Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 1)

Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 1)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Burnedout

478 posts

191 months

Thursday 6th November 2008
quotequote all

Some more of the F8:














filski666

3,841 posts

193 months

Thursday 6th November 2008
quotequote all
Yertis said:
On a tangent - pics like these sucked me into aviation, airbrushing, and eventually my career... Roy Cross is one of my heros.

so where the bloody hell were YOU when I was asking for pictures of a Tsetse Mosquito (which I believe this is ^^^^^^^)

(I am sure EricMc will correct me in a minute)


Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Thursday 6th November 2008
quotequote all
The Airfix 1/72 kit (as shown in the picture) contains parts and markings to make a MkII, a MkVI and a MkXVIII. I can't remember offhand if the MkXVIII was the version referred to as the Tetse but it was fitted with a 57mm Molins gun for anti-shipping duties (as depicted in the art work).

Airfix also do a version of the above kit with an alternative radar nose to make the NFXIX or the export Swedish J.30 (which also had four bladed props).

The Airfix 1/72 Mosquito kit came out around 1975 and has now been superseded in quality by later models by Hasegawa and Tamiya. However, it is relatively inexpensive and easily available and does build up into a pretty nice model.
I have both of the Airfix boxings in my pile of unbuilt models.

Edited by Eric Mc on Thursday 6th November 16:28

Blib

44,188 posts

198 months

Thursday 6th November 2008
quotequote all

The Wiz

5,875 posts

263 months

Thursday 6th November 2008
quotequote all
I've always loved this ...







Not very cool pics I know but an ice cool aircraft.

The Wiz

5,875 posts

263 months

Thursday 6th November 2008
quotequote all





Apache

39,731 posts

285 months

Thursday 6th November 2008
quotequote all
Burnedout said:
Some more of the F8:

Interesting to think these old birds are still using their original engines

Blib

44,188 posts

198 months

Thursday 6th November 2008
quotequote all
The Wiz said:
Posted three 'photos'.
Shirley, the last two are 'in game' shots?

confused

filski666

3,841 posts

193 months

Thursday 6th November 2008
quotequote all
The Wiz said:
I've always loved this ...







Not very cool pics I know but an ice cool aircraft.
which is very similar to the Sukhoi T-4 ! - bloody americans copy everything!











Edited by filski666 on Thursday 6th November 17:20

xiphias

5,888 posts

228 months

Thursday 6th November 2008
quotequote all
The Wiz said:


Flight simulator I'm afraid.

Burnedout

478 posts

191 months

Thursday 6th November 2008
quotequote all



hman

7,487 posts

195 months

Thursday 6th November 2008
quotequote all

mko9

2,375 posts

213 months

Thursday 6th November 2008
quotequote all
ninja-lewis said:
bobthemonkey said:
Bushmaster said:


A Tornado? In Israel? How bizarre.
Are you sure its Israel. The more logical explanation is that it was taken on an exercise; something like Reg Flag at Nellis.
Correct. The picture is a still from the IMAX film "Fighter Pilot: Operation Red Flag". It was at Nellis and the aircraft in the background is almost certainly German.
That is in fact the flightline at Nellis AFB. It could very well be a German Tornado, as they are permanently based at Holloman AFB. But Being a FLAG exercise, it could really be a Tornado from almost anywhere.

The Wiz

5,875 posts

263 months

Friday 7th November 2008
quotequote all
filski666 said:
The Wiz said:
I've always loved this ...







Not very cool pics I know but an ice cool aircraft.
which is very similar to the Sukhoi T-4 ! - bloody americans copy everything!











Edited by filski666 on Thursday 6th November 17:20
Other way round I think ... the XB70 was Designed in the late 1950s, the Valkyrie was a large six-engined aircraft able to fly at Mach 3 at an altitude of 70,000 feet (21,000 m), which would have allowed it to avoid interceptors, the only effective anti-bomber weapon at the time.

Two XB-70 prototypes were built for U.S. Air Force. However, the aircraft program's high development costs, along with changes in the technological environment with the introduction of the effective anti-aircraft missiles led to the cancellation of the B-70 program in 1961. Although the proposed fleet of operational B-70 bombers was never built, the XB-70A aircraft were used in supersonic test flights from 1964 to 1969, performing research for the design of large supersonic aircraft. One prototype crashed following a midair collision in 1966. The other is on display at the National Museum of the United States Air Force in Dayton, Ohio.

As for the T4 well despite design similarities the Sukhoi T-4 was not intended as a Soviet equivalent of the North American XB-70 Valkyrie supersonic bomber, but was rather intended to take advantage of many of the XB-70's aeronautic innovations to develop a smaller reconnaissance and interceptor aircraft capable of reaching Mach 3. In this respect the T-4 is more closely a Soviet attempt to develop an aircraft comparable to the proposed North American XF-108 Rapier.

The T-4 was made largely from titanium and stainless steel, and featured a fly-by-wire control system but also employed a mechanical system as a backup. The aircraft's nose lowered to provide visibility during takeoff and landing. A periscope was used for forward viewing when the nose was retracted, and could be employed at speeds of up to 373 mph (600 km/h). Braking parachutes were used in addition to conventional wheel brakes.[1]

The first T-4, designated "101," first flew on August 22, 1972.



filski666

3,841 posts

193 months

Friday 7th November 2008
quotequote all
The Wiz said:
filski666 said:
The Wiz said:
I've always loved this ...







Not very cool pics I know but an ice cool aircraft.
which is very similar to the Sukhoi T-4 ! - bloody americans copy everything!











Edited by filski666 on Thursday 6th November 17:20
Other way round I think ... the XB70 was Designed in the late 1950s, the Valkyrie was a large six-engined aircraft able to fly at Mach 3 at an altitude of 70,000 feet (21,000 m), which would have allowed it to avoid interceptors, the only effective anti-bomber weapon at the time.

Two XB-70 prototypes were built for U.S. Air Force. However, the aircraft program's high development costs, along with changes in the technological environment with the introduction of the effective anti-aircraft missiles led to the cancellation of the B-70 program in 1961. Although the proposed fleet of operational B-70 bombers was never built, the XB-70A aircraft were used in supersonic test flights from 1964 to 1969, performing research for the design of large supersonic aircraft. One prototype crashed following a midair collision in 1966. The other is on display at the National Museum of the United States Air Force in Dayton, Ohio.

As for the T4 well despite design similarities the Sukhoi T-4 was not intended as a Soviet equivalent of the North American XB-70 Valkyrie supersonic bomber, but was rather intended to take advantage of many of the XB-70's aeronautic innovations to develop a smaller reconnaissance and interceptor aircraft capable of reaching Mach 3. In this respect the T-4 is more closely a Soviet attempt to develop an aircraft comparable to the proposed North American XF-108 Rapier.

The T-4 was made largely from titanium and stainless steel, and featured a fly-by-wire control system but also employed a mechanical system as a backup. The aircraft's nose lowered to provide visibility during takeoff and landing. A periscope was used for forward viewing when the nose was retracted, and could be employed at speeds of up to 373 mph (600 km/h). Braking parachutes were used in addition to conventional wheel brakes.[1]

The first T-4, designated "101," first flew on August 22, 1972.
I only said that because it seems whenever I (or anyone else) posts a picture of a Russian plane (tu-144/buran/yak-38 etc) some bright spark quips the usually incorrect and just not funny "Oh the Russians just copied that from the XXX"

Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Friday 7th November 2008
quotequote all
Often because they did - or, if not a direct copy, were spurred to develop the aircarft in response to a project by a potential enemy country.

hugoagogo

23,378 posts

234 months

Friday 7th November 2008
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Often because they did - or, if not a direct copy, were spurred to develop the aircarft in response to a project by a potential enemy country.
that can't be true, weren't we always told they were the potential aggressors? wink

Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Friday 7th November 2008
quotequote all
hugoagogo said:
Eric Mc said:
Often because they did - or, if not a direct copy, were spurred to develop the aircarft in response to a project by a potential enemy country.
that can't be true, weren't we always told they were the potential aggressors? wink
They were - and so were we.

The Wiz

5,875 posts

263 months

Friday 7th November 2008
quotequote all


Edited by The Wiz on Friday 7th November 11:54

The Trig

426 posts

190 months

Friday 7th November 2008
quotequote all


Had this as a poster on my beadroom wall when I was about 13.
Great thread, company productivity has severly lacked today nono
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED