Private roads: some questions for PHers
Private roads: some questions for PHers
Author
Discussion

M3CS

Original Poster:

380 posts

199 months

Saturday 18th May 2013
quotequote all
1. If you speed or drive without insurance on a private road, are the police able to do anything?

2. If you have no business being in a private road, save being nosey and looking at nice houses from the car, are residents entitled to ask you to leave? Do they have any different rights, when compared to residents of a 'normal' road?

GreigM

6,740 posts

275 months

Saturday 18th May 2013
quotequote all
1. If its accessible to the public then the Road Traffic Act applies, so yes you need insurance and need to obey speed limits. Basically if you can drive onto the road and don't go through gates then the RTA applies.

2. I believe that they can. Access is granted by the owners, they can therefore remove the right of access at any time.

blueg33

45,535 posts

250 months

Saturday 18th May 2013
quotequote all
M3CS said:
1. If you speed or drive without insurance on a private road, are the police able to do anything?

2. If you have no business being in a private road, save being nosey and looking at nice houses from the car, are residents entitled to ask you to leave? Do they have any different rights, when compared to residents of a 'normal' road?
Your second question is easy. You are effectively trespassing and have no right to be on priovate land without the owners permission. Various rights granted to other users of the private road may allow you to be there, but if you do not know them or are not visiting it is unlikely.

Having said that, there is not much someone can do if you are trespassing, they can ask you to leave, they can secure the entrance, but only a lunatic would prosecute you because it would cost a afortune and they would need to prove a loss, which would be difficult unless you were causing an obstruction or damage

tvrgit

8,484 posts

278 months

Saturday 18th May 2013
quotequote all
If it's a private "road" (as opposed to a private access) then it's open to the public in exactly the same way as a "public road". The only difference, in law, between a private road and a "public road" is who maintains it, not who can use it.

4rephill

5,153 posts

204 months

Saturday 18th May 2013
quotequote all
2 seconds of googling brought up this: http://www.privateroads.co.uk/

And this PDF file download on the Law and Private roads: http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&...

Have a read.

In the PDF file there is a passage that states:

"A private road is not necessarily a road to which the public does not have access. Nor is it a road exempt from the law. Private Roads: a legal framework (4th ed.) by A.W. and C. Barsby (2007) contains a good description of the law."

So people stating that residents can ask non-residents to leave the area are not necessarily correct, that all depends on whether a public right of way exists for mechanically propelled vehicles on the road.

Most private roads are restricted to owners and access to properties only, but some still have a public right of way for mechanically propelled vehicles and so the residents cannot ask/demand that you do not use the road. It all depends on the individual road.



All of this information is so easy to find these days by simply searching on google and you actually get accurate answers rather than the "One answer covers all situations" posts that we seem to get on here!


liner33

10,861 posts

228 months

Saturday 18th May 2013
quotequote all
What about racetracks then? The public have access

tvrgit

8,484 posts

278 months

Saturday 18th May 2013
quotequote all
liner33 said:
What about racetracks then? The public have access
The public do not have a right of free access on to the track at any time they choose. It's a track, not a road.

tvrgit

8,484 posts

278 months

Saturday 18th May 2013
quotequote all
4rephill said:
2 seconds of googling brought up this: http://www.privateroads.co.uk/

And this PDF file download on the Law and Private roads: http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&...

Have a read.

In the PDF file there is a passage that states:

"A private road is not necessarily a road to which the public does not have access. Nor is it a road exempt from the law. Private Roads: a legal framework (4th ed.) by A.W. and C. Barsby (2007) contains a good description of the law."

So people stating that residents can ask non-residents to leave the area are not necessarily correct, that all depends on whether a public right of way exists for mechanically propelled vehicles on the road.

Most private roads are restricted to owners and access to properties only, but some still have a public right of way for mechanically propelled vehicles and so the residents cannot ask/demand that you do not use the road. It all depends on the individual road.



All of this information is so easy to find these days by simply searching on google and you actually get accurate answers rather than the "One answer covers all situations" posts that we seem to get on here!
I'm relying on a bit more than 2 seconds of googling.

I agree with what you say, but with a slight change in emphasis, in my experience.

SOME private roads are restricted to owners and access to properties only, but MOST still have a public right of ACCESS for ALL, INCLUDING PEDESTRIANS, CYCLISTS AND mechanically propelled vehicles and so the residents cannot ask/demand that you do not use the road. It all depends on the individual road.

As I said, in most cases, the only difference between a private road and a public road is who repairs it, not who can use it.

A private ACCESS is different.



Edited by tvrgit on Saturday 18th May 11:53

TangerinePool

1,393 posts

216 months

Saturday 18th May 2013
quotequote all
Slight tangent but all private roads seem to be riddled with potholes and speedbumps, presumably because no-one can get together to repair them, yet all the residents have flash motors.

liner33

10,861 posts

228 months

Saturday 18th May 2013
quotequote all
tvrgit said:
The public do not have a right of free access on to the track at any time they choose. It's a track, not a road.
Ahh so its down to if you pay ? So what about the M6 toll then ?

LukeSi

5,780 posts

187 months

Saturday 18th May 2013
quotequote all
liner33 said:
tvrgit said:
The public do not have a right of free access on to the track at any time they choose. It's a track, not a road.
Ahh so its down to if you pay ? So what about the M6 toll then ?
The M6 Toll is a private road in which the owners request the Police to patrol.

Aretnap

1,947 posts

177 months

Saturday 18th May 2013
quotequote all
GreigM said:
Basically if you can drive onto the road and don't go through gates then the RTA applies.
A popular misconception. The presence of a gate is certainly good evidence that the road is private, but the absence of a gate doesn't by itself mean that it's a public place. The key tests are (1) is it in fact used by the general public, as opposed to a special group of people (such as residents and their guests) and (2) if so, are the public using it in spite of a prohibition - express or implied. As far as (2) goes, a "keep out" sign is just as effective as a gate . Have a read of this and this - both drink driving cases where the prosecution failed to offer evidence that the roads were actually used by the public.

That said, there are laws against bad driving which apply even on truly private roads - if you injure someone by driving like a complete knob you can be done for the Victorian offence of causing bodily harm by wanton and furious driving, and if you kill someone manslaughter is always a possibility.


Edited by Aretnap on Sunday 19th May 00:03

Grenoble

58,490 posts

181 months

Saturday 18th May 2013
quotequote all
LukeSi said:
liner33 said:
tvrgit said:
The public do not have a right of free access on to the track at any time they choose. It's a track, not a road.
Ahh so its down to if you pay ? So what about the M6 toll then ?
The M6 Toll is a private road in which the owners request the Police to patrol.
It also was created by a statutory instrument to include it explicitly as a speed controlled road?

BertBert

21,051 posts

237 months

Sunday 19th May 2013
quotequote all
TangerinePool said:
Slight tangent but all private roads seem to be riddled with potholes and speedbumps, presumably because no-one can get together to repair them, yet all the residents have flash motors.
Perhaps there's a different reason other than funds or the lack of them?

clockworks

7,279 posts

171 months

Sunday 19th May 2013
quotequote all
TangerinePool said:
Slight tangent but all private roads seem to be riddled with potholes and speedbumps, presumably because no-one can get together to repair them, yet all the residents have flash motors.
That's certainly the case with my road (apart from all the residents having flash motors!). It was built in the 1960's, but the developer didn't finish the pavements to a high enough standard, so the council refused to adopt it. There have been several attempts to organise repairs, but it's proved impossible to get 40+ residents to agree to chip in. Some residents don't drive, and others say that the potholes make it safer for kids by reducing speed.
It isn't really a problem, but it looks unsightly. It also lowers property values, which means I got a relative bargain when I bought my house.

TwigtheWonderkid

48,429 posts

176 months

Sunday 19th May 2013
quotequote all
clockworks said:
TangerinePool said:
Slight tangent but all private roads seem to be riddled with potholes and speedbumps, presumably because no-one can get together to repair them, yet all the residents have flash motors.
That's certainly the case with my road (apart from all the residents having flash motors!). It was built in the 1960's, but the developer didn't finish the pavements to a high enough standard, so the council refused to adopt it. There have been several attempts to organise repairs, but it's proved impossible to get 40+ residents to agree to chip in. Some residents don't drive, and others say that the potholes make it safer for kids by reducing speed.
It isn't really a problem, but it looks unsightly. It also lowers property values, which means I got a relative bargain when I bought my house.
Not the case with my private road. We all pay £65/yr, plus the road is quite picturesque so we have tv and film companies filming in it quite often, which they pay for. The road is very well maintained and we have a substantial amount in the pot for future repairs.

clockworks

7,279 posts

171 months

Sunday 19th May 2013
quotequote all
Was that set up as a covenant when the road was built?

TangerinePool

1,393 posts

216 months

Sunday 19th May 2013
quotequote all
BertBert said:
TangerinePool said:
Slight tangent but all private roads seem to be riddled with potholes and speedbumps, presumably because no-one can get together to repair them, yet all the residents have flash motors.
Perhaps there's a different reason other than funds or the lack of them?
What I'm saying is IME it's not been a lack of funds but a lack of bringing those funds together, which amazed me as I didn't think the Astons, Bentleys, Lambos etc. enjoyed the terrain.

4rephill

5,153 posts

204 months

Sunday 19th May 2013
quotequote all
tvrgit said:
I'm relying on a bit more than 2 seconds of googling............
My point about googling was more a generalisation of people who post threads on PH in all categories TBH.

It seems that people post up a thread asking a question for which the answer is very easy to find by doing a quick search on the net which gives the exact information required.

Rather than doing that first though, they post on PH and then we get page after page of differing opinions based on personal experience, all of which can have a relevance to the issue, but do not give a definitive answer (and half the time the thread then degenerates into childish name calling and abuse because of differing opinions).

Take this thread for example, a quick search reveals that public access to private roads depends on the conditions applied to each individual road.

However, on PH the OP receives replies to the thread with people stating that if it's a private road then the residents can ask non-residents to leave the area and call the Police if they refuse to do so, as if that answer covers all private roads, but that's not the case.

The problem can be that some people read the answers supplied on this forum and take it as being the Gospel on the subject when in fact the information could be incorrect.

Don't get Me wrong, the vast majority of information on here is very useful and there are some very clever people who have helped thousands of people over the years, with all manner of issues, and personnel experiences can also be very useful. But before relying on PH, do an internet search first!






LoonR1

26,988 posts

203 months

Sunday 19th May 2013
quotequote all
liner33 said:
tvrgit said:
The public do not have a right of free access on to the track at any time they choose. It's a track, not a road.
Ahh so its down to if you pay ? So what about the M6 toll then ?
How the hell did you draw that conclusion from what you've quoted? I can't see any way in which you can.