Militant runners on country lanes

Militant runners on country lanes

Author
Discussion

_Neal_

2,690 posts

220 months

Sunday 5th May
quotequote all
Acuity30 said:
If you have that much experience with 'pricks in cars', have you ever thought that it might be you who's the problem? Road rage confrontations shouldn't be a regular occurrence for you. Got any helmet cam vids of you showing someone what for? I have a popcorn maker I've not used yet.
Advanced level misdirection and trolling - he's reacting to your comments about spraying joggers with your windscreen washers rolleyes


NRG1976

1,064 posts

11 months

Sunday 5th May
quotequote all
Some PH posters are a funny bunch with their extreme straw man approach. For example, you don’t like tea? Let me guess you’re a Brexit supporting murderer! You wonder how these people have discussions in real life hehe

_Neal_

2,690 posts

220 months

Sunday 5th May
quotequote all
NRG1976 said:
Some PH posters are a funny bunch with their extreme straw man approach. For example, you don’t like tea? Let me guess you’re a Brexit supporting murderer! You wonder how these people have discussions in real life hehe
Agreed - that was a bit of an odd one.

However, playing the ball rather than the man, how you feeling about the highway code having heard the arguments against your view? wink

Julian Scott

2,586 posts

25 months

Tuesday 7th May
quotequote all
Acuity30 said:
Long blast of screen wash and a triggering queens wave out the window as I drive past usually sends the message: Get off my commute road and go to the running track/gym.
I've just spent a week in Dubai on business, surrounded by influencers and self-appointed VIPs & z-list celebs, including most of the return flight at the bar on the A380 with even bigger bell-ends...and still none of them come close to the ery you manage to display. My congratulations.

Julian Scott

2,586 posts

25 months

Tuesday 7th May
quotequote all
KTMsm said:
Lots of people seem to have forgotten that roads are primarily for transport, not leisure
Is that written in statute? Or the Highway Code? I can't find reference to it?


Julian Scott

2,586 posts

25 months

Tuesday 7th May
quotequote all
NRG1976 said:
jasonrobertson86 said:
NRG1976 said:
remedy said:
NRG1976 said:
remedy said:
NRG1976 said:
People who jog into oncoming traffic are following the highway code, they looking after their safety. They could easily jog on on the other side of the road, but that would mean they would not be following the highway code and putting themselves and others at risk of a crash and injury or death
laugh

How have you got a driving license?

I hope this was sarcasm.
Yes I have a driving license. No sarcasm. Meant every word. Cry if you want.
Ok. It's scary that I share a road with people like you, but hope my edits in bold help with your understanding of using the roads.
Best stay indoors if you’re that easily scared. Don’t care what the Highway Code says, running into oncoming traffic is silly.
I think its quite clear who is silly here. Running with your back to traffic is also silly, hence the rules.
Do you cycle into oncoming traffic?
Do you know the Highway Code?

jasonrobertson86

599 posts

5 months

Tuesday 7th May
quotequote all
Julian Scott said:
Do you know the Highway Code?
He said its a load of rubbish rofl

NAAHD

161 posts

26 months

Tuesday 7th May
quotequote all
All the talk about cyclists reminds me of last summer when I was walking my dog along a bridleway when a cyclist flew round a corner from behind. Luckily I heard him and turned just in time as he almost hit my dog but I yanked her back just in time. Cyclist ended up on the grass verge and narrowly missed crashing into the beck. Since it had rained earlier the grass was wet and he tried to get back on the pavement but ended up losing the back end and low sided it. His mate then comes flying round the corner and tried to emergency stop and almost went over his bars. Could have been a bit grizzly if he’d gone into the water as it’s a decent drop and a rocky one at that. Genuinely could have been a life changing or life ending incident if he hadn’t managed to change direction







Julian Scott

2,586 posts

25 months

Tuesday 7th May
quotequote all
NAAHD said:
All the talk about cyclists reminds me of last summer when I was walking my dog along a bridleway when a cyclist flew round a corner from behind. Luckily I heard him and turned just in time as he almost hit my dog but I yanked her back just in time. Cyclist ended up on the grass verge and narrowly missed crashing into the beck. Since it had rained earlier the grass was wet and he tried to get back on the pavement but ended up losing the back end and low sided it. His mate then comes flying round the corner and tried to emergency stop and almost went over his bars. Could have been a bit grizzly if he’d gone into the water as it’s a decent drop and a rocky one at that. Genuinely could have been a life changing or life ending incident if he hadn’t managed to change direction




Pavement bridleway?

Tindersticks

84 posts

1 month

Tuesday 7th May
quotequote all
‘My commute road’

laugh

What an absolute melt.

NAAHD

161 posts

26 months

Tuesday 7th May
quotequote all
Julian Scott said:
NAAHD said:
All the talk about cyclists reminds me of last summer when I was walking my dog along a bridleway when a cyclist flew round a corner from behind. Luckily I heard him and turned just in time as he almost hit my dog but I yanked her back just in time. Cyclist ended up on the grass verge and narrowly missed crashing into the beck. Since it had rained earlier the grass was wet and he tried to get back on the pavement but ended up losing the back end and low sided it. His mate then comes flying round the corner and tried to emergency stop and almost went over his bars. Could have been a bit grizzly if he’d gone into the water as it’s a decent drop and a rocky one at that. Genuinely could have been a life changing or life ending incident if he hadn’t managed to change direction




Pavement bridleway?
Probably be a byway. Where I go is a public footpath that leads to a byway that leads to bridleways and farmers fields

DonkeyApple

55,631 posts

170 months

Tuesday 7th May
quotequote all
Julian Scott said:
NAAHD said:
All the talk about cyclists reminds me of last summer when I was walking my dog along a bridleway when a cyclist flew round a corner from behind. Luckily I heard him and turned just in time as he almost hit my dog but I yanked her back just in time. Cyclist ended up on the grass verge and narrowly missed crashing into the beck. Since it had rained earlier the grass was wet and he tried to get back on the pavement but ended up losing the back end and low sided it. His mate then comes flying round the corner and tried to emergency stop and almost went over his bars. Could have been a bit grizzly if he’d gone into the water as it’s a decent drop and a rocky one at that. Genuinely could have been a life changing or life ending incident if he hadn’t managed to change direction




Pavement bridleway?
Doesn't really matter. Everyone knows you don't go into a corner faster than you can stop if an obstacle appears. Away from dedicated cycle tracks the chances these days of finding a dog walker is pretty high so you don't tend to pile in at a speed that puts you at risk. Some folk aren't fully able to keep control of their hormones so end up in the trees, hopefully unhurt. Even on the dedicated tracks there's still the chance of finding a crashed rider but you do end up running the risk.

NRG1976

1,064 posts

11 months

Tuesday 7th May
quotequote all
_Neal_ said:
NRG1976 said:
Some PH posters are a funny bunch with their extreme straw man approach. For example, you don’t like tea? Let me guess you’re a Brexit supporting murderer! You wonder how these people have discussions in real life hehe
Agreed - that was a bit of an odd one.

However, playing the ball rather than the man, how you feeling about the highway code having heard the arguments against your view? wink
Some fair shouts tbh, you forget how moronic some car drivers can be in not seeing someone and leaving that person completely oblivious to the unfolding disaster, so as annoying as I find it I get the rationale.

The strange one is say if there is a group of you walking in single file (think ramblers), then you have to walk with the flow of traffic and not against. You wouldn’t have thought the danger of being hit by a moron is any less?


Solocle

3,352 posts

85 months

Tuesday 7th May
quotequote all
NAAHD said:
Probably be a byway. Where I go is a public footpath that leads to a byway that leads to bridleways and farmers fields
This is a bridleway, old RAF base


heebeegeetee

28,874 posts

249 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
NRG1976 said:
The strange one is say if there is a group of you walking in single file (think ramblers), then you have to walk with the flow of traffic and not against. You wouldn’t have thought the danger of being hit by a moron is any less?
Hmm, have to say if this is in the HC I am unaware of it.

I wouldn't walk or jog with my back to the traffic.

lancslad58

604 posts

9 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
heebeegeetee said:
NRG1976 said:
The strange one is say if there is a group of you walking in single file (think ramblers), then you have to walk with the flow of traffic and not against. You wouldn’t have thought the danger of being hit by a moron is any less?
Hmm, have to say if this is in the HC I am unaware of it.

I wouldn't walk or jog with my back to the traffic.
I suspect NRG1976 is just trying to wind you up, it's common sense to walk against the flow.
Plus from the HC

Rule 2
If there is no pavement, keep to the right-hand side of the road so that you can see oncoming traffic. You should take extra care and be prepared to walk in single file, especially on narrow roads or in poor lightkeep close to the side of the road.It may be safer to cross the road well before a sharp right-hand bend so that oncoming traffic has a better chance of seeing you. Cross back after the bend.


andyA700

2,788 posts

38 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Acuity30 said:
egor110 said:
Why would i wear a camera running ?

Mouthy blokes in cars shouting at women happens all the time so are you saying the women are asking for it by wearing shorts and vests in the summer ?
Now you just sound like a BBC interviewer rofl
You are a right charmer aren't you.

NAAHD

161 posts

26 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Solocle said:
NAAHD said:
Probably be a byway. Where I go is a public footpath that leads to a byway that leads to bridleways and farmers fields
This is a bridleway, old RAF base

The only picture I can find online of is this:


Bit further up from where the beck is but he’s a brave man walking his off leash as there’s also a few electric bicycles that I’ve had the pleasure of avoiding biglaugh

cobra kid

4,971 posts

241 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Tindersticks said:
‘My commute road’

laugh

What an absolute melt.
Melt? Are you a pretend cockney?

But yes, I agree with the sentiment.

NRG1976

1,064 posts

11 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
lancslad58 said:
heebeegeetee said:
NRG1976 said:
The strange one is say if there is a group of you walking in single file (think ramblers), then you have to walk with the flow of traffic and not against. You wouldn’t have thought the danger of being hit by a moron is any less?
Hmm, have to say if this is in the HC I am unaware of it.

I wouldn't walk or jog with my back to the traffic.
I suspect NRG1976 is just trying to wind you up, it's common sense to walk against the flow.
Plus from the HC

Rule 2
If there is no pavement, keep to the right-hand side of the road so that you can see oncoming traffic. You should take extra care and be prepared to walk in single file, especially on narrow roads or in poor lightkeep close to the side of the road.It may be safer to cross the road well before a sharp right-hand bend so that oncoming traffic has a better chance of seeing you. Cross back after the bend.
Organised walks or parades involving large groups of people walking along a road should use a pavement if available; if one is not, they should keep to the left. Look-outs should be positioned at the front and back of the group, and they should wear fluorescent clothes in daylight and reflective clothes in the dark. At night, the look-out in front should show a white light and the one at the back a red light. People on the outside of large groups should also carry lights and wear reflective clothing.