Defence spending increase

Author
Discussion

macron

Original Poster:

9,892 posts

167 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
So we had a budget ten minutes ago, and they forgot to mention this. What's being cut to pay for it do we know?

Not saying it's a bad thing given the state of the world right now, but, local elections you're going to get spanked in aside, seems odd to announce it.... Right now..?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68880171

Mr Penguin

1,234 posts

40 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
macron said:
So we had a budget ten minutes ago, and they forgot to mention this. What's being cut to pay for it do we know?

Not saying it's a bad thing given the state of the world right now, but, local elections you're going to get spanked in aside, seems odd to announce it.... Right now..?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68880171
They announced it (to the media) over a year ago https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4D4uriF4eOs

It was also in the budget speech but with a vaguer timeline https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2024-03-06/d...

Jeremy Hunt said:
Our armed forces remain the most professional and best-funded in Europe, with defence spending already more than 2% of GDP. We are providing more military support to Ukraine than nearly any other country, and our spending will rise to 2.5% as soon as economic conditions allow.
I think it is too little and we will be forced into spending quite a lot more than 2.5% within a couple of years, but hopefully I'm wrong on that.

RobB_

1,033 posts

189 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
Cameron meeting Trump last week
Trump supporting Ukraine aid this week
Macron wanting French troops on the Ukrainian / Belarus border
Iran / Israel testing each others resolve

tank

CoolHands

18,677 posts

196 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
I would ask why it’s going to be 2030 before we manage it. Get on it now

RobB_

1,033 posts

189 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
I would ask why it’s going to be 2030 before we manage it. Get on it now
Because the OBR hasn't approved that a war is good for GDP hehe

Derek Smith

45,685 posts

249 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
Empty promise. The tories won't be in.

Labour reckon they will hit 2.5% when we can afford it. Guesses when that will be?

standards

1,140 posts

219 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
I would ask why it’s going to be 2030 before we manage it. Get on it now
My thoughts exactly.

Biggy Stardust

6,924 posts

45 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
RobB_ said:
Because the OBR hasn't approved that a war is good for GDP hehe
It's the 34th Rule of Acquisition, surely?

RobB_

1,033 posts

189 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
Biggy Stardust said:
It's the 34th Rule of Acquisition, surely?
You're forgetting of the 35th Rule of Acquisition!

hidetheelephants

24,459 posts

194 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
I would ask why it’s going to be 2030 before we manage it. Get on it now
Mainly because there's little that can be bought quickly that UK forces need, it's all long lead time stuff or things to fix recruitment and retention which lack sexiness, no Secretary of State for Defence dreams of cutting the ribbon to open a Single Living Accommodation block, despite people leaving early because heating doesn't work or there's no hot water out of the taps. Retention bonus payments are also not sexy, nor are pay increases.

Biggy Stardust

6,924 posts

45 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
RobB_ said:
Biggy Stardust said:
It's the 34th Rule of Acquisition, surely?
You're forgetting of the 35th Rule of Acquisition!
And the 208th, perhaps.

Previous

1,449 posts

155 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
CoolHands said:
I would ask why it’s going to be 2030 before we manage it. Get on it now
Mainly because there's little that can be bought quickly that UK forces need, it's all long lead time stuff or things to fix recruitment and retention which lack sexiness, no Secretary of State for Defence dreams of cutting the ribbon to open a Single Living Accommodation block, despite people leaving early because heating doesn't work or there's no hot water out of the taps. Retention bonus payments are also not sexy, nor are pay increases.
There are plenty of ways of buying things that UK forces need more quickly than current defence acquisition process provide, oft at better VFM too.

Cultural changes in acquisition required for that though....

isaldiri

18,605 posts

169 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
standards said:
CoolHands said:
I would ask why it’s going to be 2030 before we manage it. Get on it now
My thoughts exactly.
What do you think should be cut now in order to get to that target then?

CoolHands

18,677 posts

196 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
Less support for Israel?

borcy

2,905 posts

57 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
Less support for Israel?
That wouldn't save much at all.

isaldiri

18,605 posts

169 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
Less support for Israel?
You want to check how much that actually is and whether it’s being paid for rather than given?

CoolHands

18,677 posts

196 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
isaldiri said:
CoolHands said:
Less support for Israel?
You want to check how much that actually is and whether it’s being paid for rather than given?
If we gave, we must have had it to give. I presume we paid to have it.

Ridgemont

6,589 posts

132 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
isaldiri said:
CoolHands said:
Less support for Israel?
You want to check how much that actually is and whether it’s being paid for rather than given?
If we gave, we must have had it to give. I presume we paid to have it.
I can’t see with my GoogleFu any examples of the UK ‘giving’ anything to Israel. I can see UK companies arms sales to Israel being around the £57m mark a year.

Do you have an example of this ‘giving’?

hidetheelephants

24,459 posts

194 months

Wednesday 24th April
quotequote all
Previous said:
Cultural changes in acquisition required for that though....
rofl Good luck with that! frown
MoD seem to have much the same chronic procurement problems that they had 30 years ago, UOR "hair on fire order the whizzo shiny things now" aside it's still st. UOR is useful but no substitute for properly managed procurement.

dukeboy749r

2,668 posts

211 months

Wednesday 24th April
quotequote all
The procurement process is a joke but then so is recruitment and retention.

Giving Capita the job of recruiting folks has been an abysmal failure.

There are huge pressures on those in (for example) the army. Yet, I’m not sure one infantry battalion is actually at full strength.

The Ranger battalions are a fudge, with soldiers with lots of Gucci kit and yet no real remit and are just draining people from other units.

Unless we reverse the downward trend, in a land battle war we really are borked at present.