2024: BTCC chat & discussion
Discussion
Alliance Racing (Motorbase) don't have any official ties with Ford, and neither do Excelr8 with Hyundai. I don't know why those teams are included in the Manufacturers/Constructors championship points.
From what I understand, the main reason for introducing the Hybrid was to try and make it more attractive to manufacturers, but since then there's actually one less with the loss of Team Dynamics as the works Honda entry and no signs of interest from any new manufacturers.
From what I understand, the main reason for introducing the Hybrid was to try and make it more attractive to manufacturers, but since then there's actually one less with the loss of Team Dynamics as the works Honda entry and no signs of interest from any new manufacturers.
Indeed. I fear that series like BTCC is of no interest to manufacturers anymore - they can just use their marketing budget to buy a few extra press cars and lend them to random non-motoring social media 'stars' and get seen by thousands more potential customers than by putting their logo on a car to be briefly seen once a month on ITV4.
At least in GT racing the brands can turn a profit in selling the cars to teams and those cars can claim more of a link to the road car than the BTCC cars with their generic drivetrains.
At least in GT racing the brands can turn a profit in selling the cars to teams and those cars can claim more of a link to the road car than the BTCC cars with their generic drivetrains.
clubracing said:
Alliance Racing (Motorbase) don't have any official ties with Ford, and neither do Excelr8 with Hyundai. I don't know why those teams are included in the Manufacturers/Constructors championship points.
The regs state:a 'Constructor' is defined as the entrant, company or individual
who is the originating designer and builder of their own competing cars. Classification as a
Constructor may not necessarily exclude their eligibility for any or all of the awards or prize
money offered to Independent entrants. The final decision as to which entrants may be eligible to
be classified as a Constructor and/or for any awards or prize money available to Independent
entrants rests solely with the Administrator, whose decision will be final
I remember their being a bit of a furore about one of the teams a few years ago (WSR I think) who insisted they were independents but Gow said "If something walks like a duck, looks like a duck and quacks like a duck..."
Again from memory, there have also been cases of independent teams choosing to run as constructors even though they didn't have to.
Truckosaurus said:
Indeed. I fear that series like BTCC is of no interest to manufacturers anymore - they can just use their marketing budget to buy a few extra press cars and lend them to random non-motoring social media 'stars' and get seen by thousands more potential customers than by putting their logo on a car to be briefly seen once a month on ITV4.
At least in GT racing the brands can turn a profit in selling the cars to teams and those cars can claim more of a link to the road car than the BTCC cars with their generic drivetrains.
I think the only way for BTCC to regain relevance to the majority of manufacturers would be to follow the lead of the SuperUtes Series in Australia, move away from being based on a type of car that's declining in popularity and reform itself as the 'Britsh Crossver Car Championship'. The UK car buying public want crossovers, and that's what most manufacturers are reshaping their model ranges around. At least in GT racing the brands can turn a profit in selling the cars to teams and those cars can claim more of a link to the road car than the BTCC cars with their generic drivetrains.
I don't think it would actually be too awful either, we've seen the WRC versions of the Puma, Countryman, and C3, and they look pretty good in tarmac spec. The current BTCC technical regulations would make a shift to crossovers straightforward as well.
Edited by clubracing on Tuesday 30th January 12:51
ninepoint2 said:
That's a shame :-(He would be in my Top 10 of recent drivers
Cook joins new Speedworks satellite team LKQ Euro Car Parts With Synetiq.
https://www.btcc.net/2024/01/31/cook-joins-new-spe...
https://www.btcc.net/2024/01/31/cook-joins-new-spe...
Sebring440 said:
Milkyway said:
Rumour mill... Bobby Thompson to BMW.
There's no rumour mill regarding that. You've just made it up yourself.If he couldn't afford to run with Team Hardship last year, where's he going to find the £600K + to run with WSR?
Milkyway said:
Sebring440 said:
Milkyway said:
Rumour mill... Bobby Thompson to BMW.
There's no rumour mill regarding that. You've just made it up yourself.If he couldn't afford to run with Team Hardship last year, where's he going to find the £600K + to run with WSR?
clubracing said:
Alliance Racing (Motorbase) don't have any official ties with Ford, and neither do Excelr8 with Hyundai. I don't know why those teams are included in the Manufacturers/Constructors championship points.
Regs states that because the teams design and manufacture the cars themselves, that qualifies them as a manufacturer. Don't confuse manufacturing race cars with car manufacturers (i.e. 1990s era).mickeyc said:
Regs states that because the teams design and manufacture the cars themselves, that qualifies them as a manufacturer. Don't confuse manufacturing race cars with car manufacturers (i.e. 1990s era).
Is is confusing though, don't most teams design and build their own cars?Even TOCA are unclear on this. They refer to "The Manufacturers/Constructors Championship", "manufacturers/importers/constructors", "manufacturer-backed teams", "full manufacturer-backed entries", and then in the "Sporting Regulations & Commercial Undertakings" document, they state:
The Manufacturers/Constructors Championship:
"For the purpose of this regulation, a 'Constructor' is defined as the entrant, company or individual who is the originating designer and builder of their own competing cars. Classification as a Constructor may not necessarily exclude their eligibility for any or all of the awards or prize money offered to Independent entrants. The final decision as to which entrants may be eligible to be classified as a Constructor and/or for any awards or prize money available to Independent entrants rests solely with the Administrator, whose decision will be final."
clubracing said:
I think the only way for BTCC to regain relevance to the majority of manufacturers would be to follow the lead of the SuperUtes Series in Australia, move away from being based on a type of car that's declining in popularity and reform itself as the 'Britsh Crossver Car Championship'. The UK car buying public want crossovers, and that's what most manufacturers are reshaping their model ranges around.
I don't think it would actually be too awful either, we've seen the WRC versions of the Puma, Countryman, and C3, and they look pretty good in tarmac spec. The current BTCC technical regulations would make a shift to crossovers straightforward as well.
Yes exactly - half the appeal of motor racing is you can go out and buy one of the cars and pretend you're a racing driver. BTCC used to be about saloons, then it became hatches as they are more popular. No reason why it cant shift to crossovers. The racing has to resonate with the spectators. When we were kids my dad drove a volvo so we supported RIckard. My mate's dad had an Cavalier so he supported Cleland. I chose my Primera cos Lesley said it was quite good... It's supposed to be "everyman's racing" while F1 is the technofest. Win on SUnday, sell on Monday and all that.I don't think it would actually be too awful either, we've seen the WRC versions of the Puma, Countryman, and C3, and they look pretty good in tarmac spec. The current BTCC technical regulations would make a shift to crossovers straightforward as well.
Edited by clubracing on Tuesday 30th January 12:51
I read a comment from a youngster the other day regarding the supertourer era. He actually thought all they did to those cars was put a roll cage and seat in them and race.
Goes to show what people will believe if the car looks as close to the showroom model as possible.
Not convinced that crossovers is the way to go just because that's what people buy. If that was the case the pickup series in the USA and Aus would be more popular than the car equivalents surely?
Goes to show what people will believe if the car looks as close to the showroom model as possible.
Not convinced that crossovers is the way to go just because that's what people buy. If that was the case the pickup series in the USA and Aus would be more popular than the car equivalents surely?
Edited by GlobalRacer on Friday 2nd February 17:03
Dynion Araf Uchaf said:
One race engineer for the team. A three mechanics per car. like I said. Clearly if you bend it the. Maybe all the mechanics jump on one car to fix it. However the more options you have to fine tune the car the more money it’ll cost. So less mechanics less cost.
It works fine in club racing. And with all due respect whilst the top 6 or so drivers are absolute aces significant numbers of the rest are no better than a good clubman. And as most are paying to be there it’s only slightly more professional than a top tier club championship
I worked on a project with a guy who at weekends was a race engineer for a known BTCC driver(mentioned in this thread) in known team that was running BTCC and Carrera Cup. He worked for the team at weekends for nothing, I can't imagine any of the mechanics below him were paid either.It works fine in club racing. And with all due respect whilst the top 6 or so drivers are absolute aces significant numbers of the rest are no better than a good clubman. And as most are paying to be there it’s only slightly more professional than a top tier club championship
Edited by Dynion Araf Uchaf on Sunday 28th January 20:15
Gassing Station | General Motorsport | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff