Anglia Auctions With Another RS

Author
Discussion

gt40steve

711 posts

105 months

Thursday 4th April
quotequote all
eliot said:
Turbobanana said:
It's amusing to consider these cars side by side.

Same age (bar a few months. 2.0-litre 4-cylinder, mid-size saloon from a major manufacturer. 4 / 5 seats, manual, front engine rear wheel drive. Both restored, to some extent.

Decent motorsport heritage (although most famous Escorts were flat-fronts), good handling, relatively simple mechanicals. But...

Triumph is streets ahead in terms of interior appointments and technical features (16 valves, single camshaft). More practical (4 doors) and refined (overdrive, one of the world's best dashboards).

Ford is a relative horse-drawn cart, mechanically. but has an image the Triumph could only dream of.

Is the Ford really worth 5 times the Triumph, as the estimate suggests? I love an RS2000, but out of these two I'd go with the Triumph every day, and enjoy the £20,000 saving.
Because the few fat and grey over 50’s who lusted after or owned a dolly sprint back in the day already own one because they are cheap.
Whereas the same demographic who wanted escorts and cossies is far larger and therefore through the laws of supply and demand they are priced accordingly.

(Old fat bloke who bought a cossie because he always wanted one)
Yep, then as now, if we asked a hundred people, I think 90 would say Escort please.
The Triumph interior isn't unpleasant but the lack of Scheel or Recaro seats and all that wood really indentify it's niche for me. Add that to the 'too many door' bodywork and styling that has it's roots in the 1960's, to me, I see a Cortina 1600E rival. Something like a 1600E with a Lotus twin cam engine would have been.

The RS2000 seems more focused on what it wants to be, what features it should have and who it's audience are.

The main advantage I see in the Triumph is the overdrive gearbox but that isn't a 'motorsport' feature like a ZF 5 speed. As a road car though it's got one up on the Escort for cruising, that's true, but was a lower noise level and better economy at 70mph high on the wish list of our 1970's sports saloon buyer ?

Other opinions may differ & I respect them, but I've made my choice.
Cut me, do I not bleed blue ? !!



aeropilot

34,834 posts

228 months

Thursday 4th April
quotequote all
gt40steve said:
eliot said:
Turbobanana said:
It's amusing to consider these cars side by side.

Same age (bar a few months. 2.0-litre 4-cylinder, mid-size saloon from a major manufacturer. 4 / 5 seats, manual, front engine rear wheel drive. Both restored, to some extent.

Decent motorsport heritage (although most famous Escorts were flat-fronts), good handling, relatively simple mechanicals. But...

Triumph is streets ahead in terms of interior appointments and technical features (16 valves, single camshaft). More practical (4 doors) and refined (overdrive, one of the world's best dashboards).

Ford is a relative horse-drawn cart, mechanically. but has an image the Triumph could only dream of.

Is the Ford really worth 5 times the Triumph, as the estimate suggests? I love an RS2000, but out of these two I'd go with the Triumph every day, and enjoy the £20,000 saving.
Because the few fat and grey over 50’s who lusted after or owned a dolly sprint back in the day already own one because they are cheap.
Whereas the same demographic who wanted escorts and cossies is far larger and therefore through the laws of supply and demand they are priced accordingly.

(Old fat bloke who bought a cossie because he always wanted one)
Yep, then as now, if we asked a hundred people, I think 90 would say Escort please.
The Triumph interior isn't unpleasant but the lack of Scheel or Recaro seats and all that wood really indentify it's niche for me. Add that to the 'too many door' bodywork and styling that has it's roots in the 1960's, to me, I see a Cortina 1600E rival. Something like a 1600E with a Lotus twin cam engine would have been.
yes
Actually, I'd choose a Savage 1600E over a Dolly Sprint, if 'more-doors' was a number one criteria.

Mr Tidy

22,639 posts

128 months

Thursday 4th April
quotequote all
I had an RS2000 in the early 80s and loved it, despite the drive train being pretty basic!

I'm glad I did because it means I don't lust after one now, knowing how many better cars £25+K could get me. biggrin

s m

23,299 posts

204 months

Friday 5th April
quotequote all
gt40steve said:
Yep, then as now, if we asked a hundred people, I think 90 would say Escort please.
The Triumph interior isn't unpleasant but the lack of Scheel or Recaro seats and all that wood really indentify it's niche for me. Add that to the 'too many door' bodywork and styling that has it's roots in the 1960's, to me, I see a Cortina 1600E rival. Something like a 1600E with a Lotus twin cam engine would have been.

The RS2000 seems more focused on what it wants to be, what features it should have and who it's audience are.

The main advantage I see in the Triumph is the overdrive gearbox but that isn't a 'motorsport' feature like a ZF 5 speed. As a road car though it's got one up on the Escort for cruising, that's true, but was a lower noise level and better economy at 70mph high on the wish list of our 1970's sports saloon buyer ?

Other opinions may differ & I respect them, but I've made my choice.
Cut me, do I not bleed blue ? !!
That overdrive switch on the gear knob was a thing of wonder when you were used to a normal 4-speed

nismocat

429 posts

9 months

Friday 5th April
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
My thought as well when I looked through the photo's, but, I'm guessing looking at them, someone drives them to this site to take photo's and where they are driven from isn't too clean, hence, they've got in a nice clean car, to drive it to somewhere to take nice photo's of what is then a not clean car.

.
The photos are taken on site at Anglia car auctions. It is up to the seller to clean them prior to the sale.

s m

23,299 posts

204 months

Friday 5th April
quotequote all
Turbobanana said:
It's amusing to consider these cars side by side.

Same age (bar a few months. 2.0-litre 4-cylinder, mid-size saloon from a major manufacturer. 4 / 5 seats, manual, front engine rear wheel drive. Both restored, to some extent.

Decent motorsport heritage (although most famous Escorts were flat-fronts), good handling, relatively simple mechanicals. But...

Triumph is streets ahead in terms of interior appointments and technical features (16 valves, single camshaft). More practical (4 doors) and refined (overdrive, one of the world's best dashboards).

Ford is a relative horse-drawn cart, mechanically. but has an image the Triumph could only dream of.

Is the Ford really worth 5 times the Triumph, as the estimate suggests? I love an RS2000, but out of these two I'd go with the Triumph every day, and enjoy the £20,000 saving.
I guess the last question very much depends on whether you just want a 70s/80s sports saloon or have hankerings for the car you drove and loved as a youngster.

If I had the room and cash I’d buy 1 of each

If I could only have one I’d pick the RS2000 having owned a couple of Mk2 RS2000s whereas only drove a friend’s Dolly Sprint - but maybe go for cheaper examples of both cars coming in at under 30k for both so I wouldn’t be afraid to use them and get a bit of Welsh road dirt and seaside air on them.

The Ford was definitely more raw, not as refined but perhaps more fun









Turbobanana

6,347 posts

202 months

Friday 5th April
quotequote all
s m said:
I guess the last question very much depends on whether you just want a 70s/80s sports saloon or have hankerings for the car you drove and loved as a youngster.
This is a very valid point.

I was lucky enough to work weekends / school holidays for a used car dealer in my teens, and once I'd passed my test was immediately put on the trade insurance. This meant I was able to drive all sorts of things from an early age. As a consequence I don't really have "hankerings for the car I drove and loved as a youngster" because there were so many. I certainly wouldn't drop this sort of money on an Escort, no matter how nice, when there are far more appealing options (to me) available.

The group test reprint was interesting - thanks for posting. Motoring journos always seem to have this image of the buying public as rallying gods, keen to apply a dab of oppo at any given moment. The majority of us have no delusions of grandeur so pictures of an RS in full Roger Clark mode are irrelevant: try that today on a Milton Keynes roundabout and see how far you get. To most buyers back then these were "just cars" and most folk buying them were probably being forced out of an MG BGT / Triumph GT6 / etc due to a growing family. Front wheel drive was coming, and in a few years the market would have the Golf GTI in the mix: probably a better car than any of these and, although way more expensive than they used to be, nowhere near the stratosphere occupied by the RS.

s m

23,299 posts

204 months

Friday 5th April
quotequote all
Turbobanana said:
s m said:
I guess the last question very much depends on whether you just want a 70s/80s sports saloon or have hankerings for the car you drove and loved as a youngster.
This is a very valid point.

I was lucky enough to work weekends / school holidays for a used car dealer in my teens, and once I'd passed my test was immediately put on the trade insurance. This meant I was able to drive all sorts of things from an early age. As a consequence I don't really have "hankerings for the car I drove and loved as a youngster" because there were so many. I certainly wouldn't drop this sort of money on an Escort, no matter how nice, when there are far more appealing options (to me) available.

The group test reprint was interesting - thanks for posting. Motoring journos always seem to have this image of the buying public as rallying gods, keen to apply a dab of oppo at any given moment. The majority of us have no delusions of grandeur so pictures of an RS in full Roger Clark mode are irrelevant: try that today on a Milton Keynes roundabout and see how far you get. To most buyers back then these were "just cars" and most folk buying them were probably being forced out of an MG BGT / Triumph GT6 / etc due to a growing family. Front wheel drive was coming, and in a few years the market would have the Golf GTI in the mix: probably a better car than any of these and, although way more expensive than they used to be, nowhere near the stratosphere occupied by the RS.
Well, that’s it summed up really. You like what you like ….. and another man’s better is another man’s worse.

I have to confess to being guilty of the above as a teenager in the 80s though - my friends and I were lucky enough to have plenty of empty deserted open roads to drive on - we were never the town centre café racers

Funnily enough after my first Mk2 RS I bought into all the fwd revolution and got a Mk1 GTI 1800 - great engine - but the rest of it compared to the Escorts/old rwd stuff I had just didn’t light my fire…….. so went back to another RS Mk2. I just found them more fun for the driving I did. Moved on through a fair few Kensington Fords/Opels since then……but have come full circle and still have an old rwd car for fun - luckily bought it before prices jumped up. Friend managed to snag a nice but useable Mk2 RS2000 a few years back for about 12k. Still great fun to get them out and go for a run on quiet Welsh roads on a nice day

Always good to see other people with the same thought enjoying their chosen stuff too - friend brings his 944 sometimes, another his Ascona - vive la difference!

aeropilot

34,834 posts

228 months

Friday 5th April
quotequote all
Turbobanana said:
s m said:
I guess the last question very much depends on whether you just want a 70s/80s sports saloon or have hankerings for the car you drove and loved as a youngster.
This is a very valid point.

I was lucky enough to work weekends / school holidays for a used car dealer in my teens, and once I'd passed my test was immediately put on the trade insurance. This meant I was able to drive all sorts of things from an early age. As a consequence I don't really have "hankerings for the car I drove and loved as a youngster" because there were so many. I certainly wouldn't drop this sort of money on an Escort, no matter how nice, when there are far more appealing options (to me) available.

The group test reprint was interesting - thanks for posting. Motoring journos always seem to have this image of the buying public as rallying gods, keen to apply a dab of oppo at any given moment. The majority of us have no delusions of grandeur so pictures of an RS in full Roger Clark mode are irrelevant
That's fair enough, but for me (and many others) at the time, that last point is VERY much why I have a huge soft spot for the Escort (and Lotus-Cortina and other homolgation specials) over any sports car or other, maybe technically better car of the period. I couldn't give a f**k if a Golf GTi is a technically better car, or an Alfa or whatever, as they are never going to stir my soul, like the Escort RS or Lotus-Cortina etc will, and that includes watching Roger and Hannu etc chucking them around a forest or around a muddy rallycross venue.
AVO stuff especially for me, as its as much the story of a large manufacturer creating a separate almost bespoke production facility to do all sorts of specialist stuff and build some unique vehicles, before the corporate suits got involved and stopped all their fun.



gt40steve

711 posts

105 months

Friday 5th April
quotequote all
Enjoying all the contributers insights and views on this thread.

Turbobanana

6,347 posts

202 months

Friday 5th April
quotequote all
gt40steve said:
Enjoying all the contributors' insights and views on this thread.
It's good to be part of, isn't it? All views are valid and as someone else said, illustrate the differences that keep the debate going.

I think there's also an influence based on your age. Mr aeropilot is, I believe, a bit older than me so his formative years were a little ahead of mine. I mentioned earlier that I worked for a local used car dealer between 1984-88, during which I passed my test at 17 in 1985. The cars that most interested me then were some of the new-ish stuff we'd get in: Golf GTI Mk1s, Mazda RX7s, Porsche 944s, Opel Mantas, Escort XR3 / XR3is, Astra GTE Mk1s, BMW 323i E21s and the odd Capri, which always felt antique compared to most of the others. Doesn't mean they were bad, just dated.

Ironically, the most expensive cars on that list (Porsche 944) are probably now the most affordable... Funny old world, innit?

beer

stevemcs

8,707 posts

94 months

Friday 5th April
quotequote all
RS2000 aside, i quite like the look of the Mk1 Fiesta 1.1, Oh and the MGZS and 216GTI - That went through last year when I looked at it but went in excess of 7k

Mark A S

1,846 posts

189 months

Friday 5th April
quotequote all
For me too, it’s the heritage/comp history that will always have a place in my heart for the likes of the RS Escorts, having watched and wanted at first, then owned several and then the icing on the cake, living the dream of competing in them, bloody marvellous FUN cars.

I do think though they are silly money, IMO 35k tops for a really good one ought to suffice, still if I was selling etc!

Personally, I would not be interested in a standard RS2, Mk 1 or 2, would have to be at least 160 bhp with decent road manners. My Ultimate RS Road car would be a tweaked RS1600 though, the Mk 1 is a beautiful looking car with many great colour choices. An alloy 2lt BD, tuned to around 220 so not too peaky, 5sp box, billies, vented discs, LSD of course and Quick rack,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, but how friggin much would that cost today!

Bring in my 3rd Lotus Sunbeam, has all that plus more, another Fab fun car to drive, and not too silly on prices,,,,,,,,,,,,,, yet!

I’m 64 now, so even older than Aero, kind of agree about rather driving than spannering, especially now I have had just about everything on the LS apart.
I guess at my age, old and a little bit fat, a car like a Dolly sprint ought to be the choice, BUT, I’m not ready for my pipe and slippers just yet wink

daqinggregg

1,617 posts

130 months

Friday 5th April
quotequote all
At the age of 20, I had an immaculate 2nd hand Dolomite Sprint (£500), very quick for its day, well appointed, great curved dash and I loved it. I thought it was the doggies.

But truth, it was half the price of an equivalent dog rough Mexico/RS2000, that, I couldn’t afford to buy, never mind insure.

Turbobanana

6,347 posts

202 months

Friday 5th April
quotequote all
Mark A S said:
Personally, I would not be interested in a standard RS2, Mk 1 or 2, would have to be at least 160 bhp with decent road manners. My Ultimate RS Road car would be a tweaked RS1600 though, the Mk 1 is a beautiful looking car with many great colour choices. An alloy 2lt BD, tuned to around 220 so not too peaky, 5sp box, billies, vented discs, LSD of course and Quick rack,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, but how friggin much would that cost today!
In fairness, that's not a "classic car", more a bespoke-built piece of kit fitted into whatever bodyshell takes your fancy. So it could just as easily be an MX5, BGT, M3, AE86 etc.

Which leaves you with this:



...and £100,000 less in your pension pot.

I guess the point is, how good could you make a Sprint / Tii / Firenza spending the same money?

And if I'm spending your £100,000 (because I don't have that sort of money), it's going here:



Actually it's not going on this one, but you get my drift.

aeropilot

34,834 posts

228 months

Friday 5th April
quotequote all
Turbobanana said:
Mark A S said:
Personally, I would not be interested in a standard RS2, Mk 1 or 2, would have to be at least 160 bhp with decent road manners. My Ultimate RS Road car would be a tweaked RS1600 though, the Mk 1 is a beautiful looking car with many great colour choices. An alloy 2lt BD, tuned to around 220 so not too peaky, 5sp box, billies, vented discs, LSD of course and Quick rack,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, but how friggin much would that cost today!
In fairness, that's not a "classic car", more a bespoke-built piece of kit fitted into whatever bodyshell takes your fancy. So it could just as easily be an MX5, BGT, M3, AE86 etc.

Which leaves you with this:



...and £100,000 less in your pension pot.

I guess the point is, how good could you make a Sprint / Tii / Firenza spending the same money?
Well, err, I guess you missed Mark's bit in his post about RS1600......and Mk.1.....and err, that's a Mk.2 you posted.
And of course a modified RS1600 is a classic car......ffs.

Anyway, it would cost you a lot more for a Sprint/Tii/Firenza to do the same with, as the parts would be astromically more than the Escort bits, because there is so little out there left for a much rarer car. The whole advantage of the Escort is there is so much out there, both new and secondhand. I seem to recall that the guy who built the Firenza Can-Am replica for historic rallying a decade or more ago, said it cost more than an Escort to do (because there wasn't the stuff around) but that wasn't the point.


Mark A S

1,846 posts

189 months

Friday 5th April
quotequote all
Turbobanana said:
That is proper Fugly, and thank you Aero, he nailed my thoughts exactly smile

aeropilot

34,834 posts

228 months

Friday 5th April
quotequote all
Mark A S said:
Turbobanana said:
That is proper Fugly, and thank you Aero, he nailed my thoughts exactly smile
The GK does have looks only a mother would like, that's for sure, but I get the attraction, as they are 'relatively' affordable for a rare car, unlike stuff like DeTomaso Mangusta's, Iso Griffo's and the like. I'd still choose an Interceptor over a GK though in the same price range, and quite frankly, for the same money as a GK, I'd rather just have all the rest of the bits that came with a 60's Corvette smile

A nice big-block 65/66 Coupe could be had for the same money, which would be much more up my strasse smile



Edited by aeropilot on Friday 5th April 17:18

Turbobanana

6,347 posts

202 months

Friday 5th April
quotequote all
Thanks aero but I'm well up to speed on my Escort mark numbers. I believe MST offer a Mk1 as well, if that floats your dinghy.

Anyway, back on topic: what do we think the Sprint (lot # 286) and RS (lot # 600) will make this weekend?

aeropilot

34,834 posts

228 months

Friday 5th April
quotequote all
Turbobanana said:
Thanks aero but I'm well up to speed on my Escort mark numbers. I believe MST offer a Mk1 as well, if that floats your dinghy.
Yes, for those that want to go down the new reg'd, all new build route with all modern running gear......

I'd rather buy an original for less money smile