|
Nick M
3,137 posts
92 months
|
I don't think they're 'abusive', in any of the readily accepted terms of the word, but I do think they're an anachronism which should be removed from our education system.
|
|
|
fluffnik
Original Poster
17,347 posts
96 months
|
wolowizard said: I find it very sad that the many outspoken atheists on PH are more than happy to poke fun at, ridicule and even abuse those that admit to being religious. These tend to be the same people that reguarly make the claim that the religious are mentally deficient in some way or just plain nutty. I'm keen to hear a rational justification for faith, I hate confusion. wolowizard said: I can only conclude that PH is happy for mental people to be made fun of and we should organise a PH meet to a special school so we can point and laugh at the mental kids. Some people put Viper Stripes (more properly, but not necessarily correctly, known as Cobra Stripes) on their 0.9l Corsas. They are mocked, they may reply... wolowizard said: Having just read that back to myself I see how stupid it sounds, but it is to near the truth to change and begs the question that if you really believe the religious are nutty mental types why is it ok to make fun of them? I don't make fun, I'm perplexed as to how such delusion (my take!) persists. I'm somewhat angered that the state spends my taxes inoculating children with this nonsense... wolowizard said: I would also like to know what the OP was told when he reported this abuse to the authorities as If I thought children were being abused I would report it without a second thought. Or is he happy to witness abuse and do nothing? I find myself in a state where the head of state is also the head of the state church. This disgusts me. I consider the whole state to be an abuse of reason and actively support Scottish Independence/the dissolution of the UK not least for its antitheocratic effects...
|
|
|
fluffnik
Original Poster
17,347 posts
96 months
|
Nick M said: I don't think they're 'abusive', in any of the readily accepted terms of the word, but I do think they're an anachronism which should be removed from our education system. How can mutilating the minds of children be anything other than abusive?
|
|
|
fluffnik
Original Poster
17,347 posts
96 months
|
Jandywa said: what is your agenda with this thread? Enquiry. ...obviously with an anti-theist bias since it's me. 
|
|
|
Nick M
3,137 posts
92 months
|
fluffnik said: How can mutilating the minds of children be anything other than abusive? I don't think they do that, having had a daughter who went to a faith school and is already growing up as an atheist... They don't brain-wash kids and teach them creationist theory, they just have a slightly different focus on a few things which aren't massively invasive, e.g. the christmas carol concert, stuff at easter, etc.
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
fluffnik
Original Poster
17,347 posts
96 months
|
wolowizard said: fluffnik said: Well educated irreligious populations tend to have little strife... My religion tells us "thou shall not kill" not thou shall not kill unless tony blair says it's ok, it is only those without faith, those that reject it that are prepared to kill. ...yet lots of killing happens in its name. IMO Tony Blair is: - a Christian
- a
 - a traitor
- a mass murderer
These attributes are independent and non conditional. wolowizard said: Care to answer my other questions as yuo conveniently skipped those to get to this post. Looked back, didn't spot questions; please enumerate.
|
|
|
fluffnik
Original Poster
17,347 posts
96 months
|
Nick M said: fluffnik said: How can mutilating the minds of children be anything other than abusive? I don't think they do that, having had a daughter who went to a faith school and is already growing up as an atheist... They don't brain-wash kids and teach them creationist theory, they just have a slightly different focus on a few things which aren't massively invasive, e.g. the christmas carol concert, stuff at easter, etc. She's done well. I also survived my broadly/diffusely presbyterian education but it tried to wound me and I do bear scars... (At ~13 I was amongst a dozen or so who went to see the head teacher AKA Rector to indicate our unwillingness to participate in Church Services. Initially he said "Bring a Note" but we said to our Church of Scotland Elder Heedie; "It has nothing to do with our parents, it's those you see before you and a fair few of our fellows who have no belief in the god you would have us worship. It would show no respect to the Church nor us to compel us to participate in a ritual for which we have only contempt." "If you can find a teacher to supervise you, fair enough." We were spoiled for choice.) Church parade died shortly after.  Not all kids are strong, not all will have defenders. Anything that gives superstitious nonsense credibility is malign and needs snuffed out.
|
|
|
Nick M
3,137 posts
92 months
|
To me there is a difference between being an atheist and being anti-religious. And you seem ardently anti-religious.
For that matter, I also happen to think there's an argument for saying a lot of theists are anti-religious, in terms of some of the things they claim to do in the name of their gods.
I would rather see energies being focused on the non-politicalisation of religion - where it is used, for example, as a 'shield' for certain groups to hide behind so they cannot be challenged through fear of 'offending' them. That to me is more 'abusive' than kids being told that a carpenter in the middle east was the son of god.
|
|
|
fluffnik
Original Poster
17,347 posts
96 months
|
Nick M said: To me there is a difference between being an atheist and being anti-religious. And you seem ardently anti-religious. Ho yuss...  I think religion is by far the most pernicious canker in humanity's being; it has no redeeming features... Nick M said: For that matter, I also happen to think there's an argument for saying a lot of theists are anti-religious, in terms of some of the things they claim to do in the name of their gods. I'm sure much is entirely cynical and devoid of "faith" but it all depends on the respectability of blatantly delusional nonsense. Nick M said: I would rather see energies being focused on the non-politicalisation of religion - where it is used, for example, as a 'shield' for certain groups to hide behind so they cannot be challenged through fear of 'offending' them. That to me is more 'abusive' than kids being told that a carpenter in the middle east was the son of god. Far better to teach sceptical enquiry where nothing is taken on trust and all knowledge is provisional. Lying to children is lying to children no mater how the religious dress it up.
|
|
|
mildmannered
553 posts
22 months
|
Before you completely bash religion, consider the part it may have paid in the civilisation of man.
Controlling all those barbaric peasants by telling them what will happen if they commit "sins" a basic per cursor to our laws isn't it?
Oh and tell your children Christmas is cancelled this year as its abusive and Daddy has to work.
Oh and BTW I'm an atheist.
|
|
|
Steve H
1,587 posts
64 months
|
wolowizard said: I find it very sad that the many outspoken atheists on PH are more than happy to poke fun at, ridicule and even abuse those that admit to being religious. These tend to be the same people that reguarly make the claim that the religious are mentally deficient in some way or just plain nutty.
I can only conclude that PH is happy for mental people to be made fun of and we should organise a PH meet to a special school so we can point and laugh at the mental kids.
Having just read that back to myself I see how stupid it sounds, but it is to near the truth to change and begs the question that if you really believe the religious are nutty mental types why is it ok to make fun of them? I think that the answer is that most disapproval of such behaviour is aimed at people who are making fun of minority groups; since outspoken atheists are in fact themselves a minority they do get a degree of leeway that a majority group might not benefit from. On the point about being nutty, I'm an atheist and I do struggle to see how anyone believing in god can be anything other than delusional or brainwashed. I understand how people would like to believe in it, I'd like to believe in it! I'd also like to believe that I'm a well built millionaire company director but every day I have to wake up and face that it's clearly not true  On the OPs question, getting them young is how religions work and probably shouldn't be. You could call it indoctrination but most of the time I don't think you can call it abuse.
|
|
|
TheHeretic
68,024 posts
124 months
|
wolowizard said: My religion tells us "thou shall not kill" not thou shall not kill unless tony blair says it's ok, it is only those without faith, those that reject it that are prepared to kill.
Care to answer my other questions as yuo conveniently skipped those to get to this post.
Does it? What religion is that?
|
|
|
Zerotonine
336 posts
43 months
|
Two of my three kids go to a c of e school, it is religious but they also teach about other faiths, and they have many children of different faiths attending too. We encourage the children to ask why to anything they do not understand. They are open minded, not religious zealots/martyrs in training. They respect people from different faiths and respect people who do not believe in any religion. If you want to ask what kind of school is child abuse, well, personally I would look at these new 'academies'.
|
|
|
Papa Hotel
9,480 posts
51 months
|
Pints said: Most definitely this.
OP, are you trying to be deliberately provocative by starting this thread? I would imagine so. The religion-bashing threads have become quite the bandwagon recently, every t  t wants to make one. I think that instead of knocking these threads, we should encourage them, hopefully they'll become such a PH cliche they'll implode under their own mass, something like the 335d (mapped) nonsense.
|
|
|
WJH
60 posts
71 months
|
Jandywa said: In alot of faith schools they teach about many other religions too (islam judaism etc), not just the one. The children can make up their own minds on what to believe. They aren't given lines for not believing something or going to church everynight.
If you believe that then you obviously didn't attend one.
|
|
|
0000
9,319 posts
60 months
|
I think it's wrong, as it would be with any cult. But abusive is probably stretching it.
|
|
|
james_tigerwoods
10,749 posts
66 months
|
Normally I avoid religion threads, but I feel I can contribute. At the age of 7, I was sent away to a Catholic boarding school run by (evil) nuns - aside from the sadistic nature of the nuns, I feel it wasn't a positive experience as I had to attend church 3 times a week. I complied to fit in and not have the s  t kicked out of me by the nuns/priest/teachers. However, I never felt I was under any more pressure than that put on me by my parents - it is they who decide your child's future - the school is almost incidental. Now, I have no religious affiliation, that's my choice - I will let my children decide their religious choices, whatever they may be.
|
|
|
Funk
13,077 posts
78 months
|
Not abuse, but it is wrong. Religions are just cults, albeit with varying degrees of indoctrination. I think children should be taught about religion, especially the harm it does and the wars it has been the root of over the centuries (and indeed still is) to allow the child to make up his or her mind about whether they wish to join a religion or not. To indoctrinate them into one which is not their choice and to teach them that all other religions are 'wrong' is deeply flawed.
|
|
|
Galileo
2,643 posts
87 months
|
[Vader] I find your lack of faith disturbing. [/Vader]
|
|
|
Countdown
6,340 posts
65 months
|
Jandywa said: Its because it isn't abuse. The OP may well not be religious but what i dont think he understands is that children can and often do choose what they do and do not like. They can make up their own minds and draw their own conclusions on something such as religion. If they choose to follow it then good for them, it obviously makes them happier. Dont see the need to think any less of them for it. Very well put.
|
|