"Value for money" watches

"Value for money" watches

Author
Discussion

AlexWF

Original Poster:

127 posts

143 months

Thursday 9th August 2012
quotequote all
With the ever increasing RRP of new watches and the likes of a new steel Submariner being almost £6k, it got me thinking about watches that could genuinely be described as good "value" in terms of their quality and/or functionality.

I'm struggling to think of many that are better than one of these:



It's "only" £2k or so new and can be picked up 2nd hand for much less, yet it's a beautifully made watch with a number of complications including moonphase and day/month indicator. True it's not got an in house movement and it's not a perpetual calendar or such like as the appearance would suggest, but it's a great watch nonetheless. It's very comfortable to wear, comes on a decent quality croc strap with folding clasp and does a good job of being an every day and dress watch at the same time.

With an imaginary budget of say £2k new, can anyone else think of a better suggestion?

AlexWF

Original Poster:

127 posts

143 months

Thursday 9th August 2012
quotequote all
Hugo a Gogo said:
pffft
Two grand value for money watch? are you on crack?
The term value for money is after all entirely subjective. The context of my suggestion was in the "luxury" swiss watch market.

And no, no crack today biglaugh

AlexWF

Original Poster:

127 posts

143 months

Thursday 9th August 2012
quotequote all
Spice_Weasel said:
Longines Hydroconquest chrono?

Fortis B42 Pilot Chrono?

Various Oris models?

£2k gives a lot of choice if buying used, however!
Oris is a good shout - I'm a fan.

AlexWF

Original Poster:

127 posts

143 months

Thursday 9th August 2012
quotequote all
bigandclever said:
AlexWF said:
It's "only" £2k or so new and can be picked up 2nd hand for much less
Would you not say that, if anything, that shows it's poor value for money, otherwise it wouldn't depreciate.

I think I might be missing the point smile
Most watches depreciate like cars. From new to 2nd hand is a big jump, and then it evens out a bit.

AlexWF

Original Poster:

127 posts

143 months

Thursday 9th August 2012
quotequote all
Podie said:
Agreed.

Boom!

Hydro Conquest is nice, but doesn't have anywhere near the functionality or complications of the Master Collection? That's what I was getting at, value for money not just in terms of it being cheap, but doing a lot for the cash.

AlexWF

Original Poster:

127 posts

143 months

Thursday 9th August 2012
quotequote all
themike888 said:
"Value for Money"....... And yet we get suggestions for watches costing thousands of pounds?!.......
A lot of money no doubt, but that was the basis for the thread really, using the Longines as an example and with a budget of £2k what would people go for?

AlexWF

Original Poster:

127 posts

143 months

Sunday 12th August 2012
quotequote all
A lot of love for Longines on here! Can't deny their quality though and "expensive" feel.