Any zc32 Suzuki swift sport users?

Those Jazz 1.5 manual Sport are "rare as rocking horse poo". Xgf Yaris was just written off, so I suggested Jazz 1.5, amongst others. There aren't many around.

DAB came in 2014. The reverse cam didn't come until the turbo model in 2017/18.

The turbo infotainment with the reverse cam can be retrofitted to the ZC32 relatively easily.

The DAB unit with nav in the ZC32 is rubbish so you may want to upgrade anyway. If you do go for a name brand as the android based Chinese stuff like Xtrons isn't great.

The Garmin DAB unit has the advantage that it's more reliable than anything that runs Android, and works fine (including traffic) without mobile data. It also supports a reversing camera, if you can be bothered to fit one (mine has been in a box for years).

I updated my Garmin with the last firmware that was available, enabled the traffic and have updated maps on an SD card. I would like Android Auto, but decided it wasn't worth upgrading.

YMMV.

My phone connected - Dab
Looking over my shoulder - Camera. Camera on such a small car is overkill

I had reverse sensors fitted as this is my wifes car, along with the reverse camera that I installed with the head unit...makes her life easier which is what is important to me.

Given that we're incapable of building roads in this country, I find that old maps are usually good enough.

This conversation prompted me to update to the latest Garmin maps though. Now on "City Navigator Europe NTU 2024.20".

The adverts in Waze are great, aren't they?

Interesting comparison with the OEM shocks Vs Bilstein B4. It's a question I've wondered myself as I don't want to lower mine either and the OEM Monroe's are expensive from Suzuki.

https://youtu.be/E88B4W5qlIY?si=ufcCtU-_LPLQUm1R

I bought one of these last year as a fun car, and an older relative has a GK5 1.5 sport.

The first thing I noticed was the driving position and seats in particular are far superior in the Suzuki (to me, anyway). The Honda maybe has the edge in terms of fit and finish, possibly, and is far more practical. However, when it comes to driving dynamics and engagement the Suzuki wins hands down. The two are very different.

As it’s my fun car I never paid any attention to the mpg, but last week my daily driver was in the garage so I had to use the Suzuki to commute to work. I got 422 miles on just over 40 litres. Having said that, I run 15 inch wheels with 205/50 tyres, so it was probably only about 410-415 miles as the rolling circumference is shorter. The smaller, lighter wheels do make a difference to the handling and acceleration, and the slightly taller sidewall works even better with the already well judged stock suspension set up. The ride quality now is really good, to be honest.

I also use 5w-30 oil.

It’s brilliant, really adds to the car.

The only downside of ownership is resisting the urge to do more to it…