How many races until Schumacher has/does one of his "stunts"

How many races until Schumacher has/does one of his "stunts"

Poll: How many races until Schumacher has/does one of his "stunts"

Total Members Polled: 174

Bahrain 1st GP: 13%
Austrialia 2nd GP: 6%
Malaysia 3rd GP: 6%
China 4th GP: 2%
Spanish 5th GP: 6%
Monaco 6th GP: 16%
Turkish 7th GP: 3%
Canadian 8th GP: 18%
Euro 9th GP: 6%
He'll be a good boy this time. Honest.: 24%
Author
Discussion

35secToNuvolari

1,016 posts

204 months

Monday 21st June 2010
quotequote all
Yeah, I think Schumacher's probably all alone when it comes to Rascasse.

mattikake

5,058 posts

200 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2010
quotequote all
35secToNuvolari said:
hornetrider said:
My thoughts can be summed up as follows.

JV would probably not have made the apex, but he doesn't have to. He has track position.
But, he didn't have track position at turn in. Again, from my perspective, he committed so early and went in so fast, passing Schumacher at some point was inevitable. Schumacher was ready to turn into the apex, largely done with his braking, but JV was still in the middle of his braking zone, unable to slow further and unable to turn into the corner.

Edited by 35secToNuvolari on Monday 21st June 21:49
I can see what you're trying to say. That the lunge was borderline wreckless by JV or at least was going to fail.

JV did make the corner though. He ran wide, but not off. So either the lunge wasn't that late or Schumi hit him so hard and in such a deliberate fasshion that he scrubbed off loads of JV's momentum.

It doesn't matter though. As stated, it's effectively JV's 'perogative' to out-brake himself if he chooses to do so by mistake...

And that still doesn't explain why Schumi decided to make deliberate 2nd input to the steering lock he already had once JV was fully alongside, other than an attempt to hit JV on purpose. If Schumi was really that aware, he'd have given JV room and done a Switch-back on the exit.

Yet of course, if he did a Switch-back there, JV would've only come back at him in the next few laps. So better to try and take JV out while he has the chance?

Maybe to even try and make it look like JV's fault?

Or a 50/50 like er... Australia '94. If it worked once before...

Maybe Schumi wanted to just give him a friendly "I'm here" bump as per touring cars, but why would he do that if JV was going to run wide/off?

It all smacks of bad losership. An autonomic response coming from deep within the persona. Whatever way you want to try and second-guess Schumi's mindset, I can't see anything other than attempted cheating.

Maybe Schumi privately thought he "didn't mean to" like that perpetually troublesome 6 year-old's immediate defense when he threw that stone at the other kids head to scare him, but caught him square between the eyes... for the upteenth time. No-one will believe it was accidental. But either way, the 6yo deserves punishment.

Anyway, with Schumi admitting this was the biggest mistake of his career - admitting guilt and at getting caught - surely any other speculation is pointless rhetoric?

mchammer89

3,127 posts

214 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2010
quotequote all
Mojocvh said:
35secToNuvolari said:
Is this similar? Dissimilar?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8-QhXnuLgk
Apart from neither being the cheating kobbler, no. Sometime even you cannot defend the indefensible....

... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcRUM2w2CVY

How many YOU TUBE videos does it take?

And see the underling... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxBbKL_YrP0&fea...

..........coming along NICELY........
Well at least you're not coming across as being biased...

Also, because Vettel misjudged a move and collided with someone he's the new Schumacher? Or did Vettel purposely crash into Webber to win the championship? I'm confused as to where the similarity is.

And what has Monaco got to do with Jerez?

All in all, a pretty useless post imo.

35secToNuvolari

1,016 posts

204 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2010
quotequote all
mattikake said:
... it's effectively JV's 'perogative' to out-brake himself if he chooses to do so by mistake...
I'm not sure I agree that one can always choose to out-brake themselves. I think one would have to judge it on a case by case basis.
mattikake said:
And that still doesn't explain why Schumi decided to make deliberate 2nd input to the steering lock he already had once JV was fully alongside, other than an attempt to hit JV on purpose. If Schumi was really that aware, he'd have given JV room and done a Switch-back on the exit.
MS had turn in oversteer. IIR, he was having trouble with his tires at this point in the race. On entry he opened up the wheel to keep the rear end in line, and then he put the lock back on. That's pretty standard stuff. In this video starting at :50 (from JV's point of view) there is a sequence, and then at :58 we see that MS has some turn over-steer just a couple of corners before the incident. It shows he's got a problem with the rear tires.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3E5Pxmvz0r8&fea...

In the next video one can see what Schumacher looks like when correcting oversteer (power-oversteer in this case, right after the transition from brake to throttle.) The video is from earlier in the race. Start at :30

http://www.garagetv.be/video-galerij/flitspaal/mic...

He does a quick opening of the steering wheel to straight ahead, then puts the lock back on, just like during the incident. In the same video (starting at 1:00, going to 1:10) one can see what Schumacher normally looks like entering the corner where the collision was. One can see approximately where he touches the the curb, how he uses about 90 degrees of steering lock, and that he puts his whole car over the curb. This is instructive because it shows how much curb JV could've used if he was able to turn into the corner.

In the first video, looking at the incident, starting at 1:09, one can see that Schumacher is taking a normal line. At 1:11 we can see how JV can't turn in to get on the curb. JV has room on the inside if he could use it. He's just going too fast. MS was putting everything but his outside tires on it. I don't even think one could say that JV was under-steering across MS's nose. I think he's still braking!

I don't think a switch back was possible because of the speed that JV came in, the width of the track, and the type of corner.

MS was tough. But I don't think he's got to take responsibility for JV coming in from so far back and so hot. How would he know that JV couldn't take the curb?

Edited by 35secToNuvolari on Tuesday 22 June 08:01

Derek Smith

45,736 posts

249 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2010
quotequote all
35secToNuvolari said:
On entry he opened up the wheel to keep the rear end in line, and then he put the lock back on.
There's a big difference in reinterpreting and ignoring evidence.

The lock that MSc put on in order to drive into JV was not, by any stretch of the imagination, corrective. It was much too hard. His wheels were getting towards full lock. You can suggest that JV was in error if, and it is a big if, he would have outbraked himself, but MSc was heading for the grass. There was no way that degree of lock was to correct anything. It was not lock 'put . . . back on'. It was much more than the original.

The incar footage shows it well, as does the head shot.

If he had pulled that amount of lock with JV not being there his rear tyres would have stepped out to the left and he would have spun. He was braking after all.

I'd actually fogotten he pleaded to it. Much too late of course to get any credibility. And he described it as a 'mistake'. From memory he didn't apologise.

You say there is no way we can agree but all I ask is for a reasonable explanation of the facts for me to consider a different interpretation. I've changed my mind over incidents that, at the time, emotion made obvious. However, wishful thinking is not really enough.

Another point, and an important one, is his previous and subsequent behaviour on track. Not being able to consider previous convictions is for courts which are not looking for justice. Here it is entirely reasonable.

We are, I think, asking if the duck made that quacking noise. You've got to say it is the prime suspect.

There might be an argument to say that JV put himself in that position hoping or expecting MS to do something stupid. I'd consider that with some logic behind it. But from what I read, that's not what you are saying. You seem to be suggesting that MSc was an innocent party just driving around as fast as he could go, paying attention to all the hazards and caught out in the end by what was, in essence, a missile.

It just doesn't add up.

The argument that JV was in some way culpable as well is arguable but that doesn't take away from the fact that MSc steered into him. And that is the critical point.

35secToNuvolari

1,016 posts

204 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2010
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
35secToNuvolari said:
On entry he opened up the wheel to keep the rear end in line, and then he put the lock back on.
There's a big difference in reinterpreting and ignoring evidence.

The lock that MSc put on in order to drive into JV was not, by any stretch of the imagination, corrective. It was much too hard. His wheels were getting towards full lock. You can suggest that JV was in error if, and it is a big if, he would have outbraked himself, but MSc was heading for the grass. There was no way that degree of lock was to correct anything. It was not lock 'put . . . back on'. It was much more than the original.

The incar footage shows it well, as does the head shot.

If he had pulled that amount of lock with JV not being there his rear tyres would have stepped out to the left and he would have spun. He was braking after all.
First, I'm not sure what videos you're watching. Second, you cite only one piece my explanation, and even there I think you may be misunderstanding what I'm saying. The rest of your response is rhetorical, rejecting every thing else out of hand. All that says to me is you disagree. It doesn't move things forward. I'd rather hear specific refutations of my points. I like detail.

As far as your assertion that MS put on so much lock he was going to spin, or that he was headed for the grass, I'd have to disagree. I don't think that explanation correlates with anything on tape. I think you should look at the 'overhead' shot in the first clip I posted above, which starts at 1:00. I also suggest you look at MS's normal line into that corner, which is in the second clip I posted, also starting at 1:00. MS covers the entire curb, for the length of the curb, and uses about 90 degrees of lock; the same lock shown in the collision. Nothing abnormal

My take. MS turns in gently, then puts on some more lock, finds the rear stepping out, straightens the wheel to stop the slide, puts the lock back on to make the corner, meanwhile JV is on a perpendicular path away from the corner. Remember, the normal line is on-top of that curb.

Edited by 35secToNuvolari on Tuesday 22 June 09:01

german tony

2,000 posts

209 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2010
quotequote all
Alright then - Scheuy's full lock antics were the actions of a man who had lost control of his car at that point. Losing control of your car & then crashing it = up before the beak in my book.

So either he deliberatly tried removing his main Championship rival or was out of control at that point, either way the beak will have him. & did so.

It's no good either saying that Villeneuve had lost control of his car at that point - 2 wrongs don't = a right.

Whether the beak was influenced by Scheuy's antics with Hill in that other WDC deciding moment we cannot tell but at the point of the Villeneuve incident Schuey had given himself something of a reputation hadn't he?

35secToNuvolari

1,016 posts

204 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2010
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
You seem to be suggesting that MSc was an innocent party just driving around as fast as he could go, paying attention to all the hazards and caught out in the end by what was, in essence, a missile.
I should address this also.

In another post I said I thought Michael didn't mind making contact. I was also trying to express the same sentiment when I said in my previous post that "Michael was tough"--I can see how I didn't make myself clear. Michael was unyielding and looking to tussle with JV.

I think it's commonly thought, or at least it was my original conclusion, that JV's move was a typical out-braking pass where he could get into the corner, dicate the apex speed and be on his way, and that MS banged against him in an attempt to stop this run of the mill, faster car gets by slower car, pass. I also think that people misconstrue MS's hand movements as trying to get a good swing going with the car (I thought this too, originally). I think he straightened the wheel because he had over-steer, and the resulting 90 lock isn't so out of the ordinary when compared to his previous lap. I also don't think he was trying to drive JV off track. I think Michael refused to leave the racing line, and I think he was putting himself in a position to cause contact. But I also think part of the problem was that JV made a mistake and couldn't get his car turned into the corner.

Edited by 35secToNuvolari on Tuesday 22 June 10:56

mattikake

5,058 posts

200 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2010
quotequote all
35secToNuvolari said:
mattikake said:
... it's effectively JV's 'perogative' to out-brake himself if he chooses to do so by mistake...
I'm not sure I agree that one can always choose to out-brake themselves. I think one would have to judge it on a case by case basis.
It's not a matter if you agree or not, that is the ethics of motor-racing, the world over, since ever.


35secToNuvolari said:
MS had turn in oversteer. IIR, he was having trouble with his tires at this point in the race. On entry he opened up the wheel to keep the rear end in line, and then he put the lock back on. That's pretty standard stuff. In this video starting at :50 (from JV's point of view) there is a sequence, and then at :58 we see that MS has some turn over-steer just a couple of corners before the incident. It shows he's got a problem with the rear tires.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3E5Pxmvz0r8&fea...
Actually it looks like Schumi wasn't have any issues at all. A bit of oversteer is his driving style.

The slow-mo replay at the end of that vid looks even more damning.

He does get a small amount of oversteer on turn-in but he has that controlled as the car straigtens for the regular line into the corner, and then JV is fully alongside. After that there is clearly a very deliberate move into JV. He can see JV is there, he turns in, the car goes toward JV, but he STILL keeps the steering lock on, and bang. The time he took to correct the overtsteer on the way in, is about 3 times the time he had to correct the steering lock when aimed at JV. Deliberate. Also the line he was aiming for, if not to hit JV, was to ride well over the inside kerb. No chance.

I'm also certain JV was going to make the corner on his own too, without some help from Schumi. He was going to do a hang-out - hang Schumi out to dry.

100% cheat. I couldn't be more convinced. Neither was anyone else judging the matter...

35secToNuvolari

1,016 posts

204 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2010
quotequote all
mattikake said:
35secToNuvolari said:
mattikake said:
... it's effectively JV's 'perogative' to out-brake himself if he chooses to do so by mistake...

35secToNuvolari said:
MS had turn in over-steer. IIR, he was having trouble with his tires at this point in the race. On entry he opened up the wheel to keep the rear end in line, and then he put the lock back on. That's pretty standard stuff. In this video starting at :50 (from JV's point of view) there is a sequence, and then at :58 we see that MS has some turn over-steer just a couple of corners before the incident. It shows he's got a problem with the rear tires.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3E5Pxmvz0r8&fea...
Actually it looks like Schumi wasn't have any issues at all. A bit of oversteer is his driving style.

The slow-mo replay at the end of that vid looks even more damning.

He does get a small amount of oversteer on turn-in but he has that controlled as the car straigtens for the regular line into the corner, and then JV is fully alongside. After that there is clearly a very deliberate move into JV. He can see JV is there, he turns in, the car goes toward JV, but he STILL keeps the steering lock on, and bang. The time he took to correct the overtsteer on the way in, is about 3 times the time he had to correct the steering lock when aimed at JV. Deliberate. Also the line he was aiming for, if not to hit JV, was to ride well over the inside kerb. No chance.

I'm also certain JV was going to make the corner on his own too, without some help from Schumi. He was going to do a hang-out - hang Schumi out to dry.

100% cheat. I couldn't be more convinced. Neither was anyone else judging the matter...
I'm not sure I agree that one can always choose to out-brake themselves. I think one would have to judge it on a case by case basis.
It's not a matter if you agree or not, that is the ethics of motor-racing, the world over, since ever.
Regarding outbraking--I think it depends how far back the driver making the pass starts his move.

Regarding the amount of time MS had to correct over-steer--the over-steer I see is only a split second at about 2:18.

As far as MS heading for the kerb, that was my point. The kerb is the racing line. It shows that JV was on an abnormal path and MS was headed for the normal one.

So lets look at the slow-motion video. And just as others try to maximize Schumi's malice by (rightfully) citing his reputation for controversial maneuvers and infusing his actions with cynicism, I'll try to find every sort of reasonable minimizing factor.

In the video above, MS starts turning in at 2:13-2:14 and JV is still behind him. At 2:16-17, even deeper in the corner, MS is still ahead. 2:17-2:18, MS adds lock to turn in, has over-steer, corrects, and JV gets a bit ahead. At this point I don't think MS knows that JV doesn't have the capacity to turn in. At 2:19, I think this is where people would like to see MS leave the door open and run parallel to JV. If we fast forward to 2:24-25-26, we can see where MS would've ended up if he tried to run parallel to JV on the outside: on the grass at least, maybe in the sand. Back to 2:19, MS tries tries to close the door, and at 2:20 hits JV. We've seen this before and since; a driver makes the mistake of trying to close the door on an under-steering car.

And I don't know if this is an accurate article, but it's the earliest (2000) one I found that identifies Schumacher's 'biggest regret' to date.

mattikake

5,058 posts

200 months

Wednesday 23rd June 2010
quotequote all
35secToNuvolari said:
mattikake said:
35secToNuvolari said:
mattikake said:
... it's effectively JV's 'perogative' to out-brake himself if he chooses to do so by mistake...

35secToNuvolari said:
MS had turn in over-steer. IIR, he was having trouble with his tires at this point in the race. On entry he opened up the wheel to keep the rear end in line, and then he put the lock back on. That's pretty standard stuff. In this video starting at :50 (from JV's point of view) there is a sequence, and then at :58 we see that MS has some turn over-steer just a couple of corners before the incident. It shows he's got a problem with the rear tires.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3E5Pxmvz0r8&fea...
Actually it looks like Schumi wasn't have any issues at all. A bit of oversteer is his driving style.

The slow-mo replay at the end of that vid looks even more damning.

He does get a small amount of oversteer on turn-in but he has that controlled as the car straigtens for the regular line into the corner, and then JV is fully alongside. After that there is clearly a very deliberate move into JV. He can see JV is there, he turns in, the car goes toward JV, but he STILL keeps the steering lock on, and bang. The time he took to correct the overtsteer on the way in, is about 3 times the time he had to correct the steering lock when aimed at JV. Deliberate. Also the line he was aiming for, if not to hit JV, was to ride well over the inside kerb. No chance.

I'm also certain JV was going to make the corner on his own too, without some help from Schumi. He was going to do a hang-out - hang Schumi out to dry.

100% cheat. I couldn't be more convinced. Neither was anyone else judging the matter...
I'm not sure I agree that one can always choose to out-brake themselves. I think one would have to judge it on a case by case basis.
It's not a matter if you agree or not, that is the ethics of motor-racing, the world over, since ever.
Regarding outbraking--I think it depends how far back the driver making the pass starts his move.
Still doesn't matter. If too far back the move probably gets blocked or they don't get enough of the car on the inside and the move fails. Too near to the corner and they out-brake themselves. Exactly when the overtaker decides to make this move does not EVER give the overtakee the right to ram them as they come alongside.

35secToNuvolari said:
As far as MS heading for the kerb, that was my point. The kerb is the racing line. It shows that JV was on an abnormal path and MS was headed for the normal one.
I said "well over" as in putting the belly of the car on the kerb and inside wheels fully on the grass. The trajectory of this is clear from any replay angle. I.e. it's not a move for the racing line, but a move to do something else...

35secToNuvolari said:
In the video above, MS starts turning in at 2:13-2:14 and JV is still behind him. At 2:16-17, even deeper in the corner, MS is still ahead. 2:17-2:18, MS adds lock to turn in, has over-steer, corrects, and JV gets a bit ahead. At this point I don't think MS knows that JV doesn't have the capacity to turn in.
JV doesn't have to turn-in. He's already arrived.

35secToNuvolari said:
At 2:19, I think this is where people would like to see MS leave the door open and run parallel to JV. If we fast forward to 2:24-25-26, we can see where MS would've ended up if he tried to run parallel to JV on the outside: on the grass at least, maybe in the sand.
...and is why this is called a hang-out manoeuvre - hanging them out to dry. Schumi's only option is to back-off and give-up the inside of the corner. This is the right of the overtaker for gaining superior track position.

35secToNuvolari said:
Back to 2:19, MS tries tries to close the door, and at 2:20 hits JV.
How can you close a door on someone who is already there? That's trapping them in it. You said that JV is already alongside. Jv is so alongside Schumi can see his car without even using his mirrors. This is what makes it a ramming incident.

35secToNuvolari said:
We've seen this before and since; a driver makes the mistake of trying to close the door on an under-steering car.
Schumi knows how to avoid someone out-braking themselves or someone trying a hang-out, you let them go and/or Switch-back up the inside. The Proof that he knows this is when he did exactly that to Hamilton in China.

He rammed JV when he should've let him go. It's as obivous as it looks.

35secToNuvolari

1,016 posts

204 months

Wednesday 23rd June 2010
quotequote all
mattikake said:
35secToNuvolari said:
As far as MS heading for the kerb, that was my point. The kerb is the racing line. It shows that JV was on an abnormal path and MS was headed for the normal one.
I said "well over" as in putting the belly of the car on the kerb and inside wheels fully on the grass. The trajectory of this is clear from any replay angle. I.e. it's not a move for the racing line, but a move to do something else...
I think this is where we reach an impasse. You say his abnormal trajectory is clear. But all I can do is point to the video I linked to above that shows MS on a normal lap. It shows how he smothers/puts the belly of the car on the curb. Unless you can point to a reference point in the video, or something specific that refutes a detail I gave, I think we'll just have to disagree.

mattikake said:
35secToNuvolari said:
At 2:19, I think this is where people would like to see MS leave the door open and run parallel to JV. If we fast forward to 2:24-25-26, we can see where MS would've ended up if he tried to run parallel to JV on the outside: on the grass at least, maybe in the sand.
...and is why this is called a hang-out manoeuvre - hanging them out to dry. Schumi's only option is to back-off and give-up the inside of the corner. This is the right of the overtaker for gaining superior track position.
I think calling it the 'hang-out' manoeuvre flatter's JV, as it implies he was exercising a lot of control. There's another term that I think is more fitting and also addresses JV's lack of control on entry; it's called the 'dive-bomb'. And I don't think that it's considered to be a respectable tactic.

mattikake said:
35secToNuvolari said:
Back to 2:19, MS tries tries to close the door, and at 2:20 hits JV.
How can you close a door on someone who is already there? That's trapping them in it. You said that JV is already alongside. Jv is so alongside Schumi can see his car without even using his mirrors. This is what makes it a ramming incident.
He tries to. I also said his move was mistaken.

A ramming incident makes it seem that all of the force of the collision came from MS. Part of the force may have come from MS pointing his car towards JV, but most of the force comes from JV's 'under-steering' car. Hence MS's nose getting swiped towards the outside of the corner. I think what MS did was to encourage contact by putting his car in JV's path.

Edit: I wrote the above without having the video up to reference. I left the text there for all to enjoy. MS was the only car moving left-to-right. When one watches the full speed shot from overhead, it looks like Villeneuve, on his tangential path, catches Schumacher's nose. The slow-mo doesn't capture that. It also makes it look like MS had more time to deliberate. I think it's important to go back and forth between the two speeds. Watch from the overhead angle at 1:09.

I also think I understand what you and others mean when you say Schumi was "headed for the grass". I think one's drawing that conclusion from the onboard, right? The camera on the onboard distorts the distances. The overhead shot will show how MS wasn't headed for the grass on the inside of the curb.

mattikake said:
35secToNuvolari said:
We've seen this before and since; a driver makes the mistake of trying to close the door on an under-steering car.
Schumi knows how to avoid someone out-braking themselves or someone trying a hang-out, you let them go and/or Switch-back up the inside. The Proof that he knows this is when he did exactly that to Hamilton in China.

He rammed JV when he should've let him go. It's as obivous as it looks.
Mitigating factors that limited MS's options: JV started late, went in too fast, and lacked control. Again, we may be at an impasse.

Cheers

Edited by 35secToNuvolari on Wednesday 23 June 08:27

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

263 months

Wednesday 23rd June 2010
quotequote all
mchammer89 said:
Mojocvh said:
35secToNuvolari said:
Is this similar? Dissimilar?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8-QhXnuLgk
Apart from neither being the cheating kobbler, no. Sometime even you cannot defend the indefensible....

... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcRUM2w2CVY

How many YOU TUBE videos does it take?

And see the underling... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxBbKL_YrP0&fea...

..........coming along NICELY........
Well at least you're not coming across as being biased...

Also, because Vettel misjudged a move and collided with someone he's the new Schumacher? Or did Vettel purposely crash into Webber to win the championship? I'm confused as to where the similarity is.

And what has Monaco got to do with Jerez?

All in all, a pretty useless post imo.
You are absolutely entitled to your flawed opinion hehe


CiderwithCerbie

1,420 posts

268 months

Wednesday 23rd June 2010
quotequote all
God will sort this out tonight when Germany get ejected from the WC by Ghana and England begin their glorious journey to Final victory, after which we all be able to sing "Two World Wars and TWO World Cups..." etc etc


Mr. Schumacher is a filthy ch**ting Kr**t and we all know it. redcard




I' ll get my coat getmecoat

Edited by CiderwithCerbie on Wednesday 23 June 08:27

mattikake

5,058 posts

200 months

Wednesday 23rd June 2010
quotequote all
35secToNuvolari said:
mattikake said:
35secToNuvolari said:
As far as MS heading for the kerb, that was my point. The kerb is the racing line. It shows that JV was on an abnormal path and MS was headed for the normal one.
I said "well over" as in putting the belly of the car on the kerb and inside wheels fully on the grass. The trajectory of this is clear from any replay angle. I.e. it's not a move for the racing line, but a move to do something else...
I think this is where we reach an impasse. You say his abnormal trajectory is clear. But all I can do is point to the video I linked to above that shows MS on a normal lap. It shows how he smothers/puts the belly of the car on the curb. Unless you can point to a reference point in the video, or something specific that refutes a detail I gave, I think we'll just have to disagree.

mattikake said:
35secToNuvolari said:
At 2:19, I think this is where people would like to see MS leave the door open and run parallel to JV. If we fast forward to 2:24-25-26, we can see where MS would've ended up if he tried to run parallel to JV on the outside: on the grass at least, maybe in the sand.
...and is why this is called a hang-out manoeuvre - hanging them out to dry. Schumi's only option is to back-off and give-up the inside of the corner. This is the right of the overtaker for gaining superior track position.
I think calling it the 'hang-out' manoeuvre flatter's JV, as it implies he was exercising a lot of control. There's another term that I think is more fitting and also addresses JV's lack of control on entry; it's called the 'dive-bomb'. And I don't think that it's considered to be a respectable tactic.

mattikake said:
35secToNuvolari said:
Back to 2:19, MS tries tries to close the door, and at 2:20 hits JV.
How can you close a door on someone who is already there? That's trapping them in it. You said that JV is already alongside. Jv is so alongside Schumi can see his car without even using his mirrors. This is what makes it a ramming incident.
He tries to. I also said his move was mistaken.

A ramming incident makes it seem that all of the force of the collision came from MS. Part of the force may have come from MS pointing his car towards JV, but most of the force comes from JV's 'under-steering' car. Hence MS's nose getting swiped towards the outside of the corner. I think what MS did was to encourage contact by putting his car in JV's path.

Edit: I wrote the above without having the video up to reference. I left the text there for all to enjoy. MS was the only car moving left-to-right. When one watches the full speed shot from overhead, it looks like Villeneuve, on his tangential path, catches Schumacher's nose. The slow-mo doesn't capture that. It also makes it look like MS had more time to deliberate. I think it's important to go back and forth between the two speeds. Watch from the overhead angle at 1:09.

I also think I understand what you and others mean when you say Schumi was "headed for the grass". I think one's drawing that conclusion from the onboard, right? The camera on the onboard distorts the distances. The overhead shot will show how MS wasn't headed for the grass on the inside of the curb.

mattikake said:
35secToNuvolari said:
We've seen this before and since; a driver makes the mistake of trying to close the door on an under-steering car.
Schumi knows how to avoid someone out-braking themselves or someone trying a hang-out, you let them go and/or Switch-back up the inside. The Proof that he knows this is when he did exactly that to Hamilton in China.

He rammed JV when he should've let him go. It's as obivous as it looks.
Mitigating factors that limited MS's options: JV started late, went in too fast, and lacked control. Again, we may be at an impasse.

Cheers

Edited by 35secToNuvolari on Wednesday 23 June 08:27
In summary, a self-obsessed man once said "I see your point, but I CHOOSE to disagree". A clever man once said "You're not entitled to your opinion. You're only entitled to your INFORMED opinion".

But if you're going to mis-use a mis-understanding of empiricism to argue a point and refuse to admit it's the wrong side of the fence to choose to sit, even when the whole world says so, and you want to agree to disagree, what about fate? : JV didn't mess the move up, because it worked. Schumi did mess the move up, because it didn't work.

mattikake

5,058 posts

200 months

Sunday 1st August 2010
quotequote all
What a wker. rolleyes

And we all know what 'move' I'm referring to. About time this idiot was penalised. It makes Senna's move on Prost in Estoril look tame (particularly as Senna moved first, then Prost, not the other way round as it was today).

There's by far enough evidence of this type of move for a little vid methinks. I was watching the move on Brundle at Hungary 1992 only last night.

Any pro-shumi lot must surely have dumped the rose tinte glasses for glasses made out of Lead.

The real Apache

39,731 posts

285 months

Sunday 1st August 2010
quotequote all
I'd like to see him apologise for that, it was totally uncalled for

-crookedtail-

1,564 posts

191 months

Sunday 1st August 2010
quotequote all
As much as I am a Schumacher fan that was bang out of order, glad Rubens got through ok.

Doniger

1,971 posts

167 months

Sunday 1st August 2010
quotequote all
mattikake said:
Any pro-shumi lot must surely have dumped the rose tinte glasses for glasses made out of Lead.
Yup...I'm pro-Schumi but that was beyond horrible. I hope he sees a race ban for that.

Le Man

860 posts

208 months

Sunday 1st August 2010
quotequote all
Hideous driving, but really, when was he ever any different? What compounds it is that he's slow now too!