless signed otherwise. Areas where street lights are in a fast area (to illuminate junctions, for instance, and there are plenty of those) need the decided speed limit to be shown, in my example an NSL. It could well also be 30, 40, 50, that needs to be displayed where street lights are present. That is the law.
I think someone is missing the point. Default or blanket or whatever you want to call it had the effect of changing the speed limit on thousands of roads overnight. The idea that some well run councils planned a paltry dusting of exemptions ahead of the implementation does not make it a varied picture.

Substantially limits went from 30mph to 20mph overnight across vast swathes of the road network and pretending like that can all be undone with a couple of retro-fit 30mph signs is a nonsense. The only way to really undo it is to reverse the change itself.

Personally, being against the idea at the beginning and not seeing any good reason to change my mind in the meantime I would be okay with them simply changing it back and can patiently wait while it is undone... if they made a mistake then forgive and move on. Over time various signs and road markings can be phased out / updated...

Evanivitch

20,102 posts

123 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
bennno said:
Evanivitch said:
Really, their words?

Because the national law is that restricted roads are 20 mph. That's the default regardless of signage. So the placing of new 20 mph signs isn't necessary. Now, if the old 30 mph signs are still in place they would be a reasonable excuse for that stretch of road, but not side streets.
So you now agree it was a blanket change?
No. Where have I used that word?

Evanivitch

20,102 posts

123 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
bennno said:
Thats a weak argument, splitting hairs, effectively it was a blanket change of anything that was 30 was supposed to become 20.

Unless where they forgot / run out of money for signs / are now waiting for a review / applied to reverse the change prior to it being implemented etc.
laugh

A blanket with holes? Like a poncho? Or a t shirt? Maybe a mesh vest?

Evanivitch

20,102 posts

123 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
bennno said:
Evanivitch said:
In Wales? The roll out has already happened...
Nope, in Pembs they've said the blanket roll out (words used safety officer in charge of roll out for county) has been stopped pending further central policy review. So its just on many of the main trunk roads, whilst lots of villages such as ours with no footpaths are still at 30mph.
I put your words to PCC, this was their response:

"The amalgamation order was sealed prior to the 17th September 2023 and signage has since been erected to reflect the new default position of 20mph on restricted streets. The majority of existing 30mph limits have defaulted however a number of locations were proposed exceptions to the order and which were included in the consultation process that took place."

Evanivitch

20,102 posts

123 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
bigothunter said:
Evanivitch said:
Because the national law is that restricted roads are 20 mph. That's the default regardless of signage. So the placing of new 20 mph signs isn't necessary.
Wales - the land where 30 limit signs actually mean 20 rofl
The vandalised signs, not the 30 mph signs. Keep up ol' chap.

bigothunter

11,297 posts

61 months

Thursday 18th April
quotequote all
Evanivitch said:
bennno said:
Thats a weak argument, splitting hairs, effectively it was a blanket change of anything that was 30 was supposed to become 20.

Unless where they forgot / run out of money for signs / are now waiting for a review / applied to reverse the change prior to it being implemented etc.
laugh

A blanket with holes? Like a poncho? Or a t shirt? Maybe a mesh vest?
A blanket with 3% holes is still a blanket. To argue otherwise is just pedantry.