Heathrow Airport: Two planes collide on runway

Heathrow Airport: Two planes collide on runway

Author
Discussion

48k

Original Poster:

13,093 posts

148 months

Saturday 6th April
quotequote all
FFS when will the BBC get proper aviation reporters who understand that the apron is not a runway.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68749...

Mr_J

361 posts

47 months

Saturday 6th April
quotequote all
I had to laugh at the headline and photo - so much so that I sent it to a mate. He and I may be more knowledgeable given that we design airports but it's pretty obvious it's not one of the runways.

I wouldn't want to be the Virgin tug driver right now.

Brother D

3,720 posts

176 months

Saturday 6th April
quotequote all
HORROR SMASH AND PASSENGER TERROR !!!



Some people need to be in jail for this level of hysteria...

MitchT

15,871 posts

209 months

Saturday 6th April
quotequote all
Brother D said:
Some people need to be in jail for this level of hysteria...
I agree. If you only read the headline you'd be expecting something akin to Tenerife '77 when it's actually the aviation equivalent of a car park scrape. They really need to get grown ups to do the writing.

aeropilot

34,625 posts

227 months

Saturday 6th April
quotequote all
Brother D said:
HORROR SMASH AND PASSENGER TERROR !!!



Some people need to be in jail for this level of hysteria...
It is about time that the media was take to task over such over the top hysteria.......

banghead

hidetheelephants

24,397 posts

193 months

Saturday 6th April
quotequote all
WTF? Did they get Kelvin MacKenzie circa 1982 to do the sub-edit?

tim0409

4,427 posts

159 months

Saturday 6th April
quotequote all
BBC article states…

“There were no injuries and no delays in the incident, which involved a British Airways plane with 121 passengers on board and a Virgin Atlantic plane.”

then a bit later…

“The passengers on the British Airways flight were scheduled to depart to Accra, Ghana, at 12:40 BST.
British Airways said it provided an alternative aircraft for them, which was rescheduled to take off at 18:00.”

scratchchin

captain_cynic

12,021 posts

95 months

Saturday 6th April
quotequote all
48k said:
FFS when will the BBC get proper aviation reporters who understand that the apron is not a runway.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68749...
The Beeb's reporting is woeful, but they still are the best of a bad lot (as evidenced by the Mirror's headline.

tim0409 said:
BBC article states…

“There were no injuries and no delays in the incident, which involved a British Airways plane with 121 passengers on board and a Virgin Atlantic plane.”

then a bit later…

“The passengers on the British Airways flight were scheduled to depart to Accra, Ghana, at 12:40 BST.
British Airways said it provided an alternative aircraft for them, which was rescheduled to take off at 18:00.”

scratchchin
Pretty obvious they meant no delays to other flights.

2HFL

1,203 posts

41 months

Saturday 6th April
quotequote all
MitchT said:
Brother D said:
Some people need to be in jail for this level of hysteria...
I agree. If you only read the headline you'd be expecting something akin to Tenerife '77 when it's actually the aviation equivalent of a car park scrape. They really need to get grown ups to do the writing.
The Tenerife incident randomly appeared in my YouTube feed the other day. What a terrible tragedy that was.

IanH755

1,861 posts

120 months

Sunday 7th April
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
Brother D said:
HORROR SMASH AND PASSENGER TERROR !!!



Some people need to be in jail for this level of hysteria...
It is about time that the media was take to task over such over the top hysteria.......

banghead
  • *EDIT*** The original BBC webpage had a very different headline to the current "just a minor bump" one (two planes "collide" at Heathrow) and Yes, I know the one in the quote is from the Mirror!
Nowadays it's not about "facts", its not about "accuracy", its not even about "the truth" - Its all about being first (no matter what) and getting "clicks" to the webpage.

Now for an "advertiser" based Media site I can at least understand that, as more clicks = more impressions on customers = more money from advertisers, but for the BBC website and BBC "journalists" (in the very loosest of terms), who have absolutely ZERO need to continually drop to a similar almost "gutter level" as the Mirror etc, to do so makes me so sad compared to how well respected it used to be.

Edited by IanH755 on Sunday 7th April 00:33

the-norseman

12,444 posts

171 months

Sunday 7th April
quotequote all
A lot of these reporters probably sit watching youtube videos at night of fully grown men playing Minecraft etc and getting overly excited about stuff on the game.

ferret50

913 posts

9 months

Sunday 7th April
quotequote all
When I was trundling Vulcans around RAF Waddington 40 years ago the Crew Chief had a lad in the cockpit ready to apply the brakes and a guy on each wingtip to check clearances to avoid just this type of damage!

biggrin

leef44

4,397 posts

153 months

Sunday 7th April
quotequote all
IanH755 said:
  • *EDIT*** The original BBC webpage had a very different headline to the current "just a minor bump" one (two planes "collide" at Heathrow) and Yes, I know the one in the quote is from the Mirror!
Nowadays it's not about "facts", its not about "accuracy", its not even about "the truth" - Its all about being first (no matter what) and getting "clicks" to the webpage.

Now for an "advertiser" based Media site I can at least understand that, as more clicks = more impressions on customers = more money from advertisers, but for the BBC website and BBC "journalists" (in the very loosest of terms), who have absolutely ZERO need to continually drop to a similar almost "gutter level" as the Mirror etc, to do so makes me so sad compared to how well respected it used to be.

Edited by IanH755 on Sunday 7th April 00:33
The truth would be passenger aeroplane wing clipped while parking. However I wonder whether it does matter for the BBC in that when people google then click on link with the most exciting title.

For the BBC, the number of clicks could mean user statistics to prove value for money of licence fee

48k

Original Poster:

13,093 posts

148 months

Sunday 7th April
quotequote all
leef44 said:
The truth would be passenger aeroplane wing clipped while parking.
No, the aircraft had already parked. The truth would be it was being pushed back from the terminal by a tug to be towed to a remote stand.

At least the BBC have edited their story now and moderated the sensationalism and innaccuracies slightly.

JW911

895 posts

195 months

Friday 12th April
quotequote all
“Collision on the runway” is what happened in Tokyo a few months ago. A tad more dramatic I would suggest.

tim0409

4,427 posts

159 months

Saturday 13th April
quotequote all
captain_cynic said:
48k said:
FFS when will the BBC get proper aviation reporters who understand that the apron is not a runway.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68749...
The Beeb's reporting is woeful, but they still are the best of a bad lot (as evidenced by the Mirror's headline.

tim0409 said:
BBC article states…

“There were no injuries and no delays in the incident, which involved a British Airways plane with 121 passengers on board and a Virgin Atlantic plane.”

then a bit later…

“The passengers on the British Airways flight were scheduled to depart to Accra, Ghana, at 12:40 BST.
British Airways said it provided an alternative aircraft for them, which was rescheduled to take off at 18:00.”

scratchchin
Pretty obvious they meant no delays to other flights.
Not obvious at all; if that’s what they meant then they should have said “no delays as a result of the incident”.

captain_cynic

12,021 posts

95 months

Saturday 13th April
quotequote all
tim0409 said:
captain_cynic said:
48k said:
FFS when will the BBC get proper aviation reporters who understand that the apron is not a runway.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68749...
The Beeb's reporting is woeful, but they still are the best of a bad lot (as evidenced by the Mirror's headline.

tim0409 said:
BBC article states…

“There were no injuries and no delays in the incident, which involved a British Airways plane with 121 passengers on board and a Virgin Atlantic plane.”

then a bit later…

“The passengers on the British Airways flight were scheduled to depart to Accra, Ghana, at 12:40 BST.
British Airways said it provided an alternative aircraft for them, which was rescheduled to take off at 18:00.”

scratchchin
Pretty obvious they meant no delays to other flights.
Not obvious at all; if that’s what they meant then they should have said “no delays as a result of the incident”.
If you had trouble making that inference then that is your problem.

It was pretty obvious what they meant.