737 max loses window

Author
Discussion

Panamax

4,123 posts

35 months

Sunday 7th January
quotequote all
Teddy Lop said:
But the procedure of idiocy is normally DENYDENYDENYDENYDENYDENYDENYDENYDENY no idea guv'nuh
What do you actually do for a living?

Teddy Lop

8,301 posts

68 months

Sunday 7th January
quotequote all
Panamax said:
Teddy Lop said:
But the procedure of idiocy is normally DENYDENYDENYDENYDENYDENYDENYDENYDENY no idea guv'nuh
What do you actually do for a living?
Sparky and suffer idiots, why?

The process of idiocy seems one of lifes universals

Panamax

4,123 posts

35 months

Sunday 7th January
quotequote all
In "risk" industries there is a recognition that everything is a careful balancing act between what is theoretically possible and what can actually be achieved on a sensible basis. Safety in cars, trains and planes is taken incredibly seriously but it's impossible to rule out every avenue of possible failure.

I was hoping you might be able to draw attention to your own field of experience where things are handled better.

tim0409

4,455 posts

160 months

Sunday 7th January
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
Or wrong sized bolts used, see the blown out cockpit window of BA Flight 5390.
I’m sticking with original theory that the bolts/nuts where left off; even if the wrong size bolts where used they would still stop the upper roller pin from moving.

b0rk

2,312 posts

147 months

Sunday 7th January
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
It does look that way; 3 of the 4 could be missing and the plug would still be held in place as there's no force on the bolts.
As long as the roller pins are present all 4 locking bolts could be missing and the door wouldn’t fail so long as the roller pins remain in the latch. The bolts have to resist very little force just holding the roller pin in the latch. I would expect that the pressure differential in service would hold the pins in the latch by design.

In theory no bolts could be safe for years if the door doesn’t become partially dislodged from the latch.

I suspect it will turn out these where missing at final assembly and due to being behind a panel are not a line inspection item. Then some sort of ground handling issue in service has knocked the door partially off said latches before failing later.

hidetheelephants

24,657 posts

194 months

Sunday 7th January
quotequote all
b0rk said:
As long as the roller pins are present all 4 locking bolts could be missing and the door wouldn’t fail so long as the roller pins remain in the latch. The bolts have to resist very little force just holding the roller pin in the latch. I would expect that the pressure differential in service would hold the pins in the latch by design.

In theory no bolts could be safe for years if the door doesn’t become partially dislodged from the latch.

I suspect it will turn out these where missing at final assembly and due to being behind a panel are not a line inspection item. Then some sort of ground handling issue in service has knocked the door partially off said latches before failing later.
Is there a wedging or overcentre action in the pin/socket arrangement? If there isn't, between impulse from rough landings, turbulence etc and the springs in the hinge mechanism the door could release itself with no bolts restraining it.

MarkwG

4,868 posts

190 months

Sunday 7th January
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
tim0409 said:
The more I read about this, the more I come to the conclusion that the four bolts were left off during assembly. I think Boeing already know this having looked at the lack of damage to the fixings, which would explain why they were able to roll out an inspection so quickly (otherwise how could they determine what they were looking for in the inspection).
It does look that way; 3 of the 4 could be missing and the plug would still be held in place as there's no force on the bolts.
My money would be on the split pins missing, or a standard nut rather than a castle tbh. A quick inspection probably wouldn't notice a missing pin, or the wrong nut, but a missing nut would be obvious

b0rk

2,312 posts

147 months

Monday 8th January
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
Is there a wedging or overcentre action in the pin/socket arrangement? If there isn't, between impulse from rough landings, turbulence etc and the springs in the hinge mechanism the door could release itself with no bolts restraining it.
https://twitter.com/fl360aero/status/1743934719987...

Based on the picture of a door plug being inspected on Twitter I think with no bolts the plug relies on the base hinge? spring providing enough force to overcome any downward loads applied to the plug. So the latch doesn’t appear to have any designed effective overcentre action.
A rough landing could I’d suspect dislodge the plug from the latches if the bolts where missing.

I don’t know how rigid the base point is, maybe one of plane experts could explain the designed mechanism more. As this is never supposed to be opened in service I’d have hoped the plug base / aperture base was designed as a rigid connection.

smack

9,730 posts

192 months

WyrleyD

1,923 posts

149 months

Monday 8th January
quotequote all
Also found a still working iPhone after falling 16,000 feet that had a baggage check on it for that flight.

Crudeoink

489 posts

60 months

Monday 8th January
quotequote all
The share Boeing price hasnt dropped as much as I was expecting. I was expecting to see a bloodbath at around -20% but Boeing on the DBX opened at about -7.2% this morning but has since recovered to -6.7%

valiant

10,335 posts

161 months

Monday 8th January
quotequote all
WyrleyD said:
Also found a still working iPhone after falling 16,000 feet that had a baggage check on it for that flight.
Wonder what phone case and screen protector it has?

16000ft drop and it survives intact.

Marketing dream.

airbusA346

788 posts

154 months

Monday 8th January
quotequote all
WyrleyD said:
Also found a still working iPhone after falling 16,000 feet that had a baggage check on it for that flight.
https://twitter.com/BigBreakingWire/status/1744296881277046852

Teddy Lop

8,301 posts

68 months

Monday 8th January
quotequote all
valiant said:
WyrleyD said:
Also found a still working iPhone after falling 16,000 feet that had a baggage check on it for that flight.
Wonder what phone case and screen protector it has?

16000ft drop and it survives intact.

Marketing dream.
The drops fine, it's the landing that hurtstongue out

I imagine soft undergrowth though!

airbusA346 said:
In different circumstances that would have been gut retchingly poinant..

airbusA346

788 posts

154 months

Monday 8th January
quotequote all
So there's no data on the CVR, because it had reached its 2 hour limit and automatically wiped the data.

Seems mad that in 2024 CVR's only have a 2 hour limit after the NTSB have been requesting 25 hours for years.

craig1912

3,330 posts

113 months

Monday 8th January
quotequote all
United Airlines has found at least 5 plug doors with loose bolts during the inspection of a Boeing 737 Max 9 plane


Bradgate

2,826 posts

148 months

Monday 8th January
quotequote all
craig1912 said:
United Airlines has found at least 5 plug doors with loose bolts during the inspection of a Boeing 737 Max 9 plane
Unbelievable. Presumably it is someone’s job to torque the bolts correctly, and someone else’s job to check that the bolts have been torqued correctly before the thing leaves the factory. Cue a frantic rush by airlines across the world to check every bolt on every aircraft in their fleet asap. Overtime bonanza for the engineers this month.

wyson

2,094 posts

105 months

Monday 8th January
quotequote all
There was a really good article about Boeing’s problems. Long story short, they decided having an engineering lead approach wasn’t generating enough shareholder returns, so went for a bean counter first approach. 737 Max is one of the fruits of that. They ditched the bean counter CEO, because of all the problems and the new guy is going for a blended approach.

Edited by wyson on Monday 8th January 21:35

airbusA346

788 posts

154 months

Monday 8th January
quotequote all
Bradgate said:
Unbelievable. Presumably it is someone’s job to torque the bolts correctly, and someone else’s job to check that the bolts have been torqued correctly before the thing leaves the factory. Cue a frantic rush by airlines across the world to check every bolt on every aircraft in their fleet asap. Overtime bonanza for the engineers this month.
There's also the issue of the loose nuts in the tail.

I believe they got rid of a load of the people doing QC, and now rely on digital torque wrenches etc that log when bolts/nuts are tightened.

airbusA346

788 posts

154 months

Monday 8th January
quotequote all
Yikes!!! Look at the image in this tweet. eek

https://twitter.com/ByERussell/status/174446013685...

It'll be interesting to know how many turns that bolt is in.