“National Conservatism”
Discussion
Ridgemont said:
ZedLeg said:
Zumbruk said:
There's some world beating whining going on there.
I particularly like watching white middle-class university graduates bleating about the world is being ruined by ... white middle-class university graduates. Presumably the wrong kind of white middle-class university graduates ?
Considering the number of white middle class graduates in positions of power and the current state of everything would suggest that’s almost certainly true.I particularly like watching white middle-class university graduates bleating about the world is being ruined by ... white middle-class university graduates. Presumably the wrong kind of white middle-class university graduates ?
https://www.aljazeera.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/...
Interesting thread. Funny how the defenders of "National Conservatism" seem to think that the only important thing is name calling and the shutting down of debate. As ever, calling a duck a duck isn't name calling and no debate has been shut down. Does anyone have anything positive to say in support of the National Conservative policies or is it all divert and deflect?
JuanCarlosFandango said:
https://youtu.be/egrbN28aaAI
Nice talk from Melanie Phillips too. What a great event. It's like a right wing Woodstock.
Don't quite agree with all of it, but that's a very decent speech, not the only one from this event either.Nice talk from Melanie Phillips too. What a great event. It's like a right wing Woodstock.
67Dino said:
The figures back him up. Not only are the young more left leaning than they were, but the data shows they are not drifting to the right as they grow up either.
(Interesting to see this is true in the US as well as UK)
So Hancock is right. If the Conservative party lurches to the right, then they’re in danger of capturing a diminishing population of older people.
Certainly true in the UK... My friends are mid 30's to early 40's, good jobs, mostly got their own houses, some with kids. Typically through and through blue voters, but socially the Conservatives don't represent many of us. We don't blame immigrants for the problems, we don't believe in any of the "war on woke" bullst, and we don't like the generational divide which has opened up as a result of policies favouring the older people and the retired pensioners. (Interesting to see this is true in the US as well as UK)
So Hancock is right. If the Conservative party lurches to the right, then they’re in danger of capturing a diminishing population of older people.
What does the Conservative party offer to the average millennial (25-45 year old)? They are generally liberal, generally have taken the brunt of the austerity and growth stagnation since 2008 when they entered the workforce, and generally voted against Brexit. Completely the antithesis to the brand of Conservatism over the last 10/12 years.
The Tory party, in it's current form, is a dying organism by virtue of only appealing to a group of voters dying year by year.
EDIT - the other problem is that Tory party members are more right leaning, and so while the only way for the party to survive and appeal to millennials is to move to the centre, the party members, focus groups, and those who can influence the direction of the party are pulling in completely the opposite direction. Not sure how you square that circle, Rishi is pretty centrist IMO, but you only have to look at the loonies elsewhere in the party (including the front bench) to see he's not really in control of the party or the direction it takes. Largely a hangover of Brexit and the Boris getting rid of anyone who disagreed with him, which included a lot of the more mature heads and long standing politicians who could have seen this coming.
Edited by Condi on Saturday 20th May 11:59
Condi said:
67Dino said:
So Hancock is right. If the Conservative party lurches to the right, then they’re in danger of capturing a diminishing population of older people.
Certainly true in the UK... My friends are mid 30's to early 40's, good jobs, mostly got their own houses, some with kids. Typically through and through blue voters, but socially the Conservatives don't represent many of us. We don't blame immigrants for the problems, we don't believe in any of the "war on woke" bullst, and we don't like the generational divide which has opened up as a result of policies favouring the older people and the retired pensioners. What does the Conservative party offer to the average millennial (25-45 year old)? They are generally liberal, generally have taken the brunt of the austerity and growth stagnation since 2008 when they entered the workforce, and generally voted against Brexit. Completely the antithesis to the brand of Conservatism over the last 10/12 years.
The Tory party, in its current form, is a dying organism by virtue of only appealing to a group of voters dying year by year.
….
I’d be interested in Condi’s and others’ views why not, as their failure to capitalise seems to me to be one factor facilitating the Conservatives move to the right.
Carl_Manchester said:
What am I doing? I am actively posting on this forum to get everyone to vote for the Marxists at the next U.K election to get these fake Cons out whilst posting in the Ed Davey thread hoping that he does something of note in order to temper things.
I think it's working. In the opposite direction.Condi said:
Certainly true in the UK... My friends are mid 30's to early 40's, good jobs, mostly got their own houses, some with kids. Typically through and through blue voters, but socially the Conservatives don't represent many of us. We don't blame immigrants for the problems, we don't believe in any of the "war on woke" bullst, and we don't like the generational divide which has opened up as a result of policies favouring the older people and the retired pensioners.
What does the Conservative party offer to the average millennial (25-45 year old)? They are generally liberal, generally have taken the brunt of the austerity and growth stagnation since 2008 when they entered the workforce, and generally voted against Brexit. Completely the antithesis to the brand of Conservatism over the last 10/12 years.
The Tory party, in it's current form, is a dying organism by virtue of only appealing to a group of voters dying year by year.
EDIT - the other problem is that Tory party members are more right leaning, and so while the only way for the party to survive and appeal to millennials is to move to the centre, the party members, focus groups, and those who can influence the direction of the party are pulling in completely the opposite direction. Not sure how you square that circle, Rishi is pretty centrist IMO, but you only have to look at the loonies elsewhere in the party (including the front bench) to see he's not really in control of the party or the direction it takes. Largely a hangover of Brexit and the Boris getting rid of anyone who disagreed with him, which included a lot of the more mature heads and long standing politicians who could have seen this coming.
Good post, which I can echo a lot. I am definitely a lefty now in my mid-30s but my background and initial political views were surefire moderate Conservative. And one thing that has been a consistent factor in my adult life (and which has been a steady push-factor for me away from the Conservatives and conservatism) is that the Conservatives have done nothing but place obstacles in my way. They have done nothing to facilitate or reward my goals in life and have been either entirely uninterested in them or have actively worked against them. And they have nearly always actively antagonised my social values. What does the Conservative party offer to the average millennial (25-45 year old)? They are generally liberal, generally have taken the brunt of the austerity and growth stagnation since 2008 when they entered the workforce, and generally voted against Brexit. Completely the antithesis to the brand of Conservatism over the last 10/12 years.
The Tory party, in it's current form, is a dying organism by virtue of only appealing to a group of voters dying year by year.
EDIT - the other problem is that Tory party members are more right leaning, and so while the only way for the party to survive and appeal to millennials is to move to the centre, the party members, focus groups, and those who can influence the direction of the party are pulling in completely the opposite direction. Not sure how you square that circle, Rishi is pretty centrist IMO, but you only have to look at the loonies elsewhere in the party (including the front bench) to see he's not really in control of the party or the direction it takes. Largely a hangover of Brexit and the Boris getting rid of anyone who disagreed with him, which included a lot of the more mature heads and long standing politicians who could have seen this coming.
I will offer a challenge to the bit in bold though:
The Tory membership is not uniformly more right-wing than the parliamentary party - it is significantly to the left economically and moderately to the right socially (significantly in some core issues).
Worth mentioning that Labour voters and MPs are in almost perfect lock-step economically, but Labour voters (in aggregate) align almost perfectly with the Tory MP social alignment.
(I acknowledge that these surveys were done in 2019 - it would be interesting to re-do them to see how those variances and alignments have changed now that both main parties are somewhat different and have actively tried to rid themselves of certain voter bases from 2019).
In general, the electorate is more socially conservative (and much more socially authoritarian) than the political class, and much more economically progressive.
This shouldn't really be a surprise - anyone who has the vaguest sense of the pulse of the Average British Voter knows there's a big constituency out there for "tax the rich, stiff the bankers, nationalise the water, pay the nurses, deport the asylum seekers, keep The Gay out of schools, ban Halal and bring back the death penalty!"
This is why I am interested in the creation of this National Conservatism (in the way that, as a kid, you might be simultaneously repulsed and fascinated by a maggot-infested badger corpse you find in the woods...) because it is a right-wing attempt to break the neoliberal orthodoxy which is failing around us and square that circle - strong government intervention and investment in national infrastructure, radical reforms of services, stoking of free enterprise and 'robust' nationalism and social conservatism.
Edited by 2xChevrons on Saturday 20th May 12:58
JuanCarlosFandango said:
I think English literature is very much a part of British culture.
I think England made some especially significant contributions to modern democracy. Britain as a whole did too.
I'm sure there are lovely cheeses from Wales, Scotland and Ireland but I am especially into Cheddar and Stilton at the moment. Both of which happen to be English.
So yes, singling it out.
Eh, you don't know your history then. There was not really any democracy before England became the UK in 1707. The significant contributions to modern democracy are all post 1800 union with Ireland, so it is meaningless to talk of English vs UK contributions. Gladstone was from a Scottish family for example.I think England made some especially significant contributions to modern democracy. Britain as a whole did too.
I'm sure there are lovely cheeses from Wales, Scotland and Ireland but I am especially into Cheddar and Stilton at the moment. Both of which happen to be English.
So yes, singling it out.
wisbech said:
Eh, you don't know your history then. There was not really any democracy before England became the UK in 1707. The significant contributions to modern democracy are all post 1800 union with Ireland, so it is meaningless to talk of English vs UK contributions. Gladstone was from a Scottish family for example.
Well that's common law, magna carta, parliament, the civil war and the bill of rights all for nought then.Yes, modern democracy took shape after the union, and I am proud to inherit that tradition too. They're not in opposition.
67Dino said:
The figures back him up. Not only are the young more left leaning than they were, but the data shows they are not drifting to the right as they grow up either.
(Interesting to see this is true in the US as well as UK)
So Hancock is right. If the Conservative party lurches to the right, then they’re in danger of capturing a diminishing population of older people.
Hancock is likely one of the worst senior politicians in critical role we have ever had in a time of crisis. He is also arguing for an essentially pointless strategy. Pointless because Conservatives becoming Labour in order to be elected rather defeats the purpose. You might as well elect Labour and have a party beholden to different vested interests instead. If there is indeed a permanent shift in attitudes then the role of the Conservatives would be better as offering an effective opposition and continue to argue the case for conservative solutions.(Interesting to see this is true in the US as well as UK)
So Hancock is right. If the Conservative party lurches to the right, then they’re in danger of capturing a diminishing population of older people.
I also don't actually think there has been a permanent shift either. We are seeing the failure of an entire governing agenda and the Conservatives have been in office while this culminated. If Labour also provide no solutions then the voters will be open to
alternatives.
JuanCarlosFandango said:
wisbech said:
Eh, you don't know your history then. There was not really any democracy before England became the UK in 1707. The significant contributions to modern democracy are all post 1800 union with Ireland, so it is meaningless to talk of English vs UK contributions. Gladstone was from a Scottish family for example.
Well that's common law, magna carta, parliament, the civil war and the bill of rights all for nought then.Yes, modern democracy took shape after the union, and I am proud to inherit that tradition too. They're not in opposition.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff