CV19 - Cure Worse Than The Disease? (Vol 19)

Cancelled NHS appointments bro. < there's your evidence as it's been on the BBC and confirmed by the fact checkers.

Everything is fine.gif.

And of course there is nothing wrong with the MHRA and ONS having the details of illness and deaths by vaccination status and only disclosing it to the manufacturers and not politicians under a MOI request and the general public. The claim of commercial sensitivity is fully justified………

And who checks the fact checkers - I mean that lady at the BBC is so reliable that she would never lie on A CV would she?

To jameswills credit though, at least he's polite unlike some others adamant that their right.......

That is rich coming from you of all people. You have been abusive in your replies going back at least 2 years towards anyone who hasn't parroted The Official Narrative. Your posts would be far more fitting in the other thread.

By the way, I'm still waiting for you to provide me with this when you are ready :

Please furnish me with the details of this supposed "evidence to the contrary" that I have apparently refuted. >

I'm referring to your post history going back several years where you have consistently been abusive to any person who you deemed to be a CT because they dared to question and point out the gaping holes in The Official Narrative, and in fact you continue to do so, as evidenced in your posts here in this thread from just a few days ago. To then come here and post about being polite is the height of hypocrisy.

And I'm still waiting for this "evidence to the contrary" from you. List the specific example(s) :

As others have said, your posts are civilised and seem to be meant sincerely. But I'm curious: if there was no Covid virus in, say, March/April 2020, what caused the spike in infections? A paramedic (user name pneumothorax) posted on here with real life reports of very strange symptoms, notably hypoxia, that he hadn't seen before. What he witnessed, first hand, was something new and different. If not Covid, then what?

Then there's the vaccines. Studies from the likes of the ONS, NHS England and The Lancet all showed greatly reduced rates of intensive care admissions and deaths in those who had the vaccines. Those studies are freely available with a spot of cursory Googling. When you say the vaccine(s) did not do "anything positive" that can be "substantiated", are you saying that all the studies are wrong?

With all due respect, your comment that I've quoted is pretty staggering and hard to take seriously.

OK so in short then, you're a massive hypocrite. It's OK for you to name call and be abusive to anyone who you do deem to be a CT because they don't parrot The Official Narrative, despite having proven to be right countless times, but if someone dares to point out the utter stupidity from you and others like Elysium who continue post your "evidence" to the contrary using official government figures which have been proven on numerous occasions to be made-up/fabricated/manipulated to suit whichever agenda/narrative they want to push today, then those people are mean and not being polite. Cool!

Perhaps you should go back and read his posts then as it would appear you have a poor memory. Any questioning by others of the official figures with the suggestion that something sinister could be going on has been met with abuse and ridicule. Just a few days ago he referred to such people not believing the official narrative as "turds in a swimming pool" (paraphrasing) and that kind of thing has been consistent from him since I've been here at least. He did it to BVD just the other day, scoffing at him for daring to have thoughts in his head that didn't align with The Official Narrative - "you are better than this" or some similarly condescending tone, hence why I've called him a massive hypocrite accusing others of not being polite, because it's true.

I think we must have been reading very different posts from isaldiri and Elysium over the last couple of years.

^^This. isaldiri has been one of the most legit posters on this thread.

Well, if you want someone to parrot made-up figures from official government channels without any context and completely ignore what's actually going on outside in the real world, sure, I can imagine the confirmation bias is comforting for a lot of people and they can keep their blinkers on and rest-assured that all is well in the world.

Those still using government data to support their arguments are basically still where John C was 2 years ago before he woke up, did his research and realsed that everything he'd been using from the government was complete BS data. It's not even a debate anymore as this stuff has been exposed wide open for years now, but some stubbornly refuse to admit it because saving face is more important.