FIRECalc

Author
Discussion

xeny

4,392 posts

79 months

Tuesday 4th May 2021
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
Another question is why do FIRE individuals think it’s right not to be paying towards the state? The NHS the education the welfare state?
Do FIRE people elect not to get full state pension ie the 35 qualifying years which would be 53yo at the lowest. Takes big balls to laugh off state pension.
I don't follow you - what has FIRE got to do with not paying tax?

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

199 months

Tuesday 4th May 2021
quotequote all
tighnamara said:
Welshbeef said:
xeny said:
Welshbeef said:
It must be lonely too - your mates clearly either most or all are not in the same situation. As such your either friendly with millionaire silver spoons (self made would unlikely be not working) retired pensioners down the allotment.
I don't see the difference in loneliness - if you're mates are working, then you're not seeing them during work hours, regardless of if you're early retired or not.
How do people get husband and wife or man and man partner or lady and lady partner to both hit FIRE together? Clearly it would be unfeasible for one partner of the union to retire early and expect to live on a shoe string - but the other not and then in reality it’s the worker who keeps the other going. / become a home maker husband or significant other.

Or is FIRE more designed to singletons and those who cannot or do not want children.

Another question is why do FIRE individuals think it’s right not to be paying towards the state? The NHS the education the welfare state?
Do FIRE people elect not to get full state pension ie the 35 qualifying years which would be 53yo at the lowest. Takes big balls to laugh off state pension.
This was your previous comment "Surely people have no judgement on what other individuals choose to do / when they retire or don’t"

Yet you are now challenging morals of those retiring early of not contributing to the state, not sure where you are coming from with that one.

As you have said it is the individuals choice on when they want to retire, good on them for me if they are happy and content.
Surely it’s good to ask questions as opposed to being naive about the setup.

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

199 months

Tuesday 4th May 2021
quotequote all
xeny said:
I don't follow you - what has FIRE got to do with not paying tax?
You’ve got to be earning over £38k to be a net contributor to the tax system.

So living on beans/£12k a year is clearly worlds apart from that break even point - basically if too many people did that balancing the books at state level wouldn’t be possible

Trif

751 posts

174 months

Tuesday 4th May 2021
quotequote all
Condi said:
Buying consumer goods doesn't equal happiness, but buying experiences does. Whether that be holidays, trackdays, scuba diving, good restaurants, or whatever your poison, those do bring satisfaction and happiness, and are rarely free.

Maybe why I don't understand is that I'm not in some depressing middle management job thinking that is all which defines me. Work can be/should be enjoyable.
For me, it is purely about putting mild constraints on pleasures so they remain treats. Experiences are just as much consumerism as purchasing goods and I just found I enjoyed what I did have more that way and a bi-product was increased savings which lent its self to investing and will lead to a slightly earlier retirement then the state would otherwise have dictated. I didn't wake up one day and decide I am going to retire as soon as possible. It was a natural progression of having savings and asking 'and now what'. It's not that I dislike work, just that I don't want to be doing what I am now in my late 50s or 60s. I don't want to be the person which people question how far from retirement I am, or say that I'm just biding my time until I get my pension. I have ideas what that 'retirement' might entail and some of them are what many would consider as jobs.



Welshbeef said:
Another question is why do FIRE individuals think it’s right not to be paying towards the state? The NHS the education the welfare state?

I always thought it as odd that pensioners don't continue paying national insurance to be honest. Health and care requirements go up substantially in later years. From what I can work out, you don't pay NI on early access to your pension either.


Welshbeef said:
Do FIRE people elect not to get full state pension ie the 35 qualifying years which would be 53yo at the lowest. Takes big balls to laugh off state pension.
I have contributions from the age of 16 and would only need to earn enough in my 50th year to cover the minimum contributions rather then work a full year. I am not expecting this to be a problem for my plans, but you can always buy more qualifying years, but probably better to do this closer to the time as their might not be a state pension then.

xeny

4,392 posts

79 months

Tuesday 4th May 2021
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
You’ve got to be earning over £38k to be a net contributor to the tax system.

So living on beans/£12k a year is clearly worlds apart from that break even point - basically if too many people did that balancing the books at state level wouldn’t be possible
I don't see a difference between your disapprobation of people engaged in FIRE and those choosing to study basket weaving like courses in H.E. Society is built around the individual taking choices within its rules - either is within the rules.

By your logic, everyone is presumably obligated to find the highest paid job available, make no use of ISA allowances or pension tax relief and commit suicide straight into a combined heat and power plant furnace if they develop a disease that is expensive to treat?

red_slr

17,350 posts

190 months

Tuesday 4th May 2021
quotequote all
I will be about 8 years short on NICs. I plan to make VCs.

SP is not a critical part of my plan. I will be almost 70 when its due anyway and have (hopefully) been retired for over 25 years at that point so dont think its a big deal.


NickCQ

5,392 posts

97 months

Tuesday 4th May 2021
quotequote all
The direction of travel is that all these things will be means tested anyway, so your FIRE-ist with a healthy nest egg could find they don't qualify.

Tony427

2,873 posts

234 months

Tuesday 4th May 2021
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
How do people get husband and wife or man and man partner or lady and lady partner to both hit FIRE together? Clearly it would be unfeasible for one partner of the union to retire early and expect to live on a shoe string - but the other not and then in reality it’s the worker who keeps the other going. / become a home maker husband or significant other.

Or is FIRE more designed to singletons and those who cannot or do not want children.

Another question is why do FIRE individuals think it’s right not to be paying towards the state? The NHS the education the welfare state?
Do FIRE people elect not to get full state pension ie the 35 qualifying years which would be 53yo at the lowest. Takes big balls to laugh off state pension.
One thing I might mention is that when retired and even with expensive holidays its really quite easy to live inexpensively. Once the mortgage, the commuting costs, parking costs, the lunch sandwiches etc have gone apart from food, entertainment, holidays and utility bills there's little call on disposable income. We dont have grandkids yet. Obviously.

To be honest I'm surprised just how easy it is to live really well on what I had previously thought would be a "budget."

I retired early at 51, sorted the pension out, and decided to put something back into society, through teaching and mentoring, which lasted a couple of years until I realised that the scrotes I were trying to help were just that, scrotes.

My wife was still working, so I started a little lifestyle business which provides my car, some dividends, bit of pension top up, and the minimum salary to avoid tax and NI. It also gives me an interest and as it's not onerous I can run it from wherever I happen to be. Australia, USA or even China. We do like to travel.

My wife has now retired but an elderly MiL requiring care takes up quite a bit of her time so each of us having seperate interests ensures we don't get too bored with just each others company. She is however threatening to get a National Trust pass for us. Dire news.

When my wife retired, at 59, we took her pension income , deducted it from her salary and worked out what she would need to take from the cash lump sum annually to maintain her previous net monthly income, thus ensuring no drop of living standards. Four years in, she hasn't had to take anything out of her cash sum and in two years she gets the full State Pension.

I haven't even touched my private pension yet, there is no need, so it sits there growing slowly, and in four years I also get a full State Pension. So both state pensions will be coming in and we don't even spend our income now. When I'm 66 I may or may not continue with the business, or even sell it. I suppose it will depend how I feel at the time as it's still fun at the moment. Would you give up a hobby just because you hit 66.

As regards the 35 years NI contributions, I retired at 51 with fully paid up NI contributions because I started working in school holidays at 16 and paid NI on my wages. This continued throughout 6th form and University summer holidays. These summer jobs gave me NI entitlement for all those 5 years. At the time I didn't know anything about NI or realise its significance. At 16 I just wanted a car for when I was 17 and a pair of Black Wrangler Elephant Cord jeans. Both to impress the ladies. It worked. The practice wife and I divorced in 92.

Therefore its worthwhile checking your state pension forecast. Even if you have underpaid your NI ( eg after being contracted out of NI) you can make later lump sum payments to buy back contributions and increase State Pension levels.

In short, once retired with mortgages and big purchases out of the way, its not difficult to live well for a lot less than you anticipate. You will spend more on experiences, but equally remember them for a shorter time.

Also get your state pension forecast it may well be good news. Especially if you had temporary jobs whilst younger. My daughter has also benefited from her part time weekend job in this regard so its not just oldies like me this applies to.

Good luck all.














eyebeebe

3,003 posts

234 months

Tuesday 4th May 2021
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
How do people get husband and wife or man and man partner or lady and lady partner to both hit FIRE together? Clearly it would be unfeasible for one partner of the union to retire early and expect to live on a shoe string - but the other not and then in reality it’s the worker who keeps the other going. / become a home maker husband or significant other.

Or is FIRE more designed to singletons and those who cannot or do not want children.

Another question is why do FIRE individuals think it’s right not to be paying towards the state? The NHS the education the welfare state?
Do FIRE people elect not to get full state pension ie the 35 qualifying years which would be 53yo at the lowest. Takes big balls to laugh off state pension.
Prepare to have your mind blown… not everyone has your circumstances or narrow view of the world.

In my circle of friends there are two other couples who have decided in the last year that they want to stop working around 50 and are working towards that (from currently being 40ish). Like us, one of them doesn‘t have children, the other ones have a daughter. None of us come from a particularly privileged background and AFAIK none are expecting any meaningful inheritances. 2 of the 6 of us have an Eastern EU background and moved to the UK and then to Switzerland as adults. Another pair of close friends have similar financial background and could easily do the same if they wish. I could probably think of quite a few others in our wider circle in a similar position.

None of us remotely lead a a „12k a year“ frugal lifestyle and none of us plan to do so post work. All of us work and would be able to give up at the same time as our partners.

And to really boil your piss, not only will we get a decent state pension from Switzerland, having spent most of our working careers here, my girlfriend and I could also buy additional NI contributions to get a full UK state pension.

Tony427

2,873 posts

234 months

Tuesday 4th May 2021
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
When did that change? 16 year olds going into 6th form or college don't get two years of NI credited to them now.

Blatter

857 posts

192 months

Thursday 6th May 2021
quotequote all
mids said:
Those links are going to keep me busy ^^

I've also used : https://www.retireeasy.co.uk/ which allows a lot of inputs and graphically does a good job of explaining the results but it assumes constant growth every year which we know never happens in reality.
I note that RetireEasy is a subscription service. Once you've done your initial inputting of data and got your results for retirement, why would you continue to subscribe? Or, to put it another way, what benefits do you get for your continued subscription?

chip*

1,030 posts

229 months

Thursday 6th May 2021
quotequote all
Blatter said:
mids said:
Those links are going to keep me busy ^^

I've also used : https://www.retireeasy.co.uk/ which allows a lot of inputs and graphically does a good job of explaining the results but it assumes constant growth every year which we know never happens in reality.
I note that RetireEasy is a subscription service. Once you've done your initial inputting of data and got your results for retirement, why would you continue to subscribe? Or, to put it another way, what benefits do you get for your continued subscription?
These models are based on various assumptions at this point in time which can be very different 12/24/36/48/60 months down the line e.g. Your investment growth wasn't as good as you originally expected, regulatory tax changes is taking a bigger cut from your pension, your personal financial demands has changes for whatever reason etc....Hence, you should regularly revisit the plan with the latest updates to ascertain the impact to your retirement plan.

Mazinbrum

937 posts

179 months

Thursday 6th May 2021
quotequote all
One unexpected concern I found when retiring early at 54 was that I might not be spending enough!

bitchstewie

Original Poster:

51,682 posts

211 months

Sunday 12th May
quotequote all

gotoPzero

17,350 posts

190 months

Sunday 12th May
quotequote all
I do think FIRE is a principle that can apply to anyone.

What irritates me is that people say they do it because its on trend.

They don't care about their number, none of it is real to them or even matters because they are living in daddies summer home on Lake Como and receive their "6 figs" trust fund payment each month.

That's not what FIRE is about, to me anyway.

Each to their own though.

okgo

38,256 posts

199 months

Monday 13th May
quotequote all
I agree that it can apply to anyone and in many different forms, Coast/FAT/Barista etc cover these I guess. I only really found out about such things about 3.5 years ago when my wife and I were early 30's, what it has done is change the mindset and know there is 'another way'. While I am learning everyday (annoyingly if I knew what I know now, I'd have done things VERY differently when we bought our current house a while back, hey ho), reading further into the topic has given me much more knowledge and understanding of the options that exist. This has been invaluable, I'd go as far as saying this will be a generational change for my kids and their kids. All thanks to reading up on FIRE.

I like to think of it a bit like what I knew at 25 vs 15 about 'work and careers' - when you're 15 you get told about the 10 different career types you could have, they're very generic and top line 'Fireman, Police, Doctor, IT, Lawyer etc' - when you are 25 you realise the amount of nuance and depth of some of those categories and have a far greater understanding of where to pitch yourself and what options you have - you wish you knew most of it before you did a degree in many cases. That is what FIRE has done for me with money.

I note there is a lot of binary thinking on the subject, I see it on Reddit a lot, especially around children's schooling etc "save it into an ISA, much more useful than any paid school" type comments, or people forcing themselves to live in grim places because they're cheap. I saw condi's note on page 1 and I do think he has a point about 'some' of the FIRE community, it is utterly depressing to read of someone who is 21 on Reddit looking for the fastest possible way to exit life, its super naive for one, but also missing the point of existence in a big way - are these people going to bumble on as single people and then retire at 36 living in some LCOL sthole and do nothing for the rest of their lives apart fromwatch the Global All Cap chart? Maybe, sounds horrid.

We haven't come up with any number yet mostly because our outgoings are so high now on things that will not exist once we've chosen to retire, it makes modelling it a bit of a headache, but we're also not desperate to quit yet. However, our saving and spending has certainly changed in the face of learning that we really could pack it all in fairly early (thanks to those lovely tech jobs the article above mentions, in part) - but I do think you can live a decent life and do things, go places, treat your kids, help them with tuition/houses, AND still be aiming at FIRE. Sure you'll cost yourself a year or two but I think it's a worthwhile trade off to make, personally.

The one undeniable truth of FIRE IMO is that it does hugely skew to higher earners, but even modest earners can create real wealth if they start early. But as we see on this forum, the allure of silly bets on single stocks/getting rich quick will mean most of the UK public are incapable of staying the course. I know of many of my mates who invested in various things only to cash out at a loss when it crashed. Or worse are the ones that have no real knowledge or plan and are rapidly entering into their 40's, a big shock coming down the line there.

bitchstewie

Original Poster:

51,682 posts

211 months

Monday 13th May
quotequote all
I'm too old to FIRE but the one thing reading about it did do was focus my mind on making work optional which it just about is.

They'll probably carry me out in a box but knowing I have the choice is the main thing IMO.

Also the obvious mindset thing of just buying less pointless "stuff".

He says having just come back from the bathroom showroom with a BoM for a new bathroom.

BoRED S2upid

19,751 posts

241 months

Monday 13th May
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
xeny said:
I don't follow you - what has FIRE got to do with not paying tax?
You’ve got to be earning over £38k to be a net contributor to the tax system.

So living on beans/£12k a year is clearly worlds apart from that break even point - basically if too many people did that balancing the books at state level wouldn’t be possible
I think anyone toying with FIRE has been a big net contributor over 30+ years or made some big money and paid big tax along the way.



Olivera

7,219 posts

240 months

Monday 13th May
quotequote all
FIRE = crackpot methodology (for most)

okgo

38,256 posts

199 months

Monday 13th May
quotequote all
Olivera said:
FIRE = crackpot methodology (for most)
Come on… you’ve got qualify that hehe