737 max loses window

Author
Discussion

hidetheelephants

24,673 posts

194 months

Monday 8th January
quotequote all
airbusA346 said:
Yikes!!! Look at the image in this tweet. eek

https://twitter.com/ByERussell/status/174446013685...

It'll be interesting to know how many turns that bolt is in.
I doubt those are screws, far more likely to be bolts with nuts on the other side of the frame; Boeing management need taking to the cleaners over this. Utter failure of process control.

airbusA346

788 posts

154 months

Monday 8th January
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
I doubt those are screws, far more likely to be bolts with nuts on the other side of the frame; Boeing management need taking to the cleaners over this. Utter failure of process control.
What ever it is going into they only look finger tight to me. I wonder if they are meant to be lock wired too.


Maybe they need to do a D Check on some of them to see what else isn't right.

airbusA346

788 posts

154 months

Monday 8th January
quotequote all
United have also found the loose bolts aren't the same ones across the 5 aircraft.

https://theaircurrent.com/feed/dispatches/united-f...

hidetheelephants

24,673 posts

194 months

Monday 8th January
quotequote all
They've completely forgotten how to build aeroplanes, this is basic stuff; between this and the shambolic KC46 programme the company is a disgrace.

MartG

20,706 posts

205 months

Monday 8th January
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
They've completely forgotten how to build aeroplanes, this is basic stuff; between this and the shambolic KC46 programme the company is a disgrace.
Not to mention the Starliner fiasco frown

Bradgate

2,826 posts

148 months

Monday 8th January
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
They've completely forgotten how to build aeroplanes, this is basic stuff; between this and the shambolic KC46 programme the company is a disgrace.
Exactly. Cutting costs & cutting corners in order to keep the shareholders happy & make sure the CEO gets his bonus, and never mInd the lives of passengers & crew.

Panamax

4,129 posts

35 months

Monday 8th January
quotequote all
airbusA346 said:
I believe they got rid of a load of the people doing QC, and now rely on digital torque wrenches etc that log when bolts/nuts are tightened.
The whole area of Quality Control is fraught with difficulties. This dated October 2023 from the UK's Health and Safety Executive in connection with safety-critical welding of boilers and pipes in the energy industry,

"This safety alert highlights that the non-destructive testing (NDT) process is vulnerable to tampering. HSE and other regulators have investigated several instances where NDT has been falsified. In particular, radiographic images of welds have been falsely obtained or tampered with, including duplicate images of welds and false identification numbers added after processing. In these cases there is a significant risk of flaws and defects going undetected with a subsequent risk of structural failure.

"Most recently, during a large-scale steam boiler construction which required hundreds of internal tube welds and thousands of radiograph images, instances of film duplication were noticed by the inspector. Further investigation revealed large-scale falsification of weld images and shortcuts taken to reduce the time spent on site."
https://www.hse.gov.uk/safetybulletins/radiography...

GliderRider

2,131 posts

82 months

Tuesday 9th January
quotequote all
airbusA346 said:
Yikes!!! Look at the image in this tweet. eek

https://twitter.com/ByERussell/status/174446013685...

It'll be interesting to know how many turns that bolt is in.
If those are either plain or helical spring washers of the sort with a single split, then they can be worse than useless in equipment prone to vibration, as this vibration test rig demonstrates:

Plain & locking washers on a vibration test rig

It looks like the door plug had a nice soft landing





Edited by GliderRider on Tuesday 9th January 01:23

hidetheelephants

24,673 posts

194 months

Tuesday 9th January
quotequote all
MartG said:
hidetheelephants said:
They've completely forgotten how to build aeroplanes, this is basic stuff; between this and the shambolic KC46 programme the company is a disgrace.
Not to mention the Starliner fiasco frown


Tony1963

4,819 posts

163 months

Tuesday 9th January
quotequote all
Panamax said:
The whole area of Quality Control is fraught with difficulties. This dated October 2023 from the UK's Health and Safety Executive in connection with safety-critical welding of boilers and pipes in the energy industry,

"This safety alert highlights that the non-destructive testing (NDT) process is vulnerable to tampering. HSE and other regulators have investigated several instances where NDT has been falsified. In particular, radiographic images of welds have been falsely obtained or tampered with, including duplicate images of welds and false identification numbers added after processing. In these cases there is a significant risk of flaws and defects going undetected with a subsequent risk of structural failure.

"Most recently, during a large-scale steam boiler construction which required hundreds of internal tube welds and thousands of radiograph images, instances of film duplication were noticed by the inspector. Further investigation revealed large-scale falsification of weld images and shortcuts taken to reduce the time spent on site."
https://www.hse.gov.uk/safetybulletins/radiography...
Steam boilers on airliners now?

Seven7

107 posts

8 months

Tuesday 9th January
quotequote all
Just Boeings...

colin79666

1,830 posts

114 months

Tuesday 9th January
quotequote all
Excellent technical video on how the door plug works.


It would seem the plug is removed by Boeing during the interior fit out so Spirit may be off the hook.

How long before every Boeing aircraft has to be grounded for an inspection of every single bolt?!

airbusA346

788 posts

154 months

Tuesday 9th January
quotequote all
Alaska Airlines have found additional aircraft with 'loose hardware'.

https://news.alaskaair.com/alaska-airlines/operati...

airbusA346

788 posts

154 months

Tuesday 9th January
quotequote all
During the explosive decompression the cockpit door flew open. According to Boeing, it is designed to do this. Problem is the pilots did not know this and it isn't in the manuals.

Now where have we heard that before... MCAS!

xeny

4,379 posts

79 months

Tuesday 9th January
quotequote all
airbusA346 said:
During the explosive decompression the cockpit door flew open. According to Boeing, it is designed to do this. Problem is the pilots did not know this and it isn't in the manuals.

Now where have we heard that before... MCAS!
So a hijacker just needs to depressurize the aircraft to access the super secure cockpit?

Seven7

107 posts

8 months

Tuesday 9th January
quotequote all
airbusA346 said:
During the explosive decompression the cockpit door flew open. According to Boeing, it is designed to do this. MCAS!
What is the thinking behind that?

MartG

20,706 posts

205 months

Tuesday 9th January
quotequote all
Seven7 said:
airbusA346 said:
During the explosive decompression the cockpit door flew open. According to Boeing, it is designed to do this. MCAS!
What is the thinking behind that?
The cockpit bulkhead is not designed to be a pressure bulkhead - if the door didn't blow open to releive a pressure differential then the entire bulkhead could fail explosively

Teddy Lop

8,301 posts

68 months

Tuesday 9th January
quotequote all
MartG said:
Seven7 said:
airbusA346 said:
During the explosive decompression the cockpit door flew open. According to Boeing, it is designed to do this. MCAS!
What is the thinking behind that?
The cockpit bulkhead is not designed to be a pressure bulkhead - if the door didn't blow open to relieve a pressure differential then the entire bulkhead could fail explosively
You could easily implement vents for pressure equalisation while maintaining security though?

xeny

4,379 posts

79 months

Tuesday 9th January
quotequote all
Teddy Lop said:
You could easily implement vents for pressure equalisation while maintaining security though?
Then an attacker could potentially gas the pilots. Interesting set of security tradeoffs.

Teddy Lop

8,301 posts

68 months

Tuesday 9th January
quotequote all
xeny said:
Teddy Lop said:
You could easily implement vents for pressure equalisation while maintaining security though?
Then an attacker could potentially gas the pilots. Interesting set of security tradeoffs.
Getting gas canisters and the kind of breathing equipment you'd require onto an aircraft wouldn't be easy surely? Plus it's still all the same air, you could just release to the cabin..

Doesn't need to be a huge vent for the few m pocket of air in the cockpit, and can easily be one-way or pressure controlled.

The opposite pressure differential - with the hole in the cockpit and the rest of the jet wanting to vent - would be more of an issue but in that event access to the cockpit might be better anyway.