buy to let or holiday let?
Poll: buy to let or holiday let?
Total Members Polled: 80
Discussion
LooneyTunes said:
Some of mine are higher end and, although I might only get 4-5% income from them, general house price increases have pushed values up by more than the cost of that £35k flat. Others can easily value enhance by six figure sums through refurb etc.
Hmmm, Glasgow isn't a BIG city, so what tends to happen is if values rise in one area, say the west end, then before too long the south side starts to rise and then the east end starts catching up. The poor old north end is always the last but it catches up eventually. Would imagine that's pretty similar all around the UK.The other thing is the expensive property rises more arithmetically, but at the same %age as the poor stuff, so the 500k flat becomes 600k and the 50k flat becomes 60k. So one guy spends 500 and makes 100 and the other guy spends 500 as 50 x 10 and makes 100 too. But the second guy outguns the first guys rent income by a considerable margin. Up here a 500k flat might make 2kpm even 2.5k. But the 50k flats make 450-600. So 10 flat guy makes at least twice posh flat guy's income.
Gentrification often takes place as a result of local government policy or even national government policy which eventually trickles down into every area which means that you can buy a property in a run down area and be pretty sure that it won't stay run down forever, especially when the entire UK nation's property market is moving on an upward value gradient. (with some but really few exceptions).
Other things come into play too. That £35k flat is actually worth £50k. It's a misprice. And I'm also pretty confident it sold for £40k. So whoever bought it has made an unrealised capital gain of £10k or 25% before a ball's kicked.
25% instant capital gain isn't to be sniffed at and is definitely massively harder to obtain further upmarket where IMO underpricing isn't common and overpricing is.
Edited by Groat on Tuesday 26th April 00:48
Groat said:
Hmmm, Glasgow isn't a BIG city, so what tends to happen is if values rise in one area, say the west end, then before too long the south side starts to rise and then the east end starts catching up. The poor old north end is always the last but it catches up eventually. Would imagine that's pretty similar all around the UK.
The other thing is the expensive property rises more arithmetically, but at the same %age as the poor stuff, so the 500k flat becomes 600k and the 50k flat becomes 60k. So one guy spends 500 and makes 100 and the other guy spends 500 as 50 x 10 and makes 100 too. But the second guy outguns the first guys rent income by a considerable margin. Up here a 500k flat might make 2kpm even 2.5k. But the 50k flats make 450-600. So 10 flat guy makes at least twice posh flat guy's income.
Gentrification often takes place as a result of local government policy or even national government policy which eventually trickles down into every area which means that you can buy a property in a run down area and be pretty sure that it won't stay run down forever, especially when the entire UK nation's property market is moving on an upward value gradient. (with some but really few exceptions).
Other things come into play too. That £35k flat is actually worth £50k. It's a misprice. And I'm also pretty confident it sold for £40k. So whoever bought it has made an unrealised capital gain of £10k or 25% before a ball's kicked.
25% instant capital gain isn't to be sniffed at and is definitely massively harder to obtain further upmarket where IMO underpricing isn't common and overpricing is.
I tend to see that logic as sound. For a BTL cheaper is often better. In the past I have picked up cheap stuff from auctions ( the old Estates Gazette auction issues had loads). Usually in areas where I wouldn’t live. However the strong yields can be offset by the properties where the tenants default on the rent. In a crappy area this is more likely. The benchmark is yield across the portfolio rather than per unit. The other thing is the expensive property rises more arithmetically, but at the same %age as the poor stuff, so the 500k flat becomes 600k and the 50k flat becomes 60k. So one guy spends 500 and makes 100 and the other guy spends 500 as 50 x 10 and makes 100 too. But the second guy outguns the first guys rent income by a considerable margin. Up here a 500k flat might make 2kpm even 2.5k. But the 50k flats make 450-600. So 10 flat guy makes at least twice posh flat guy's income.
Gentrification often takes place as a result of local government policy or even national government policy which eventually trickles down into every area which means that you can buy a property in a run down area and be pretty sure that it won't stay run down forever, especially when the entire UK nation's property market is moving on an upward value gradient. (with some but really few exceptions).
Other things come into play too. That £35k flat is actually worth £50k. It's a misprice. And I'm also pretty confident it sold for £40k. So whoever bought it has made an unrealised capital gain of £10k or 25% before a ball's kicked.
25% instant capital gain isn't to be sniffed at and is definitely massively harder to obtain further upmarket where IMO underpricing isn't common and overpricing is.
Edited by Groat on Tuesday 26th April 00:48
blueg33 said:
I tend to see that logic as sound. For a BTL cheaper is often better. In the past I have picked up cheap stuff from auctions ( the old Estates Gazette auction issues had loads). Usually in areas where I wouldn’t live. However the strong yields can be offset by the properties where the tenants default on the rent. In a crappy area this is more likely. The benchmark is yield across the portfolio rather than per unit.
Lots of cheap property brings lots of headaches though even if the yields are much better. Edit - Sorry can see you typed exactly that. Brain fart!
Edited by dmahon on Tuesday 26th April 06:39
GT03ROB said:
Welshbeef said:
Fair enough - he hasn’t populated his garage & im guessing I cannot ask for the custard test?
Welshy Groat has been a regular on the property investment & pension threads for many years now. There are many posters you could call custard on but not Groak. To top it off we’ve now got custard tests being wheeled out for the ready availability of 95k!!
Welshchap, the custard test is for when someone claims to have three F40’s, one in each colour of the Italian flag, but displays no car knowledge and has 3 posts to their name.
Not for the ability to access (relatively small) sums of capital.
blueg33 said:
Groat said:
Hmmm, Glasgow isn't a BIG city, so what tends to happen is if values rise in one area, say the west end, then before too long the south side starts to rise and then the east end starts catching up. The poor old north end is always the last but it catches up eventually. Would imagine that's pretty similar all around the UK.
The other thing is the expensive property rises more arithmetically, but at the same %age as the poor stuff, so the 500k flat becomes 600k and the 50k flat becomes 60k. So one guy spends 500 and makes 100 and the other guy spends 500 as 50 x 10 and makes 100 too. But the second guy outguns the first guys rent income by a considerable margin. Up here a 500k flat might make 2kpm even 2.5k. But the 50k flats make 450-600. So 10 flat guy makes at least twice posh flat guy's income.
Gentrification often takes place as a result of local government policy or even national government policy which eventually trickles down into every area which means that you can buy a property in a run down area and be pretty sure that it won't stay run down forever, especially when the entire UK nation's property market is moving on an upward value gradient. (with some but really few exceptions).
Other things come into play too. That £35k flat is actually worth £50k. It's a misprice. And I'm also pretty confident it sold for £40k. So whoever bought it has made an unrealised capital gain of £10k or 25% before a ball's kicked.
25% instant capital gain isn't to be sniffed at and is definitely massively harder to obtain further upmarket where IMO underpricing isn't common and overpricing is.
I tend to see that logic as sound. For a BTL cheaper is often better. In the past I have picked up cheap stuff from auctions ( the old Estates Gazette auction issues had loads). Usually in areas where I wouldn’t live. However the strong yields can be offset by the properties where the tenants default on the rent. In a crappy area this is more likely. The benchmark is yield across the portfolio rather than per unit. The other thing is the expensive property rises more arithmetically, but at the same %age as the poor stuff, so the 500k flat becomes 600k and the 50k flat becomes 60k. So one guy spends 500 and makes 100 and the other guy spends 500 as 50 x 10 and makes 100 too. But the second guy outguns the first guys rent income by a considerable margin. Up here a 500k flat might make 2kpm even 2.5k. But the 50k flats make 450-600. So 10 flat guy makes at least twice posh flat guy's income.
Gentrification often takes place as a result of local government policy or even national government policy which eventually trickles down into every area which means that you can buy a property in a run down area and be pretty sure that it won't stay run down forever, especially when the entire UK nation's property market is moving on an upward value gradient. (with some but really few exceptions).
Other things come into play too. That £35k flat is actually worth £50k. It's a misprice. And I'm also pretty confident it sold for £40k. So whoever bought it has made an unrealised capital gain of £10k or 25% before a ball's kicked.
25% instant capital gain isn't to be sniffed at and is definitely massively harder to obtain further upmarket where IMO underpricing isn't common and overpricing is.
Edited by Groat on Tuesday 26th April 00:48
As for mispriced/bargain purchases, correct that there aren’t a lot of them higher up. They are there but you’re less likely to see them on rightmove. Bought two recently, both well above UK average price, one where there were offers 25% higher, the other never saw the open market and easy to see it going 30% higher if it hadn’t had a defaulting tenant who wasn’t prepared to allow internal inspection of the property (tart it up with 20% of the purchase price and it’d be worth 75%+ more than I paid for it). The difference is that there’s no waiting for government policy or other gentrification of other areas to take place and you could buy, redecorate/renovate, and flip these for healthy returns.
As for the bit in bold, seem to also get some more “needy” tenants towards the lower end who will contact about the smallest little thing. But on the flip side some of them are kept absolutely immaculately. It’s not risk free higher up though where I recovered defaults could be significant and the damage a tenant could cause can run to large numbers.
I’m not saying that your model is wrong, Groat, in fact I’d be looking at the volume side and outsourcing it all if I lived near Glasgow, but that sort of stock isn’t available where I live. For me it makes sense to push a bit higher than my local market’s entry point, save on management costs, and adopt an approach which sees those unrealised gains as being quite important. Different strategies, different return profiles, the important thing is that we’re each happy with what we do/get out of it.
(Typo corrected)
Edited by LooneyTunes on Tuesday 26th April 07:19
dmahon said:
blueg33 said:
I tend to see that logic as sound. For a BTL cheaper is often better. In the past I have picked up cheap stuff from auctions ( the old Estates Gazette auction issues had loads). Usually in areas where I wouldn’t live. However the strong yields can be offset by the properties where the tenants default on the rent. In a crappy area this is more likely. The benchmark is yield across the portfolio rather than per unit.
Lots of cheap property brings lots of headaches though even if the yields are much better. Edit - Sorry can see you typed exactly that. Brain fart!
Edited by dmahon on Tuesday 26th April 06:39
DoubleSix said:
This thread is hilarious.
To top it off we’ve now got custard tests being wheeled out for the ready availability of 95k!!
Welshchap, the custard test is for when someone claims to have three F40’s, one in each colour of the Italian flag, but displays no car knowledge and has 3 posts to their name.
Not for the ability to access (relatively small) sums of capital.
Or if someone claims to be a Finance Director and yet shows no financial nous. To top it off we’ve now got custard tests being wheeled out for the ready availability of 95k!!
Welshchap, the custard test is for when someone claims to have three F40’s, one in each colour of the Italian flag, but displays no car knowledge and has 3 posts to their name.
Not for the ability to access (relatively small) sums of capital.
Abdul Abulbul Amir said:
DoubleSix said:
This thread is hilarious.
To top it off we’ve now got custard tests being wheeled out for the ready availability of 95k!!
Welshchap, the custard test is for when someone claims to have three F40’s, one in each colour of the Italian flag, but displays no car knowledge and has 3 posts to their name.
Not for the ability to access (relatively small) sums of capital.
Or if someone claims to be a Finance Director and yet shows no financial nous. To top it off we’ve now got custard tests being wheeled out for the ready availability of 95k!!
Welshchap, the custard test is for when someone claims to have three F40’s, one in each colour of the Italian flag, but displays no car knowledge and has 3 posts to their name.
Not for the ability to access (relatively small) sums of capital.
Welshbeef said:
rfisher said:
Welshbeef said:
Groat said:
Welshbeef said:
Well when I ask would it be financed or cash buy outright - I don’t get any indication from your “aaaaaaarrggh just missed this” statement. Maybe it’s local slang but sorry didn’t give me a hint that you had £35k ready to drop.
I see! Wasn't aware that "just missed this" meant anything different in any other UK dialect. It means missed OUT on it. Didn't get it. Too late. It went too quick. Took second prize. Whatever you want to call it. No cigar for me!Having said that, it's the usual old story. Miss one bus and another two arrive. Seen a 2 bed in the east end for £60k that'll do £650 a month which isn't spectacular but certainly is better than playing in the equity casino, waiting for a premium bond to come up, or losing money on crypto-nonsense etc etc. And I prefer changing tenants once every few years to every few days plus voids, so no FHLs thanks. Not even to stay in, having discovered that what FHL owners consider 'luxury' and what me and boss consider luxury seem never ever to match. The last "luxury apartment" was in Nice. Fled after 24 hours. The one before was in Madeira. Place was ok-ish but the owner omitted to tell us that the LA was digging a supersized tunnel with a supersized tunnel digging machine about 50 feet from the flat which after a couple of days had us feeling like a pair of milkshakes.
Edited by Groat on Sunday 24th April 19:20
I don't think he's short of a Groat or two.
Whilst he doesn't own half of Glasgow, he owns a chunk of it and is unlikely to be short of a five figure sum of cash at any given time. He owns a lot of property plus other businesses, or at least did when our paths crossed.
Groat said:
Having said that, it's the usual old story. Miss one bus and another two arrive. Seen a 2 bed in the east end for £60k that'll do £650 a month which isn't spectacular but certainly is better than playing in the equity casino,
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/90538405#/?channel=RES_BUYhttps://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/90538405#/?...
Offered £60k this early am......5pm phone call .....ACCEPTED!!!!!
(thats a 15/20k flip)
Groat said:
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/90538405#/?...
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/90538405#/?...
Offered £60k this early am......5pm phone call .....ACCEPTED!!!!!
(thats a 15/20k flip)
Pic 4 - Is there something dead under the covers? Possibly a cat? (see clue in pic 2)https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/90538405#/?...
Offered £60k this early am......5pm phone call .....ACCEPTED!!!!!
(thats a 15/20k flip)
It’s been a fair bit of hard work, but we bought a log cabin on a beach in Scotland last year. Got a mega deal, and including extensive refurb it owes us 210k. We’ve been letting it for 2 months now, and it’s netting £ 4-5k a month so far.
However, so far we’ve only had great customers, no emergencies, and my sister in law is doing the turnarounds and guest support as she lives 3 miles from it.
Without her support on hand it would be a nightmare
However, so far we’ve only had great customers, no emergencies, and my sister in law is doing the turnarounds and guest support as she lives 3 miles from it.
Without her support on hand it would be a nightmare
Re Holiday let - Sunday Times article says Northumberland the current hotspot according to Sykes. Bit of a thread resurrection but thought it was an interesting read over a cup of coffee...
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/5fcbdae5-ec4f-4...
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/5fcbdae5-ec4f-4...
Gassing Station | Finance | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff