Jamie Chadwick - First competitive female driver in F1?

Jamie Chadwick - First competitive female driver in F1?

Author
Discussion

TheDeuce

22,059 posts

67 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
RacerMike said:
TheDeuce said:
Physical strength gives a driver control, and from that point all their other attributes become more effective.
Tell me you know nothing about driving a car fast without telling me you know nothing about driving a car fast.
Are you being serious? confused


Leithen

11,023 posts

268 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
But Danica did only manage to compensate to a certain level, and then she got no further.
IndyCar and NASCAR are famously physical. She won in IndyCar, IIRC bloody nearly won the Indy 500 and stuck her Cup car on pole in Daytona.

If the physical argument is to be believed, she must have been so much better than her male counterparts in every other department to make up the difference.

Which of course is rubbish. The physical argument doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.

732NM

4,736 posts

16 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
Danica was fit as a butchers dog when in her prime racing.

RacerMike

4,226 posts

212 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
RacerMike said:
TheDeuce said:
Physical strength gives a driver control, and from that point all their other attributes become more effective.
Tell me you know nothing about driving a car fast without telling me you know nothing about driving a car fast.
Are you being serious? confused
Yes.

TheDeuce

22,059 posts

67 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
RacerMike said:
TheDeuce said:
RacerMike said:
TheDeuce said:
Physical strength gives a driver control, and from that point all their other attributes become more effective.
Tell me you know nothing about driving a car fast without telling me you know nothing about driving a car fast.
Are you being serious? confused
Yes.
So when you race, you don't feel having the strength to firmly locate yourself and your head in the car helps? You need immense strength and stamina to resist the forces in F1 - if you can't resist you get battered about and how can that possiblly result in perfect car control and placement?

The strength to remain in control and the stamina to do so for upto 2 hours is considerable.

Forester1965

1,794 posts

4 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
So when you race, you don't feel having the strength to firmly locate yourself and your head in the car helps? You need immense strength and stamina to resist the forces in F1 - if you can't resist you get battered about and how can that possiblly result in perfect car control and placement?

The strength to remain in control and the stamina to do so for upto 2 hours is considerable.
Explain how a woman is incapable of having sufficient muscle to overcome G forces of an F1 car (bear in mind when you answer that they can overcome the G force to pilot a jet fighter).

Ken_Code

779 posts

3 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
Leithen said:
The logical consequence of such an argument is that Danica Patrick must have been astonishingly talented to be able to make up such an obvious physical deficit to her male counterparts.

The reality is that physical strength is only a small part of a complex equation.
It’s still a part.

The claim that it’s only a small part is unevidenced.

Ken_Code

779 posts

3 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
Forester1965 said:
54kg Yuki Tsunoda is loads stronger than all those weakling female boxers (btw female featherweight begins at 57kg).

I may or may not be being sarcastic.
He most likely is.

Ken_Code

779 posts

3 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
Forester1965 said:
Explain how a woman is incapable of having sufficient muscle to overcome G forces of an F1 car (bear in mind when you answer that they can overcome the G force to pilot a jet fighter).
Here, have a friend explain this to you.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36696264/#:~:text=...

TheDeuce

22,059 posts

67 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
Forester1965 said:
TheDeuce said:
So when you race, you don't feel having the strength to firmly locate yourself and your head in the car helps? You need immense strength and stamina to resist the forces in F1 - if you can't resist you get battered about and how can that possiblly result in perfect car control and placement?

The strength to remain in control and the stamina to do so for upto 2 hours is considerable.
Explain how a woman is incapable of having sufficient muscle to overcome G forces of an F1 car (bear in mind when you answer that they can overcome the G force to pilot a jet fighter).
You've asked that question previously - it's nothing like the relatively brief forces a fighter pilot sustains. Dog fights virtually never happen these days, if they do it's minutes not hours. You know this..

I can't explain why women apparently can't develop the same strength in the same way with the same stamina. Go ask an expert if you want the science. I just pointed out it matters and they apparently can't match the men.

If they could, we'd have the occasional championship result to demonstrate as much surely?

I refuse to be told that accuracy, which is what car control comes down to, is not aided by core strength. Everything in life that requires accuracy is enhanced by strength.

RacerMike

4,226 posts

212 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
RacerMike said:
TheDeuce said:
RacerMike said:
TheDeuce said:
Physical strength gives a driver control, and from that point all their other attributes become more effective.
Tell me you know nothing about driving a car fast without telling me you know nothing about driving a car fast.
Are you being serious? confused
Yes.
So when you race, you don't feel having the strength to firmly locate yourself and your head in the car helps? You need immense strength and stamina to resist the forces in F1 - if you can't resist you get battered about and how can that possiblly result in perfect car control and placement?

The strength to remain in control and the stamina to do so for upto 2 hours is considerable.
Your entire body is strapped into the car. The biggest issue is heat. Being a man has absolutely zero part of it. I was moderately fit at my peak and was racing in British GT. It had zero impact on my performance.

TheDeuce

22,059 posts

67 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
RacerMike said:
TheDeuce said:
RacerMike said:
TheDeuce said:
RacerMike said:
TheDeuce said:
Physical strength gives a driver control, and from that point all their other attributes become more effective.
Tell me you know nothing about driving a car fast without telling me you know nothing about driving a car fast.
Are you being serious? confused
Yes.
So when you race, you don't feel having the strength to firmly locate yourself and your head in the car helps? You need immense strength and stamina to resist the forces in F1 - if you can't resist you get battered about and how can that possiblly result in perfect car control and placement?

The strength to remain in control and the stamina to do so for upto 2 hours is considerable.
Your entire body is strapped into the car. The biggest issue is heat. Being a man has absolutely zero part of it. I was moderately fit at my peak and was racing in British GT. It had zero impact on my performance.
Your head has movement and being in control of that makes a big difference. F1 drivers talk about it all the time.

Forester1965

1,794 posts

4 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
Your head has movement and being in control of that makes a big difference. F1 drivers talk about it all the time.
You still haven't answered why a woman can't have strong enough muscles to cope with 5g.


TheDeuce

22,059 posts

67 months

Sunday 12th May
quotequote all
Forester1965 said:
TheDeuce said:
Your head has movement and being in control of that makes a big difference. F1 drivers talk about it all the time.
You still haven't answered why a woman can't have strong enough muscles to cope with 5g.
What do you mean 'still'? I already replied to you above, I'm no expert in 'why' but they cleary struggle when it comes to extended periods of coping with such a battering of forces. There's an issue with strength.

It's like you clearly struggle to hang onto a discussion without repeating the same questions and repeatedly ignoring the same answers.

Forester1965

1,794 posts

4 months

Sunday 12th May
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
What do you mean 'still'? I already replied to you above, I'm no expert in 'why' but they cleary struggle when it comes to extended periods of coping with such a battering of forces. There's an issue with strength.

It's like you clearly struggle to hang onto a discussion without repeating the same questions and repeatedly ignoring the same answers.
What evidence do you have that a woman is physically incapable of coping with 1.5hrs driving an F1 car at full speed?

TheDeuce

22,059 posts

67 months

Sunday 12th May
quotequote all
Forester1965 said:
TheDeuce said:
What do you mean 'still'? I already replied to you above, I'm no expert in 'why' but they cleary struggle when it comes to extended periods of coping with such a battering of forces. There's an issue with strength.

It's like you clearly struggle to hang onto a discussion without repeating the same questions and repeatedly ignoring the same answers.
What evidence do you have that a woman is physically incapable of coping with 1.5hrs driving an F1 car at full speed?
Full speed is the problem.

Assuming you mean full speed, as in, the competitive pace of the car..?

If so my evidence is that not a single woman has ever come close the grade at anything like F1 level, over a race distance.


dobly

1,208 posts

160 months

Sunday 12th May
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
Forester1965 said:
TheDeuce said:
What do you mean 'still'? I already replied to you above, I'm no expert in 'why' but they cleary struggle when it comes to extended periods of coping with such a battering of forces. There's an issue with strength.

It's like you clearly struggle to hang onto a discussion without repeating the same questions and repeatedly ignoring the same answers.
What evidence do you have that a woman is physically incapable of coping with 1.5hrs driving an F1 car at full speed?
Full speed is the problem.

Assuming you mean full speed, as in, the competitive pace of the car..?

If so my evidence is that not a single woman has ever come close the grade at anything like F1 level, over a race distance.
How many have ever been given the chance / support / backing to do so?

Forester1965

1,794 posts

4 months

Sunday 12th May
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
Full speed is the problem.

Assuming you mean full speed, as in, the competitive pace of the car..?

If so my evidence is that not a single woman has ever come close the grade at anything like F1 level, over a race distance.
None, then.

You probably said the 4 minute mile was not within human capability back in the day, because it hadn't been done.



TheDeuce

22,059 posts

67 months

Sunday 12th May
quotequote all
Forester1965 said:
TheDeuce said:
Full speed is the problem.

Assuming you mean full speed, as in, the competitive pace of the car..?

If so my evidence is that not a single woman has ever come close the grade at anything like F1 level, over a race distance.
None, then.

You probably said the 4 minute mile was not within human capability back in the day, because it hadn't been done.
I see. So we have to ignore all evidence that something is very unlikely to happen on the basis it could one day happen.

In other words there's zero evidence that the penguins won't conquer the world and enslave us by Christmas.


RacerMike

4,226 posts

212 months

Sunday 12th May
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
Forester1965 said:
TheDeuce said:
Full speed is the problem.

Assuming you mean full speed, as in, the competitive pace of the car..?

If so my evidence is that not a single woman has ever come close the grade at anything like F1 level, over a race distance.
None, then.

You probably said the 4 minute mile was not within human capability back in the day, because it hadn't been done.
I see. So we have to ignore all evidence that something is very unlikely to happen on the basis it could one day happen.

In other words there's zero evidence that the penguins won't conquer the world and enslave us by Christmas.
I’m sorry, but using another logical fallacy to try and validate your other logical fallacy doesn’t work. Provide us some evidence that a woman can’t hold her head up and I’ll listen.