|
The Jolly Todger
1,155 posts
49 months
|
This thread would be better with fewer plumbers.
|
|
|
essexplumber
7,283 posts
42 months
|
The Jolly Todger said: This thread would be better with fewer plumbers. Ah, would it? I think football would be better with fewer Chelsea's and Citeh's f  king it up as a meaningfull competition but lifes a b h aint it.
|
|
|
Negative Creep
11,266 posts
96 months
|
essexplumber said: Negative Creep said: Having grown up in Medway I would always look for Gillingham's results and went to the odd game, but would never call myself a fan. Since I now live in Plymouth it's much the same for them, but I'd never claim to support two clubs How do you end up supporting Chelsea if you live in Kent? Dad's side of the family is from Clapham and started going in the 30's. So every member of my family is a Chelsea fan
|
|
|
GLENRED
5,805 posts
75 months
|
essexplumber said: Ah, would it? I think football would be better with fewer Chelsea's and Citeh's f king it up as a meaningfull competition but lifes a b h aint it. He's Back !! 
|
|
|
mercfunder
2,594 posts
42 months
|
essexplumber said: I think football would be better with fewer Chelsea's and Citeh's f king it up as a meaningfull competition but lifes a b h aint it. At least we have both got a manager.;)
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
Riff Raff
2,222 posts
64 months
|
mercfunder said: essexplumber said: I think football would be better with fewer Chelsea's and Citeh's f king it up as a meaningfull competition but lifes a b h aint it. At least we have both got a manager  Don't worry. Levy has it all under control. Possibly.
|
|
|
Audi 525i
1,250 posts
21 months
|
The Jolly Todger said: This thread would be better with fewer plumbers. This thread would be better with more Todgers. So I've been led to believe.
|
|
|
jcremonini
521 posts
36 months
|
essexplumber said: The Jolly Todger said: This thread would be better with fewer plumbers. Ah, would it? I think football would be better with fewer Chelsea's and Citeh's f king it up as a meaningfull competition but lifes a b h aint it. So - you think that, if it was not for City and Chelsea, Tottenham might stand a chance of winning something then ? Bearing in mind how long it has been since your lot last won anything 'meaningful' perhaps you can be so good as to tell us who was "f king it all up" for you in the years between then and the likes of Abramovich coming along ? The answer, of course, is no one. The game has never been 'f ked up' - your club has just been sadly lacking (despite the large forays into the transfer market)
|
|
|
Riff Raff
2,222 posts
64 months
|
jcremonini said: essexplumber said: The Jolly Todger said: This thread would be better with fewer plumbers. Ah, would it? I think football would be better with fewer Chelsea's and Citeh's f king it up as a meaningfull competition but lifes a b h aint it. So - you think that, if it was not for City and Chelsea, Tottenham might stand a chance of winning something then ? Bearing in mind how long it has been since your lot last won anything 'meaningful' perhaps you can be so good as to tell us who was "f king it all up" for you in the years between then and the likes of Abramovich coming along ? The answer, of course, is no one. The game has never been 'f ked up' - your club has just been sadly lacking (despite the large forays into the transfer market) Sorry about the formatting here, but they were doing quite well in 1898, and again from 42-46 while all the able bodied men were away on other business. Rank Manager Years Played Won Win % 1 Frank Brettell 1898–1899 63 37 58.73 2 Arthur Turner 1942–1946 49 27 55.10 3 John Cameron 1899–1907 570 296 51.93 4 David Pleat 1 1986–1987 119 60 50.42 5 Harry Redknapp 2008–2012 198 98 49.49 6 Bill Nicholson 1958–1974 832 408 49.03 7 Arthur Rowe 1949–1955 283 135 47.70 8 Fred Kirkham 1907–1908 61 29 47.54 9 Jimmy Anderson 2 1955–1958 161 75 46.58 10 Percy Smith 1929–1935 253 109 46.38 11 Doug Livermore Ray Clemence 1992–1993 51 23 45.09 12 Martin Jol 3 2004–2007 150 67 44.67 13 Peter Shreeves 1984–1986 & 1991–1992 177 79 44.63 14 Jack Tresadern 1935–1938 146 65 44.52 15 Peter McWilliam 1913–1927 & 1938–1942 750 331 44.13 16 'The Directors' 1908–1913 231 99 42.86 17 Joe Hulme 1946–1949 150 64 42.67 18 Keith Burkinshaw 1976–1984 431 182 42.23 19 Terry Venables 1987–1991 165 67 40.61 20 Billy Minter 1927–1929 124 49 39.52
|
|
|
daffykyle1
73 posts
33 months
|
Riff Raff said: Sorry about the formatting here, but they were doing quite well in 1898, and again from 42-46 while all the able bodied men were away on other business.
Rank Manager Years Played Won Win %
1 Frank Brettell 1898–1899 63 37 58.73
2 Arthur Turner 1942–1946 49 27 55.10
3 John Cameron 1899–1907 570 296 51.93
4 David Pleat 1 1986–1987 119 60 50.42
5 Harry Redknapp 2008–2012 198 98 49.49
6 Bill Nicholson 1958–1974 832 408 49.03
7 Arthur Rowe 1949–1955 283 135 47.70
8 Fred Kirkham 1907–1908 61 29 47.54
9 Jimmy Anderson 2 1955–1958 161 75 46.58
10 Percy Smith 1929–1935 253 109 46.38
11 Doug Livermore
Ray Clemence 1992–1993 51 23 45.09
12 Martin Jol 3 2004–2007 150 67 44.67
13 Peter Shreeves 1984–1986 & 1991–1992 177 79 44.63
14 Jack Tresadern 1935–1938 146 65 44.52
15 Peter McWilliam 1913–1927 & 1938–1942 750 331 44.13
16 'The Directors' 1908–1913 231 99 42.86
17 Joe Hulme 1946–1949 150 64 42.67
18 Keith Burkinshaw 1976–1984 431 182 42.23
19 Terry Venables 1987–1991 165 67 40.61
20 Billy Minter 1927–1929 124 49 39.52 Tournament Years Played Won Win % 1 Champions League/European Cup Finals 1898 - 2012 0 0 0
|
|
|
andyjo1982
4,155 posts
79 months
|
Riff Raff said: jcremonini said: essexplumber said: The Jolly Todger said: This thread would be better with fewer plumbers. Ah, would it? I think football would be better with fewer Chelsea's and Citeh's f king it up as a meaningfull competition but lifes a b h aint it. So - you think that, if it was not for City and Chelsea, Tottenham might stand a chance of winning something then ? Bearing in mind how long it has been since your lot last won anything 'meaningful' perhaps you can be so good as to tell us who was "f king it all up" for you in the years between then and the likes of Abramovich coming along ? The answer, of course, is no one. The game has never been 'f ked up' - your club has just been sadly lacking (despite the large forays into the transfer market) Sorry about the formatting here, but they were doing quite well in 1898, and again from 42-46 while all the able bodied men were away on other business. Rank Manager Years Played Won Win % 1 Frank Brettell 1898–1899 63 37 58.73 2 Arthur Turner 1942–1946 49 27 55.10 3 John Cameron 1899–1907 570 296 51.93 4 David Pleat 1 1986–1987 119 60 50.42 5 Harry Redknapp 2008–2012 198 98 49.49 6 Bill Nicholson 1958–1974 832 408 49.03 7 Arthur Rowe 1949–1955 283 135 47.70 8 Fred Kirkham 1907–1908 61 29 47.54 9 Jimmy Anderson 2 1955–1958 161 75 46.58 10 Percy Smith 1929–1935 253 109 46.38 11 Doug Livermore Ray Clemence 1992–1993 51 23 45.09 12 Martin Jol 3 2004–2007 150 67 44.67 13 Peter Shreeves 1984–1986 & 1991–1992 177 79 44.63 14 Jack Tresadern 1935–1938 146 65 44.52 15 Peter McWilliam 1913–1927 & 1938–1942 750 331 44.13 16 'The Directors' 1908–1913 231 99 42.86 17 Joe Hulme 1946–1949 150 64 42.67 18 Keith Burkinshaw 1976–1984 431 182 42.23 19 Terry Venables 1987–1991 165 67 40.61 20 Billy Minter 1927–1929 124 49 39.52 Perhaps Levy's masterplan is to try talk Frank Brettell out of retirement...
|
|
|
TwigtheWonderkid
6,030 posts
19 months
|
essexplumber said: Ah, would it? I think football would be better with fewer Chelsea's and Citeh's f king it up as a meaningfull competition but lifes a b h aint it.  You weren't exactly pulling up many trees before us and Citeh won the lotto rollover!!! Abramovic arrived 2003. Check out the results of Chelsea/Spud encounters thru the 90s.
|
|
|
BrabusMog
4,921 posts
55 months
|
TwigtheWonderkid said: essexplumber said: Ah, would it? I think football would be better with fewer Chelsea's and Citeh's f king it up as a meaningfull competition but lifes a b h aint it. You weren't exactly pulling up many trees before us and Citeh won the lotto rollover!!! Abramovic arrived 2003. Check out the results of Chelsea/Spud encounters thru the 90s. Help me out here,there must be a reason why Chelsea call Spurs' ground Three Point Lane, isn't there?
|
|
|
jcremonini
521 posts
36 months
|
Riff Raff said: Sorry about the formatting here, but they were doing quite well in 1898, and again from 42-46 while all the able bodied men were away on other business. Plumber will be posting blaming the North Atlantic Treaty and the lack of global warfare for Tottenham's abject failure to win anything. Damn politicians!
|
|
|
daffykyle1
73 posts
33 months
|
Yeah, we were smashing Spurs well before the Abramovich era.
I remember a little known player called George Weah I believe scoring a last minute winner at the Bridge on his debut.
God, those were the days - when we were the minnows!
Possibly worth mentioning that last season was the first time we finished below Spurs since 96-96 season.
|
|
|
CIE560
10,441 posts
62 months
|
BrabusMog said: Help me out here,there must be a reason why Chelsea call Spurs' ground Three Point Lane, isn't there? That's funny, at Man Utd we have a similar name for it! 
|
|
|
TEKNOPUG
7,463 posts
74 months
|
BrabusMog said: Help me out here,there must be a reason why Chelsea call Spurs' ground Three Point Lane, isn't there? Because that's their total points haul in their last 5 visits 
|
|
|
BrabusMog
4,921 posts
55 months
|
TEKNOPUG said: BrabusMog said: Help me out here,there must be a reason why Chelsea call Spurs' ground Three Point Lane, isn't there? Because that's their total points haul in their last 5 visits So perhaps that money isn't the be-all and end-all
|
|
|
BrabusMog
4,921 posts
55 months
|
CIE560 said: BrabusMog said: Help me out here,there must be a reason why Chelsea call Spurs' ground Three Point Lane, isn't there? That's funny, at Man Utd we have a similar name for it! I wish West Ham could say the same...
|
|
|
Riff Raff
2,222 posts
64 months
|
TEKNOPUG said: BrabusMog said: Help me out here,there must be a reason why Chelsea call Spurs' ground Three Point Lane, isn't there? Because that's their total points haul in their last 5 visits Don't worry. It will be business as usual, if it's true that AVB is in the frame for 'Arry's old job......
|
|
