CV19 - Cure Worse Than The Disease? (Vol 19)

Hmm. I wonder what the possible reasons for that could be. Hmm.

Because (for the hard of thinking) that would expose the scam wide open for everyone to see they were duped and lied to.

As for your demands for controlled tests, you don't need any - it's a pointless exercise. All you have to do is take a look at your family, friends and work colleagues and note that - by and large - all the unvaxxed are getting on with their lives in good health and are wondering what all the fuss is about vs the sleeve-rollers who are now either sadly dead , or have a growing list of mysterious ailments that have appeared since 2021 that all the GPs are completely baffled by.

I have looked at my family and friends, and even work colleagues and no one I know has died. All in good health, all seem fine and no mystery illness or ailments.

When do you think they will die? Just so I can give them a heads up.

I keep repeating the following but my own personal control group of friends, family and work colleagues numbers well over 100.

Of that group, I suspect, the vast majority have had some of the 'doom juice'.

Oddly, none of them have suffered from turbo cancers, dropped dead, have grown second heads, etc, etc. I also don't know anyone who is quivering from fear about Covid or dropping dead from the vaccine. They are, as far as I know, just getting on with life.

Just wondering what constitutes a control group? Asking for a friend.

Just to clarify, does the above mean that 'anecdata' is now admissible on this thread and carries weight?

I recall that contributors to this thread providing anecdotal recollections have previously been alleged to be fantasists who post totally fabricated fairy tales about people they know, so it would be useful to know if 'anecdata' no longer falls under this umbrella.

Or is only one sort of anecdata the 'right' anecdata?

I'm sorry to hear that. I hope your sister is able to get sorted out at some point. Your mum may be able to receive some sort of Carer allowance if she does not already do so, which might enable respite care to be arranged at least periodically?


From the people I know... early-40s male had massive chest pain after being injected (to the point of almost calling an ambulance); 60-something woman dead in about 6 months from aggressive cancer but no family history of it; 70-something male with long-term well-managed prostate cancer seemingly had it 'reactivate' and spread quickly and terminally within about 6 months of injection; 50-something work colleague diagnosed with colon and liver cancer about 6 months after a booster injection (outcome TBC...); 50-something colleague seemingly died suddenly and unexpectedly; mid-30s woman has totally messed-up periods.


I'm sure some will say that such things are bound to happen by chance in a social circle of any given size, therefore 'nothing to see here'....

But, of course, that would then mean that those proclaiming no-one they know has had any similar issues are statistical outliers, surely?

Is the "experience" somewhat analogous to asbestos?

I've never known of, nor met anyone affected by asbestos - this is despite knowing people who used to saw it dry, before being told, best damp it down before sawing it - or my uncle who used to mix up asbestos powder into a paste and use as insulation on hot water tanks.

However, the issues around asbestos are widely known. The vaccine risks haven't been helped by "Safe and Effective", to "No heart issues" to "Does sometimes cause issues". If the message had been honest, that there's very small risks, you wouldn't leave room for the "Lies! It's all lies!!", which has caused a mistrust in public health and all the further issues stemming from this.

There are known risks with all medication, and all vaccines. It's why informed consent really matters... Like others, without a lot more studies, it's just guesswork, there's proven carcinogens in processed meat [1], there's micro plastics, there's Teflon coatings, particulates, hormones (in food and taken) etc... Then throw in NHS delays, lockdowns, stress, depression, vaccines, etc... And really it's an enormous task to pick apart, and cynically, one likely to rock a few too many apple carts to get a desire to fund it.

[1] https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answer...

What I'm not going to do is believe 'facts for the easily led' from pish sites like zerohedge

That's because you are a lost cause and nothing me or anyone else said would convince you otherwise.

I don't bother arguing with Jehovahs Witnesses either. If they want to believe in their pish it's up to them, similar with zerohedge 'facts'.

The ones who I can debate sensibly with like Elysium or Hants PHer have no need of such lists.

You keep getting your info from zerohedge and the like. I and others like me will keep occasionally pointing out it's pish due to it being, erm, pish.

So in short then : you can't provide any links to back up any of your claims. It's just "Zerohedge is wrong because I say so". Cool.

We can keep dancing this dance if you want but I'll keep referring you back to the Jehovahs Witnesses answer.