UK population must fall to 30m

Author
Discussion

V8mate

Original Poster:

45,899 posts

191 months

Sunday 22nd March 2009
quotequote all
Apparently, we need to reduce our population to 30m in order to achieve a sustainable society.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/art...


I'm happy to step up to the plate and take on this difficult job.

If somene can organise sufficient squads of 'enforcers' I'll get cracking first thing in the morning.

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

219 months

Sunday 22nd March 2009
quotequote all
Why am I not surprised?

eccles

13,753 posts

224 months

Sunday 22nd March 2009
quotequote all
V8mate said:
If somene can organise sufficient squads of 'enforcers' I'll get cracking first thing in the morning.
Are you a closet Nazi or something?

Jasandjules

70,016 posts

231 months

Sunday 22nd March 2009
quotequote all
I don't think we ought to listen a greenie on any issue at all, until they can PROVE beyond any doubt that they are not simply full of s**t.

However, we could still engage in Chav culling, simply to make the country a better place to live.

turbobloke

104,510 posts

262 months

Sunday 22nd March 2009
quotequote all
Political views on sustainability are based on the usual ecomyths.

http://reason.com/rb/rb062602.shtml

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

206 months

Sunday 22nd March 2009
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
Political views on sustainability are based on the usual ecomyths.

http://reason.com/rb/rb062602.shtml
Awwww Turbo don't be a spoilsport

This means we won't be able to cull the chavs

Bing o

15,184 posts

221 months

Sunday 22nd March 2009
quotequote all
eccles said:
V8mate said:
If somene can organise sufficient squads of 'enforcers' I'll get cracking first thing in the morning.
Are you a closet Nazi or something?
No closet involved...

turbobloke

104,510 posts

262 months

Sunday 22nd March 2009
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
turbobloke said:
Political views on sustainability are based on the usual ecomyths.

http://reason.com/rb/rb062602.shtml
Awwww Turbo don't be a spoilsport

This means we won't be able to cull the chavs
Nah. Carry on, we need to tackle genuine environmental pollutants.

V8mate

Original Poster:

45,899 posts

191 months

Sunday 22nd March 2009
quotequote all
Bing o said:
eccles said:
V8mate said:
If somene can organise sufficient squads of 'enforcers' I'll get cracking first thing in the morning.
Are you a closet Nazi or something?
No closet involved...
Neither nationalist nor socialist either!

Mon Ami Mate

6,589 posts

270 months

Sunday 22nd March 2009
quotequote all
V8mate said:
Apparently, we need to reduce our population to 30m in order to achieve a sustainable society.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/art...


I'm happy to step up to the plate and take on this difficult job.

If somene can organise sufficient squads of 'enforcers' I'll get cracking first thing in the morning.
Will Porritt and his chums please do us all a favour then and kill themselves.

rusal

526 posts

187 months

Sunday 22nd March 2009
quotequote all
im confused now. i thought we needed more people so that we can tax them to be able to afford the pensions to pay old people.
i think there is some mileage in that film soilent green day.
if we just turn old people into biscuits it does sort of resolve it all doesnt it. pensions and famine.
cept of course im 50 now so F%*k that then.
who else could we turn into biscuits.
Gordon would make a frikkin big biscuit that could a few families going.

Timberwolf

5,354 posts

220 months

Sunday 22nd March 2009
quotequote all
What with the government running a little short on the old dough, there's always the possibility (given that the source is closely linked to Brown) that these are being punted out as softening-up/investigative exercises towards a reduction of child benefit.

Could go down will in the heartlands.

Erm, </enormous_global_conspiracy>. Be interesting to see if anything else comes of it, though, it's a definite change from the usual, "how dare you, you motorist!"

Orb the Impaler

1,881 posts

192 months

Sunday 22nd March 2009
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
However, we could still engage in Chav culling, simply to make the country a better place to live.
I actually agree that 30m is about right - and about 3bn for the whole planet.

The trouble is that it's not the chavs and detritus that will be culled. In super-PC Britain all able-bodied, middle class people will be exterminated.

The country will then be populated by 30m disabled, chav, ethnic-minority, long-term-sick benefit claimants rolleyes

bosscerbera

8,188 posts

245 months

Sunday 22nd March 2009
quotequote all
61 million to start with; 30m remaining sounds about perfect. I reckon 31m covers the entire welfare state, a good three-quarters of the public sector and their families.

His reasoning is bks though.

Muze ST

279 posts

193 months

Sunday 22nd March 2009
quotequote all
Easy

Kill the 26million chavs and your sorted.

edit then the get id of the 5 million illegal immigrants and workers in thsi country.

Edited by Muze ST on Sunday 22 March 10:39

V8mate

Original Poster:

45,899 posts

191 months

Sunday 22nd March 2009
quotequote all
Orb the Impaler said:
Jasandjules said:
However, we could still engage in Chav culling, simply to make the country a better place to live.
I actually agree that 30m is about right - and about 3bn for the whole planet.

The trouble is that it's not the chavs and detritus that will be culled. In super-PC Britain all able-bodied, middle class people will be exterminated.

The country will then be populated by 30m disabled, chav, ethnic-minority, long-term-sick benefit claimants rolleyes
Not if I'm in charge of the 're-organisation' wink

kit80

4,764 posts

189 months

Sunday 22nd March 2009
quotequote all
Orb the Impaler said:
Jasandjules said:
However, we could still engage in Chav culling, simply to make the country a better place to live.
I actually agree that 30m is about right - and about 3bn for the whole planet.

The trouble is that it's not the chavs and detritus that will be culled. In super-PC Britain all able-bodied, middle class people will be exterminated.

The country will then be populated by 30m disabled, chav, ethnic-minority, long-term-sick benefit claimants rolleyes
yes Sad but true!

Well educated people reproduce less (as there isn't the welfare state benefit incentive to do so).

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

219 months

Sunday 22nd March 2009
quotequote all
V8mate said:
Orb the Impaler said:
Jasandjules said:
However, we could still engage in Chav culling, simply to make the country a better place to live.
I actually agree that 30m is about right - and about 3bn for the whole planet.

The trouble is that it's not the chavs and detritus that will be culled. In super-PC Britain all able-bodied, middle class people will be exterminated.

The country will then be populated by 30m disabled, chav, ethnic-minority, long-term-sick benefit claimants rolleyes
Not if I'm in charge of the 're-organisation' wink
I don't know why you don't just be done with it and put a few swastikas in your profile.

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

264 months

Sunday 22nd March 2009
quotequote all
Hmm so these dheads believe that all the settled indigenous races within the UK should whittle away their numbers in the belief that

The world has too many humans.

Remind me what % of the total worlds population does the uk make up????

That their places (in the UK) will not be taken by even more "unseen" migrants.


But of course it would be seen as Non PC/racist even to suggest that we get shot of(*) the "unseen" migrants in the first place then see how the country stands.


Total nonsense and just goes to show how far down the road to a totalitarian (**) state we are when fascists like this have the governments ear.


(*) Not literally I hasten to add.
(**) Totalitarianism (or totalitarian rule) is a concept used to describe political systems where a state regulates nearly every aspect of public and private life. Giovani Gentile, described totalitarianism as a society in which the ideology of the state had influence, if not power, over most of its citizens.
Totalitarian regimes, in contrast to a dictatorship, establish complete political, social, and cultural control over their subjects, and are usually headed by a charismatic leader.(so were not quite there yet hehe )

elster

17,517 posts

212 months

Sunday 22nd March 2009
quotequote all
10 Pence Short said:
I don't know why you don't just be done with it and put a few swastikas in your profile.
I don't remember chavs in Nazi Germany.