Now Gordon wants your organs

Author
Discussion

Bing o

Original Poster:

15,184 posts

221 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
Practically State ownership of your organs now - when will we say enough is enough?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7729009.stm

ewenm

28,506 posts

247 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
I don't have an objection to this. It's not like I need my organs after death.

TankRizzo

7,320 posts

195 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
article said:
UK Organ Donation Taskforce
rolleyes

sleep envy

62,260 posts

251 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
Bing o said:
Practically State ownership of your organs now - when will we say enough is enough?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7729009.stm
why, what are you going to do with yours when you're dead?

personally I think it's a good idea

Established 1984

1,237 posts

187 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
I've always thought that it should be opt-out rather than opt-in. And you not going to be complaining when the measure saves your life or that of somebody you love.

elster

17,517 posts

212 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
I can't quite understand how anyone can be against it.

Would you not rather save a life once your a dead, rather than them rot in the ground or be cremated?

onomatopoeia

3,472 posts

219 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
Bing o said:
Practically State ownership of your organs now - when will we say enough is enough?
I'm entirely happy to bash this government but on this occasion I agree. Organ donation should be opt out, or at minimum a donor card should be treated as absolute consent rather that requiring the relatives to be asked while they are grieving.

Strangely Brown

10,202 posts

233 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
TankRizzo said:
article said:
UK Organ Donation Taskforce
rolleyes

funk odyssey

1,983 posts

231 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
Bing o said:
Practically State ownership of your organs now - when will we say enough is enough?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7729009.stm
what's the problem with Presumed COnsent?

King Herald

23,501 posts

218 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
onomatopoeia said:
Bing o said:
Practically State ownership of your organs now - when will we say enough is enough?
I'm entirely happy to bash this government but on this occasion I agree. Organ donation should be opt out, or at minimum a donor card should be treated as absolute consent rather that requiring the relatives to be asked while they are grieving.
Ihf, heaven forbid, something happened to my wife or daughter I'd love to know that a small part of them was living on in another persons life.

However, the report does state that Spain had the opt-out system for ten years, and found donors numbers increased when it was put back to voluntary only. And I believe the UK has decided against the opt-out system too?

dilbert

7,741 posts

233 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
What would happens if such a law were combined with a euthansia law.
Would it mean that your doctor could legally sign you off for killing, cut you up, and then sell your organs for personal gain.

Edited by dilbert on Monday 17th November 13:12

tinman0

18,231 posts

242 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
Bing o said:
Practically State ownership of your organs now - when will we say enough is enough?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7729009.stm
Yeah, we've done this one on PH before, and although I agree with you, you are in for a bumpy thread wink Prepare to be murdered by the keyboard warriors.

ewenm

28,506 posts

247 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
dilbert said:
What would happens if such a law were combined with a euthansia law.
Would it mean that your doctor could sign you off for killing and then sell your organs for personal gain.
Strawman alert!
wink

Fatbloke

396 posts

282 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
shows just how out of touch Government is

the people want it, Government says No

superlightr

12,877 posts

265 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
Its not a problem if you are dead. really dead. But as I understand it for most cases the organs to be of any use the donor has to be alive, preped and then organs removed then they die.

What if your not dead or about to die, how long do they give you on life suport? How almost dead do you have to be? people have woken up again after being in a coma. There is a conflict of interests, how long do the doctors keep you going for -v- the need to whip out your organs. What % of unlikely to survive do they work on before the say its ok to whip em out?

Doc 1 - 80% sure this person wont pull through - right whip out his eyes, and lungs.

Doc 2 - 95% sure this person wont pull through - whip out his heart and kidneys

Patient - hang on Im not dead yet and might be the 5% that make it......

Patient - uncosious and thinking keep on working me docs' dont give up on me just yet, I might make it but then hears them say - never mind give up now we need his bits for another...

Edited by superlightr on Monday 17th November 13:17

BiggusLaddus

821 posts

233 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
dilbert said:
What would happens if such a law were combined with a euthansia law.
Would it mean that your doctor could sign you off for killing and then sell your organs for personal gain.
Like in 'Coma'?




eekeek

Bing o

Original Poster:

15,184 posts

221 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
tinman0 said:
Bing o said:
Practically State ownership of your organs now - when will we say enough is enough?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7729009.stm
Yeah, we've done this one on PH before, and although I agree with you, you are in for a bumpy thread wink Prepare to be murdered by the keyboard warriors.
I just want to make my own choices in life rather than have the state still interfere when I'm dead.

Mr POD

5,153 posts

194 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
Established 1984 said:
I've always thought that it should be opt-out rather than opt-in. And you not going to be complaining when the measure saves your life or that of somebody you love.
The only issue I have, is that I'm too cynical to believe that the surgeons will want to save me, if they can have my organs.

funk odyssey

1,983 posts

231 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
superlightr said:
Its not a problem if you are dead. really dead. But as I understand it for most cases the organs to be of any use the donor has to be alive, preped and then organs removed then they die.

What if your not dead or about to die, how long do they give you on life suport? How almost dead do you have to be? people have woken up again after being in a coma. There is a conflict of interests, how long do the doctors keep you going for -v- the need to whip out your organs. What % of unlikely to survive do they work on before the say its ok to whip em out?

Doc 1 - 80% sure this person wont pull through - right whip out his eyes, and lungs.

Doc 2 - 95% sure this person wont pull through - whip out his heart and kidneys

Patient - hang on Im not dead yet and might be the 5% that make it......
surely that goes for anyone with a current donor card? where's the difference?

Gun

13,431 posts

220 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
Great idea, there are too many people waiting, and dying, on the transplant list.