Why aren't there more monorails in the UK?

Why aren't there more monorails in the UK?

Author
Discussion

heisthegaffer

Original Poster:

3,460 posts

200 months

Tuesday 2nd April
quotequote all
Was just reading some of the thread on opening old railway lines in Wales and wondered why we don't have more monorails that are elevated rather than buying expensive land for railway lines?

We could use them as branch lines etc

SpudLink

6,075 posts

194 months

Tuesday 2nd April
quotequote all

12TS

1,884 posts

212 months

Tuesday 2nd April
quotequote all
Too expensive, they're bespoke and don't have any big supply chain behind them to cut costs. Docklands Light Railway is a bit similar, but that was a child which was born in different times.

essayer

9,129 posts

196 months

Tuesday 2nd April
quotequote all
I'd prefer a skyscraper made of lollipop sticks, a 50-foot magnifying glass or an escalator to nowhere

2xChevrons

3,304 posts

82 months

Tuesday 2nd April
quotequote all
There is no national/international standard for monorail so virtually all the infrastructure and rolling stock has to be bespoke. Even if you copy an existing system design it won't have economy of scale in comparison to mass-produced steel rail and concrete or steel sleepers, ballast etc.

Monorail systems aren't compatible with 'traditional' rail, so are immediately restricted to branch/shuttle services. You also need bespoke maintenance and servicing facilities.

There is no simple and cost-effective way of making points/switches for monorail and system designers put a lot of effort into minimising them. This makes monorails best suited to simple shuttle or loop systems, not a diverse multi-path network like traditional rail. That immediately puts limits on service patterns and frequency.

Monorails do not save much in construction costs over conventional rail. The track is much more expensive per mile. The track may be elevated but you still need to acquire the land or the rights to run it across. If you build them above public roads you commit to following the curves, humps and bumps of the road, limiting the maximum speed and turning your monorail into a more expensive and less flexible bus.

Reinstating abandoned heavy rail (with modern light or basic rail) is still the most cost-effective solution if rail has to be the answer. Monorail do have use cases as mass transit in urban areas but not as rural branch lines.

grumbledoak

31,609 posts

235 months

Tuesday 2nd April
quotequote all
essayer said:
I'd prefer a skyscraper made of lollipop sticks, a 50-foot magnifying glass or an escalator to nowhere
clap

littleredrooster

5,557 posts

198 months

Tuesday 2nd April
quotequote all
Did you mean why aren't there more more monorails?

heisthegaffer

Original Poster:

3,460 posts

200 months

Wednesday 3rd April
quotequote all
littleredrooster said:
Did you mean why aren't there more more monorails?
I did indeed.

Thanks for the responses people.

IJWS15

1,877 posts

87 months

Thursday 4th April
quotequote all
How do you evacuate passengers from an elevated monorail when it fails?


SpudLink

6,075 posts

194 months

Thursday 4th April
quotequote all
IJWS15 said:
How do you evacuate passengers from an elevated monorail when it fails?
Like this...

GliderRider

2,200 posts

83 months

Thursday 4th April
quotequote all
IJWS15 said:
How do you evacuate passengers from an elevated monorail when it fails?
Ask Derek & Clive

NSFW

ARHarh

3,859 posts

109 months

Thursday 4th April
quotequote all
There is one up the lane from here. Might not win many awards for passenger comfort, and it not quite in Wales, but it used to be in Wales.

https://www.tanatvalleyrailway.co.uk/monorail

dudleybloke

20,044 posts

188 months

Thursday 4th April
quotequote all
There used to be one at the Merry Hill shopping centre but it closed down years ago, was never working whenever I went there.

FourWheelDrift

88,807 posts

286 months

Thursday 4th April
quotequote all
Instead of a monorail What about an elevated railway instead?

This one was built in 1897 and is still in use today.


croyde

23,211 posts

232 months

Thursday 4th April
quotequote all
SpudLink said:
IJWS15 said:
How do you evacuate passengers from an elevated monorail when it fails?
Like this...
You were very quick with that, nice one smile

smn159

12,897 posts

219 months

Thursday 4th April
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
Instead of a monorail What about an elevated railway instead?

This one was built in 1897 and is still in use today.

I've been on that!!

Evanivitch

20,662 posts

124 months

Thursday 4th April
quotequote all
The main issue is NIMBYism.

Just consider how much of HS2 has been buried to protect NIMBYs from their view. A monorail (or even a raised railway on concrete pillars, like in much of China's network), is actually a fairly modular and simple way to build light rail (I.e. foundation and pillar heights are adjusted for topography, track bed is modular and standardised). But it puts the tracks at height, and no one will agree to that.

Consider some cities with their raised railway systems. You see very little of that in the UK.

Eric Mc

122,336 posts

267 months

Thursday 4th April
quotequote all
Should the thread tile actually be "Why AREN'T there more monorails in the UK?".

Evanivitch

20,662 posts

124 months

Thursday 4th April
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
Instead of a monorail What about an elevated railway instead?

This one was built in 1897 and is still in use today.

And yet Maglev never (to any great extent) happened.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transrapid

generationx

6,971 posts

107 months

Thursday 4th April
quotequote all
smn159 said:
FourWheelDrift said:
Instead of a monorail What about an elevated railway instead?

This one was built in 1897 and is still in use today.

I've been on that!!
As recent as 1999



Trams don’t have so far to fall…