When is a classic car a classic car?
Discussion
absolutely said:
crankedup said:
Vintage cars are only classed as such if said car was built from the end of veteran era up to 1930. After 1930 they are classic cars apparently. I have considered for some while that a post vintage classification needs to be formally agreed upon and an modern classic group also. I know this won't help the OP much, sorry.
Big hairy bks! You cannot say a 1931 Phantom II is not a Vintage car!Its a can of worms which could be discussed adinfinitum and still not be resolved. As mentioned earlier, just enjoy your car/lorry/bus/tank or whatever it is you drive
Edited by crankedup on Wednesday 21st May 17:31
crankedup said:
absolutely said:
crankedup said:
Vintage cars are only classed as such if said car was built from the end of veteran era up to 1930. After 1930 they are classic cars apparently. I have considered for some while that a post vintage classification needs to be formally agreed upon and an modern classic group also. I know this won't help the OP much, sorry.
Big hairy bks! You cannot say a 1931 Phantom II is not a Vintage car!The Americans call all old cars "antique cars", they're nothing like a granfather clock or a cupboard!
Gretchen said:
plasticpig said:
You can if you are the VSCC. The CCOA reckon the vintage cut off is 1925 IIRC.
So, in effect, they could also say anything post 1973 (ie not tax exempt) should not be considered a 'classic'... ?? Dictionary defines 'classic' as;
a. Belonging to the highest rank or class.
b. Serving as the established model or standard: a classic example of colonial architecture.
c. Having lasting significance or worth; enduring.
Simes205 said:
williamp said:
A Classic car is a car which leaves and indelible impression on you
It could be any vehicle, from any age which qualifies as a classic, simply because you remember it well. Of course its different for different people. Thats the joy of our hobby.
Perfect.It could be any vehicle, from any age which qualifies as a classic, simply because you remember it well. Of course its different for different people. Thats the joy of our hobby.
I'd also interpret 'Indelible impression'...as good or bad, thus making the Allegros and 2CVs of this world classics in their own right.
Doesn't help your arguement much though does it dinkel?
austin said:
a8hex said:
I wouldn't even use the "not in production" test. Some cares remained in production for years. How about Morgans? are they classics straight off the production line? It's possible that there will be more C-Types built this year than at any time in the 50s, admittedly most of them won't be aiming at qualifying for FIA papers, but do they count as classics?
Who are the C-Types made by? It's not Jaguar so they aren't even Jaguar C-Types...austin said:
Personally I wouldn't class a new Morgan as a classic either, in fact I would say nothing pre 1980 as an absolute minimum.
The problem is that it is a personal thing.
That is the whole point, I'd consider the +4 a classic, but not an Aero.The problem is that it is a personal thing.
But why 1980? would a Fiat 126 made in December 79 be a classic and Aston V8 Vantage made in January 1980 not? Why not 1960 or a rolling 50 years?
austin said:
The other question is why do we need to answer the question at all, they are after all just old cars. Just enjoy them and stop arguing the toss about what you call it.
I can drink to that.Kick back, chill out and enjoy
PS, love your car.
I believe that it depends entirely on a car. I think that pretty much any Jag, Aston, Lotus, Alfa, Maserati or low volume car is a class failry soon after it's been made, but some cars of 30 years old I still would'nt consider a classic. It's completely subjective in most cases, but I think that pretty much anything made before the 70's could be generally conisdered a classic now.
Oh dear, what a can of worms! Vintage was defined in 1934 when the VSCC was formed - pre 1931. A classic though? Well, a Morris Minor is a classic in most peoples eyes but is a Marina or Allegro for example? Both have their supporters and one make clubs. Now let me quote Gretchen's dictionary definition:-
a. Belonging to the highest rank or class.
b. Serving as the established model or standard: a classic example of colonial architecture.
c. Having lasting significance or worth; enduring.
Now that means that I personally am a classic but not two of my cars! Is my Lynx D a classic? personally I think not but the make does seem to have taken on a kind of mythical existance of it's own somehow. A car that is still in production isn't? Well a Morgan has been quoted but surely when the Mini and the Minor finished production the earliest models of their ranges were already classics, especially the Cooper versions. A Toyota Crown or a Talbot Tagora? Both very rare now but classics? Hmmm. Will my C type be a classic one day? I doubt it, more a curiosity even if it will have FIA papers.
No, you'll get a different answer from every person you meet, especially depending on their age. I guess some youngsters consider a 911 a classic even if it is a 993 because it is and was the car of their dreams as they grew up whereas we older farts look at a completely different range of cars.
Personally I try not to make a definition or dividing line; if I like it it's a classic and one of my favourite classics is a Bristol which can be defined as a classic the day it is registered, just like Morgan!
a. Belonging to the highest rank or class.
b. Serving as the established model or standard: a classic example of colonial architecture.
c. Having lasting significance or worth; enduring.
Now that means that I personally am a classic but not two of my cars! Is my Lynx D a classic? personally I think not but the make does seem to have taken on a kind of mythical existance of it's own somehow. A car that is still in production isn't? Well a Morgan has been quoted but surely when the Mini and the Minor finished production the earliest models of their ranges were already classics, especially the Cooper versions. A Toyota Crown or a Talbot Tagora? Both very rare now but classics? Hmmm. Will my C type be a classic one day? I doubt it, more a curiosity even if it will have FIA papers.
No, you'll get a different answer from every person you meet, especially depending on their age. I guess some youngsters consider a 911 a classic even if it is a 993 because it is and was the car of their dreams as they grew up whereas we older farts look at a completely different range of cars.
Personally I try not to make a definition or dividing line; if I like it it's a classic and one of my favourite classics is a Bristol which can be defined as a classic the day it is registered, just like Morgan!
absolutely said:
crankedup said:
Sorry mate, its not my definition. Its always going to upset some people when they find that thier 1931 car IS NOT CLASSED as a vintage car. (My self included with my 1931 Austin 7 'Swallow' Saloon)
Who says?Edit to correct quote attribution
Edited by tvrgaas on Thursday 22 May 10:35
Back on Topic: the original poster asked about classic cars - I think one of the classic cars magazines said if it is listed in their price guide it is a classic. One could also argue if there is an owners club and they sit in a field comparing polish - it's a classic. Or it needs an enthusisastic owner. Perhaps a better definition is what would you cross the road to look at? (Allegro or F40?)
dinkel said:
In Holland if a car is over 25 years old you don't need to pay roadtaxes anymore .
Yep we used to have that here, but it stuck about 10 years ago and the historic tax class is pre 1973 (ish). austin said:
williamp said:
And also, in the UK an insurance company defines any car older then 10 years as a classic, and you can get classic car insurance for it.
Not sure that is always the case, my 16 year old Cavalier for instance.Definately not a classic whatever anyone says.
This goes back to my definition. Everyones idea of a "classic" will be different, but they will think of it as a classic because it means something to them.
austin said:
dinkel said:
So what can we expect at the Ace Cafe Classic Car Night? Folks interpretations?
People that love their own cars beyond financial sense...Good definition though, justifies why a DB4 GT changes from owner for 1m euros . . .
Model T FORD, Mini, 2cv, VW Beetle ,Austin 7 ,its cars like these that can truly be called classics .They made a lasting impression on the motoring public ,were popular and were built in very large numbers .There are also cars like the E Type, 911, Cobra etc. which were defining moments in auto history ,classics in the 2nd degree if you like .Thirdly any cars lusted after by general car enthusiasts or which competed closely with any of the aforementioned maybe deemed classics. Age alone however I feel does not constitute a classic vehicle. Austin Maxi anyone?
Andy. IMO obviously
Andy. IMO obviously
Some interesting points (which I haven't quoted.
hot metal said:
Age alone however I feel does not constitute a classic vehicle. Austin Maxi anyone?
Andy. IMO obviously
ButAndy. IMO obviously
Maxis are probably rarer now than DB5s.
If someone has loved their Maxi enough to have preserved it and still drive it today, then in their eyes it must be a classic. And it can be nice to see these types of cars at classic car dos as well the more exotic varieties. Of course in the case of the Maxi someone must love them a lot, because BMW have gone to the trouble of building a whole new generation of them, of course they weren't quite brave enough to call them Maxis, so they call them Minis instead
a8hex said:
If someone has loved their Maxi enough to have preserved it and still drive it today, then in their eyes it must be a classic. And it can be nice to see these types of cars at classic car dos as well the more exotic varieties.
It was interesting walking through the car park at last year's Goodwood Revival - More C & D-Types than you could shake a stick at, the only Mercedes 300SL Gullwing I've *ever* seen outside a museum or exhibition (two of them in fact!), every kind of Aston you can imagine (including one of the 'project' racers), '50s and '60s Ferraris sprinkled liberally - well, you get the picture. Amazingly the cars which seemed to be drawing the attention, getting the lingering looks, and drawing comment were the prosaic stuff scattered amongst the exotica, nice clean Hillman Minx's, Ford Consuls, Morris Oxford's and the like - you could overhear (or sometime just imagine from the expressions on peoples faces) the conversations "just like Dad used to have", "our youngest was conceived in one of those", "we went on honeymoon in one like that", "that's like the taxi was took me to my first date", etc, etc, etc. You can't discount that sort of emotional resonance and if someone owns and loves something which used to be considered very ordinary but has significance to the owner I'd have to be in a very harsh mood before I could look them in the eye and tell 'em that their car was just old junk rather than a classic...--
JG
Gassing Station | Classic Cars and Yesterday's Heroes | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff