EVs... no one wants them!

EVs... no one wants them!

Author
Discussion

CheesecakeRunner

3,880 posts

92 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
FiF said:
just rude.
I know. I’m tired of a generation of people having no regard for anyone younger than them who will actually have to live with the issues they’ve caused.

Dave200

4,061 posts

221 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
M4cruiser said:
Dave200 said:
Mark V GTD said:
Dave200 said:
I took my Tesla on a fairly long trip to visit some friends yesterday evening.
Yes but its a Tesla so it does all that you said. Any other EV would be a lot more stressful!
It really wouldn't. Had the Supercharger been occupied or broken I had 3 viable high speed alternatives that would have simply been charged back to my monthly energy bill without fuss.
Dave, I'm with MarkV on this, it really would have been a different story in a Leaf 24. Try it.
Ok, so you wouldn't buy a Leaf 24 if you had regular trips like that, but most people who do local commuting, week in week out, will have a trip as you describe sometimes,
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here. You buy the appropriate car for your circumstances. Using the Leaf 24 as an example is about as relevant as suggesting a Smart Car.

FiF

44,239 posts

252 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
CheesecakeRunner said:
FiF said:
just rude.
I know. I’m tired of a generation of people having no regard for anyone younger than them who will actually have to live with the issues they’ve caused.
Works both ways that. I'm tired of a generation that thinks they know everything but are in many ways completely dysfunctional with little emotional resilience.

Example individuals who apply for a job knowing that it entails them performing certain functions, eg answering phones, but then refuse to do so as they only accept calls from people they know. Mid 20s even 30 year olds who need their mother to ring up and sort some issue out for their offspring, several real examples of that.

CheesecakeRunner

3,880 posts

92 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
Sounds like it’s not only that generation who lacks resilience.

And don’t make assumptions about which generation I’m from.

biggbn

23,630 posts

221 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
Pantomime. Oh no he didn't!! Oh yes he did!! Never any ambiguity. It seems the twain will never meet on this issue. Then again, some will adamantly never have a diesel, an auto, a triple, a hybrid. And that's cool, choice is a wonderful thing. It does always surprise me how acrimonious these discussions become and how steadfastly sure each 'side' of the 'discussion' are. Perhaps if we brought it down a little we could all learn from each other rather than chucking absolutes about from entrenched positions?

Have a wonderful day all, gbnx

Tony33

1,128 posts

123 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
CheesecakeRunner said:
Merc 450 said:
I'm 60 next month
Then electrification of personal transport is simply not an issue you will ever have to deal with in your life. You don’t have a dog in this fight.
Half of all new cars are bought by 55s and over, almost a quarter by the 65s and over. The cars that are hitting the secondhand car market in the next decade or two will be highly influenced by this age group and will impact supply and price. So they do have a part to play and ignoring them as not going to impacted would be foolish for any EV strategy, whether ICE continue to exist in their lifetime or not.

FiF

44,239 posts

252 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
CheesecakeRunner said:
Sounds like it’s not only that generation who lacks resilience.

And don’t make assumptions about which generation I’m from.
Don't make assumptions that I don't care about younger generations either, or the mess that the country and world is in and how we move forward. Just speaking bluntly as I find unfortunately.


Unreal

3,577 posts

26 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
Lots of fingers in the ears, la la la, not listening when it comes to the social issues around electrification, demonisation of ICE, availability of second hand cars and charging.

I did have a laugh at the neat little rubber strips you can install to charge your car. Lovely bit of pavement, perfectly flat, nice and dry and clean. Nice sunny day. Most pavements people will be familiar with, even in decent areas, are in a shocking state with uneven slabs and bodged tarmac and I can just picture those little rubber strips when they're a few months old and filling up with the typical pavement mix of mud, dog piss and other assorted muck. I can really see the attraction of getting home on a wet cold night and laying your twee cable in that minging slot and likewise extracting it in the morning. Certainly puts the gross inconvenience of diesel gloves into perspective. This is before we get to the absolutely epic parking disputes that will ensue or the council 'licence fee' you'll be paying to put the thing in.

This describes where millions who currently have ICE cars live. On street charging for these people cannot be done. Let them eat cake won't cut it. At night round here the public on street charging spots are occupied overnight by ICE vehicles who have lost their normal spaces. No one polices it and quite right to. I'd like some anti social behaviour policed before resources are used to police overnight parking regulations. The council persists in installing facilities and taking a disproportionate amount of space for a minority of expensive cars which they justify under their ambition of making the town net zero which no one can recall finding on an election manifesto. Of course, there's denial at the moment and record breaking progress on filling potholes. Surely nothing to do with the imminent local elections.

I'm all right Jack. I have a drive and garages with power. An EV would be just fine for me and millions like me. I'm concerned about everyone else. It is not about poor people wanting luxuries they have never been able to have, and shouldn't expect to have. It's about removing a basic level of convenience with no way of replacing it. Car less communities and improved public transport. Do me a favour. If we're going car less, why put in charging points? As for public transport - it's already a joke and deteriorating, not improving.

Tony33

1,128 posts

123 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
Unreal said:
I'm all right Jack. I have a drive and garages with power. An EV would be just fine for me and millions like me. I'm concerned about everyone else. It is not about poor people wanting luxuries they have never been able to have, and shouldn't expect to have. It's about removing a basic level of convenience with no way of replacing it. Car less communities and improved public transport. Do me a favour. If we're going car less, why put in charging points? As for public transport - it's already a joke and deteriorating, not improving.
Baby steps, council "solutions" are just a token gesture at this stage. I believe the aim will be to evolve the change to car less or much reduced car usage by steadily making it less appealing to have cars. People will move and be replaced by people who embrace active travel and public transport. Not everyone will be happy about it. Returning cities to how they were in the olden days seems to be a thing and not without support it seems.

Ankh87

702 posts

103 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
That's all good and well trying to make things how they were before but this isn't the 60s no more. People don't just work around the corner from home or even in the same city.

Lots of people commute from one city to another which can mean in some cases a 2 bus journey that takes over an hour or 20 minutes by car.

So trying to force people to use public transport doesn't really work.

tamore

7,048 posts

285 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
M4cruiser said:
Dave200 said:
Mark V GTD said:
Dave200 said:
I took my Tesla on a fairly long trip to visit some friends yesterday evening.
Yes but its a Tesla so it does all that you said. Any other EV would be a lot more stressful!
It really wouldn't. Had the Supercharger been occupied or broken I had 3 viable high speed alternatives that would have simply been charged back to my monthly energy bill without fuss.
Dave, I'm with MarkV on this, it really would have been a different story in a Leaf 24. Try it.
Ok, so you wouldn't buy a Leaf 24 if you had regular trips like that, but most people who do local commuting, week in week out, will have a trip as you describe sometimes,
in reality, you're on about me! vauxhall e-combo which in reality only gets 115 miles when it's cold and loaded up. for the trips we do to scotland or elsewhere where public charging is needed, it's worth it. even in the 2 years we've had it the charging situation has improved massively.

destination charging is the big gap now. holiday parks, hotels, etc. easy solutions to these too as you don't need huge power feeds for a few 7kW chargers.

740EVTORQUES

501 posts

2 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
Ankh87 said:
That's all good and well trying to make things how they were before but this isn't the 60s no more. People don't just work around the corner from home or even in the same city.

Lots of people commute from one city to another which can mean in some cases a 2 bus journey that takes over an hour or 20 minutes by car.

So trying to force people to use public transport doesn't really work.
And that is something that will need to change if we are all to live in a more sustainable way.

The idea that large numbers of people should drive in individual vehicles for several hours a day just to get to and from work is a a relatively new phenomenon, and not something to try to preserve.

Imagine the positive effects on quality of life if people weren’t forced to do this?

GT9

6,830 posts

173 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
FiF said:
Yes it's a bit of FUD, but saying he doesn't have a dog in the fight with, one could reasonably assume, 20 years minimum of motoring ahead is just rude.
In 450’s case though his chosen dog is called hydrogen and it’s in intensive care on life support.

If by some miracle it survives it’ll be in an electric wheelchair for the rest of its life.

Ankh87

702 posts

103 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
740EVTORQUES said:
Ankh87 said:
That's all good and well trying to make things how they were before but this isn't the 60s no more. People don't just work around the corner from home or even in the same city.

Lots of people commute from one city to another which can mean in some cases a 2 bus journey that takes over an hour or 20 minutes by car.

So trying to force people to use public transport doesn't really work.
And that is something that will need to change if we are all to live in a more sustainable way.

The idea that large numbers of people should drive in individual vehicles for several hours a day just to get to and from work is a a relatively new phenomenon, and not something to try to preserve.

Imagine the positive effects on quality of life if people weren’t forced to do this?
It doesn't work though. Local companies are few and far between, jobs for people just aren't there. Back then there were plenty of manufacturers but now everything is make outside of the UK. Look at Tata for example. So you're asking for a utopia to which no longer exists in this century.

As for car sharing, again this doesn't really work. We do it at my work and there's only a handful if that of people that do it. People have things going on in their life that makes it near impossible. Such things as picking up kids, hobbies after work or even second jobs.

Yes it would be great for what you're asking for but since the 70s and 80s, this all changed.

Even where I live, there use to be loads of local jobs but since a certain Prime Minister closed a lot of it down, the locals all had to find jobs further away.

Merc 450

973 posts

100 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
CheesecakeRunner said:
Merc 450 said:
I'm 60 next month
Then electrification of personal transport is simply not an issue you will ever have to deal with in your life. You don’t have a dog in this fight.
i'm not planning on dying yetrolleyes

740EVTORQUES

501 posts

2 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
Ankh87 said:
It doesn't work though. Local companies are few and far between, jobs for people just aren't there. Back then there were plenty of manufacturers but now everything is make outside of the UK. Look at Tata for example. So you're asking for a utopia to which no longer exists in this century.

As for car sharing, again this doesn't really work. We do it at my work and there's only a handful if that of people that do it. People have things going on in their life that makes it near impossible. Such things as picking up kids, hobbies after work or even second jobs.

Yes it would be great for what you're asking for but since the 70s and 80s, this all changed.

Even where I live, there use to be loads of local jobs but since a certain Prime Minister closed a lot of it down, the locals all had to find jobs further away.
But surely that is worth trying to reverse, it would probably have just as much of a beneficial environmental effect as encouraging take up of EVs?

And just to clarify, I’m not talking about restricting freedom to travel, quite the reverse freeing people from the tyranny of having to travel just to work

Unreal

3,577 posts

26 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
Tony33 said:
Unreal said:
I'm all right Jack. I have a drive and garages with power. An EV would be just fine for me and millions like me. I'm concerned about everyone else. It is not about poor people wanting luxuries they have never been able to have, and shouldn't expect to have. It's about removing a basic level of convenience with no way of replacing it. Car less communities and improved public transport. Do me a favour. If we're going car less, why put in charging points? As for public transport - it's already a joke and deteriorating, not improving.
Baby steps, council "solutions" are just a token gesture at this stage. I believe the aim will be to evolve the change to car less or much reduced car usage by steadily making it less appealing to have cars. People will move and be replaced by people who embrace active travel and public transport. Not everyone will be happy about it. Returning cities to how they were in the olden days seems to be a thing and not without support it seems.
I would not be surprised if the aim is to reduce car usage - but obviously only for the plebs.

Regardless of the fact that this masterplan seems to involve going back in time, I just can't see it working in practice. Time will tell as always. In the meantime, I await the next steps in terms of getting the majority of the population who are overweight on their bikes and walking and the transformation of public transport to a non-feral and stained seat free first choice. Any baby steps on the horizon for those two issues?

Edited by Unreal on Saturday 27th April 13:26

biggbn

23,630 posts

221 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
740EVTORQUES said:
Ankh87 said:
That's all good and well trying to make things how they were before but this isn't the 60s no more. People don't just work around the corner from home or even in the same city.

Lots of people commute from one city to another which can mean in some cases a 2 bus journey that takes over an hour or 20 minutes by car.

So trying to force people to use public transport doesn't really work.
And that is something that will need to change if we are all to live in a more sustainable way.

The idea that large numbers of people should drive in individual vehicles for several hours a day just to get to and from work is a a relatively new phenomenon, and not something to try to preserve.

Imagine the positive effects on quality of life if people weren’t forced to do this?
Do you car share? Genuinely interested

Unreal

3,577 posts

26 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
biggbn said:
740EVTORQUES said:
Ankh87 said:
That's all good and well trying to make things how they were before but this isn't the 60s no more. People don't just work around the corner from home or even in the same city.

Lots of people commute from one city to another which can mean in some cases a 2 bus journey that takes over an hour or 20 minutes by car.

So trying to force people to use public transport doesn't really work.
And that is something that will need to change if we are all to live in a more sustainable way.

The idea that large numbers of people should drive in individual vehicles for several hours a day just to get to and from work is a a relatively new phenomenon, and not something to try to preserve.

Imagine the positive effects on quality of life if people weren’t forced to do this?
Do you car share? Genuinely interested
laugh


Ankh87

702 posts

103 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
740EVTORQUES said:
Ankh87 said:
It doesn't work though. Local companies are few and far between, jobs for people just aren't there. Back then there were plenty of manufacturers but now everything is make outside of the UK. Look at Tata for example. So you're asking for a utopia to which no longer exists in this century.

As for car sharing, again this doesn't really work. We do it at my work and there's only a handful if that of people that do it. People have things going on in their life that makes it near impossible. Such things as picking up kids, hobbies after work or even second jobs.

Yes it would be great for what you're asking for but since the 70s and 80s, this all changed.

Even where I live, there use to be loads of local jobs but since a certain Prime Minister closed a lot of it down, the locals all had to find jobs further away.
But surely that is worth trying to reverse, it would probably have just as much of a beneficial environmental effect as encouraging take up of EVs?

And just to clarify, I’m not talking about restricting freedom to travel, quite the reverse freeing people from the tyranny of having to travel just to work
Yes it's worth trying but how can you create jobs that just aren't there? You can't just force big companies to buy land or develop a site that's not going to be beneficial

How can you make public transport better when it's all privately owner? Those companies have had decades to improve it, yet still haven't.