Things that annoy you beyond reason...(Vol. 7)

Things that annoy you beyond reason...(Vol. 7)

Author
Discussion

popeyewhite

19,927 posts

121 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
FiF said:
Alickadoo said:
FiF said:
I'd agree, have seen a number of eclipses, mostly partial obviously, over the years, first one recalled was 1961. As recently as 2015 when the total eclipse path passed close to the NW coast of the UK. Certainly where I was, out by the riverside with the dog it was very eery. The light was very strange, colours faded almost to monotone, things became very quiet, quite eery at times. Not sure what % of obscuration

Not anything to lose your self control over, but as a rare once in a lifetime experience can understand why people really want to see a total eclipse. Have people really forgotten the hoohah in SW England in 1999?
Would you say it was eery, a bit eery, quite eery, or very eery?
And the point of your post is what, to be a humourless twerp?

Or does it annoy you beyond reason and therefore thread appropriate? Strange.
I think he was making fun of your [repeated] spelling error.

5s Alive

1,830 posts

35 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
FiF said:
Alickadoo said:
FiF said:
I'd agree, have seen a number of eclipses, mostly partial obviously, over the years, first one recalled was 1961. As recently as 2015 when the total eclipse path passed close to the NW coast of the UK. Certainly where I was, out by the riverside with the dog it was very eery. The light was very strange, colours faded almost to monotone, things became very quiet, quite eery at times. Not sure what % of obscuration

Not anything to lose your self control over, but as a rare once in a lifetime experience can understand why people really want to see a total eclipse. Have people really forgotten the hoohah in SW England in 1999?
Would you say it was eery, a bit eery, quite eery, or very eery?
And the point of your post is what, to be a humourless twerp?

Or does it annoy you beyond reason and therefore thread appropriate? Strange.
I think he was making fun of your [repeated] spelling error.
It's always looked odd to my eyes but eery is an accepted alternative spelling.

Turtle Shed

1,545 posts

27 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Crappy garden ornaments. Fake wells and water pumps to name but two.

Jader1973

4,003 posts

201 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Driving to work the other day I was aware of a marked up Hyundai Santa Fe about a km behind me. It was gaining very slowly so I just set my cruise to 112 and bumbled along.

It caught up to me when we hit slow traffic about 20km later…and it turned out it was the fking SES, not plod.


popeyewhite

19,927 posts

121 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
5s Alive said:
popeyewhite said:
FiF said:
Alickadoo said:
FiF said:
I'd agree, have seen a number of eclipses, mostly partial obviously, over the years, first one recalled was 1961. As recently as 2015 when the total eclipse path passed close to the NW coast of the UK. Certainly where I was, out by the riverside with the dog it was very eery. The light was very strange, colours faded almost to monotone, things became very quiet, quite eery at times. Not sure what % of obscuration

Not anything to lose your self control over, but as a rare once in a lifetime experience can understand why people really want to see a total eclipse. Have people really forgotten the hoohah in SW England in 1999?
Would you say it was eery, a bit eery, quite eery, or very eery?
And the point of your post is what, to be a humourless twerp?

Or does it annoy you beyond reason and therefore thread appropriate? Strange.
I think he was making fun of your [repeated] spelling error.
It's always looked odd to my eyes but eery is an accepted alternative spelling.
Hmm. You mean others have spelt 'eerie' wrong enough times the variant has found its way into the dictionary. biggrin



5s Alive

1,830 posts

35 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
5s Alive said:
popeyewhite said:
FiF said:
Alickadoo said:
FiF said:
I'd agree, have seen a number of eclipses, mostly partial obviously, over the years, first one recalled was 1961. As recently as 2015 when the total eclipse path passed close to the NW coast of the UK. Certainly where I was, out by the riverside with the dog it was very eery. The light was very strange, colours faded almost to monotone, things became very quiet, quite eery at times. Not sure what % of obscuration

Not anything to lose your self control over, but as a rare once in a lifetime experience can understand why people really want to see a total eclipse. Have people really forgotten the hoohah in SW England in 1999?
Would you say it was eery, a bit eery, quite eery, or very eery?
And the point of your post is what, to be a humourless twerp?

Or does it annoy you beyond reason and therefore thread appropriate? Strange.
I think he was making fun of your [repeated] spelling error.
It's always looked odd to my eyes but eery is an accepted alternative spelling.
Hmm. You mean others have spelt 'eerie' wrong enough times the variant has found its way into the dictionary. biggrin
Or indeed the other way around. One has to hope that accepted language drift/evolution never extends as far as; should of, would of, could of... aaargh!

Where's me blood pressure tablets! smile
scratchchin

Nethybridge

938 posts

13 months

Thursday 11th April
quotequote all
5s Alive said:
Or indeed the other way around. One has to hope that accepted language drift/evolution never extends as far as; should of, would of, could of... aaargh!

Where's me blood pressure tablets! smile
scratchchin
All this fuss over an eagle's nest.

LankyFreak

670 posts

29 months

Thursday 11th April
quotequote all
21st Century Man said:
Hot sauce that isn't, not even remotely.
Worse than this is hot sauce that IS hot but tastes only hot, almost a chemical taste.No real flavour to it.

Sycamore

1,795 posts

119 months

Thursday 11th April
quotequote all
LankyFreak said:
Worse than this is hot sauce that IS hot but tastes only hot, almost a chemical taste.No real flavour to it.
Most hot sauce tastes like that for me, which is annoying because I like spicy food biggrin

Yet to find a hot sauce that has a nice taste to it

CivicDuties

4,680 posts

31 months

Thursday 11th April
quotequote all
stemll said:
CivicDuties said:
stemll said:
CivicDuties said:
Zarco said:
CivicDuties said:
The American term "drywall".

Of course it's fking dry, it's intended to be used indoors. What the fk use would wetwall be? And it's not a fking wall. It's boarding. Made out of plaster. Perhaps we could call it, oh I dunno, "plasterboard".

Pricks.
We call it drylining in this country too. Likely because there is no wet trade involved (bricks and mortar). It is a wall because it has metal or timber studs holding it up (instead of bricks/blocks).

Make sense to me.
Drylining is a less awful term, but again, I would assume it's sodding dry, I don't need telling because there isn't a "wetlining" alternative. And no, it isn't a wall. It is part of a wall. The frame it is nailed to plus the plasterboard = wall.
There is a "wetlining" alternative. It's called plastering.
I wouldn't plaster a wooden frame, which is the sort of thing which constitutes the majority of a wall on which plasterboard is hung. Because it doesn't adhere well to fresh air. So it's not an alternative to plasterboard.
All of the solid walls in my house have plasterboard on them but you wouldn't put the frame on would you, you'd plaster the bricks or blocks rolleyes

Maybe if there was more of that, we'd get proper solid walls rather than partition walls that exist for no reason other them being cheap.
Look. I'm not here to be Yanksplained. I'm here to tell people about something which annoys me beyond reason. Drywall is a ridiculous word because it simply doesn't describe the the thing it purports to describe, unequivocally. Like a lot of garbage buzzwords which Yanks love. This stuff is plasterboard. I've got dry walls in my house, but not a single piece of plasterboard. Can we please call a spade a spade. Not doing so annoys me beyond reason.

LankyFreak

670 posts

29 months

Thursday 11th April
quotequote all
Sycamore said:
Most hot sauce tastes like that for me, which is annoying because I like spicy food biggrin

Yet to find a hot sauce that has a nice taste to it
It isn't very hot—I'd give it a 4/10 on the heat scale—but Huy Fong's sriracha sauce is very tasty. Flying Goose (I think it's more commonly found in the UK) is decent too.

Zarco

17,885 posts

210 months

Thursday 11th April
quotequote all
CivicDuties said:
Zarco said:
CivicDuties said:
The American term "drywall".

Of course it's fking dry, it's intended to be used indoors. What the fk use would wetwall be? And it's not a fking wall. It's boarding. Made out of plaster. Perhaps we could call it, oh I dunno, "plasterboard".

Pricks.
We call it drylining in this country too. Likely because there is no wet trade involved (bricks and mortar). It is a wall because it has metal or timber studs holding it up (instead of bricks/blocks).

Make sense to me.
Drylining is a less awful term, but again, I would assume it's sodding dry, I don't need telling because there isn't a "wetlining" alternative. And no, it isn't a wall. It is part of a wall. The frame it is nailed to plus the plasterboard = wall.
Drywall is referring to a system formed by the timber/metal studwork and plasterboard. To make a wall. Same as what we call drylining in the UK.

You seem to be getting your knickers in a twist thinking it is just the plasterboard. Of course this is the beyond reason thread, so crack on biggrin

FiF

44,108 posts

252 months

Thursday 11th April
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
5s Alive said:
popeyewhite said:
FiF said:
Alickadoo said:
FiF said:
I'd agree, have seen a number of eclipses, mostly partial obviously, over the years, first one recalled was 1961. As recently as 2015 when the total eclipse path passed close to the NW coast of the UK. Certainly where I was, out by the riverside with the dog it was very eery. The light was very strange, colours faded almost to monotone, things became very quiet, quite eery at times. Not sure what % of obscuration

Not anything to lose your self control over, but as a rare once in a lifetime experience can understand why people really want to see a total eclipse. Have people really forgotten the hoohah in SW England in 1999?
Would you say it was eery, a bit eery, quite eery, or very eery?
And the point of your post is what, to be a humourless twerp?

Or does it annoy you beyond reason and therefore thread appropriate? Strange.
I think he was making fun of your [repeated] spelling error.
It's always looked odd to my eyes but eery is an accepted alternative spelling.
Hmm. You mean others have spelt 'eerie' wrong enough times the variant has found its way into the dictionary. biggrin
Wouldn't be PH without the grammar and spelling twerps piling on for a poke. Tiresome. The spelling version in my post has been in use since 17th century apparently.

Two words, second one Off.

Fastdruid

8,649 posts

153 months

Thursday 11th April
quotequote all
CivicDuties said:
stemll said:
CivicDuties said:
Zarco said:
CivicDuties said:
The American term "drywall".

Of course it's fking dry, it's intended to be used indoors. What the fk use would wetwall be? And it's not a fking wall. It's boarding. Made out of plaster. Perhaps we could call it, oh I dunno, "plasterboard".

Pricks.
We call it drylining in this country too. Likely because there is no wet trade involved (bricks and mortar). It is a wall because it has metal or timber studs holding it up (instead of bricks/blocks).

Make sense to me.
Drylining is a less awful term, but again, I would assume it's sodding dry, I don't need telling because there isn't a "wetlining" alternative. And no, it isn't a wall. It is part of a wall. The frame it is nailed to plus the plasterboard = wall.
There is a "wetlining" alternative. It's called plastering.
I wouldn't plaster a wooden frame, which is the sort of thing which constitutes the majority of a wall on which plasterboard is hung. Because it doesn't adhere well to fresh air. So it's not an alternative to plasterboard.
You say that but it used to be the way walls *were* constructed. Lath and plaster. Nail strips of thin wood between the studs and plaster over the top.

CivicDuties

4,680 posts

31 months

Thursday 11th April
quotequote all
Zarco said:
Drywall is referring to a system formed by the timber/metal studwork and plasterboard. To make a wall. Same as what we call drylining in the UK.

You seem to be getting your knickers in a twist thinking it is just the plasterboard. Of course this is the beyond reason thread, so crack on biggrin
Indeed.

However, the Yanks don't use the word plasterboard to just refer to the plasterboard. They call it drywall. So the word drywall can mean 2 different things. The plasterboard alone, or the whole installation.

This makes absolutely no difference to me in my life, but it annoys me beyond reason.

C5_Steve

3,099 posts

104 months

Thursday 11th April
quotequote all
CivicDuties said:
Zarco said:
Drywall is referring to a system formed by the timber/metal studwork and plasterboard. To make a wall. Same as what we call drylining in the UK.

You seem to be getting your knickers in a twist thinking it is just the plasterboard. Of course this is the beyond reason thread, so crack on biggrin
Indeed.

However, the Yanks don't use the word plasterboard to just refer to the plasterboard. They call it drywall. So the word drywall can mean 2 different things. The plasterboard alone, or the whole installation.

This makes absolutely no difference to me in my life, but it annoys me beyond reason.
Slight tangent but for years I had no clue what they were talking about when they (Americans) talked about Sheetrock. Turns out it's a brand of plasterboard and like many things (Hoover etc) it's adopted.

24lemons

2,651 posts

186 months

Thursday 11th April
quotequote all
Rusty Old-Banger said:
beambeam1 said:
Ornamental wheelbarrows. Can't stand the chintzy bloody things.
Especially twee ones.
hehe

Johnspex

4,343 posts

185 months

Thursday 11th April
quotequote all
CivicDuties said:
Zarco said:
Drywall is referring to a system formed by the timber/metal studwork and plasterboard. To make a wall. Same as what we call drylining in the UK.

You seem to be getting your knickers in a twist thinking it is just the plasterboard. Of course this is the beyond reason thread, so crack on biggrin
Indeed.

However, the Yanks don't use the word plasterboard to just refer to the plasterboard. They call it drywall. So the word drywall can mean 2 different things. The plasterboard alone, or the whole installation.

This makes absolutely no difference to me in my life, but it annoys me beyond reason.
150 posts per month on average! Blimey. What else do you do?

CivicDuties

4,680 posts

31 months

Thursday 11th April
quotequote all
Johnspex said:
CivicDuties said:
Zarco said:
Drywall is referring to a system formed by the timber/metal studwork and plasterboard. To make a wall. Same as what we call drylining in the UK.

You seem to be getting your knickers in a twist thinking it is just the plasterboard. Of course this is the beyond reason thread, so crack on biggrin
Indeed.

However, the Yanks don't use the word plasterboard to just refer to the plasterboard. They call it drywall. So the word drywall can mean 2 different things. The plasterboard alone, or the whole installation.

This makes absolutely no difference to me in my life, but it annoys me beyond reason.
150 posts per month on average! Blimey. What else do you do?
Not much.

Pit Pony

8,612 posts

122 months

Thursday 11th April
quotequote all
carlo996 said:
Tourists/muppets in airports.

They should be banned until they pass basic proficiency smile
If i travel alone it is efficient and relatively stress free.
If I travel with wife, family or work colleagues it's all very stressful. I've no idea why.