RE: MG Cyberster goes on sale priced from £55k

RE: MG Cyberster goes on sale priced from £55k

Author
Discussion

Griffith4ever

4,295 posts

36 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
clacs2 said:
Griffith4ever said:
It's certainly quite a collection of "looks" - MX5 front end, and then the back is a mix of supra with a bit of a Porsche tail light bar "swoosh" above. Doors are a surprise. I am thinking I'd feel a bit of a nob getting out of scissor doors in a regular-joe car, but then I suppose tesla kicked it off with their gull-wings.

As for the weight question - it's a fair one. Thing is, fat people don't care about cars' dynamic handling much. They just need big cup holders for Maccy D's. You don't see fat racing drivers. If you've owned anything light and fast you'll know that weight really kills the fun no matter how trick the electronic suspension is. You just can't undo inertia. BUT - 99% of people don't drive a car in the manner that the weight matters - they just don't care.

Good luck to them - it looks "OK". It certainly seems to be attacking the E-MX5 buyer.
What an odd post. I'm 6'1" and 16st, which is probably a couple more than I should be due to middle age and Hobnobs.

Despite this, I appreciate and indeed enjoy lightweight performance vehicles in the form of our Civic and TVR, not to mention our motorbikes.
Your not "fat" at 16st, 6ft-1. The point I was making is that big fat people are rarely the same people you see getting out of lightweight sports cars. The point is kind of lost as it was a few pages ago. Someone was asking why we are concerned with car weight when so many people are overweight, IIRC, and I was merely pointing out that obese people are not really who we think of when looking at lightweight cars.

BTW - I can tell the difference in performance in all my cars with and without a passenger - even my more powereful cars - you lose a certain "punch" to the performance (including TVRs, Westies, R8 etc). We weigh a lot! even when "regular" sized.

smilo996

2,799 posts

171 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
fatsams said:
With many manufacturers stopping/suspending electric car manufacturing, why is it electric? I would love to buy one but not electric. Wouldn’t it be great to make it eFuel, it would push the petrol suppliers to make it available at local petrol stations, perhaps encouraging petrol car users to start using it!
? sounds like wishful thinking. Most of the new cars featured are electric. Hanging on to fossils when people want unlimited transport, energy and economic activity is daft.

kambites

67,599 posts

222 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Griffith4ever said:
Your not "fat" at 16st, 6ft-1.
Debatable. We've become so used to seeing fat people that it seems normal, but taking teh WHO's figures, for someone with a vaguely normal amount of musgle (ie not a body builder) the upper limit of healthy body-weight for 6'1 is about 14 stone.

But the difference between 14 stone and 16 stone is bugger all when it comes to the weight of any car heavier than a Caterham! It's about a quarter of a tank of fuel in most petrol cars. You've got to be really, REALLY, fat for your weight to make an appreciable difference to the way a modern mainstream car drives. hehe

Edited by kambites on Friday 26th April 17:25

smilo996

2,799 posts

171 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Quite sharp looking, like the wheels & looks better than the Man-child Musk Cybersportsterplaidjoke.
Chinese & made in China, no thanks.

Silvanus

5,274 posts

24 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
unlikelymechanic said:
A long time ago I landed a Ford Fusion courtesy car while my company Mondeo was in for service, and ever since then I partly base my car buying decisions on what the crappiest courtesy car I could end up with if it had to go in the dealer for work. My logic seems to have served me well since.

MG Cyberster = MG3

Sorry I'm out!
If everyone used that logic, some makers of some very good cars would have gone bust hehe

cerb4.5lee

30,751 posts

181 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
kambites said:
Griffith4ever said:
Your not "fat" at 16st, 6ft-1.
Debatable. We've become so used to seeing fat people that it seems normal, but taking teh WHO's figures, for someone with a vaguely normal amount of musgle (ie not a body builder) the upper limit of healthy body-weight for 6'1 is about 14 stone.

But the difference between 14 stone and 16 stone is bugger all when it comes to the weight of any car heavier than a Caterham! It's about a quarter of a tank of fuel in most petrol cars. You've got to be really, REALLY, fat for your weight to make an appreciable difference to the way a modern mainstream car drives. hehe

Edited by kambites on Friday 26th April 17:25
Up until I started buying reasonably quick cars, I could always feel the difference in weight when you were 4 up. I remember my old E61 520d feeling as gutless as hell when it was fully loaded with us and stuff for example.

I remember driving 4 adults up to Anfield years back in my Sierra XR4x4 to watch Liverpool play, and that felt properly sluggish with us all in it as well.

Watcher of the skies

534 posts

38 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Silvanus said:
unlikelymechanic said:
A long time ago I landed a Ford Fusion courtesy car while my company Mondeo was in for service, and ever since then I partly base my car buying decisions on what the crappiest courtesy car I could end up with if it had to go in the dealer for work. My logic seems to have served me well since.

MG Cyberster = MG3

Sorry I'm out!
If everyone used that logic, some makers of some very good cars would have gone bust hehe
I think I'll cancel that order for the Aston in case they give me a Cygnet when it's in for servicing laugh

Rich Boy Spanner

1,330 posts

131 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
W12AAM said:
Chinese built; Fully Electric, stupid doors....and about £20k too much - No thanks; And that's from an MG fan.
They should have aimed more at an MX5 equivalent, as MG are not a premier brand. They should have made it all petrol...Or hybrid - But NOT fully electric. Those doors, i dont like - Look like something some "oik" would do to his hot-hatch
A nice 2nd hand F-Type or Boxter, for 1/2 the price would be my preferred choice.
The Chinese just don't understand the brand they've bought / "Stolen" from us.
It's not 1960 any more. MG died like the rest of the UK car industry because it made badly engineered crap cars. Now we are being moved to EV's and will buy a lot of them from China. It's what happens.

D4rez

1,401 posts

57 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Rich Boy Spanner said:
W12AAM said:
Chinese built; Fully Electric, stupid doors....and about £20k too much - No thanks; And that's from an MG fan.
They should have aimed more at an MX5 equivalent, as MG are not a premier brand. They should have made it all petrol...Or hybrid - But NOT fully electric. Those doors, i dont like - Look like something some "oik" would do to his hot-hatch
A nice 2nd hand F-Type or Boxter, for 1/2 the price would be my preferred choice.
The Chinese just don't understand the brand they've bought / "Stolen" from us.
It's not 1960 any more. MG died like the rest of the UK car industry because it made badly engineered crap cars. Now we are being moved to EV's and will buy a lot of them from China. It's what happens.
Exactly. They’re not stupid enough to invest in 5 years of dead end technology for a small number of 59 year old gammon

howardhughes

1,013 posts

205 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Gordon Hill said:
Looks like another high quality EV interior. Makes one drool at the mouth and ache to own one.
Drool at the mouth? I beg to differ.

carlo996

5,764 posts

22 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
Up until I started buying reasonably quick cars, I could always feel the difference in weight when you were 4 up. I remember my old E61 520d feeling as gutless as hell when it was fully loaded with us and stuff for example.

I remember driving 4 adults up to Anfield years back in my Sierra XR4x4 to watch Liverpool play, and that felt properly sluggish with us all in it as well.
Even in something quicker you can feel it, anyone who can’t isn’t interested. But, it’s similar to some claiming that you can’t tell of a car isn’t front, or rear wheel drive unless you’re on the limit. They walk amongst us smile

cerb4.5lee

30,751 posts

181 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
carlo996 said:
Even in something quicker you can feel it, anyone who can’t isn’t interested. But, it’s similar to some claiming that you can’t tell of a car isn’t front, or rear wheel drive unless you’re on the limit. They walk amongst us smile
We need to stick together then bud I reckon. beer

Fr0dders

176 posts

225 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
GT9 said:

HIF Global, who aim to become the world's largest producer of e-fuel have an ambitious target to supply 5 million cars worldwide by 2035.
Out of 1.5 billion cars...
Less than 0.5% of cars.
I think it's highly unlikely that an entry level sports car will be at the front of the queue.
Sustainable fuels will really only be of any use to supercar owners. It will enable brands like Pagani, Koenigsegg, Bugatti, to keep going, and maybe some diehard enthusiasts of ICE cars to keep running their old Porsche or whatever and just keep the miles down to afford the £5 / litre the sustainable fuel costs.

You average affordable roadster / coupe / sportscar from BMW, Audi, Toyota, Mercedes etc.. will all be electric. Sustainable fuels will only work for the most niche of use cases.

Edited by Fr0dders on Friday 26th April 19:09

VladD

7,862 posts

266 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Electronicpants said:
With the US about to ban Tick Tock, and MI5 confirming UK Universities are being targeted, and whilst I'm well aware just about everything manufactured comes from China, but when a product is owned and run by the Chinese government it really makes me wonder if ethically, funding, and giving your data to them is a great idea.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68902636
As Jimmy Kimmel pointed out, you can't blame America for wanting to ban Tik Tok when it's already banned in China.

Skeptisk

7,528 posts

110 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
VladD said:
Electronicpants said:
With the US about to ban Tick Tock, and MI5 confirming UK Universities are being targeted, and whilst I'm well aware just about everything manufactured comes from China, but when a product is owned and run by the Chinese government it really makes me wonder if ethically, funding, and giving your data to them is a great idea.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68902636
As Jimmy Kimmel pointed out, you can't blame America for wanting to ban Tik Tok when it's already banned in China.
That doesn’t seem to be true (or at least is unproven). China has its own version which is owned by the same company

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/is-tiktok-banned...

VladD

7,862 posts

266 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Skeptisk said:
VladD said:
Electronicpants said:
With the US about to ban Tick Tock, and MI5 confirming UK Universities are being targeted, and whilst I'm well aware just about everything manufactured comes from China, but when a product is owned and run by the Chinese government it really makes me wonder if ethically, funding, and giving your data to them is a great idea.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68902636
As Jimmy Kimmel pointed out, you can't blame America for wanting to ban Tik Tok when it's already banned in China.
That doesn’t seem to be true (or at least is unproven). China has its own version which is owned by the same company

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/is-tiktok-banned...
OK, so it's not banned, you just can't have it in China because it's not made available. Not sure there's a huge difference there.

Art Keller

779 posts

80 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
I remember when people scoffed at Japanese cars...........

soxboy

6,291 posts

220 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Art Keller said:
I remember when people scoffed at Japanese cars...........
And Czech
And Korean

spikyone

1,473 posts

101 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Silvanus said:
spikyone said:
Frankychops said:
I find it comical that an ‘MG’ is being compared to an upcoming Porsche.

Shows the rise of one brand and the slide of another.

Spec for spec, I’d bet the Porsche costs 75% more and is within 10% of the size and weight.
It shows nothing about their brand image at all. It's purely the fact that at £55k for a convertible "sports car", it's the same price as one of the definitive current sports cars, the Boxster, with which it shares a 2 seater convertible layout. And coincidentally Porsche are about to release a new electric one of those.

I don't think anyone has said they'd take the MG over a Porsche either. Quite the opposite in fact.
At least one person on here has said that, they've ordered the MG in yellow. I'm sure they could have chosen a Boxster if they'd wanted one. The Porsche may be a better sports car, but it might necessarily not be a better purchase option.

I don't think the people buying (leasing) these would consider the Boxster. This is a car that will appeal to company users as an alternative to the usual salary sacrifice cars. The overall cost difference between one of these and a petrol Porsche with a similar list price will be huge.
There's an exception to every rule of course, but very few in this thread are making any sort of positive comparison to Porsche. And of course there's SS for those that can take advantage - but that wasn't the point Franky was making. He was suggesting it says something that we're comparing this to a Porsche. If someone said "your wife's nowhere near as hot as Margot Robbie", no-one would be claiming their wife was being paid a compliment...

Your own money, no salary sacrifice? I don't think anyone on this thread would take the MG over a Boxster, and the comparison really isn't one that reflects well in the MG.

Skeptisk

7,528 posts

110 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
VladD said:
Skeptisk said:
VladD said:
Electronicpants said:
With the US about to ban Tick Tock, and MI5 confirming UK Universities are being targeted, and whilst I'm well aware just about everything manufactured comes from China, but when a product is owned and run by the Chinese government it really makes me wonder if ethically, funding, and giving your data to them is a great idea.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68902636
As Jimmy Kimmel pointed out, you can't blame America for wanting to ban Tik Tok when it's already banned in China.
That doesn’t seem to be true (or at least is unproven). China has its own version which is owned by the same company

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/is-tiktok-banned...
OK, so it's not banned, you just can't have it in China because it's not made available. Not sure there's a huge difference there.
There is a huge difference. Banned means that the owner would have launched it in China but was stopped from doing so. They have made an equivalent platform available in China. Do you know how different it is from Tiktoc?