FIRECalc

Author
Discussion

BoRED S2upid

19,754 posts

241 months

Monday 13th May
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
I'm too old to FIRE but the one thing reading about it did do was focus my mind on making work optional which it just about is.

They'll probably carry me out in a box but knowing I have the choice is the main thing IMO.

Also the obvious mindset thing of just buying less pointless "stuff".

He says having just come back from the bathroom showroom with a BoM for a new bathroom.
Definitely the FI bit is far more important than the retirement bit.

Car bon

4,683 posts

65 months

Monday 13th May
quotequote all
Thanks for the thread revival - I do enjoy reminicing about Welshbeefs contributions to the Finance forum smile

leef44

4,495 posts

154 months

Monday 13th May
quotequote all
okgo said:
I agree that it can apply to anyone and in many different forms, Coast/FAT/Barista etc cover these I guess. I only really found out about such things about 3.5 years ago when my wife and I were early 30's, what it has done is change the mindset and know there is 'another way'. While I am learning everyday (annoyingly if I knew what I know now, I'd have done things VERY differently when we bought our current house a while back, hey ho), reading further into the topic has given me much more knowledge and understanding of the options that exist. This has been invaluable, I'd go as far as saying this will be a generational change for my kids and their kids. All thanks to reading up on FIRE.

I like to think of it a bit like what I knew at 25 vs 15 about 'work and careers' - when you're 15 you get told about the 10 different career types you could have, they're very generic and top line 'Fireman, Police, Doctor, IT, Lawyer etc' - when you are 25 you realise the amount of nuance and depth of some of those categories and have a far greater understanding of where to pitch yourself and what options you have - you wish you knew most of it before you did a degree in many cases. That is what FIRE has done for me with money.

I note there is a lot of binary thinking on the subject, I see it on Reddit a lot, especially around children's schooling etc "save it into an ISA, much more useful than any paid school" type comments, or people forcing themselves to live in grim places because they're cheap. I saw condi's note on page 1 and I do think he has a point about 'some' of the FIRE community, it is utterly depressing to read of someone who is 21 on Reddit looking for the fastest possible way to exit life, its super naive for one, but also missing the point of existence in a big way - are these people going to bumble on as single people and then retire at 36 living in some LCOL sthole and do nothing for the rest of their lives apart fromwatch the Global All Cap chart? Maybe, sounds horrid.

We haven't come up with any number yet mostly because our outgoings are so high now on things that will not exist once we've chosen to retire, it makes modelling it a bit of a headache, but we're also not desperate to quit yet. However, our saving and spending has certainly changed in the face of learning that we really could pack it all in fairly early (thanks to those lovely tech jobs the article above mentions, in part) - but I do think you can live a decent life and do things, go places, treat your kids, help them with tuition/houses, AND still be aiming at FIRE. Sure you'll cost yourself a year or two but I think it's a worthwhile trade off to make, personally.

The one undeniable truth of FIRE IMO is that it does hugely skew to higher earners, but even modest earners can create real wealth if they start early. But as we see on this forum, the allure of silly bets on single stocks/getting rich quick will mean most of the UK public are incapable of staying the course. I know of many of my mates who invested in various things only to cash out at a loss when it crashed. Or worse are the ones that have no real knowledge or plan and are rapidly entering into their 40's, a big shock coming down the line there.
I think I may be that saddo. Retired early but managing my retirement savings investments. Went into accountancy to give myself the tools to ensure financial security.

But I would say a lot has to do with my upbringing which was not the best - made to feel like I was a burden with parents having to work to provide for me. So I had to grow up very quickly.

One thing I will say though is that straight after uni, I went backpacking in the far east with the flatmates for just over two months before starting work (paid for by summer work, weekend work and sandwich year). This was well worth it. It takes a lot of travel and adventure hunger out of your system before you start working. This then meant I spent less money of travelling to exotic places in my later life which would have been much more expensive and luxurious biggrin

So you could say backpacking after uni is the first step to FIRE thumbup

funinhounslow

1,673 posts

143 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
leef44 said:
One thing I will say though is that straight after uni, I went backpacking in the far east with the flatmates for just over two months before starting work (paid for by summer work, weekend work and sandwich year). This was well worth it. It takes a lot of travel and adventure hunger out of your system before you start working. This then meant I spent less money of travelling to exotic places in my later life which would have been much more expensive and luxurious biggrin

So you could say backpacking after uni is the first step to FIRE thumbup
I think there is a lot in this. I did the Euro Interrailing, BUNAC, Aussie working holiday trips in my youth plus the "lads' holidays" to Ibiza etc

One thing I have learned is that travelling is less fun the older you get. Work means holidays are city breaks and cruises these days and although I enjoy them I had a much better time backpacking around and taking cheap package holidays to the Med.

I thought I'd be travelling a lot when I retired - I'm really starting to rethink that. As well as the point above there is the conundrum that over tourism has reduced the travel experience. When I went to Japan in the 90s there weren't a great deal of backpackers about - now a screen has been built to hide Mr Fuji from Instagrammers that were making locals' life a misery...

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/26/fuji...

gotoPzero

17,365 posts

190 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
We are travelling a lot in our retirement but its one of the reasons why we wanted to retire early.
The plan is to have all our big demanding trips done by 50. After that more "holidays" of the traditional kind.

Its funny I was telling a family friend about our trip to Japan last year, they are late 60s, and they were hooked.
They looked at booking and got as far as ready to click "buy now" on a travel website but then they bottled it.
Decided it was too much for them, too far, too physically demanding etc. Its in their head, they are physically able but now they are not bothering.

Of course there are people who are physically fit and rowing the Pacific, or whatever, at 60. But I think a lot of people start to back off the bigger trips when they get older. Insurance may play a part too. Along with all those little health issues no one likes to admit they have but just deal with.

I have certainly noticed in my family as aunts and uncles have passed 70 they have all stopped going away. Several were regulars to the Canaries, Greece, Med etc but since turning 70 most of them consider a holiday as a couple of days in the lake district or a bus tour to France.


xeny

4,408 posts

79 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
gotoPzero said:
Its funny I was telling a family friend about our trip to Japan last year, they are late 60s, and they were hooked.
They looked at booking and got as far as ready to click "buy now" on a travel website but then they bottled it.
Decided it was too much for them, too far, too physically demanding etc. Its in their head, they are physically able but now they are not bothering.
I have a relative who between the ages of 70 and 80 has visited NZ, Galapagos/Ecuador x 2, Panama, Costa Rica, Namibia and Peru. They were cursing when Covid cancelled a 2nd trip to Namibia and a trip to Alaska.

They are in reasonable health, but v.overweight. Yes there's a health aspect, but a lot of it is confidence.

WayOutWest

768 posts

59 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
okgo said:
We haven't come up with any number yet mostly because our outgoings are so high now on things that will not exist once we've chosen to retire, it makes modelling it a bit of a headache, but we're also not desperate to quit yet. However, our saving and spending has certainly changed in the face of learning that we really could pack it all in fairly early (thanks to those lovely tech jobs the article above mentions, in part) - but I do think you can live a decent life and do things, go places, treat your kids, help them with tuition/houses, AND still be aiming at FIRE. Sure you'll cost yourself a year or two but I think it's a worthwhile trade off to make, personally.

The one undeniable truth of FIRE IMO is that it does hugely skew to higher earners, but even modest earners can create real wealth if they start early. But as we see on this forum, the allure of silly bets on single stocks/getting rich quick will mean most of the UK public are incapable of staying the course. I know of many of my mates who invested in various things only to cash out at a loss when it crashed. Or worse are the ones that have no real knowledge or plan and are rapidly entering into their 40's, a big shock coming down the line there.
I think keeping a lid on lifestyle inflation as your career earnings increase is the key thing, without necessarily going down into beans on toast level scrimping or living in crapholes.

Once the mortgage is paid off it gives you a clearer idea of how much you need. I've been experimenting by jacking up salary sacrifice pension contributions progressively each couple of months (e.g. 20-30-40-50%) to see how little I can comfortably survive on.

When it gets too unbearable, or going into overdraft seems certain each month even when no big/unexpected bills hit, then time to row things back.
I may have just hit that point and have to drop back 5 or 10%.
But you'd be amazed how much you are being robbed in income tax and NICs, so the hit to your take home pay is often a lot less than you might think.
It's even better if your employer chucks in some of the employer NICs they've saved - but this really does vary from employer to employer.
If you are not planning on FIREing before 55 anyway it is a no brainer to use an SS pension over ISAs, unless you can afford to max out both.
















xeny

4,408 posts

79 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
WayOutWest said:
If you are not planning on FIREing before 55 anyway it is a no brainer to use an SS pension over ISAs, unless you can afford to max out both.
I agree, just be careful if you end up SSing into the 20% tax band, and paying 40% tax in retirement. Also, needs careful arithmetic WRT which month you leave during in the final year if you are really cutting things fine so that you don't waste income tax allowance.

fat80b

2,300 posts

222 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
WayOutWest said:
I've been experimenting by jacking up salary sacrifice pension contributions progressively each couple of months (e.g. 20-30-40-50%) to see how little I can comfortably survive on.

But you'd be amazed how much you are being robbed in income tax and NICs, so the hit to your take home pay is often a lot less than you might think.
It's even better if your employer chucks in some of the employer NICs they've saved - but this really does vary from employer to employer.
If you are not planning on FIREing before 55 anyway it is a no brainer to use an SS pension over ISAs, unless you can afford to max out both.
This is kindof where I find myself almost by accident - I have the option of taking *any amount of salary sacrifice and they will pay the 13.8% NI into my pension as well. After putting a spreadsheet together and modelling the options, I'm sacrificing almost the max amount I can per year into the pension.

It makes paying off the mortgage seem like a very poor idea when you can have 2.4 x as much money in your pension instead!

I think this means that I am FIREing by accident.




Edited by fat80b on Tuesday 14th May 20:27

macron

9,956 posts

167 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
xeny said:
I have a relative who between the ages of 70 and 80 has visited NZ, Galapagos/Ecuador x 2, Panama, Costa Rica, Namibia and Peru. They were cursing when Covid cancelled a 2nd trip to Namibia and a trip to Alaska.

They are in reasonable health, but v.overweight. Yes there's a health aspect, but a lot of it is confidence.
And insurance. Assuming they have insurance.

I know a guy who has now been retired for longer than he worked at his sole employer, the Post Office, strong middle management job. Final salary pension, left at 55 with it boosted by them explaining why stamps are so much money now, and among other benefits, dirt cheap travel insurance for life. Not a repeatable situation these days I'm sure.

isleofthorns

479 posts

171 months

Tuesday 14th May
quotequote all
WayOutWest said:
I think keeping a lid on lifestyle inflation as your career earnings increase is the key thing, without necessarily going down into beans on toast level scrimping or living in crapholes
this has been pretty much how I've been.... I've had some ok years along the way but never spent all of my earnings. for several years I saved probably 70% or so. I'm not a big advocate for FIRE, but I've inadvertently shared some of their key principles.


WayOutWest

768 posts

59 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
xeny said:
WayOutWest said:
If you are not planning on FIREing before 55 anyway it is a no brainer to use an SS pension over ISAs, unless you can afford to max out both.
I agree, just be careful if you end up SSing into the 20% tax band, and paying 40% tax in retirement. Also, needs careful arithmetic WRT which month you leave during in the final year if you are really cutting things fine so that you don't waste income tax allowance.
Yes, although you'd need a DC pension pot comfortably well over a million for 40% tax to be a problem in retirement- unless continuing paid work in some capacity as well as drawing down pension, or have other taxable income sources on top.
I used to only make pension contributions if getting 40% tax relief, but since moving to SS been much happier to SS income well into the 20% income band as you are effectively getting about 30% tax relief (inc NI saving) on that portion, and paying effectively only 15% on the way out (e.g. factoring in 25% Tax Free Lump Sums).


On your second point I've observed at least a couple of colleagues retiring around the tax year end for that reason so they start their pension drawdown with a clean sheet.



okgo

38,299 posts

199 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
WayOutWest said:
I think keeping a lid on lifestyle inflation as your career earnings increase is the key thing, without necessarily going down into beans on toast level scrimping or living in crapholes.

Once the mortgage is paid off it gives you a clearer idea of how much you need. I've been experimenting by jacking up salary sacrifice pension contributions progressively each couple of months (e.g. 20-30-40-50%) to see how little I can comfortably survive on.

When it gets too unbearable, or going into overdraft seems certain each month even when no big/unexpected bills hit, then time to row things back.
I may have just hit that point and have to drop back 5 or 10%.
But you'd be amazed how much you are being robbed in income tax and NICs, so the hit to your take home pay is often a lot less than you might think.
It's even better if your employer chucks in some of the employer NICs they've saved - but this really does vary from employer to employer.
If you are not planning on FIREing before 55 anyway it is a no brainer to use an SS pension over ISAs, unless you can afford to max out both.
My wife and I both are into tapered allowance territory on pensions - so they’ll likely not be as attractive for us as other things sadly. But you are right - strip out school fees/mortgage/savings and suddenly the number isn’t actually that much.

We are aiming to get to the chubby/fat fire end of the spectrum if possible but we may have started a little too late in the day.

xeny

4,408 posts

79 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
WayOutWest said:
On your second point I've observed at least a couple of colleagues retiring around the tax year end for that reason so they start their pension drawdown with a clean sheet.
Other reason for doing this is psychological - easy to start retirement thinking of it as a really long summer holiday than into the depths of winter.

Sheepshanks

32,966 posts

120 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
okgo said:
My wife and I both are into tapered allowance territory on pensions - so they’ll likely not be as attractive for us as other things sadly. But you are right - strip out school fees/mortgage/savings and suddenly the number isn’t actually that much.

We are aiming to get to the chubby/fat fire end of the spectrum if possible but we may have started a little too late in the day.
I know this is PH, but if you're both into tapered allowance territory then that's a heck of a lot to go at. There's something wrong if your biggest worry isn't potential IHT bills for your kids.

okgo

38,299 posts

199 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
Sheepshanks said:
I know this is PH, but if you're both into tapered allowance territory then that's a heck of a lot to go at. There's something wrong if your biggest worry isn't potential IHT bills for your kids.
You still need to accumulate wealth though. And given there’s not as many tax efficient ways to do so it still takes time. Also houses expensive etc.

Will worry about IHT later, only 36!

limpsfield

5,896 posts

254 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
Sheepshanks said:
okgo said:
My wife and I both are into tapered allowance territory on pensions - so they’ll likely not be as attractive for us as other things sadly. But you are right - strip out school fees/mortgage/savings and suddenly the number isn’t actually that much.

We are aiming to get to the chubby/fat fire end of the spectrum if possible but we may have started a little too late in the day.
I know this is PH, but if you're both into tapered allowance territory then that's a heck of a lot to go at. There's something wrong if your biggest worry isn't potential IHT bills for your kids.
As this is PH, a certain demographic of posters will always use finance threads as a wallet-wave humble brag.

I think okgo is the new Welshbeef. And I am here for it!

okgo

38,299 posts

199 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
limpsfield said:
As this is PH, a certain demographic of posters will always use finance threads as a wallet-wave humble brag.

I think okgo is the new Welshbeef. And I am here for it!
I was mindful of that hence only directly answering his post that said money saving should be focussed on pensions.

It’s a thread about Fire which is literally about building the biggest pot of money possible. I’m not going to apologise for it - it also doesn’t go that far when houses in London cost what they do.

Anyway, got to pack for my holibobs now.

Sheepshanks

32,966 posts

120 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
okgo said:
Sheepshanks said:
I know this is PH, but if you're both into tapered allowance territory then that's a heck of a lot to go at. There's something wrong if your biggest worry isn't potential IHT bills for your kids.
You still need to accumulate wealth though. And given there’s not as many tax efficient ways to do so it still takes time. Also houses expensive etc.

Will worry about IHT later, only 36!
To be fair, mine didn't really come until the kids were through uni and the mortgage paid off, coupled with me (just me, wife never earned much) earning a lot more with a lot of it as dividends plus the company was maxxing out my pension.

I often think that for most people, life is backwards - you need a high income and a big house when you're "young". You've certainly got that, although I appreciate that your tax bills will be immense.

WayOutWest

768 posts

59 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
Therein lies the irony of ISAs being more worthwhile for wealthier people than anyone else. Most 20% taxpayers cannot afford to get near to maxing out their ISA allowance each year, nor should they really beyond using for an emergency fund, as they are better off using pensions in the main, certainly if Salary Sacrifice.

Tbh I always thought the pension taper rules were needlessly complex when introduced, maybe let everyone have £60k pa pension annual allowance regardless of how much they earn, but increase the income tax rate instead above £150k or whatever.

Anyway, enjoy your extravagant luxury holiday okgo wink

Edited by WayOutWest on Wednesday 15th May 17:06