VX220 Turbo to Z4M Roadster

VX220 Turbo to Z4M Roadster

Author
Discussion

Denno B

Original Poster:

965 posts

206 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
Is this a car that could replace my vx without me regretting it? I love the car but it is used more as a toy and i have a clio 172 as a daily driver. I feel it's a bit of a waste now having two cars and am contemplating replacing the both with one nice car. The Z4M seems a more sensible car to use everyday and i can't see much else for the money that comes close. The running costs for my two cars would probably be similar to running just an M so that's not an issue. Can i expect similar performance from the M as my mildly tuned turbo? (It's around 270bhp per tonne with 260ft lb of torque). The vx is an occasion everytime i drive it even after 3.5yrs of ownership and the performance is all that is required for road use, would the M have the same appeal? Any thoughts would be appreciated and if anyone has gone from a vx220 to a z4m your experiences would be good to hear and may help make my mind up.

custardkid

2,514 posts

225 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
the M, if my memory is correct, about 220 -230 per ton, so is slower.
it will also be better build / have more noise damping etc so will feel slower as there is less of an assault on the senses.
the up side is that its easy to live with every day and you could comfortable drive the length of germany at 140mph only needing to stop when the tank runs dry

I'm guessing the vx is fun in a darty balletic way. the M is fun in a 'i've just wrestled a tiger' kinda way

drive one, its the only way to see if it suits you.

custard

Porscheplayer

381 posts

191 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
custardkid said:
the M, if my memory is correct, about 220 -230 per ton, so is slower.
That sentence should finish with, so is slower off the line, however once rolling and past 60mph the Z4M R will have the legs I think
Power/weight is a good performance measurement, but doesn't take into account aerodynamic drag.

I test drove VX a few years back, it was a great car but ran out of steam about 90mph

What sort of power is the VX220 putting out?

thegreengoblet

1,040 posts

217 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
Sorry I cannot help. But I'm quite interested in this thread. I was thinking of suplementing the e36 M3 Evo with a VX220 turbo (which I could have as a company car).

Denno B

Original Poster:

965 posts

206 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
Porscheplayer said:
custardkid said:
the M, if my memory is correct, about 220 -230 per ton, so is slower.
That sentence should finish with, so is slower off the line, however once rolling and past 60mph the Z4M R will have the legs I think
Power/weight is a good performance measurement, but doesn't take into account aerodynamic drag.

I test drove VX a few years back, it was a great car but ran out of steam about 90mph

What sort of power is the VX220 putting out?
Yeah i'd expect the vx to leave the m off the line as it's probably low 4's to 60mph if i wanted to kill my clutch! Am more interested in rolling in gear acceleration and if that would be similar, 60-100mph would be around 6 seconds in the vx. My car has approximately 250bhp and pulls strong in every gear, plenty of torque to not have to work it too hard either. If the m would even match the performance i'd be happy with that but it's not all about that, the m seems a proper drivers car and something i could use all year round.

Porscheplayer

381 posts

191 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
Think you'll find the M fast enough then.

The M has 338BHP which helps punch a good hole in air compared to 250BHP cars, I tend to find most sporty car very similar below 60-70mph, but more power means the Z4M will pull much quicker at higher speeds.

You’re not going to come close to the intimate driving experience offered by the sublime feedback of the VX steering though, I actually said “lovely” out loud within a few corners on my test drive.


Tea Pot One

1,849 posts

229 months

Sunday 26th September 2010
quotequote all
I would have thought the Z4M R would be slower ... and feel slower ... a modified VX is decidedly quick ! That said, the Z4M is quick .... but certainly doesn't feel mega rapid.

I had a TVR Griffith 500 which felt in a different league (performance wise) to my Z4M R but, as has been pointed out, above 60mph the Z4M piles on speed with little effort and is deceptive as it is a very linear delivery .

john_p

7,073 posts

251 months

Monday 27th September 2010
quotequote all
If it's your only car, remember that the Z4MR has an awkward boot, especially for things like suitcases. We fit a Le Mans trip for two, but it was tough. Something to remember if you use the 172 for moving things about!


sixspeed

2,060 posts

273 months

Monday 27th September 2010
quotequote all
Had a VXT (only Stage One mind), and bought the Z4MC. Didn't miss the VX one bit tbh. Admittedly I've made some changes to take my Z towards a more track-focussed machine, like the VX, but I don't think you'll be disappointed if you're looking for a little more refinement. The Z4M still gives plenty of thrills!