Anyone know which film it's from ? (Girl/Gun/Black Porsche)
Discussion
AstonZagato said:
I don't think it is from a film at all. The shells ejecting from the gun are photoshopped IMHO - think about it: car travelling at speed 60mph would cover say 25m per second. So even at 5 shots per second, the ejected shells would be 5m apart.
Ah, but that is assuming that the shells come out stationary, when in fact they have the same forward momentum as the car that the girl is leaning out of. The only deceleration would be caused by drag, which would require a more complex calculation given that the shells aren't ejected at a perfect profile and therefor vary frontal area as they gfall.
AstonZagato said:
I don't think it is from a film at all. The shells ejecting from the gun are photoshopped IMHO - think about it: car travelling at speed 60mph would cover say 25m per second. So even at 5 shots per second, the ejected shells would be 5m apart.
It could be on a conveyor belt ...... 
Egbert Nobacon said:
AstonZagato said:
I don't think it is from a film at all. The shells ejecting from the gun are photoshopped IMHO - think about it: car travelling at speed 60mph would cover say 25m per second. So even at 5 shots per second, the ejected shells would be 5m apart.
It could be on a conveyor belt ...... There's no evidence of any elastic bands
Blib said:
theboyfold said:
Where did you find it in the first place?
I've forgotten. 
Edited by theboyfold on Friday 7th November 16:24
SirTainly said:
AstonZagato said:
I don't think it is from a film at all. The shells ejecting from the gun are photoshopped IMHO - think about it: car travelling at speed 60mph would cover say 25m per second. So even at 5 shots per second, the ejected shells would be 5m apart.
think you are right, also do pistols fire full auto? And if they can, would you get that many rounds off firing one handed and not get muzzle climb ?And as for firing one handed - doesn't work you would get climb but in any case that pistol wouldn't fire full auto.
Twincharged said:
AstonZagato said:
I don't think it is from a film at all. The shells ejecting from the gun are photoshopped IMHO - think about it: car travelling at speed 60mph would cover say 25m per second. So even at 5 shots per second, the ejected shells would be 5m apart.
Ah, but that is assuming that the shells come out stationary, when in fact they have the same forward momentum as the car that the girl is leaning out of. The only deceleration would be caused by drag, which would require a more complex calculation given that the shells aren't ejected at a perfect profile and therefor vary frontal area as they gfall.It looks like the bird from Transporter 2 but there's no Porsche action in it, just Audis. I watched it last night 
It wouldn't be Transporter 3 either, cos she copped it in 2.
Katie Nauta is her name.
ETA - lol, first Google result for "Kate Nauta Porsche Gun" brings back the Pictures thread where someone already said all that
It wouldn't be Transporter 3 either, cos she copped it in 2.
Katie Nauta is her name.
ETA - lol, first Google result for "Kate Nauta Porsche Gun" brings back the Pictures thread where someone already said all that
Edited by Famous Graham on Friday 7th November 17:04
AstonZagato said:
Beretta 93R is a semi auto pistol which fires three shell blasts at 1100 rounds per minute - so 18 per second (and has a muzzle brake to defeat recoil).
Looking at the picture, the shells are 6" apart. So that is 9ft per second - or 6.1mph (not really enough to ruffle her hair).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beretta_93R
it's a 92FS not a 93RLooking at the picture, the shells are 6" apart. So that is 9ft per second - or 6.1mph (not really enough to ruffle her hair).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beretta_93R
XJSJohn said:
:DrumsFingersImpatiently:
Get on with it lads, PH is supposed to be th eallmighty oracle after all ....
Are we saying that of all people, Blib has stumped the Mighty Pistonheads ??!?!?!?!
ohh the shame
Actually you could be right, this is the first time i've ever seen a thread not get an answer in two years! Get on with it lads, PH is supposed to be th eallmighty oracle after all ....
Are we saying that of all people, Blib has stumped the Mighty Pistonheads ??!?!?!?!
ohh the shame
It's official, PH is going down the pan
Dirty Boy said:
XJSJohn said:
:DrumsFingersImpatiently:
Get on with it lads, PH is supposed to be th eallmighty oracle after all ....
Are we saying that of all people, Blib has stumped the Mighty Pistonheads ??!?!?!?!
ohh the shame
Actually you could be right, this is the first time i've ever seen a thread not get an answer in two years! Get on with it lads, PH is supposed to be th eallmighty oracle after all ....
Are we saying that of all people, Blib has stumped the Mighty Pistonheads ??!?!?!?!
ohh the shame
It's official, PH is going down the pan
jammy_basturd said:
Well there is no point in looking for a film if its not from one. I've just spent a good two hours looking for it and I'm no closer to finding a source.
My point exactly.There is an assumption it is from a film but there is no evidence that it is. In fact there is lots of evidence that the image has been heavily 'shopped so it unlikely to be a direct still from a film (though it could be a promotional poster).
mrmr96 said:
Twincharged said:
AstonZagato said:
I don't think it is from a film at all. The shells ejecting from the gun are photoshopped IMHO - think about it: car travelling at speed 60mph would cover say 25m per second. So even at 5 shots per second, the ejected shells would be 5m apart.
Ah, but that is assuming that the shells come out stationary, when in fact they have the same forward momentum as the car that the girl is leaning out of. The only deceleration would be caused by drag, which would require a more complex calculation given that the shells aren't ejected at a perfect profile and therefor vary frontal area as they gfall.I wonder how much the car has been accelerating by firing the gun? Hmm...
Let's assume the car is travelling at a constant velocity of 10m/s, we're going to need the weight of the rounds and the muzzle velocity, and let's disregard drag. Anyone care to do the maths?
Gassing Station | The Pie & Piston Archive | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff