CV19 - Cure Worse Than The Disease? (Vol 19)

CV19 - Cure Worse Than The Disease? (Vol 19)

Author
Discussion

isaldiri

18,758 posts

169 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
RSTurboPaul said:
IIRC Australia rolled out mRNA treatments prior to Covid arriving and a rise in reported ill health was reported before Covid hit.

I am sure I have seen a graph somewhere but don't have time to look it up now.
Source please that mRNA treatments were widely rolled out to people pre covid.

RSTurboPaul

10,531 posts

259 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
isaldiri said:
RSTurboPaul said:
IIRC Australia rolled out mRNA treatments prior to Covid arriving and a rise in reported ill health was reported before Covid hit.

I am sure I have seen a graph somewhere but don't have time to look it up now.
Source please that mRNA treatments were widely rolled out to people pre covid.
To clarify, I should have said 'prior to Covid arriving in large numbers in Australia'.


https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations




https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/coronavirus-d...



I note the lack of granularity on which injectable products were administered.

The DHAC website gives the following information regarding a timeline for Pfizer products:

https://www.health.gov.au/our-work/covid-19-vaccin...

DHAC website said:
In September 2021, the Australian Government announced a dose sharing partnership with the UK. Under this agreement Australia received 4 million Pfizer doses from the UK in September 2021. The Government sent 4 million doses back to the UK in late 2021.

In August 2021, the Australian Government announced a dose swap deal with Singapore. Australia gained access to 500,000 Singaporean Pfizer doses to boost the vaccine program in September 2021, and returned 500,000 Pfizer doses to Singapore in November 2021.

In August 2021, the Australian Government bought 1 million Pfizer doses from the Republic of Poland.

In July 2021, the Australian Government announced the purchase of 85 million more Pfizer doses. These were planned to be booster doses, ensuring Australia’s supply of mRNA vaccines in 2022 and 2023.

In May 2021, the Australian Government purchased 500,000 Pfizer doses through the COVAX Facility.

In April 2021, the Australian Government ordered a further 20 million doses of the Pfizer vaccine.

In February 2021, Australia ordered an extra 10 million doses of the Pfizer vaccine.

In November 2020, the Australian Government agreed to buy 10 million doses of the Pfizer vaccine.
And the following for Moderna:

DHAC said:
The Moderna vaccine is another mRNA vaccine, similar to Pfizer. The TGA provisionally approved the Moderna vaccine for use in Australia on 9 August 2021, and granted full registration to the product on 21 April 2023.

Doses for Australia

We have a contract for 28 million doses:

10 million doses of the original formulation, available in late 2021.

15 million doses of variant-specific versions to address longer-term immunity and viral variants, available in 2022.

3 million doses of a variant-specific version to ensure an adequate portfolio of vaccines through 2023 and 2024.

In September 2021, the Australian Government purchased an additional 1 million Moderna doses from European Union member states.


The Australian Government has entered into a 10-year partnership with Moderna and the Victorian Government that will see Moderna build an mRNA vaccine manufacturing facility at Monash University Victoria.

ruggedscotty

5,642 posts

210 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
jameswills said:
What about unintended consequences like autism due to vaccinations? Or any other manner of auto immune disease thanks to vaccines but no one wants to mention?

But no, keep pushing those jabs. It’s the only thing that saves humanity apparently
autism due to vaccinations - and just like that any credibility that you had just vanished.

to even try and link autism to vaccines ? what are you smoking? even the person that originally said this... now denies it. So please please Im curious where are you getting your information from, what research based fact checked and peer reviewed documents are you privy to that confirms what you have said.

Unreal

3,613 posts

26 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
ruggedscotty said:
jameswills said:
What about unintended consequences like autism due to vaccinations? Or any other manner of auto immune disease thanks to vaccines but no one wants to mention?

But no, keep pushing those jabs. It’s the only thing that saves humanity apparently
autism due to vaccinations - and just like that any credibility that you had just vanished.

to even try and link autism to vaccines ? what are you smoking? even the person that originally said this... now denies it. So please please Im curious where are you getting your information from, what research based fact checked and peer reviewed documents are you privy to that confirms what you have said.
No-one knows what causes autism. Any direct attribution therefore has to be treated with caution but completely ruling out a link with vaccinations would seem unwise to me as well.

ruggedscotty

5,642 posts

210 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
In many regards, vaccines—and in particular, those for mumps, measles, and rubella (MMR)—have the makings of a cause-effect myth.5 The notion that “if B follows A, then A is probably the cause of B” is the most common misinterpretation of causality.

The MMR vaccine is administered to 12- to 18-month-old children. At this age, the first signs of an impending developmental condition, such as autism, start creeping in and become noticeable. The idea that “vaccine precedes event, hence vaccine causes disease” fits the cognitive bias to search for patterns and is much more comforting than the notion of coincidence or bad luck.

A simplistic explanation, such as the claim that the emerging but still weak immune system of the toddler is overstimulated and damaged by the vaccine, adds credibility to the cause-effect sequence. At the same time, the current and future benefits of the vaccine are much more difficult to imagine and process. Whereas intervening to treat an existing condition is easy to understand, the notion of prevention is intangible.

Paradoxically, the decrease in vaccination is the result of the success of vaccines in eradicating the respective illnesses. The benefit of injecting a substance to prevent a disease that neither the subject nor anyone around her has ever seen, such as measles, is difficult to comprehend. However, almost everyone has met a person affected by autism, and the prospect of having it is scary.

General numerical illiteracy adds to the bias in risk assessment.

isaldiri

18,758 posts

169 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
RSTurboPaul said:
isaldiri said:
RSTurboPaul said:
IIRC Australia rolled out mRNA treatments prior to Covid arriving and a rise in reported ill health was reported before Covid hit.

I am sure I have seen a graph somewhere but don't have time to look it up now.
Source please that mRNA treatments were widely rolled out to people pre covid.
To clarify, I should have said 'prior to Covid arriving in large numbers in Australia'.
Right. So your argument is that the mRNA vaccines were rolled out in Oz prior to covid arriving in very large numbers of cases by way of omicron which only really happened end of 2021/early 2022 - I can certainly agree with that.

Can you point to a 'rise in reported ill health' that has increased in line with that vaccination rollout throughout early 2021?

Rollin

6,123 posts

246 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
No doubt Spode has a few Aussie acquaintances who've had the odd ache and pain. Just let him check his notebook.

Roderick Spode

3,167 posts

50 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
Rollin said:
No doubt Spode has a few Aussie acquaintances who've had the odd ache and pain. Just let him check his notebook.
Another valuable, nay indispensable contribution there from [T]Rollin. Whatever would we do without your wit, wisdom and insight?

No doubt earned a few 'attaboy' pats on the back from like minded raconteurs. Be sure to cash them in before they expire.

andyeds1234

2,301 posts

171 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
ruggedscotty said:
jameswills said:
What about unintended consequences like autism due to vaccinations? Or any other manner of auto immune disease thanks to vaccines but no one wants to mention?

But no, keep pushing those jabs. It’s the only thing that saves humanity apparently
autism due to vaccinations - and just like that any credibility that you had just vanished.
roflroflrofl

I feel that stable door was left open, quite some time ago.

Hants PHer

5,811 posts

112 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
isaldiri said:
Right. So your argument is that the mRNA vaccines were rolled out in Oz prior to covid arriving in very large numbers of cases by way of omicron which only really happened end of 2021/early 2022 - I can certainly agree with that.

Can you point to a 'rise in reported ill health' that has increased in line with that vaccination rollout throughout early 2021?
This analysis might be useful:
https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/measuring-australi...

It states that excess deaths in 2021 were 1.6% above expected. Covid-19 vaccines were rolled out from February 2021, well before the major Omicron wave of early 2022. So it doesn't appear that the Covid-19 vaccines created major harms.

Of course, a crazy person will say "Ah, but the killer vaccines didn't start wiping out millions until 2022 you see."
Or, "Oh, the Australian Bureau of Statistics, you can't trust them, they falsify the data!" jester



andyeds1234

2,301 posts

171 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
Roderick Spode said:
RSTurboPaul said:
IIRC Australia rolled out mRNA treatments prior to Covid arriving and a rise in reported ill health was reported before Covid hit.

I am sure I have seen a graph somewhere but don't have time to look it up now.
Aren't you listening? It was all Covid. Nothing to see here, collect your parrot on the way out.
I didn’t say it was all Covid, but lingering ill health following a global viral pandemic seems fairly likely, no?
There is no doubt that vaccines can cause side effects. I’m not sure anybody denies that, but the pandemic itself is a fairly sizeable elephant in the room, for causation of lingering ill health.


Elysium

13,919 posts

188 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
Unreal said:
ruggedscotty said:
jameswills said:
What about unintended consequences like autism due to vaccinations? Or any other manner of auto immune disease thanks to vaccines but no one wants to mention?

But no, keep pushing those jabs. It’s the only thing that saves humanity apparently
autism due to vaccinations - and just like that any credibility that you had just vanished.

to even try and link autism to vaccines ? what are you smoking? even the person that originally said this... now denies it. So please please Im curious where are you getting your information from, what research based fact checked and peer reviewed documents are you privy to that confirms what you have said.
No-one knows what causes autism. Any direct attribution therefore has to be treated with caution but completely ruling out a link with vaccinations would seem unwise to me as well.
I am quite certain that autism has been with us far longer than vaccines have.

In fact some scientists believe that autism has played an important part in human evolution.

https://theconversation.com/how-our-autistic-ances...

Autism is genetic and hereditary. Autistic genes have been selected repeatedly through generations. Because autistic people tend to be agents of change.

It seems entirely unlikely that this genetic condition that can be seen in people throughout history is a side effect of modern vaccines.

It’s a mistake to assume that autism is characterised by people with severe disability and communication difficulties. The same condition gave us Einstein and Elon Musk.




Unreal

3,613 posts

26 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
Elysium said:
Unreal said:
ruggedscotty said:
jameswills said:
What about unintended consequences like autism due to vaccinations? Or any other manner of auto immune disease thanks to vaccines but no one wants to mention?

But no, keep pushing those jabs. It’s the only thing that saves humanity apparently
autism due to vaccinations - and just like that any credibility that you had just vanished.

to even try and link autism to vaccines ? what are you smoking? even the person that originally said this... now denies it. So please please Im curious where are you getting your information from, what research based fact checked and peer reviewed documents are you privy to that confirms what you have said.
No-one knows what causes autism. Any direct attribution therefore has to be treated with caution but completely ruling out a link with vaccinations would seem unwise to me as well.
I am quite certain that autism has been with us far longer than vaccines have.

In fact some scientists believe that autism has played an important part in human evolution.

https://theconversation.com/how-our-autistic-ances...

Autism is genetic and hereditary. Autistic genes have been selected repeatedly through generations. Because autistic people tend to be agents of change.

It seems entirely unlikely that this genetic condition that can be seen in people throughout history is a side effect of modern vaccines.

It’s a mistake to assume that autism is characterised by people with severe disability and communication difficulties. The same condition gave us Einstein and Elon Musk.
I repeat. No-one knows what causes autism. Some scientists think it is largely genetic related. Some don't. In my experience, with two autistic members of the family, autistic people are no more likely to be agents of change or able to display special talents than they are to be withdrawn non productive members of society. Obviously, famous people who are also diagnosed as autistic tend to be receive a lot of publicity. The same thing happens with dyslexia.

I rule nothing out in terms of causes.

Rollin

6,123 posts

246 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
Remember when people said they'd never seen any antivax sentiment on this thread? rofl




Elysium

13,919 posts

188 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
Unreal said:
Elysium said:
Unreal said:
ruggedscotty said:
jameswills said:
What about unintended consequences like autism due to vaccinations? Or any other manner of auto immune disease thanks to vaccines but no one wants to mention?

But no, keep pushing those jabs. It’s the only thing that saves humanity apparently
autism due to vaccinations - and just like that any credibility that you had just vanished.

to even try and link autism to vaccines ? what are you smoking? even the person that originally said this... now denies it. So please please Im curious where are you getting your information from, what research based fact checked and peer reviewed documents are you privy to that confirms what you have said.
No-one knows what causes autism. Any direct attribution therefore has to be treated with caution but completely ruling out a link with vaccinations would seem unwise to me as well.
I am quite certain that autism has been with us far longer than vaccines have.

In fact some scientists believe that autism has played an important part in human evolution.

https://theconversation.com/how-our-autistic-ances...

Autism is genetic and hereditary. Autistic genes have been selected repeatedly through generations. Because autistic people tend to be agents of change.

It seems entirely unlikely that this genetic condition that can be seen in people throughout history is a side effect of modern vaccines.

It’s a mistake to assume that autism is characterised by people with severe disability and communication difficulties. The same condition gave us Einstein and Elon Musk.
I repeat. No-one knows what causes autism. Some scientists think it is largely genetic related. Some don't. In my experience, with two autistic members of the family, autistic people are no more likely to be agents of change or able to display special talents than they are to be withdrawn non productive members of society. Obviously, famous people who are also diagnosed as autistic tend to be receive a lot of publicity. The same thing happens with dyslexia.

I rule nothing out in terms of causes.
Repeating it isn’t going to make me agree smile

There is very strong evidence that autism is hereditary. Whilst a specific genetic cause has yet to be proven there is really no other explanation for the way it presents in families through multiple generations:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_auti...

The fact that the diagnostic criteria require symptoms to “limit and impair everyday functioning” reinforces the idea that autism is a disability, but for most people this is not the case. For many neurodivergence has positive aspects.

I think it is entirely reasonable to rule out vaccination as a ‘cause’ of autism, because the condition very clearly existed before vaccines were developed.

Michelangelo, Darwin, Newton and Mozart are all thought to have been likely to be autistic. Their ‘different’ brain function existed long before vaccines.





r3g

3,353 posts

25 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
More revelations from the Scottish Covid Inquiry - Midazolam "concerns" (JC). Claims of state sponsored murder is a recurring theme in the comments. scratchchin

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGk6_w1Bv6A

pavarotti1980

4,987 posts

85 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
r3g said:
More revelations from the Scottish Covid Inquiry - Midazolam "concerns" (JC). Claims of state sponsored murder is a recurring theme in the comments. scratchchin

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGk6_w1Bv6A
Maybe you can run through the pharmacokinetics/licensed indications/ current uses of midazolam and then try and argue there is a link.

Maybe you could run through the dispensing data down to VMPP level and explain it and back up your theory of state sponsored euthanasia (spoiler alert it wont)

Or more likely it will be gobbledegook and various links to YouTube and other weird websites and lots of whataboutery.

Maybe you would prefer patients are not prescribed just in case drugs as part of end of life care and they are agitated, drooling and in pain instead?


Edited by pavarotti1980 on Wednesday 15th May 06:29

Elysium

13,919 posts

188 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
pavarotti1980 said:
r3g said:
More revelations from the Scottish Covid Inquiry - Midazolam "concerns" (JC). Claims of state sponsored murder is a recurring theme in the comments. scratchchin

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGk6_w1Bv6A
Maybe you can run through the pharmacokinetics/licensed indications/ current uses of midazolam and then try and argue there is a link.

Maybe you could run through the dispensing data down to VMPP level and explain it and back up your theory of state sponsored euthanasia (spoiler alert it wont)

Or more likely it will be gobbledegook and various links to YouTube and other weird websites and lots of whataboutery.

Maybe you would prefer patients are not prescribed just in case drugs as part of end of life care and they are agitated, drooling and in pain instead?
I think this is an example of you being so determined to challenge the ‘wrong’ thinking of others that you have failed to appreciate the context.

If you had watched the video you would have seen individuals presenting to the enquiry about the loss of loved ones. You would have heard them express concern about these people having been given drugs that are associated with ‘end of life’ care. Where we all know the boundary blurs between easing discomfort and ‘helping’ those who are suffering them along their way.

We know that large numbers of elderly people were discharged from hospitals to care homes to free up capacity. We know that this very likely seeded the first wave of COVID in those care homes. We know that many more people than usual died in those care homes. We know that many more doses of Midazolam were procured than is usual.

The COVID enquiry evidence isn’t gobbledegook, regardless of your opinion of the YouTuber that is discussing it. This subject deserves public discussion and investigation, because it is entirely possible that unnecessary harm was caused.



Unreal

3,613 posts

26 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
Elysium said:
Unreal said:
Elysium said:
Unreal said:
ruggedscotty said:
jameswills said:
What about unintended consequences like autism due to vaccinations? Or any other manner of auto immune disease thanks to vaccines but no one wants to mention?

But no, keep pushing those jabs. It’s the only thing that saves humanity apparently
autism due to vaccinations - and just like that any credibility that you had just vanished.

to even try and link autism to vaccines ? what are you smoking? even the person that originally said this... now denies it. So please please Im curious where are you getting your information from, what research based fact checked and peer reviewed documents are you privy to that confirms what you have said.
No-one knows what causes autism. Any direct attribution therefore has to be treated with caution but completely ruling out a link with vaccinations would seem unwise to me as well.
I am quite certain that autism has been with us far longer than vaccines have.

In fact some scientists believe that autism has played an important part in human evolution.

https://theconversation.com/how-our-autistic-ances...

Autism is genetic and hereditary. Autistic genes have been selected repeatedly through generations. Because autistic people tend to be agents of change.

It seems entirely unlikely that this genetic condition that can be seen in people throughout history is a side effect of modern vaccines.

It’s a mistake to assume that autism is characterised by people with severe disability and communication difficulties. The same condition gave us Einstein and Elon Musk.
I repeat. No-one knows what causes autism. Some scientists think it is largely genetic related. Some don't. In my experience, with two autistic members of the family, autistic people are no more likely to be agents of change or able to display special talents than they are to be withdrawn non productive members of society. Obviously, famous people who are also diagnosed as autistic tend to be receive a lot of publicity. The same thing happens with dyslexia.

I rule nothing out in terms of causes.
Repeating it isn’t going to make me agree smile

There is very strong evidence that autism is hereditary. Whilst a specific genetic cause has yet to be proven there is really no other explanation for the way it presents in families through multiple generations:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_auti...

The fact that the diagnostic criteria require symptoms to “limit and impair everyday functioning” reinforces the idea that autism is a disability, but for most people this is not the case. For many neurodivergence has positive aspects.

I think it is entirely reasonable to rule out vaccination as a ‘cause’ of autism, because the condition very clearly existed before vaccines were developed.

Michelangelo, Darwin, Newton and Mozart are all thought to have been likely to be autistic. Their ‘different’ brain function existed long before vaccines.
Likewise, suggestions and belief aren't evidence. It would be surprising if there was no genetic link, given what we see with many inherited conditions but we have no proof and a genetic link is not a root cause.

I understand the desire to portray autism in a good light but claims that people ranging from Einstein to Michelangelo were autistic are just laughable. I can see it with Elon Musk and for balance I'd throw in that irritating nerk Chris Packham. People are rather less keen to talk about the many more people who are life limited in a wide variety of ways. They aren't blessed with an ability to play chess just by looking at a board or instantly tell you what the day of the week it was on 15 May 1183.

The landscape has changed in recent years. Whilst it seems likely that what we call autism has been around for many years, its current prevalence demands explanation not the attempted celebration we often see. Anyone over the age of 50 will be able to testify to the absence in their schools and communities of the widespread autistic traits so commonplace today. Children did not commonly have meltdowns, bash their heads against walls or be non-verbal and unable to make eye contact. We know that these behaviours cannot be suppressed so the idea that they were always present and we just didn't recognise them is a construction not a fact, a modern construction of people who weren't there.

I'd obviously be more relaxed about the condition if autism meant brilliance with difference but it most definitely does not in the majority of cases I see, For that reason alone I would like to see the causes identified, which has nothing to do with blaming vaccines and everything to do with ruling nothing out, including vaccines.