Do you pay your TV licence fee?

Author
Discussion

TEKNOPUG

19,025 posts

207 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
richhead said:
CoolHands said:
They’re onto a losing wicket, they just can’t face it.
well they know that only oap,s will pay, and thats a shrinking market.
It's definitely a growing market.

tangerine_sedge

4,854 posts

220 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
LimaDelta said:
It's not about the cost, it's about their values no longer aligning with many of the British viewers[Citation needed]. It's about essentially funding an organisation and their smug, sneering employees, who brazenly and visibly hate a huge proportion of the British people[Citation needed]. And it's the fact that much of what they produce is low-quality, preachy, propaganda, rather than entertaining or educating[Citation needed]. There are so many other sources these days, that the licence fee is an anachronism. The BBC, like any other broadcaster, should sink or swim on it's own merits, and not rely on coercion and the threat of prosecution to survive.

YMMV.
My gut feeling is that your opinion of the BBC is driven by years of right wing media attacking it, and years of Tory governments using it as a handy dog to kick when their news journalists dare to critique poor policy.

If the BBC didn't exist, then most TV consumed would be of US origin. One only has to look at the current commercial operators to see the lack of quality original UK content created specifically for UK audiences.



Jamescrs

4,538 posts

67 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
Wacky Racer said:
Yes, it's less than £4.00 a week ffs!

A small price to pay for no adverts.

How else are the going to fund the programmes?

That includes Radio as well.
It's not about the money for me, I don't agree with the way the BBC operates and I don't make use of their services so i'm not paying for it.

I don't really care how they fund their programmes or the rest of their network, radio etc as I don't use them in the same way I don't care how Disney fund themselves as I don't subscribe to Disney+.


LimaDelta

6,567 posts

220 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
tangerine_sedge said:
LimaDelta said:
It's not about the cost, it's about their values no longer aligning with many of the British viewers[Citation needed]. It's about essentially funding an organisation and their smug, sneering employees, who brazenly and visibly hate a huge proportion of the British people[Citation needed]. And it's the fact that much of what they produce is low-quality, preachy, propaganda, rather than entertaining or educating[Citation needed]. There are so many other sources these days, that the licence fee is an anachronism. The BBC, like any other broadcaster, should sink or swim on it's own merits, and not rely on coercion and the threat of prosecution to survive.

YMMV.
My gut feeling is that your opinion of the BBC is driven by years of right wing media attacking it, and years of Tory governments using it as a handy dog to kick when their news journalists dare to critique poor policy.

If the BBC didn't exist, then most TV consumed would be of US origin. One only has to look at the current commercial operators to see the lack of quality original UK content created specifically for UK audiences.
Here's a [citation] thought experiment - walk into any BBC exec/talent meeting/staff room and ask for a show of hands who voted to leave the EU. See how many hands go up. Ask the same for how many voted Tory at the last GE, count the hands. I'd wager a large sum that even if there are a few in those rooms, they are unlikely to be brave enough to put up their hands. Ask yourself if there is a cultural reason why? Does the BBC only employ people who have a metropolitan liberal-left bias, or are they the only types drawn to that institution?

ARHarh

3,831 posts

109 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
tangerine_sedge said:
If the BBC didn't exist, then most TV consumed would be of US origin. One only has to look at the current commercial operators to see the lack of quality original UK content created specifically for UK audiences.
I disagree with the US thing, I tend to watch 2 hours of TV every day. I record it from live to air channels, no subscription stuff. And I can't remember the last time I watched an American program. I did watch a Canadian one last night though. Yes some channels are full of American stuff but there is still plenty of UK produced stuff.

I don't seem to find much BBC stuff of interest these days though.

Mr Penguin

1,595 posts

41 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
There is a lot of British film and TV on ITV, Channel 4, probably Sky, and even Netflix. Some of what the BBC broadcast isn't made by the BBC but by other companies who would sell to someone else.
The BBC lost its way in the 90s when they tried to chase ratings and move to the lowest levels of entertainment. At the very least it needs major reforms.

Jordie Barretts sock

4,753 posts

21 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
When there was only the BBC, then a licence to fund it was a reasonable way of solving the problem.

Now the BBC is a very small part of broadcast TV and radio. I don't need a licence to listen to commercial radio, why should I need a licence to watch ITV/YouTube/all the rest?

Make the BBC fully commercial and self funding. That's the obvious and simple answer.

richhead

989 posts

13 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
Jordie Barretts sock said:
When there was only the BBC, then a licence to fund it was a reasonable way of solving the problem.

Now the BBC is a very small part of broadcast TV and radio. I don't need a licence to listen to commercial radio, why should I need a licence to watch ITV/YouTube/all the rest?

Make the BBC fully commercial and self funding. That's the obvious and simple answer.
the top people at the bbc wont do this unless forced to, they are milking the gravy train, why would they stop?
if the bbc had to pay its own way it would fail in its current form and they know that.

funinhounslow

1,673 posts

144 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
Wacky Racer said:
Yes, it's less than £4.00 a week ffs!

A small price to pay for no adverts.

How else are the going to fund the programmes?

That includes Radio as well.
It’s £169/year - quite a sum if you have no interest in watching the BBC’s output but just want to watch football live on Sky or whatever.

And there are adverts - they’re forever advertising their own products and services.

I’ve recently subscribed to GHR premium - I think it’s very good value at £40/year but it would be ridiculous to insist that you had to subscribe to it to listen to Virgin radio - and that is pretty much where we are with TV now…

Acuity30

219 posts

20 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
Never paid for it, never watch any live TV tbh, maybe a total of 10 minutes in a year and the odd BBC youtube video

Ken Figenus

5,719 posts

119 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
LimaDelta said:
Here's a [citation] thought experiment - walk into any BBC exec/talent meeting/staff room and ask for a show of hands who voted to leave the EU. See how many hands go up. Ask the same for how many voted Tory at the last GE, count the hands. I'd wager a large sum that even if there are a few in those rooms, they are unlikely to be brave enough to put up their hands. Ask yourself if there is a cultural reason why? Does the BBC only employ people who have a metropolitan liberal-left bias, or are they the only types drawn to that institution?
I have been in such meetings. You are likely correct. Lefties are more authoritarian than liberal these days thoughfrown....But if you walked into a room full of bankers or cabbies or £75k bricklayers or Landlords then their answers might be grouped by industry niche too.

I don't agree with the license fee based on the prosecution scenario (watching ITV 'live' is nothing to do with BBC demanded income...) but its clear that the Tories say the BBC is too Left and Labour say its too Right. Its definitely quite woke as the casting and quota biases don't reflect actual society but more ideology. But then so does ITV and CH4... Not a biggie for me at all but I do see it.

Davie_GLA

6,549 posts

201 months

Monday 13th May
quotequote all
I haven’t checked the whole thread however it came to mind when browsing some random sub Reddit on the topic.

There is a guy that has been documenting and cataloging every letter received from 2006 with the usual threats of enforcement, court summons, etc etc and according to what I read not a single threat has been successful and the guy has done a sterling job of holding his nerve.

http://www.bbctvlicence.com/ - side note, cracking domain name in itself.

~£2600 “saved” and estimated cost to the bbc of ~£100 over that timeframe. If you dig out some stats and these threats are carried out toward suspected license fee avoiders I wonder what the total cost of chasing the fees when you build in the costs for Capita, postage, paper, ink, disk space etc etc.

I do watch a lot of telly so don’t mind paying the fee but sometimes I do wonder what it might be like to challenge this. When you fire up op;Ayer now you only need to say “yes”‘ to the notice. As far as I know this doesn’t call home to bbc with an address and when they can’t match a payment I guess this is when they send the heavies. I do get annoyed that I need to declare my address when I buy a telly and then inevitable get a letter to say they know I’ve bought a new telly..

monthou

4,648 posts

52 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
Davie_GLA said:
I I do get annoyed that I need to declare my address when I buy a telly and then inevitable get a letter to say they know I’ve bought a new telly..
Hasn't been the case for 11 years.

WarrenB

2,457 posts

120 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
Davie_GLA said:
I haven’t checked the whole thread however it came to mind when browsing some random sub Reddit on the topic.

There is a guy that has been documenting and cataloging every letter received from 2006 with the usual threats of enforcement, court summons, etc etc and according to what I read not a single threat has been successful and the guy has done a sterling job of holding his nerve.

http://www.bbctvlicence.com/ - side note, cracking domain name in itself.

~£2600 “saved” and estimated cost to the bbc of ~£100 over that timeframe. If you dig out some stats and these threats are carried out toward suspected license fee avoiders I wonder what the total cost of chasing the fees when you build in the costs for Capita, postage, paper, ink, disk space etc etc.

I do watch a lot of telly so don’t mind paying the fee but sometimes I do wonder what it might be like to challenge this. When you fire up op;Ayer now you only need to say “yes”‘ to the notice. As far as I know this doesn’t call home to bbc with an address and when they can’t match a payment I guess this is when they send the heavies. I do get annoyed that I need to declare my address when I buy a telly and then inevitable get a letter to say they know I’ve bought a new telly..
I bought a house to renovate three years ago. I wasn't living there for the first 18 months whilst I was renovating it, but I amassed quite the collection of letters and threats from the TV Licence bods. There were notes from enforcement officers saying they'd been round but 'missed me'. After receiving the first one I'd assumed they'd realise the house was a building site, no furniture or TVs to be seen through any window, but no. The letters kept coming.

When I moved in I declared that I didn't need a licence, I don't use iPlayer or watch live TV. None of the TVs are connecting up to an aerial. The letters finally stopped.

Then my brother starting using my old TV (at a property WITH a TV Licence), however iPlayer was still signed in on my account using the same email address I'd declared I didn't need a licence. I got an email telling me I'd been using iPlayer and I need to buy a licence. There was no option to reply to the email or speak to anyone to tell them they were wrong, so I just deleted my BBC account and thought that'd be that. But the emails continued, then I started getting letters along with threats of visits from enforcement officers and court... There was never any option to declaire I didn't need a licence, no option to speak to anyone, just instructions on how to pay. I eventually managed to find a phone number where I could re-declare I didn't need a licence, but it was tough to find.


PhilboSE

4,421 posts

228 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
“As you have failed to respond to our previous letters you have given us no option but to commence enforcement action against you. You can expect a visit from one of our Enforcement Officers where you will be interviewed under caution”.

Bring it on. The property in question is uninhabitable and doesn’t have a scrap of furniture let alone a tv. I’m under no obligation to declare if I need a licence, even though their letters don’t acknowledge this.

If I get a visit it will be entertaining.

I buy a licence for our other properties, through gritted teeth because literally the only BBC content we consume is Only Connect. I do watch some live rugby on Prime but the logic for why that triggers a tv licence eludes me.

The sooner the whole system is overhauled the better, but it’s a hot potato because everyone knows subscription rates will fall.

Cotty

39,692 posts

286 months

Thursday 16th May
quotequote all
PhilboSE said:
“As you have failed to respond to our previous letters you have given us no option but to commence enforcement action against you. You can expect a visit from one of our Enforcement Officers where you will be interviewed under caution”.

Bring it on. The property in question is uninhabitable and doesn’t have a scrap of furniture let alone a tv. I’m under no obligation to declare if I need a licence, even though their letters don’t acknowledge this.

If I get a visit it will be entertaining.

I buy a licence for our other properties, through gritted teeth because literally the only BBC content we consume is Only Connect. I do watch some live rugby on Prime but the logic for why that triggers a tv licence eludes me.

The sooner the whole system is overhauled the better, but it’s a hot potato because everyone knows subscription rates will fall.
Are you sure that wording is correct. I know they like to act belligerent, but they can't interview you under caution, they don't have that power.

Zarco

18,008 posts

211 months

Thursday 16th May
quotequote all
We have a licence and always have. I'm scratching my head as to the last time I watched the BBC though. Probably The Gold and NW200 / IoMTT coverage. My daughter probably watches the odd thing.

None of us ever watch live broadcast TV any more.

James6112

4,518 posts

30 months

Thursday 16th May
quotequote all
Always had a TV licence as much prefer the BBC output to the other channels. Both TV, Radio, iplayer etc.
Cheap as chips.

No SkyTv or Virgin etc.

Cotty

39,692 posts

286 months

Thursday 16th May
quotequote all
Zarco said:
We have a licence and always have. I'm scratching my head as to the last time I watched the BBC though. Probably The Gold and NW200 / IoMTT coverage. My daughter probably watches the odd thing.

None of us ever watch live broadcast TV any more.
If you don't watch live TV on any channel or service then you don't need to pay the licence.

Zarco

18,008 posts

211 months

Thursday 16th May
quotequote all
Cotty said:
If you don't watch live TV on any channel or service then you don't need to pay the licence.
I thought you did to use i-player.