PH Heroes: Mini JCW GP Works

We got in a pickle over this: is the original Mini Cooper S with John Cooper Works GP Kit (full title) really a contender for PH Heroes status, or should I be asking you to Tell Me I'm Wrong?

Proper hero or Tell Me I'm Wrong fodder?
Proper hero or Tell Me I'm Wrong fodder?
Period reviews of the car - the celebratory run-out model for the first-generation BMW Mini - typically enthused over the driving experience but pouted about the chintzy looks and the £22K asking price. Six years later a new GP has arrived, sticking to the same, stripped-out two-seat formula but now costing almost £29,000. That makes the original car look like a bargain, but how does the drive stands up?

Combat ted?
I borrowed BMW UK's own 11,500-mile timewarp example for the drive home from 2012 Paris motor show to find out. Sitting defiant among the concrete columns and florescent light of an underground car park, the GP bristles with immediate purpose. The bodywork addenda and red accents at once faintly ridiculous and endearing.

Mini's own GP Works has just over 11K on it
Mini's own GP Works has just over 11K on it
This is no teddy bear underneath the combat gear. We're all familiar with the GP's boxy spoiler, lightweight 18s and strut bar substitute for the back seats; what's less well remembered are the bespoke aluminium control arms at the rear - gorgeous, and plainly visible through those wheels. It was assembled by Bertone in Italy, and although its 218hp was only 8hp up on the existing JCW variant, it was still more than contemporary Mini Challenge racing cars.

Arrested development
With total weight savings over 50kg (where buyers didn't option back the no cost air con), a proper limited slip differential, 10mm ride height reduction and fettled engine, it has all the makings of a proper pocket rocket. Starting it for the first time in a subterranean car park, the aural impact is every bit as bold as its optical clout - the whine and fizz from the supercharger seems more superbike than supermini, and it's almost impossible to resist indulging the snap of the delivery to exacerbate the way the exhaust merrily crackles and pops.

Much more raw and 'pure'  than new one
Much more raw and 'pure' than new one
Giddy already, it's out into the daylight and straight onto one of those mad multi-lane French roundabouts with the right of way issues. Although painfully aware I'm in a vaguely irreplaceable car (in terms of mileage, anyway), the GP's compact size and assertive, snarling responses make short work of out-muscling the native commuters: who is this foreign idiot in his shouty, aggressive-looking little right-hand drive car? Eyebrows are raised, passers-by gawp - it really does arrest the attention.

Trust issues
Approval swells as the journey progresses. The gearbox is light but precise, the clutch less so. The engine feels absolutely immense for just 1.6 litres - BMW's own work on the intercooler and engine-mapping adding to JCW's existing upgrade of the 'charger, intake and injection.

With a new 7,150rpm rev limit (peak power comes at 7,100) and a meaty 184lb ft at 4,600rpm, it feels good for its claimed 149mph. The suspension is remarkably supple. The Recaro seats fabulous. I want one.

Doesn't look shy, even in grey paint
Doesn't look shy, even in grey paint
Back in the UK it begins - albeit slightly - to unravel. I'm finding it hard to trust the front end. Anticipating something sharp and pointy and tenaciously adhesive, compared to the best current hot hatches the GP doesn't quite transparently deliver. Could be the tyres or the geometry on this particular car - though it's also clear the diff does much better with the electronic traction gizmos disabled.

You wanna piece of me?
2,000 were built, and although 449 were originally destined for the UK, according to only 437 actually found homes here; judging by the PH classifieds you'll be needing at least £11K to join the ownership ranks. The imminent arrival of the new version is unlikely to diminish these values. The two are similar in character, but from my own brief squirt in the new GP2, all that clever aero can't quite make up for the missing mechanical diff, and the 1.6 turbo can't match the supercharged engine for charm.

New one looks the part but is it too civilised?
New one looks the part but is it too civilised?
And that's what really makes the MINI GP (version 1) a PH Hero: it might not be the fastest thing on four wheels, nor the hardest, but it's absolutely bursting with attention to detail and charisma.






1,598cc supercharged four cylinder
Transmission: 6-speed manual, front-wheel drive with mechanical LSD
Power (hp): 218 @ 7,100rpm
Torque (lb ft): 184 @ 4,600rpm
0-62mph: 6.5 seconds
Top speed: 149mph
Weight: 1,195kg (EU)
On sale: 2006
Price new: £22,000
Price now: £12,000

P.H. O'meter

Join the PH rating wars with your marks out of 10 for the article (Your ratings will be shown in your profile if you have one!)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Rate this article

Comments (56) Join the discussion on the forum

  • fusion01 28 Jul 2013

    I really hate the gp1. It looks awful. scrappy mini. I'm also really hoping that derogatory comments like these well have others spreading the same negative criticisms therefore in turn leading to less demand for the said car and I'm able to pick one up in the near future after greater depreciations! I've owned faster cars that were pretty uninvolving, this looks right on. tried both a super and turbo Cooper s a while back, former was instant boost, whine audible... latter had big lag, inferior when pitted up against other turbo competitors.

  • CiderFex 28 Nov 2012

    FergusC said:
    Maybe to the untrained eye the mini GP is just 'another Mini', but to the petrolhead connoisseur it is a very special limited car.

    For shear driving pleasure it eclipses the E92 M3 I had previously, is in a different league to the Clio 200 (not cup chassis) i also ran, which I personally found over hyped. Of all the cars I have owned its similarities are most closely linked to that of my Elise R, if Lotus made a hot hatch.....
    Lotus doesn't need to because BMW did a good enough job back in '06.

  • vetteheadracer 26 Nov 2012

    0llie said:
    Which one of those did you drive? I'm a moderator on a leading UK MINI forum and know of the two cars at the front.

    I'm biased, but I will have a GP one day, been lucky to passenger one, and it was absolutely wonderful. I have also driven an R53 JCW (which had been lightly fettled, putting out 230~bhp), a really lovely car to drive.

    Nice article, although the mileage thing seems a bit strange, I saw one for sale about 6 months ago with just 2k miles from new.
    Third one down the line.

  • TOENHEEL 26 Nov 2012

    I ran one for a while..couldnt get over how thirsty the thing was for fuel might as well of bought an m3 or similar. Fun little car to drive but I bought it after selling a Noble as I needed a nippy everyday car and thought that going backwards in cars for a while wouldnt bother me but it really did!! I just couldn't love it so moved it on. Mine only had 3k miles on the clock when I bought it was literally a new car not a mark on it #0689.

    I felt like the car was just literally a marketing tool to rid them of body shells, things like the fake brake ducts on the front annoyed me as they are a great handling little car and deserved to be more hardcore like an R26R with a half cage and mini works race car seats etc. Mine never felt "that" quick either.. Certainly couldn't shake off Clio 182's in a straight line. I had my car booked into 1320 for new camshaft etc to up the power and try and give me what I felt was missing but ended up changing my mind at the last minute and selling. Ended up with another Exige which was a fantastic decision. The GP basically finished me with hot hatches..

  • Citrus7 26 Nov 2012

    Was always impressed by this vid of Gp playing with 911's on track

View all comments in the forums Make a comment